Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings United States of America v. Sutton et al United States v. Kisha Sutton — S.D. W. Va., No. 2:24-cr-00192 Order denying Keisha Sutton's 179 Second Motion — United States v. Sutton et al. (Dkt. 196, S.D. W. Va.)

Court filing

Order denying Keisha Sutton's 179 Second Motion — United States v. Sutton et al. (Dkt. 196, S.D. W. Va.)

Filed May 12, 2025 in United States v. Sutton et al.; one of 133 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Filed2025-05-12

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia · No. 2:24-cr-00192 · Doc. 196 · 2025-05-12 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

1 
 
 
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
 
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA 
 
 
 
CHARLESTON DIVISION 
 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
 
Plaintiff, 
 
v. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 2:24-cr-00192 
 
KISHA SUTTON -01,  
SHAMIESE WRIGHT -02, 
 
Defendants. 
 
 
 
ORDER 
 
 
The Court has reviewed the Defendant’s Second Motion to Continue Trial, Pre-Trial 
Deadlines (Document 179) filed by Defendant Keisha Sutton, and the Defendant Shamise Wright’s 
Joinder of Kisha Sutton’s Motion to Continue Pretrial and Trial Dates (Document 180) filed by 
Defendant Shamise Wright.  The Court has also reviewed the Government’s Response in 
Opposition to Defendant Kisha Sutton’s Second Motion to Continue Trial (Document 195). 
The Defendant, Sutton, has requested a continuance to further investigate the role of a 
financial institution and a financial technology company acting as a third-party administrator.  The 
Defendant, Wright, joins in the motion filed by Defendant Sutton and also requests additional time 
to discuss discovery with Counsel.  The Court previously continued the trial of this matter from 
April 14, 2025, to June 9, 2025.   
 
Case 2:24-cr-00192     Document 196     Filed 05/12/25     Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1064

2 
 
After thorough review and careful consideration, the Court finds that the Defendants have 
failed to show how the additional time would impact their ability to defend the requisite elements 
of the charged offense and, therefore, aid in effective representation of their respective clients.  
Wherefore, the Court ORDERS that the Defendant’s Second Motion to Continue Trial, Pre-Trial 
Deadlines (Document 179) and the Defendant Shamise Wright’s Joinder of Kisha Sutton’s Motion 
to Continue Pretrial and Trial Dates (Document 180) be DENIED.  
The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the Defendants and their 
respective counsel, to the United States Attorney, to the United States Probation Office, and to the 
Office of the United States Marshal. 
ENTER: 
May 12, 2025 
 
 
Case 2:24-cr-00192     Document 196     Filed 05/12/25     Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1065

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.wvsd.240497.196.0.pdf
Size
146,166 bytes
SHA-256
fedc7c3ee6b7e1c71aadfcf2307b10c60f38be0d8cc38ec839c9bf5e5463ee4f
Our copy
gov.uscourts.wvsd.240497.196.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top