Court filing
Florida Mdfl 8 21 Cv 02524 11Th 22 10257 Doc 042 Att 0
Summary
A joint motion to stay district court proceedings pending appeal, filed January 12, 2022 as Document 42 in State of Florida v. Bill Nelson, in his official capacity as Administrator of NASA, et al., No. 8:21-cv-02524-SDM-TGW, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida. The motion recounts that on December 22, 2021 the Court granted in part Florida's motion for a preliminary injunction on its claim under the Federal Procurement and Administrative Services Act, and that a December 30, 2021 order enjoined enforcement within Florida of contract clauses tied to Executive Order 14042. It states that Defendants noticed their appeal on January 12, 2022 and asks the Court to stay proceedings until appellate proceedings are exhausted, citing Landis v. N. Am. Co. The four-page motion is signed by counsel for the State of Florida and the U.S. Department of Justice.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
No. 8:21-cv-02524-SDM-TGW · Doc. 42 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
Case 8:21-cv-02524-SDM-TGW Document 42 Filed 01/12/22 Page 1 of 4 PageID 687
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Plaintiff,
v.
No. 8:21-cv-2524-SDM-TGW
BILL NELSON, in his official capacity
as Administrator of NASA, et al.,
Defendants.
JOINT MOTION TO STAY DISTRICT COURT PROCEEDINGS
PENDING APPEAL
The parties jointly request that this Court stay further proceedings in this matter
pending final resolution of Defendants’ appeal from the Court’s Opinion and Order
granting Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction, except insofar as the Court
plans to resolve the remainder of Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction. See
ECF Nos. 37 and 40 (“Opinion and Order”). 1
On December 22, 2021, the Court granted in part Florida’s motion for a prelim-
inary injunction on Florida’s claim that the President likely exceeded his statutory au-
thority under the Federal Procurement and Administrative Services Act (FPASA).
ECF No. 37. And on December 30, 2021, the Court issued an order enjoining the
Federal Government “from enforcing within Florida any contract clause requiring
compliance with the COVID Safety Protocols for Federal Contractors described in
1
Defendants do not concede that the Court would have jurisdiction to issue any
further orders or opinions related to Florida’s motion for a preliminary injunction, in
light of Defendants’ appeal of the preliminary injunction to the Eleventh Circuit. ECF
No. 41.
Case 8:21-cv-02524-SDM-TGW Document 42 Filed 01/12/22 Page 2 of 4 PageID 688
Executive Order 14042 . . . or from denying Florida a government contract based on
Florida’s refusal to agree to such a contract clause.” ECF No. 40. Defendants noticed
their appeal of the Court’s Opinion and Order on January 12, 2022. See ECF No. 41.
Defendants are currently obligated to respond to Plaintiffs’ amended complaint on or
before January 21, 2022. ECF No. 37.
The parties agree and respectfully suggest that a stay of proceedings pending the
final resolution of Defendants’ appeal will both promote judicial economy and pre-
serve the resources of the parties and this Court. See Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S.
248, 254 (1936) (A district court’s “power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power
inherent in every court to control the disposition of the causes on its docket with econ-
omy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants.”); accord Claridy v. City
of Lake City, No. 3:13-cv-558, 2014 WL 11430972, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 25, 2014).
Defendants’ appeal implicates important legal issues that the parties and the Court will
likely have to address in future proceedings, including the scope of the President’s au-
thority under FPASA—an issue addressed by “[o]nly sparse authority” and “none in
the Eleventh Circuit.” ECF 37 at 24.
An appellate decision on those issues (and others) will thus likely provide the
Court and the parties significant aid in the ultimate resolution of this case. Further-
more, the parties’ proposed stay is of a limited and definite duration that will not cause
undue delay in the resolution of this case.
Furthermore, although the Court has ruled on Florida’s motion for preliminary
injunction regarding the President’s authority under FPASA, the Court retained under
2
Case 8:21-cv-02524-SDM-TGW Document 42 Filed 01/12/22 Page 3 of 4 PageID 689
advisement the balance of Florida’s motion. ECF No. 37 at 35, 37–38. The filing of
the stay motion is not intended to preclude the Court from issuing further orders or
opinions regarding the balance of Florida’s motion if it so chooses.
Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Court stay further district
court proceedings in this matter until the parties have exhausted appellate proceedings.
DATED: January 12, 2022 Respectfully submitted,
Ashley Moody BRIAN M. BOYNTON
ATTORNEY GENERAL Acting Assistant Attorney General
John Guard (FBN 374600) BRAD P. ROSENBERG
CHIEF DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL Assistant Director
/s/ James H. Percival /s/ Zachary A. Avallone
James H. Percival* (FBN 1016188) VINITA ANDRAPALLIYAL
DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL ZACHARY A. AVALLONE
OF LEGAL POLICY (D.C. Bar 1023361)
LEE REEVES
Henry C. Whitaker (FBN 1031175) KEVIN WYNOSKY
SOLICITOR GENERAL Trial Attorneys
U.S. Department of Justice
Natalie P. Christmas (FBN 1019180) Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch
ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL 1100 L Street NW, Room 12400
OF LEGAL POLICY Washington, D.C. 20005
(202) 514-2705
Office of the Attorney General zachary.a.avallone@usdoj.gov
The Capitol, Pl-01
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1050 Counsel for Defendants
(850) 414-3300
(850) 410-2672 (fax)
james.percival@myfloridalegal.com
Counsel for the State of Florida
3
Case 8:21-cv-02524-SDM-TGW Document 42 Filed 01/12/22 Page 4 of 4 PageID 690
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
On January 12, 2022, I electronically submitted the foregoing document with
the clerk of court for the U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida, using the
electronic case filing system of the Court. I hereby certify that I have served all parties
electronically or by another manner authorized by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
5(b)(2).
/s/ Zachary A. Avallone
ZACHARY A. AVALLONE
Trial Attorney
U.S. Department of Justice
File and source
- File
- Florida_MDFL_8-21-cv-02524_11th-22-10257__doc-042__att-0.pdf
- Size
- 102,300 bytes
- SHA-256
- a9a4b5dfcc714d635f464e2c16619968b66d3c21c77367e9d8d19f80441d7f0b
- Original
- storage.courtlistener.com