Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. Keough USA v. Keough — U.S. District Court, S.D. Fla., West Palm Beach Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order — USA v. Keough (Dkt. 46.1)

Court filing

Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order — USA v. Keough (Dkt. 46.1)

Filed November 20, 2023 in USA v. Keough; one of 55 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Filed2023-11-20

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida · No. 9:23-cr-80154-DMM · Doc. 46-1 · 2023-11-20 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
 
CASE NO.  23-CR-80154-DMM 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 
vs. 
 
GREGORY SCOTT KEOUGH, 
 
 
 
 
Defendant. / 
 
PROPOSED ORDER 
 
THIS CAUSE having come before this Court on Defendant’s unopposed motion to Modify 
Condition of Pretrial Release to permit as a part of the condition of home confinement, a curfew 
of 10:00 pm to 8:00 am, or as directed by the supervising officer, it is GRANTED. 
   After a detention hearing, the Court denied the United States’ Motion for Detention and 
entered an Order Setting Conditions of Release to Defendant’s brother in-law’s home, including 
home detention and GPS monitoring. DE 26, 28, 29.  
On September 6, 2023, the Defendant posted bond and was released.  The Defendant has 
been on release since that time and has met all conditions of pretrial release.  The assigned U.S. 
Probation Officer voiced no objection to the recommended bond modification, as to curfew. 
Defendant has requested the elimination of Probation’s requirement to provide Probation 
a one-week advance schedule.  In consideration of all the circumstances stated by counsel, the 
maintenance of active GPS monitoring, and the recommended curfew, it is 
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Defendant will remain on home confinement with 
a curfew of 10:00 pm to 8:00 am, and the removal of Probation required for a one-week advance 
schedule, or as directed by the supervising officer.  All other conditions remain in effect.  
___________________________ 
WILLIAM MATTHEWMAN 
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 
Case 9:23-cr-80154-DMM   Document 46-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 11/20/2023   Page 1 of 1

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.flsd.653009.46.1.pdf
Size
77,975 bytes
SHA-256
143b9c768dfbd2cf0c73a44c57c6b51890ba31c0f4c53b37197d7fd13fa4f16d
Our copy
gov.uscourts.flsd.653009.46.1.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top