Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation — N.D. Cal., No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options Frederick Schoeneman… —…

Court filing

ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options Frederick Schoeneman… — Plaid Privacy (Dkt. 46)

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed2019-01-15

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR · Doc. 46 · 2019-01-15 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

An ADR Certification by Parties and Counsel, on Form ADR-Cert, filed July 15, 2020 as Document 46 in Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The form certifies, under Civil L.R. 16-8(b) and ADR L.R. 3-5 (b), that each signer has read the handbook entitled Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedures Handbook, discussed the available dispute resolution options provided by the Court and private entities, and considered whether the case might benefit from any of them. Counsel further certifies that the selection of an ADR process was discussed with counsel for the other parties. The printed choices are to stipulate to an ADR process or to discuss ADR selection with the assigned judge at the case management conference. The one-page form is signed by Shawn M. Kennedy and by Frederick Schoeneman, dated 7/15/20.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Form ADR-Cert  rev. 1-15-2019 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
 
 
Plaintiff(s) 
v. 
 
 
Defendant(s) 
 
CASE No C 
 
ADR CERTIFICATION BY 
PARTIES AND COUNSEL 
 
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8(b) and ADR L.R. 3-5 (b), each of the undersigned certifies that he or 
she has: 
 
1) Read the handbook entitled “Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedures Handbook” 
(available at cand.uscourts.gov/adr). 
2) Discussed with each other the available dispute resolution options provided by the Court 
and private entities; and 
3) Considered whether this case might benefit from any of the available dispute resolution 
options. 
Date: 
 
Date: 
Party 
 
 
Attorney 
Counsel further certifies that he or she has discussed the selection of an ADR process with 
counsel for the other parties to the case. Based on that discussion, the parties: 
 intend to stipulate to an ADR process 
 prefer to discuss ADR selection with the Assigned Judge at the case management 
conference 
 
 
Date: 
 
 
Attorney 
 
 
 
 
Important! E-file this form in ECF using event name: “ADR Certification (ADR LR 3-5 b) of Discussion of ADR 
Options.” 
 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR     Document 46     Filed 07/15/20     Page 1 of 1
/s/ Shawn M. Kennedy
/s/ Shawn M. Kennedy
X
7/15/20
7/15/20
7/15/20
/s/ Frederick Schoeneman

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.359040.46.0.pdf
Size
339,607 bytes
SHA-256
504077c2be13951202df8b6b4ae3b8b6b2c5c54c1faa981775894e9e36d886d6
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.359040.46.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top