Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. Mosley et al United States v. Frank Mosley — U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal., Oakland Proposed Order — USA v. Mosley et al. (Dkt. 128-1, N.D. Cal.)

Court filing

Proposed Order — USA v. Mosley et al. (Dkt. 128-1, N.D. Cal.)

Summary

Document 128-1, filed 08/08/24 in No. CR 23-0134 AMO, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Oakland Division, is a two-page proposed Preliminary Order of Forfeiture in United States v. Frank Mosley and Reginald Mosley. Citing their plea agreements entered August 7, 2023 and October 5, 2023, it would forfeit $713.66 seized from a Wells Fargo account and $286,355.95 in cash and securities seized from a Fidelity Investments account under 18 U.S.C. 981(a)(1)(C). It directs the government to publish notice for at least thirty days on forfeiture.gov and lets third parties petition within thirty days of final notice.. The order would become final as to each defendant at sentencing and be made part of the judgment; the signature line for Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin is blank and undated.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed August 8, 2024 in USA v. Mosley et al.; one of 59 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed2024-08-08

Cite this document

“Proposed Order — USA v. Mosley et al. (Dkt. 128-1, N.D. Cal.).” U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 4:23-cr-00134-AMO, Doc. 128-1, filed 2024-08-08. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-frank-mosley-cand-412164/2024-08-08-gov-uscourts-cand-412164-128-1-doc-128-1/, SHA-256 d26eb1873a24c5b4183dce85786877bf02c29ddf9ba31a386e0ecd1b372d7bae.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

[PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE 
CR 23-0134 AMO 
 
1 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
       
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
OAKLAND DIVISION 
 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  
Plaintiff, 
v. 
 
FRANK MOSLEY AND REGINALD 
MOSLEY, 
Defendants. 
_______________________________________
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
Case No.  CR 23-0134 AMO 
[PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY ORDER OF 
FORFEITURE  
 
 
Having considered the application for a preliminary order of forfeiture filed by the United States, 
and defendant Frank Mosley and Reginald Mosley’s plea agreement entered on August 7, 2023 and 
October 5, 2023, respectively, and good cause appearing,  
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following property is forfeited to the United States pursuant 
to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C) and the procedures outlined in Rule 32.2 of the 
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and Title 21, United States Code, Section 853: 
• $713.66 seized from a Wells Fargo account bearing an account number ending in 6953; 
• $286,355.95 in cash and securities seized from Fidelity Investments account bearing an 
account number ending in 3836. 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States, through its appropriate agency, shall seize 
the forfeited property forthwith and publish for at least thirty days on the government website 
www.forfeiture.gov a notice of this Order, notice of the government=s intent to dispose of the property in 
Case 4:23-cr-00134-AMO     Document 128-1     Filed 08/08/24     Page 1 of 2

 
 
 
[PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE 
CR 23-0134 AMO 
 
2 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
such manner as the Attorney General may direct, and notice that any person, other than the defendant, 
having or claiming a legal interest in the property must file a petition with the Court and serve a copy on 
government counsel within thirty (30) days of the final publication of notice or of receipt of actual 
notice, whichever is earlier; 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, the government may conduct discovery, in order to identify, 
locate, or dispose of property subject to forfeiture, in accordance with Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal 
Rules of Criminal Procedure; 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the Preliminary 
Order of Forfeiture, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 
32.2(e). 
 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal 
Procedure, this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture shall become final as to the defendant at the time of 
sentencing and shall be made part of the sentence and included in the judgment. 
 
 
 
 
IT IS SO ORDERED this _____ day of August, 2024. 
 
 
 
 
_______________________________ 
 
 
 
HON. ARACELI MARTINEZ-OLGUIN 
   
United States District Judge 
 
 
 
 
Case 4:23-cr-00134-AMO     Document 128-1     Filed 08/08/24     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.412164.128.1.pdf
Size
137,665 bytes
SHA-256
d26eb1873a24c5b4183dce85786877bf02c29ddf9ba31a386e0ecd1b372d7bae
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.412164.128.1.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top