Court filing

USCA Time Schedule Order as to Martin Kao, USCA No. 25-2435 — USA v. Kao (Dkt. 175, D. Haw. No. 1:21-cr-00061)

Summary

A Time Schedule Order in the appeal United States of America v. Kao, Docket Number 25-2435, from originating case 1:21-cr-00061-LEK, filed April 16, 2025 on the District of Hawaii docket. It lists Tuesday, April 29, 2025 with Tiffany Jennifer Lam Appeal Transcript Order Due, Thursday, May 29, 2025 with Tiffany Jennifer Lam Appeal Transcript Due, Tuesday, July 8, 2025 with Tiffany Jennifer Lam Appeal Opening Brief Due, and Thursday, August 7, 2025 with the answering brief entries for United States of America and Martin Kao. The order states that failure of the appellant to comply with the time schedule order may result in automatic dismissal of the appeal.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed April 16, 2025 in USA v. Kao; one of 169 filings from this case.

Record facts

Court	U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii
Filed	2025-04-16

Cite this document

“USCA Time Schedule Order as to Martin Kao, USCA No. 25-2435 — USA v. Kao (Dkt. 175, D. Haw. No. 1:21-cr-00061, HID 154418).” U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii, No. 1:21-cr-00061-LEK, Doc. 175, filed 2025-04-16. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-kao-hawaii-1-21-cr-00061/2025-04-16-gov-uscourts-hid-154418-175-0-doc-175/, SHA-256 630e416aa973773c36d4c298a6e0fc19c99921efa6ae53ba538c55b08b72785f.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

TIME SCHEDULE ORDER 
 
Docket Number: 
25-2435 
Originating Case Number: 1:21-cr-00061-LEK 
Case Title: 
United States of America v. Kao 
  
Tuesday, April 29, 2025 
Tiffany Jennifer Lam 
Appeal Transcript Order Due 
Thursday, May 29, 2025 
Tiffany Jennifer Lam 
Appeal Transcript Due 
Tuesday, July 8, 2025 
Tiffany Jennifer Lam 
Appeal Opening Brief Due 
Thursday, August 7, 2025 
United States of America 
Appeal Answering Brief Due 
Martin Kao 
Appeal Answering Brief Due 
 
If there were reported hearings, the parties shall designate and, if necessary, cross-
designate the transcripts pursuant to 9th Cir. R. 10-3. If there were no reported hearings, 
the transcript deadlines do not apply. 
The optional reply may be filed within 21 days of service of the answering brief.  See 
Fed. R. App. P. 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1.  
Failure of the appellant to comply with the time schedule order may result in 
automatic dismissal of the appeal.  See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. 
 
 
Molly C. Dwyer 
Clerk of Court  
Office of the Clerk 
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit  
Post Office Box 193939 
San Francisco, California 94119-3939 
415-355-8000 
   
Case: 25-2435, 04/16/2025, DktEntry: 2.1, Page 2 of 2 
Case 1:21-cr-00061-LEK     Document 175     Filed 04/16/25     Page 1 of 1  PageID.2151

File and source

File: gov.uscourts.hid.154418.175.0.pdf
Size: 793,975 bytes
SHA-256: 630e416aa973773c36d4c298a6e0fc19c99921efa6ae53ba538c55b08b72785f
Our copy: gov.uscourts.hid.154418.175.0.pdf
Original: PACER (login required)