Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings United States v. Bowens United States v. Bowens — U.S. District Court, M.D. Fla., Orlando Division Third Motion to Withdraw as Attorney — Charles Taylor — United States v. Bowens (M.D. Fla.)

Court filing

Third Motion to Withdraw as Attorney — Charles Taylor — United States v. Bowens (M.D. Fla.)

Filed September 30, 2025 in United States v. Bowens; one of 57 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Filed2025-09-30

U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida · No. 6:21-cr-00141-RBD-NWH · Doc. 144 · 2025-09-30 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
Case No.: 6:21-cr-141-Orl-RBD-UAM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
v.
EMMET BOWENS
                                                                         /
THIRD MOTION TO WITHDRAW
Counsel for Defendant Emmet Bowens hereby requests to withdraw from
representing Bowens, and as support states as follows:
1.
Counsel was appointed to represent Bowens on  December 26, 2024.
2.
On February 28, 2025, attorney Brian L. Shrader filed a Notice of
Appearance (Doc. 119) on behalf of Bowens.
3.
On March 13, 2025, counsel filed a motion to withdraw (Doc. 121)
based on the filing of the notice by attorney Shrader.
4.
Once attorney Shrader received the CMECF regarding the motion to
withdraw, he contacted the undersigned indicating he was just fired and
was filing a motion to withdraw himself, which he did on March 13,
2025. (Doc. 122).
5.
On March 15, 2025, counsel visited Bowens at the Seminole County
Case 6:21-cr-00141-RBD-NWH     Document 144     Filed 09/30/25     Page 1 of 3 PageID 401

Jail.  Bowens was very hostile towards counsel while using profane
language.  Bowens also threatened to report counsel to the Florida Bar
for fraud.
6.
Since that meeting, Bowens or his representative has filed no less than
two bar complaints against counsel.  The complaints were eventually
disposed of as having no merit.  
7.
The attorney client relationship and communication has completely
broken down.  The relationship is now antagonistic.  Counsel cannot
effectively represent Bowens.  
8.
Thereafter, counsel filed an Amended Motion to Withdraw.  (Doc. 123).
9.
On March 27, 2025, the Court denied all pending motions to continue
without prejudice because “no substantive proceedings are contemplated
pending a report from the medical team at the Bureau of Prisons.” .
(Doc. 129).
10.
On or about September 15, 2025, a report was authored by the Bureau
of Prisons related to Bowens’ competency.  The instant motion is now
ripe for consideration.
WHEREFORE, Counsel requests this Honorable Court grant the above
captioned motion, and relieve counsel of his obligation in this matter, and any other
relief the Court deems necessary and proper.
Case 6:21-cr-00141-RBD-NWH     Document 144     Filed 09/30/25     Page 2 of 3 PageID 402

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing motion was
electronically filed with CMECF on this 30th day of September 2025 which will
forward a copy to the United States Attorney’s Office.  
/s/ Charles E. Taylor Jr.,                    
Charles E. Taylor, Jr., Esq.
Florida Bar Number 0529321
37 North Orange Avenue, Suite 500
Orlando, Florida  32801
Telephone: 407-244-5997
Facsimile: 407-614-1600
E-Mail: Charles@attorneytaylor.com
Case 6:21-cr-00141-RBD-NWH     Document 144     Filed 09/30/25     Page 3 of 3 PageID 403

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.flmd.396523.144.0.pdf
Size
62,616 bytes
SHA-256
d6b43c7af59b990bb828f1d2f37bddc725caec364d9e27cd637e21ccac463d23
Our copy
gov.uscourts.flmd.396523.144.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top