Court filing
USCA Time Schedule Order as to Martin Kao, USCA No. 25-1454 — PPP Attempt Conspiracy Legal Filings (Dkt. 160)
No. 1:21-cr-00061-LEK · Doc. 160 · Docket on CourtListener
Summary
A time schedule order from the Office of the Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in appeal No. 25-1454, United States of America v. Kao, originating from No. 1:21-cr-00061-LEK-1, filed in the district court March 7, 2025 as Document 160. It sets Martin Kao's appeal transcript order due March 20, 2025, the transcript due April 21, 2025 and the opening brief due May 29, 2025. The United States of America's answering brief is due June 30, 2025, and an optional reply may be filed within 21 days of service of the answering brief. The order cites 9th Cir. R. 10-3, Fed. R. App. P. 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1, and states that the appellant's failure to comply may result in automatic dismissal under 9th Cir. R. 42-1.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Full text
Case 1:21-cr-00061-LEK Document 160 Filed 03/07/25 Page 1 of 1 PageID.1367
Office of the Clerk
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Post Office Box 193939
San Francisco, California 94119-3939
415-355-8000
Molly C. Dwyer
Clerk of Court
TIME SCHEDULE ORDER
Docket Number: 25-1454
Originating Case Number: 1:21-cr-00061-LEK-1
Case Title: United States of America v. Kao
Thursday, March 20, 2025
Martin Kao Appeal Transcript Order Due
Monday, April 21, 2025
Martin Kao Appeal Transcript Due
Thursday, May 29, 2025
Martin Kao Appeal Opening Brief Due
Monday, June 30, 2025
United States of America Appeal Answering Brief Due
If there were reported hearings, the parties shall designate and, if necessary, cross-
designate the transcripts pursuant to 9th Cir. R. 10-3. If there were no reported hearings,
the transcript deadlines do not apply.
The optional reply may be filed within 21 days of service of the answering brief. See
Fed. R. App. P. 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1.
Failure of the appellant to comply with the time schedule order may result in
automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1.
Case: 25-1454, 03/07/2025, DktEntry: 2.1, Page 2 of 2
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.hid.154417.160.0.pdf
- Size
- 795,647 bytes
- SHA-256
- 6d84d642d3a0be062c0b6109d97d6042209cbf5c6984d802eb2e46ab062d8220
- Original
- PACER (login required)