Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation — N.D. Cal., No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Plaid Inc... (Dettmer, E…

Court filing

CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Plaid Inc... (Dettmer, Ethan)… — Plaid Privacy (Dkt. 34)

Summary

A Consent or Declination to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form, Document 34, dated May 26, 2020 in James Cottle, et al. v. Plaid Inc., Case No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The form provides two options, consent or decline, under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) for the party the signer represents. It lists Ethan D. Dettmer as the name and Plaid Inc. as the party represented, with a /s/ signature of Ethan D. Dettmer.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed2020-05-26

Cite this document

“CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Plaid Inc... (Dettmer, Ethan)… — Plaid Privacy (Dkt. 34).” U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR, Doc. 34, filed 2020-05-26. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-plaid-privacy-cand-359040/2020-05-26-gov-uscourts-cand-359040-34-0-doc-34/, SHA-256 0c390f87dc7a87a1cf8794ba3fd8bc0c941fccd37ee2a45a78f504fc52acbd3e.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
United States District Court 
Northern District of California
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
 
JAMES COTTLE, et al. 
 
Plaintiff(s) 
 
v. 
 
PLAID INC. 
Defendant(s). 
Case No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR  
 
CONSENT OR DECLINATION  
TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE 
JURISDICTION 
 
 
 
 
INSTRUCTIONS: Please indicate below by checking one of the two boxes whether you (if you are the party) 
or the party you represent (if you are an attorney in the case) choose(s) to consent or decline magistrate judge 
jurisdiction in this matter. Sign this form below your selection. 
 
☒ Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction 
 
 
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), I voluntarily consent to have a 
United States magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and 
entry of final judgment. I understand that appeal from the judgment shall be taken directly to the 
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. 
 
 
OR 
 
☐ Decline Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction 
 
 
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), I decline to have a United States 
magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in this case and I hereby request that this case 
be reassigned to a United States district judge. 
 
 
DATE: May 26, 2020 
NAME: Ethan D. Dettmer 
 
COUNSEL FOR  
(OR “PRO SE”):  
 
Plaid Inc. 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Ethan D. Dettmer 
 
 
 
Signature 
 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR   Document 34   Filed 05/26/20   Page 1 of 1

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.359040.34.0.pdf
Size
149,434 bytes
SHA-256
0c390f87dc7a87a1cf8794ba3fd8bc0c941fccd37ee2a45a78f504fc52acbd3e
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.359040.34.0.pdf
Original
storage.courtlistener.com
Back to top