Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Full Docket Federal Contractor Mandates Florida Mdfl 8 21 Cv 02524 11Th 22 10257 Doc 042 Att 0

Court filing

Florida Mdfl 8 21 Cv 02524 11Th 22 10257 Doc 042 Att 0

Summary

A joint motion to stay district court proceedings pending appeal, filed January 12, 2022 as Document 42 in State of Florida v. Bill Nelson, in his official capacity as Administrator of NASA, et al., No. 8:21-cv-02524-SDM-TGW, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida. The motion recounts that on December 22, 2021 the Court granted in part Florida's motion for a preliminary injunction on its claim under the Federal Procurement and Administrative Services Act, and that a December 30, 2021 order enjoined enforcement within Florida of contract clauses tied to Executive Order 14042. It states that Defendants noticed their appeal on January 12, 2022 and asks the Court to stay proceedings until appellate proceedings are exhausted, citing Landis v. N. Am. Co. The four-page motion is signed by counsel for the State of Florida and the U.S. Department of Justice.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

No. 8:21-cv-02524-SDM-TGW · Doc. 42 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

Case 8:21-cv-02524-SDM-TGW Document 42 Filed 01/12/22 Page 1 of 4 PageID 687




                    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                    FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

 STATE OF FLORIDA,
                      Plaintiff,
               v.
                                                  No. 8:21-cv-2524-SDM-TGW
 BILL NELSON, in his official capacity
 as Administrator of NASA, et al.,
                      Defendants.

          JOINT MOTION TO STAY DISTRICT COURT PROCEEDINGS
                           PENDING APPEAL

      The parties jointly request that this Court stay further proceedings in this matter

pending final resolution of Defendants’ appeal from the Court’s Opinion and Order

granting Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction, except insofar as the Court

plans to resolve the remainder of Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction. See

ECF Nos. 37 and 40 (“Opinion and Order”). 1

      On December 22, 2021, the Court granted in part Florida’s motion for a prelim-

inary injunction on Florida’s claim that the President likely exceeded his statutory au-

thority under the Federal Procurement and Administrative Services Act (FPASA).

ECF No. 37. And on December 30, 2021, the Court issued an order enjoining the

Federal Government “from enforcing within Florida any contract clause requiring

compliance with the COVID Safety Protocols for Federal Contractors described in



      1
         Defendants do not concede that the Court would have jurisdiction to issue any
further orders or opinions related to Florida’s motion for a preliminary injunction, in
light of Defendants’ appeal of the preliminary injunction to the Eleventh Circuit. ECF
No. 41.
Case 8:21-cv-02524-SDM-TGW Document 42 Filed 01/12/22 Page 2 of 4 PageID 688




Executive Order 14042 . . . or from denying Florida a government contract based on

Florida’s refusal to agree to such a contract clause.” ECF No. 40. Defendants noticed

their appeal of the Court’s Opinion and Order on January 12, 2022. See ECF No. 41.

Defendants are currently obligated to respond to Plaintiffs’ amended complaint on or

before January 21, 2022. ECF No. 37.

       The parties agree and respectfully suggest that a stay of proceedings pending the

final resolution of Defendants’ appeal will both promote judicial economy and pre-

serve the resources of the parties and this Court. See Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S.

248, 254 (1936) (A district court’s “power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power

inherent in every court to control the disposition of the causes on its docket with econ-

omy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants.”); accord Claridy v. City

of Lake City, No. 3:13-cv-558, 2014 WL 11430972, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 25, 2014).

Defendants’ appeal implicates important legal issues that the parties and the Court will

likely have to address in future proceedings, including the scope of the President’s au-

thority under FPASA—an issue addressed by “[o]nly sparse authority” and “none in

the Eleventh Circuit.” ECF 37 at 24.

       An appellate decision on those issues (and others) will thus likely provide the

Court and the parties significant aid in the ultimate resolution of this case. Further-

more, the parties’ proposed stay is of a limited and definite duration that will not cause

undue delay in the resolution of this case.

       Furthermore, although the Court has ruled on Florida’s motion for preliminary

injunction regarding the President’s authority under FPASA, the Court retained under

                                              2
Case 8:21-cv-02524-SDM-TGW Document 42 Filed 01/12/22 Page 3 of 4 PageID 689




advisement the balance of Florida’s motion. ECF No. 37 at 35, 37–38. The filing of

the stay motion is not intended to preclude the Court from issuing further orders or

opinions regarding the balance of Florida’s motion if it so chooses.

       Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Court stay further district

court proceedings in this matter until the parties have exhausted appellate proceedings.



DATED: January 12, 2022                  Respectfully submitted,

Ashley Moody                             BRIAN M. BOYNTON
ATTORNEY GENERAL                         Acting Assistant Attorney General

John Guard (FBN 374600)       BRAD P. ROSENBERG
CHIEF DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL Assistant Director

/s/ James H. Percival              /s/ Zachary A. Avallone
James H. Percival* (FBN 1016188)   VINITA ANDRAPALLIYAL
DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL            ZACHARY A. AVALLONE
      OF LEGAL POLICY                     (D.C. Bar 1023361)
                                   LEE REEVES
Henry C. Whitaker (FBN 1031175)    KEVIN WYNOSKY
SOLICITOR GENERAL                  Trial Attorneys
                                   U.S. Department of Justice
Natalie P. Christmas (FBN 1019180) Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch
ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL         1100 L Street NW, Room 12400
       OF LEGAL POLICY             Washington, D.C. 20005
                                   (202) 514-2705
Office of the Attorney General     zachary.a.avallone@usdoj.gov
The Capitol, Pl-01
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1050    Counsel for Defendants
(850) 414-3300
(850) 410-2672 (fax)
james.percival@myfloridalegal.com
Counsel for the State of Florida




                                           3
Case 8:21-cv-02524-SDM-TGW Document 42 Filed 01/12/22 Page 4 of 4 PageID 690




                            CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

       On January 12, 2022, I electronically submitted the foregoing document with

the clerk of court for the U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida, using the

electronic case filing system of the Court. I hereby certify that I have served all parties

electronically or by another manner authorized by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

5(b)(2).

                                         /s/ Zachary A. Avallone
                                         ZACHARY A. AVALLONE
                                         Trial Attorney
                                         U.S. Department of Justice


File and source

File
Florida_MDFL_8-21-cv-02524_11th-22-10257__doc-042__att-0.pdf
Size
102,300 bytes
SHA-256
a9a4b5dfcc714d635f464e2c16619968b66d3c21c77367e9d8d19f80441d7f0b
Our copy
Florida_MDFL_8-21-cv-02524_11th-22-10257__doc-042__att-0.pdf
Original
storage.courtlistener.com
Back to top