Criminal Minutes

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia · No. 1:22-cr-00284-SEG-CMS · Doc. 5 · 2022-08-10 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

Magistrate's criminal minutes for an arraignment held in open court on August 10, 2022, filed as Document 5 in the criminal case against Harrescia Hopkins, No. 1:22-cr-00284-SEG-CMS, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The completed form records Christopher C. Bly as the presiding magistrate judge, Garrett Bradford as the Assistant United States Attorney and Stephen Johnson as defense counsel, and carries checkbox entries for initial appearance, arraignment, plea, detention and bond. Its third page sets out an order under the Due Process Protections Act and Fed. R. Crim. P. 5(f) directing the government to meet its disclosure obligations under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972) and Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 434 (1995). That order lists consequences of untimely disclosure. The minutes run three pages.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

· MAGISTRATE'S CRIMINAL MINUTES 
ARRAIGNMENT 
PLEA AND 
SENTENCE 
Filed in Open Court: 
Date: 8/ 10 
/2022 Time: J)::a,.9 
Time in Court: 
Hrs 
aQ 
Min 
Tape: 
FTR 
Magistrate (presiding): 
CHRISTOPHER C. BLY 
Deputy Clerk:--'J:.:a:.:.m""'e:.:s:..:J:.:a:.:.rv""'i:.:s_----'E=x:.:.:h.:.:.i=-bi:.:;ts:......aY~ea.::s'--4,D---..:.N=oa...._D-.-
Case Number: 
l : 22-CR ... 'a.<;''::\: 
Defendant's Name: Harrescia Hopkins 
AUSA: 
Garrett Bradford 
Defendant's Attorney: Stephen Johnson 
USPO/PTR: 
Type Counsel: ( ) Retained ( ) C~A ("'}FPO 
iJ~ ~~ ~ 
.. ~no.cl 
/den A~e.r. 
ARREST DATE: 
INTERPRETER: 
/INITIAL APPEARANCE HEARING. ( ) In THIS DISTRICT 
Oft in custody? () Yes 
-
~
endant advised of right to counsel. 
( ) WAIVER OF COUNSEL filed. 
ORDER appointing Federal Defender Program as counsel. () INITIAL APPEARANCE ONLY. 
ORDER appointing 
as counsel. 
ORDER giving defendant 
days to employ counsel (cc: served by Mag CRD) 
Oft to pay attorney fees as follows: 
_ 
i_!ffORMATION/COMPLAINT filed. 
✓copy 1nd1ctmenU1nformatlon given to dft? ( X) Yes 
() No 
Read to dft? () Yes 
( ) No 
(X) Prior to Hrg 
WAIVER OF INDICTMENT filed. 
CONSENT TO TRIAL BEFORE MAGISTRATE (Misd / Petty) offense filed. 
-
/4'RRAIGNMENT HELD.( )indictment / information 
() Dft's WAIVER of appearance filed. 
Arraignment continued to 
at 
Request of ( ) Govt 
( ) Oft 
Oft failed to appear for arraignment. 
Bench warrant 
_
/ 
issued 
~ 
Oft enters PLEA OF NOT GUil TY. () Oft stood mute; plea of NOT GUil TY entered. () Waiver of appearance. 
Estimated trial time: 
days. 
MOTION TO CHANGE PLEA, and order allowing same. 
/4s lGNED TO JUDGE 
8 E,_G-
for ( ) trial 
v"ASSIGNED TO MAGISTRATE 
CM5 
( ) arraignmenUsentence. 
for p~
I proceedings. 
(o/Sr!ORT 
() MEDIUM 
()LONG 
PRE-SENTENCE INVESTIGATION filed. Referred to USPO for PSI and continued 
until 
at 
for sentencing. 
Case 1:22-cr-00284-SEG-CMS     Document 5     Filed 08/10/22     Page 1 of 3

ARRAIGNMENT - Pg. 2 
Case No.: 
Defendant: 
Government MOTION FOR DETENTION filed. Hearing set for 
Temporary commitment issued. 
Oft remanded to custody of US Marshals Service. 
BOND REVOCATION/ DETENTION HEARING 
~ 
I PRETRIAL DETENTION hearing held. 
Government MOTION FOR DETENTION ( ) GRANTED 
( ) DENIED ( ) WITHDRAWN 
WRITTEN ORDER TO FOLLOW. 
HEARING HELD on motion for reduction/ modification of bond. 
Motion for reduction / modification of Bond 
( ) GRANTED 
( ) DENIED. 
_ 
~
TTEN ORDER TO FOLLOW. 
~
DSETat 
~ljo1cc:CJ 
__ Non-surety 
Surety ( ) Cash 
( ) Property 
( ) Corporate surety ONLY 
SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 
/
Bond filed; defendant released. 
Bond NOT EXECUTED. 
Defendant to remain in Marshal's custody. 
at 
__ Defendant to remain on pretrial release under the terms and conditions set forth in the U. S. District for the 
WITNESSES: 
SENTENCE: 
Case 1:22-cr-00284-SEG-CMS     Document 5     Filed 08/10/22     Page 2 of 3

~
ant to the Due Process Protections Act,~Fed. R. Crim. P. 5(f), the government is directed to adhere 
to the disclosure obligations set forth in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny, and to provide all 
materials and information that are arguably favorable to the defendant in compliance with its obligations under 
Brady; Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972); and their progeny. Exculpatory material as defined in Brady 
and Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 434 (1995), shall be provided sufficiently in advance of trial to allow a defendant 
to use it effectively, and exculpatory information is not limited to information that would constitute admissible 
evidence. 
The failure of the government to comply with its Brady obligations in a timely manner may result in serious 
consequences, including, but not limited to, the suppression or exclusion of evidence, the dismissal of some or all 
counts, adverse jury instructions, contempt proceedings, or other remedies that are just under the circumstances. 
Case 1:22-cr-00284-SEG-CMS     Document 5     Filed 08/10/22     Page 3 of 3

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.gand.306194.5.0.pdf

Size

618,241 bytes

SHA-256

b4a10916b0d70af77329c60f9cd04a3a57b15a5dffa2c8a2d31d45e45e94adfe

Our copy

gov.uscourts.gand.306194.5.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)