Court filing
Discovery Plan by Kolawole Ahmadou, Kiana Dervin, Kristina Henderson — Marshall v. Prestamos CDFI, LLC (Dkt. 74, E.D. Pa. No. 5:21-cv-04337)
Filed May 16, 2023 in Marshall v. Prestamos CDFI, LLC; one of 344 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2023-05-16 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania · No. 5:21-cv-04337-JMG · Doc. 74 · 2023-05-16 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ALICIA MARSHALL, DANIEL
PRONSKY, PARIS TOWNSEND,
NANCILEE HOLLAND, LEONA
OWSLEY, KOLAWOLE AHMADOU,
KIANA DERVIN, KRISTINA
HENDERSON, DUSTIN INNIS, KELLY
STALNAKER and JAMIE JONES,
individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
PRESTAMOS CDFI, LLC, and
CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA, INC.,
Defendants.
Civil Action No. 5:21-cv-04337-JMG
JOINT PROPOSED JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY PLAN
Pursuant to the Court’s Order filed May 16, 2023 (ECF No. 73), Plaintiffs Alicia
Marshall, Daniel Pronsky, Paris Townsend, Nancilee Holland, Leona Owsley, Kolawole
Ahmadou, Kiana Dervin, Kristina Henderson, Dustin Innis, Kelly Stalnaker and Jamie Jones
(collectively, “Plaintiffs”), and defendants Prestamos CDFI, LLC (“Prestamos”) and Chicanos
Por La Causa, Inc. (“CPLC”) (collectively “Defendants”) have met and conferred, and submit
this joint proposed jurisdictional discovery plan.
1.
Plaintiffs shall serve, and Defendants shall collectively respond to the following
written discovery requests. Defendants reserve all rights to object to written discovery as they
would in the normal course as permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
a.
no more than fifteen (15) requests for production of documents pursuant to
Rule 34;
Case 5:21-cv-04337-JMG Document 74 Filed 05/19/23 Page 1 of 4
2
b.
no more than ten (10) interrogatories pursuant to Rule 33; and
c.
no more than twelve (12) requests for admissions pursuant to Rule 36.
2.
Plaintiffs shall take the following depositions, each of which shall be limited three
and one-half (3.5) hours on the record. Defendants reserve all rights to object to deposition topics
and deposition questions as they would in the normal course as permitted by the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure.
a.
one (1) 30(b)(6) deposition of Prestamos for which Mr. Jose Martinez will
be the corporate designee; and
b.
one (1) deposition 30(b)(6) deposition of CPLC for which Alicia Nunez
will be the corporate designee.
3.
None of the above-referenced discovery shall be counted against any discovery
limits that may otherwise apply to Plaintiffs at any point in this case.
4.
Plaintiffs shall serve written discovery directed to personal jurisdiction on
Defendants no later than fourteen (14) days after the Court’s entry of an order adopting a
jurisdictional discovery plan.
5.
Defendants shall serve written responses to Plaintiffs’ written discovery within 30
days after Plaintiffs’ service of written discovery.
6.
Defendants shall substantially complete their production of documents responsive
to Plaintiffs’ written discovery within 40 days after Defendants serve written responses to that
discovery.
7.
Defendants shall produce privilege logs no later than fourteen (14) days after
making their document productions, and within fourteen (14) days after making any
supplemental document productions.
Case 5:21-cv-04337-JMG Document 74 Filed 05/19/23 Page 2 of 4
3
8.
Plaintiffs will take the Rule 30(b)(6) depositions of Defendants within 45 days
after Defendants substantially complete their production of documents.
9.
CPLC shall file any brief in support of its motion to dismiss or renewed motion to
dismiss on grounds of personal jurisdiction within twenty-one (21) days after the completion of
the last of the two above-referenced depositions.
10.
Plaintiffs shall file a responsive brief to any such motion or renewed motion to
dismiss within thirty (30) days after CPLC files its above-referenced brief.
11.
CPLC may file a reply brief addressed to personal jurisdiction within ten (10)
days after Plaintiffs file the above-referenced responsive brief.
12.
The following chart reflects the parties’ proposed schedule for jurisdictional
discovery.
Event
Deadline
Plaintiffs serve written discovery
14 days after the Court’s entry of an order
adopting a jurisdictional discovery plan
Defendants serve written responses to
Plaintiffs’ written discovery
30 days after Plaintiffs’ service of discovery
Defendants produce documents responsive to
Plaintiffs’ written discovery
40 days after Defendants’ serve written
responses
Defendants produce privilege logs
14 days after Defendants’ initial production,
14 days after any supplemental production
Plaintiffs take Rule 30(b)(6) depositions of
Defendants
45 days after Defendants’ initial production of
documents
CPLC files brief addressed to personal
jurisdiction
21 days after completion of depositions
Plaintiffs file response brief addressed to
personal jurisdiction
30 days after CPLC files its brief addressed to
personal jurisdiction
CPLC may file reply brief addressed to
personal jurisdiction
10 days after Plaintiffs file response brief
addressed to personal jurisdiction
Case 5:21-cv-04337-JMG Document 74 Filed 05/19/23 Page 3 of 4
4
13.
The foregoing proposed schedule is subject to the parties’ good faith compliance
with the foregoing discovery. To the extent the parties have a dispute concerning any of the
discovery, they shall meet and confer and seek to resolve their dispute, failing which they may
promptly bring the dispute to the Court.
Dated: May 19, 2023
Respectfully submitted,
Ballard Spahr LLP
By: /s/ Marcel S. Pratt
Marcel S. Pratt (Pa. ID 307483)
Timothy D. Katsiff (Pa. ID 75490)
Thomas J. Gallagher IV (Pa. ID 316269)
Alexa L. Levy (Pa. ID 327973)
1735 Market Street, 51st Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19103
T: 215-665-8500
F: 215-864-8999
PrattM@ballardspahr.com
KatsiffT@ballardspahr.com
GallagherT@ballardspahr.com
LevyA@BallardSpahr.com
Herrera Arellano LLP
Roy Herrera*
Daniel A. Arellano*
Jillian L. Andrews*
Austin T. Marshall*
1001 North Central Avenue, Suite 404
Phoenix, AZ 85004
T: 602-567-4820
Roy@ha-firm.com
Daniel@ha-firm.com
Jillian@ha-firm.com
Austin@ha-firm.com
*pro hac vice admission forthcoming
Attorneys for Defendants
Bailey & Glasser LLP
By: /s/ Lawrence J. Lederer
Lawrence J. Lederer (Pa. ID 50445)
Bart D. Cohen (Pa. ID 57606)
1622 Locust Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103
T.: 202.463-2101
F.: 202.463-2103
llederer@baileyglasser.com
bcohen@baileyglasser.com
Bailey & Glasser LLP
Michael L. Murphy (admitted pro hac vice)
1055 Thomas Jefferson Street NW, Suite 540
Washington, DC 20007
T.: 202.463.2101
F.: 202.463.2103
mmurphy@baileyglasser.com
Nolan Heller Kauffman LLP
Justin A. Heller (admitted pro hac vice)
Matthew M. Zapala (admitted pro hac vice)
80 State Street, 11th Floor
Albany, NY 12207
T.: 518.449.3300
F.: 518.432.3123
jheller@nhkllp.com
mzapala@nhkllp.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the
Proposed Class and Subclasses
Case 5:21-cv-04337-JMG Document 74 Filed 05/19/23 Page 4 of 4File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.paed.589575.74.0.pdf
- Size
- 194,309 bytes
- SHA-256
- 3b8ffbf98d3c867fa11c4430858dc8e1779416f41413c2fa951f819fadf5a841
- Original
- PACER (login required)