Response in Opposition by USA as to Dara Buck re 70 Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 — USA v. Buck (Dkt. 72, S.D. Ga.)

Summary

Government's Reply in Opposition to Defendant's Construed Response, Document 72, filed 06/24/24 in Case CR422-065, United States of America v. Dara Buck, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, Savannah Division, three pages. The government states that, although docketed as an amended motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, it construes Buck's June 11, 2024 untitled filing as a response in opposition to the government's motion to dismiss (Doc. 69) and in support of her pending § 2255 motion (Doc. 70). It asserts that Buck failed to timely file her § 2255 motion, that the statute of limitations should not be tolled, and that Buck reasserts the same arguments (Docs. 66; 70). It requests that the § 2255 motion be dismissed. It is signed /s/ Joshua Kyle Davis, Assistant United States Attorney.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 
SAVANNAH DIVISION 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 
v. 
 
DARA BUCK 
 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
 
 
  CR422-065 
   
   
GOVERNMENT’S REPLY IN OPPOSITION TO  
DEFENDANT’S CONSTRUED RESPONSE 
 
 
Although docketed as an amended motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, 
the government construes defendant Dara Buck’s June 11, 2024, untitled filing as a 
response in opposition to the government’s motion to dismiss and in support of her 
pending § 2255 motion. (Doc. 70.) 
 
The government continues to assert Buck’s § 2255 motion should be dismissed 
for the reasons set forth in its motion to dismiss. (Doc. 69.) Nothing in Buck’s response 
alters the government’s position that she failed to timely file her § 2255 motion and 
the statute of limitations should not be tolled. Rather, Buck reasserts the same 
arguments in her response as were raised in the § 2255 motion. (Docs. 66; 70.)  
 
For these reasons, the government continues to request that defendant’s § 2255 
motion be dismissed.  
Respectfully submitted, 
 
JILL E. STEINBERG 
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 
 
/s/ Joshua Kyle Davis 
Joshua Kyle Davis 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Georgia Bar No. 575970 
Case 4:22-cr-00065-RSB-CLR     Document 72     Filed 06/24/24     Page 1 of 3

2 
 
P.O. Box 2017 
Augusta, Georgia 30903 
T: (706) 826-4537 
Email: kyle.davis2@usdoj.gov 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Case 4:22-cr-00065-RSB-CLR     Document 72     Filed 06/24/24     Page 2 of 3

3 
 
 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
This is to certify that I have on this day served all the parties in this case in 
accordance with the notice of electronic filing (“NEF”) that was generated as a result 
of electronic filing in this Court. In addition, I mailed a paper copy via U.S. Postal 
Service to: 
 
Dara Buck, Reg. No. 10895-510 
FPC Alderson 
Federal Prison Camp 
Glen Ray Rd., Box A 
Alderson, WV 24910 
 
This June 24, 2024. 
 
 
Respectfully submitted, 
 
JILL E. STEINBERG 
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 
 
/s/ Joshua Kyle Davis 
Joshua Kyle Davis 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Georgia Bar No. 575970 
P.O. Box 2017 
Augusta, Georgia 30903 
T: (706) 826-4537 
Email: kyle.davis2@usdoj.gov 
 
Case 4:22-cr-00065-RSB-CLR     Document 72     Filed 06/24/24     Page 3 of 3

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.gasd.87047.72.0.pdf

Size

108,436 bytes

SHA-256

b2622869fc27dc004206f2651705e0a5e18e5cdd49b069e8fede45384be404f6

Our copy

gov.uscourts.gasd.87047.72.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)