Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. Mosley et al (CAND 412164)

Case docket

United States v. Mosley et al. — N.D. Cal., Oakland Division, No. 4:23-cr-00134-AMO

USA v. Mosley et al (CAND 412164) — 12 court filings in the archive from U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, filed between May 18, 2023 and June 11, 2025. Among them: 2 notices, 2 orders and 2 proposed orders.

Case facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filings12 public filings
Filed2023-05-18 – 2025-06-11
Document typesnotices (2), orders (2), proposed orders (2), waiver (1), stipulation (3)
Original PDFs12 of 12

Case summary

Frank Mosley was prosecuted in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Oakland Division, No. 4:23-cr-00134-AMO, before District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín. He filed a waiver of indictment on May 18, 2023. A stipulation signed by the United States and the defendant states that on August 7, 2023 he pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349 and to aiding and advising in the filing of false tax returns in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(2), and that at the sentencing hearing on May 6, 2024 the court ordered 30 months in custody and three years of supervised release and deferred restitution. The parties jointly asked the court to order restitution of $3,082,404 to the Small Business Administration. This page also carries proposed forfeiture orders naming a co-defendant.

Case at a glance

Defendant(s)Frank Mosley, whose filings make up this page. The government's notice of related cases states that the information in this case charges Frank Mosley, Reginald Mosley, Marcus Wilborn, Aaron Boren and Scott Conway; the proposed forfeiture orders on this page are captioned against Frank Mosley and Reginald Mosley. No judgment for any defendant is on this page
Court and docketU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Oakland Division, No. 4:23-cr-00134-AMO, written on the parties' filings as CR 23-0134 AMO and 23-CR-0134-AMO (District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín). A related case, United States v. Kenya Ellis, No. 23-cr-00136-JST, was related to this one by order of June 6, 2023
ProgramPaycheck Protection Program (PPP). The government's notice of related cases states that the information alleges a conspiracy during 2020 and 2021 to submit fraudulent loan applications to the Covid-19 Paycheck Protection Program, and that the defendants obtained over $3 million in illicit proceeds
ChargesConspiracy to commit bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349 and aiding and advising in the filing of false tax returns in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(2), as recorded in the parties' stipulation on restitution. He waived indictment on May 18, 2023 and was charged by information. The information itself is not on this page
Outcome and sentencePleaded guilty on August 7, 2023. At the sentencing hearing on May 6, 2024 the court ordered 30 months in custody plus three years of supervised release and deferred the determination of restitution, according to the parties' stipulation. The judgment and any amended judgment are not on this page. The parties jointly requested an amended judgment ordering restitution of $3,082,404 in total to the Small Business Administration. A proposed preliminary order of forfeiture of August 8, 2024 and a proposed final order of June 11, 2025 cover $713.66 seized from a Wells Fargo account and $286,355.95 in cash and securities seized from a Fidelity Investments account

What was he convicted of?

The stipulation and proposed order on restitution, signed by the United States and the defendant, states that on August 7, 2023 he pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349 and to aiding and advising in the filing of a false tax return in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(2). The information is not among the filings on this page.

What was the sentence and the restitution?

The same stipulation states that at the sentencing hearing on May 6, 2024 the court ordered the defendant to serve 30 months in custody plus three years of supervised release and deferred the determination of restitution. The parties then jointly requested that the court enter an amended judgment ordering restitution of $3,082,404 in total to the Small Business Administration, stipulating that the agency qualifies as a victim under 18 U.S.C. § 3663A. No judgment or amended judgment is on this page.

What property was forfeited?

A proposed preliminary order of forfeiture filed August 8, 2024, captioned against Frank Mosley and Reginald Mosley and referring to their plea agreements of August 7, 2023 and October 5, 2023, lists $713.66 seized from a Wells Fargo account and $286,355.95 in cash and securities seized from a Fidelity Investments account, to be forfeited under 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), Rule 32.2 and 21 U.S.C. § 853. A proposed final order of forfeiture filed June 11, 2025 states that the court entered the preliminary order on August 8, 2024, that the United States complied with the publication requirements and that no petitions were filed.

Summary written from the documents on this page; every sentence is sourced.

Filings

12 public filings from this case, in filing-date order.

  1. Waiver of Indictment by Frank Mosley (jlm, Court Staff) (Filed on 5/18/2023) — USA v. Mosley et al. (Dkt. 20, N.D. Cal.)Waiver · PDF
  2. Initial AppearancePDF
  3. Minute Order — Initial AppearanceMinute entry · PDF
  4. Notice of Appearance of Malcolm Segal — USA v. Mosley et al. (N.D. Cal.)Notice · PDF
  5. STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Sentencing Hearing as to Frank Mosley,…Stipulation · Dkt. 41 · PDF
  6. Order by Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin granting 41 Stipulation — USA v. Mosley et al. (Dkt. 43, N.D. Cal.)Order · PDF
  7. STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Sentencing Hearing as to Frank Mosley,…Stipulation · Dkt. 63 · PDF
  8. Order by Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin granting 63 Stipulation — USA v. Mosley et al. (Dkt. 64, N.D. Cal.)Order · PDF
  9. Stipulation with Proposed Order re: Restitution as to Frank Mosley — USA v. Mosley et al. (Dkt. 107, N.D. Cal.)Stipulation · PDF
  10. Proposed OrderProposed order · Dkt. 128.1 · PDF
  11. Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel by Frank Mosley (Segal, Malcolm) — USA v. Mosley et al. (Dkt. 129, N.D. Cal.)Notice · PDF
  12. Proposed OrderProposed order · Dkt. 137.1 · PDF

Other cases in the archive from U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

Court, dates and docket numbers are as recorded on the filings.

Back to top