Court filing

Order Regarding Discovery Dispute: Based on the arguments made — Greathouse v. Capital Plus Financial LLC (Dkt. 46, E.D. Ark. No. 4:21-cv-01243)

Summary

A one-page order by United States District Judge Billy Roy Wilson in Eric Greathouse, et al. v. Capital Plus Financial, LLC, et al., 4:21-CV-01243-BRW, Eastern District of Arkansas, entered the 3rd day of May, 2022 and filed 05/03/22 as Document 46. After a telephone conference on April 27, 2022, where plaintiffs argued they were entitled to jurisdictional discovery, and after reviewing defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 44), the court says it is not persuaded such discovery is warranted at this time. Plaintiffs may make further arguments for jurisdictional discovery in their response to the motion to dismiss.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed May 3, 2022 in Greathouse v. Capital Plus Financial LLC; one of 47 filings from this case.

Record facts

Court	U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Filed	2022-05-03

Cite this document

“Order Regarding Discovery Dispute: Based on the arguments made — Greathouse v. Capital Plus Financial LLC (Dkt. 46, E.D. Ark. No. 4:21-cv-01243).” U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, No. 4:21-cv-01243-BRW, Doc. 46, filed 2022-05-03. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-greathouse-capitalplus-ared-131205/2022-05-03-gov-uscourts-ared-131205-46-0-gov-uscourts-ared-131205-46-0/, SHA-256 094551f1c67bb7f8d3ae833326062e387b90ff74e80ec57b82e90475a35bdbb3.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CENTRAL DIVISION
ERIC GREATHOUSE, et al.
PLAINTIFFS
VS.
4:21-CV-01243-BRW
CAPITAL PLUS FINANCIAL, LLC, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Upon the parties’ request, I held a telephone conference on Wednesday April 27, 2022, to
discuss discovery issues in this case.  During the conference call, Plaintiffs argued that they are
entitled to jurisdictional discovery.  Defendants had not yet filed their motion to dismiss the
Amended Complaint, but stated that they would likely do so by the April 29, 2022 deadline.  I
advised that I would review the motion to dismiss after it was filed, and enter an Order
addressing the issue.  
Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 44) before the deadline.  Based on
the arguments made during the call, and after reviewing the motion, I am not persuaded that
jurisdictional discovery is warranted at this time.  However, Plaintiffs can make additional
arguments for jurisdictional discovery in their response to Defendants’ motion to dismiss, which
I will consider.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of May, 2022.
_______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-1-
BILLY ROY WILSON
Case 4:21-cv-01243-BRW     Document 46     Filed 05/03/22     Page 1 of 1

File and source

File: gov.uscourts.ared.131205.46.0.pdf
Size: 108,963 bytes
SHA-256: 094551f1c67bb7f8d3ae833326062e387b90ff74e80ec57b82e90475a35bdbb3
Our copy: gov.uscourts.ared.131205.46.0.pdf
Original: PACER (login required)