Court filing
Exhibit A — USA v. Crowther (Dkt. 123.1)
Filed March 25, 2021 in USA v. Crowther; one of 318 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2021-03-25 |
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida · No. 2:20-cr-00114 · Doc. 123-1 · 2021-03-25 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
53
JOHN MILLER - CROSS/DICKERSON
yourself first.
(Witness examines evidence.)
Q
Okay, sir. Do you recall reviewing this IFR when it was
published?
A
Yes.
Q
And, when you reviewed this when it was published, what
was your understanding of this IFR?
A
This IFR was a consolidated IFR that was issued after
the passage of the -- well, it's for loan forgiveness and loan
review as provided by the Economic Aid Act.
Q
And we haven't talked about the Economic Aid Act yet.
What is that?
A
The Economic Aid Act was another of the stimulus . . .
stimulus acts, or programs, that was passed by Congress and
signed by the President. I believe it was signed at the end of
December.
Q
Okay. And so this IFR is saying anything from the
Economic Aid Act overrides any conflicting past, previous
guidance in the FAQs, and the SBA will be revised in the FAQs;
correct?
A
It does state SBA will be revising the FAQs. It
overrides any conflicting guidance in the FAQs. So, if there
wasn't conflicting guidance, then the other guidance would
stand. And it says that the SBA will be revising the FAQs to
conform.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
This IFR was a consolidated IFR that was issued after
the passage of the -- well, it's for loan forgiveness and loan
review as provided by the Economic Aid Act.
It does state SBA will be revising the FAQs. It
overrides any conflicting guidance in the FAQs. So, if there
wasn't conflicting guidance, then the other guidance would
stand. And it says that the SBA will be revising the FAQs to
conform.
Case 2:20-cr-00114-JES-M_M Document 123-1 Filed 03/25/21 Page 1 of 4 PageID
723
67
JOHN MILLER - CROSS/DICKERSON
limitations though. I want to point that out. Right before
that.
Q
And where does it say the limitations?
A
That same sentence. "Section 7A of the Small Business
Act provides that, subject to several important limitations,
borrower shall be eligible for forgiveness."
Q
Right but this was an add-on to the 7A; correct?
A
That's correct.
Q
And correct me if I'm wrong, 7A SBA loans are directly
from the SBA to the actual borrower?
A
No, they are not. They are guaranteed loans, as well.
Q
Okay. So, when is the SBA proceeds ever come into play
with regard to a 7A loan, is it only during either the guaranty
when there's a default, or with a Paycheck Protection Program
when there's actually forgiveness?
A
Yes. The government funds would only come into play for
a 7A loan in the event of a guaranty purchase, as you
suggest -- or when a guaranty is honored. Or in the case of
the Paycheck Protection Program forgiveness. Some of the
funds, though, are also issued to lenders for processing loans.
They are paid a fee in the PPP loan. I just want to point that
out.
Q
But, with a borrower who has not defaulted on the loan,
and a borrower who has not applied for forgiveness, there's no
SBA proceeds applied to that loan.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
So, when is the SBA proceeds ever come into play
with regard to a 7A loan, is it only during either the guaranty
when there's a default, or with a Paycheck Protection Program
when there's actually forgiveness?
A
Yes. The government funds would only come into play for
a 7A loan in the event of a guaranty purchase, as you
suggest -- or when a guaranty is honored. Or in the case of
the Paycheck Protection Program forgiveness.
But, with a borrower who has not defaulted on the loan,
and a borrower who has not applied for forgiveness, there's no
SBA proceeds applied to that loan.
Case 2:20-cr-00114-JES-M_M Document 123-1 Filed 03/25/21 Page 2 of 4 PageID
724
68
JOHN MILLER - CROSS/DICKERSON
A
Not to the loan; correct. There would have been
proceeds applied to the lender for making that loan.
Q
That goes to the lender.
A
That goes to the lender. Correct.
Q
But no SBA proceeds going to the borrower.
A
No SBA proceeds going to the borrower; correct.
Q
And do you have any direct knowledge or information
about the Target Roofing PPP application?
A
None. No.
Q
And none about the forgiveness eligibility, nothing;
right?
A
No. I don't know if a forgiveness application was
submitted.
Q
You don't even know if a forgiveness application was
submitted.
A
That's correct, I do not know.
Q
Okay. And you made a comment about if the SBA . . . I
think -- I don't want to paraphrase it, so correct me if I'm
wrong. If an applicant uses the proceeds knowingly wrong, the
SBA will ask them for repayment?
A
Actually, if the SBA -- I'm not sure that that's what I
said.
Q
All right. Well, tell me. I want your words.
A
Okay. If -- if the SBA -- if a borrower knowingly uses
the proceeds for an unauthorized purpose, the borrower could be
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Not to the loan; correct. There would have been
proceeds applied to the lender for making that loan.
That goes to the lender.
A
That goes to the lender. Correct.
Q
But no SBA proceeds going to the borrower.
A
No SBA proceeds going to the borrower; correct.
Okay. If -- if the SBA -- if a borrower knowingly uses
the proceeds for an unauthorized purpose, the borrower could be
Case 2:20-cr-00114-JES-M_M Document 123-1 Filed 03/25/21 Page 3 of 4 PageID
725
69
JOHN MILLER - CROSS/DICKERSON
held legally liable. Could be prosecuted. Such as for charges
of fraud.
Q
Okay.
A
Are you getting to when payment in full could be
required? Is that what you want to be --
Q
Yeah, sure.
A
That would occur if the SBA finds that a borrower is
ineligible, which could also stem from a knowing misuse of
funds.
Q
So knowing misuse of funds would qualify as ineligible
for the SBA to be able to demand the money back from the
borrower.
A
It would depend upon the facts and circumstances of the
case, but if there's an inadequate basis for the borrower to
make the certifications that the borrower attested to in the
PPP loan application, then SBA could declare the borrower to be
ineligible for the loan.
Q
Is that a could or will standard for the SBA?
A
That's a could.
Q
What's the difference between could and will?
A
Well, again, it depends upon the facts and circumstances
of the case. The loan review would look at the case, and they
would make the determination based upon weighing all of the
facts and circumstances of that issue.
Q
And are you aware that the SBA has not requested or
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
held legally liable. Could be prosecuted. Such as for charges
of fraud.
Q
Okay.
A
Are you getting to when payment in full could be
required? Is that what you want to be --
Q
Yeah, sure.
A
That would occur if the SBA finds that a borrower is
ineligible, which could also stem from a knowing misuse of
funds.
Q
So knowing misuse of funds would qualify as ineligible
for the SBA to be able to demand the money back from the
borrower.
A
It would depend upon the facts and circumstances of the
case, but if there's an inadequate basis for the borrower to
make the certifications that the borrower attested to in the
PPP loan application, then SBA could declare the borrower to be
ineligible for the loan.
Q
Is that a could or will standard for the SBA?
A
That's a could.
Case 2:20-cr-00114-JES-M_M Document 123-1 Filed 03/25/21 Page 4 of 4 PageID
726File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.flmd.381779.123.1.pdf
- Size
- 70,887 bytes
- SHA-256
- 38f052ed6f080e3af225a14a0d8a8f8214cd3ce29bd5cf85aa86e24db39ea416
- Original
- PACER (login required)