Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation — N.D. Cal., No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR ORDER (AS MODIFIED) by Magistrate Judge Donna M.… — Plaid Privacy (Dkt. 36)

Court filing

ORDER (AS MODIFIED) by Magistrate Judge Donna M.… — Plaid Privacy (Dkt. 36)

Summary

A Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Time to Respond to Complaint and Setting Briefing Schedule, marked (AS MODIFIED), Doc. 36, stamped filed May 27, 2020 in James Cottle, et al. v. Plaid Inc., No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Oakland Division, before Hon. Donna M. Ryu. The parties stipulate that Defendant will respond to the Complaint on or before July 22, 2020, Plaintiffs may file an opposition on or before September 23, 2020, and Defendant may file a reply on or before October 14, 2020. It is signed /s/ Ethan D. Dettmer and /s/ Shawn M. Kennedy, and the last order page carries the words IT IS SO ORDERED AS MODIFIED above the name Judge Donna M. Ryu.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed2020-05-04

Cite this document

“ORDER (AS MODIFIED) by Magistrate Judge Donna M.… — Plaid Privacy (Dkt. 36).” U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR, Doc. 36, filed 2020-05-04. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-plaid-privacy-cand-359040/2020-05-04-gov-uscourts-cand-359040-36-0-doc-36/, SHA-256 6280489e07edbd51fb9a4eed5cc30bb263ee3c1c0f8c8e888219c7fa65e4cba0.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND SETTING 
BRIEFING SCHEDULE - CASE NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR
Gibson, Dunn & 
Crutcher LLP
GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 
ETHAN D. DETTMER, SBN 196046
edettmer@gibsondunn.com
ABIGAIL A. BARRERA, SBN 301746
abarrera@gibsondunn.com
ASHLEY J. HODGE, SBN 287653
ahodge@gibsondunn.com
ANTHONY D. BEDEL, SBN 324065
tbedel@gibsondunn.com
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: 415.393.8200
Facsimile: 415.393.8306
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
ALEXANDER H. SOUTHWELL (pro hac vice)
asouthwell@gibsondunn.com
200 Park Avenue, 48th Floor
New York, NY 10166
Telephone: 212.351.4000
Facsimile: 212.351.4035
Attorneys for Defendant PLAID INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
JAMES COTTLE, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
PLAID INC.,
Defendant.
CASE NO. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO 
COMPLAINT AND SETTING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE
Hon. Donna M. Ryu
Action Filed:
May 4, 2020
Trial Date:
None Set
(AS MODIFIED) 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR   Document 36   Filed 05/27/20   Page 1 of 6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND SETTING 
BRIEFING SCHEDULE - CASE NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR
Gibson, Dunn & 
Crutcher LLP
Defendant Plaid Inc. (“Defendant”) and Plaintiffs James Cottle and Frederick Schoeneman, 
on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated (“Plaintiffs”) by and through their counsel of 
record, hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs commenced this action by filing a Complaint on May 4, 2020, see Dkt. 
No. 1;
WHEREAS, the Complaint asserts ten separate causes of action against Defendant Plaid Inc. 
and includes factual and legal allegations predicated on conduct that is claimed to go back to 2013;
WHEREAS, the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and related governmental orders have 
impacted, among many other things, ongoing business and litigation activities, including delaying
typical briefing schedules;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs served Defendant with the Complaint on May 6, 2020 and Defendant’s
answer or other response to the Complaint is currently due on May 27, 2020, see Dkt. No. 26;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendant consented to have Magistrate Judge Ryu conduct all 
further proceedings in this case on May 6, 2020 and May 26, 2020, respectively, see Dkt. Nos. 15 & 
34;
WHEREAS, this extension of time will not alter the date of any event or deadline already 
fixed by Court order;
WHEREAS, no previous time modifications have been made in the case, whether by 
stipulation or Court order;
WHEREAS, Civil Local Rule 6-1(a) provides that “[p]arties may stipulate in writing, without 
a Court order, to extend the time within which to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint, or to 
enlarge or shorten the time in matters not required to be filed or lodged with the Court, provided the 
change will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order”; and 
WHEREAS, this stipulation is not intended to operate as an admission of any factual 
allegation or legal conclusion and is submitted subject to and without waiver of any right, defense, 
affirmative defense, or objection, including lack of subject matter jurisdiction, lack of personal 
jurisdiction, or improper venue, except that Defendant expressly waives any defect concerning 
insufficient process or insufficient service of process;
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR   Document 36   Filed 05/27/20   Page 2 of 6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND SETTING 
BRIEFING SCHEDULE - CASE NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR
Gibson, Dunn & 
Crutcher LLP
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the 
undersigned counsel for the parties in this action, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1 that:

Defendant will file its responsive pleading or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ 
Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) on or before July 22, 2020.

Plaintiffs may file an opposition to any responsive pleading motion on or before 
September 23, 2020.

Defendant may file a reply brief in support of any such pleading motion on or 
before October 14, 2020.

The Court will hear argument at the soonest time available thereafter, based on the 
Court’s availability.
In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1, the filer of this document hereby attests that the 
concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory, below.
Dated: May 26, 2020
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
By:
/s/ Ethan D. Dettmer
Ethan D. Dettmer (SBN 196046)
Abigail A. Barrera (SBN 301746)
Ashley J. Hodge (SBN 287653)
Anthony D. Bedel (SBN 324065)
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
Telephone: 415.393.8200
Fax: 415.393.8306
abarrera@gibsondunn.com
ahodge@gibsondunn.com
tbedel@gibsondunn.com
Alexander H. Southwell (pro hac vice)
200 Park Avenue, 48th Floor
New York, NY 10166
Telephone: 212.351.4000
Fax: 212.351.4035
asouthwell@gibsondunn.com
Attorneys for Defendant Plaid Inc.
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR   Document 36   Filed 05/27/20   Page 3 of 6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND SETTING 
BRIEFING SCHEDULE - CASE NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR
Gibson, Dunn & 
Crutcher LLP
Dated: May 26, 2020
By:
/s/ Shawn M. Kennedy
Shawn M. Kennedy (SBN 218472)
Andrew M. Purdy (SBN 261912)
Bret D. Hembd (SBN 272826)
HERRERA PURDY LLP
4590 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 500
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Telephone: (949) 936-0900
Fax: (855) 969-2050
skennedy@herrerapurdy.com
apurdy@herrerapurdy.com
bhembd@herrerapurdy.com
Nicomedes Sy Herrera (SBN 275332)
Laura E. Seidl (SBN 269891)
HERRERA PURDY LLP
1300 Clay Street, Suite 600
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: (510) 422-4700
Fax: (855) 969-2050
nherrera@herrerapurdy.com
lseidl@herrerapurdy.com
Rachel Geman (pro hac vice)
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & 
BERNSTEIN, LLP
250 Hudson Street, 8th Floor
New York, NY 10013-1413
Telephone: (212) 355-9500
Fax: (212) 355-9592
rgeman@lchb.com
Michael W. Sobol (SBN 194857)
Melissa Gardner (SBN 289096)
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & 
BERNSTEIN, LLP
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3339
Telephone: (415) 956-1000
Fax: (415) 956-1008
msobol@lchb.commgardner@lchb.com
Warren T. Burns (pro hac vice)
Russell Herman (pro hac vice)
BURNS CHAREST LLP
900 Jackson Street, Suite 500
Dallas, TX 75202
Telephone: (469) 904-4550
Fax: (469) 444-5002
wburns@burnscharest.com
rherman@burnscharest.com
Christopher J. Cormier (pro hac vice)
BURNS CHAREST LLP
5290 Denver Tech Center Parkway, Suite 150
Greenwood Village, CO 80111
Telephone: (720) 630-2092
Fax: (469) 444-5002
ccormier@burnscharest.com 
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Classes
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR   Document 36   Filed 05/27/20   Page 4 of 6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND SETTING 
BRIEFING SCHEDULE - CASE NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR
Gibson, Dunn & 
Crutcher LLP
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Having reviewed the above Stipulation and Proposed Order Extending Time to Respond to 
Complaint and Setting Briefing Schedule, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 
that the following schedule shall govern this matter:

Defendant will file its responsive pleading or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ 
Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) on or before July 22, 2020.

Plaintiffs may file an opposition to any such pleading motion on or before 
September 23, 2020.

Defendant may file a reply brief in support of any such pleading motion on or 
before October 14, 2020.

The Court will hear argument on the motion on _________, at __________.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:  ____________, 2020
_______________________________________
THE HONORABLE DONNA M. RYU
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
set a hearing on the motion upon completion of the briefing, if necessary.
AS MODIFIED. 
May 27
U
N
I
T
E
D
S
T
A
T
E
S
D
I
S
T
R
I
C
T
C
O
U
R
T
N
O
R
T
H
E
R
N
D
I
S
T
R
I
C
T
O
F
C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
IT IS SO ORDERED
AS MODIFIED
Judge Donna M. Ryu
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR   Document 36   Filed 05/27/20   Page 5 of 6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND SETTING 
BRIEFING SCHEDULE - CASE NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR
Gibson, Dunn & 
Crutcher LLP
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Ethan D. Dettmer, hereby certify that on May 26, 2020, I caused the foregoing Stipulation 
and [Proposed] Order Extending Time to Respond to Complaint and Setting Briefing Schedule to be 
electronically filed via the Court’s CM/ECF system.  Notice of this filing will be served to all counsel 
of record by operation of the Court’s electronic filing system.
/s/ Ethan D. Dettmer
Ethan D. Dettmer
           
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR   Document 36   Filed 05/27/20   Page 6 of 6

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.359040.36.0.pdf
Size
78,789 bytes
SHA-256
6280489e07edbd51fb9a4eed5cc30bb263ee3c1c0f8c8e888219c7fa65e4cba0
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.359040.36.0.pdf
Original
storage.courtlistener.com
Back to top