ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Frederick Schoeneman)… — Plaid Privacy (Dkt. 47)

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR · Doc. 47 · 2019-01-15 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

An ADR Certification by Parties and Counsel, Form ADR-Cert, filed July 16, 2020 in James Cottle, et al. v. Plaid Inc., Case No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, as Document 47. Filed under Civil L.R. 16-8(b) and ADR L.R. 3-5 (b), the one-page form certifies that each signatory read the handbook entitled Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedures Handbook, discussed the dispute resolution options provided by the court and private entities, and considered whether the case might benefit from them. It further certifies that counsel discussed the selection of an ADR process with counsel for the other parties, and offers two options: to stipulate to an ADR process, or to discuss ADR selection with the assigned judge. The signature entries are dated 7/15/20 and bear the names Shawn M. Kennedy and Frederick Schoeneman.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Form ADR-Cert  rev. 1-15-2019 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
 
 
Plaintiff(s) 
v. 
 
 
Defendant(s) 
 
CASE No C 
 
ADR CERTIFICATION BY 
PARTIES AND COUNSEL 
 
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8(b) and ADR L.R. 3-5 (b), each of the undersigned certifies that he or 
she has: 
 
1) Read the handbook entitled “Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedures Handbook” 
(available at cand.uscourts.gov/adr). 
2) Discussed with each other the available dispute resolution options provided by the Court 
and private entities; and 
3) Considered whether this case might benefit from any of the available dispute resolution 
options. 
Date: 
 
Date: 
Party 
 
 
Attorney 
Counsel further certifies that he or she has discussed the selection of an ADR process with 
counsel for the other parties to the case. Based on that discussion, the parties: 
 intend to stipulate to an ADR process 
 prefer to discuss ADR selection with the Assigned Judge at the case management 
conference 
 
 
Date: 
 
 
Attorney 
 
 
 
 
Important! E-file this form in ECF using event name: “ADR Certification (ADR LR 3-5 b) of Discussion of ADR 
Options.” 
 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR     Document 47     Filed 07/16/20     Page 1 of 1
/s/ Shawn M. Kennedy
/s/ Shawn M. Kennedy
X
7/15/20
7/15/20
7/15/20
/s/ Frederick Schoeneman
James Cottle, et al.
Plaid Inc.
4:20-cv-03056-DMR

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.359040.47.0.pdf

Size

413,148 bytes

SHA-256

d35a812a4ad948e2acfbcd431cf2400b7f5a2597c136bb5e7b3c9064e03caf65

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.359040.47.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)