Due Process Protections Act order

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia · No. 2:23-cr-00112 · Doc. 23 · 2023-08-02 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

A Due Process Protections Act order to all counsel regarding Brady obligations in United States of America v. Imeesha Bradley, No. 2:23-cr-00112, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, entered August 2, 2023 by Senior United States District Judge David A. Faber as Doc. 23. Citing the Due Process Protections Act and Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the order confirms the United States' obligation under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defendant and orders it to do so. It warns that untimely disclosure may result in consequences including exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings or sanctions. The two-page order directs the Clerk to send copies to counsel, the United States Marshal and the Probation Office.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA 
AT CHARLESTON 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
v.   
 CRIMINAL NO. 2:23-00112 
IMEESHA BRADLEY 
DUE PROCESS PROTECTIONS ACT ORDER 
TO ALL COUNSEL REGARDING BRADY OBLIGATIONS 
In accord with the Due Process Protections Act and Rule 
5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this court 
confirms the United States’ obligation to disclose to the 
defendant all exculpatory evidence, that is, evidence that favors 
the defendant or casts doubt on the United States’ case, as 
required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its 
progeny, and hereby ORDERS the United States to do so.  Failure 
to disclose exculpatory evidence in a timely manner may result in 
serious consequences, including, but not limited to, exclusion of 
evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, 
contempt proceedings, disciplinary action, or sanctions by the 
court. 
    The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to 
counsel of record, the United States Marshal for the Southern 
District of West Virginia, and the Probation Office of this 
Court.  
Case 2:23-cr-00112     Document 23     Filed 08/02/23     Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 50

IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of August, 2023.  
ENTER:  
  
  
 
David  A.  Faber
Senior United States District Judge
Case 2:23-cr-00112     Document 23     Filed 08/02/23     Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 51

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.wvsd.237173.23.0.pdf

Size

171,546 bytes

SHA-256

fdb8d830c5f5a92fb5bbc90232d1c82d83d8563af3a1f423a2b14ca524181706

Our copy

gov.uscourts.wvsd.237173.23.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)