Court filing
Opposition to Notice of Motion and Motion — USA v. Western Distribution, LLC. et al. (Dkt. 83, C.D. Cal.)
Filed October 3, 2022 in Carl Bradley Johansson; one of 66 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2022-10-03 |
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California · No. 5:21-cr-00170-JGB · Doc. 83 · 2022-10-03 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 E. MARTIN ESTRADA United States Attorney SCOTT M. GARRINGER Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division JOSEPH O. JOHNS (Cal. Bar. No. 144524) MATTHEW W. O’BRIEN (Cal. Bar No. 261568) Assistant United States Attorneys Environmental and Community Safety Crimes Section 1300 United States Courthouse 312 North Spring Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Telephone: (213) 894-4536/8644 Facsimile: (213) 894-0141 E-mail: joseph.johns@usdoj.gov Matthew.O’Brien@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, INC., aka “NDSI,” WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTION, INC., dba “Quality Services,” CARL BRADLEY JOHANSSON, aka “Brad Johnson,” aka “Carl Johnson,” aka “C. Brad Johanson,” aka “Keith Golatta,” ENRIQUE GARCIA, aka “Henry Garcia,” and DONALD CAMERON SPICER, Defendants. And the additional following case CR No. 5:18-00114(B)-VAP CR No. 5:21-00170-VAP GOVERNMENT’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT CARL BRADLEY JOHANSSON’S THIRD REQUEST TO CONTINUE SENTENCING Case 5:21-cr-00170-JGB Document 83 Filed 10/03/22 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:599 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WESTERN DISTRIBUTION, LLC, aka “Advanced Distribution Inc.,” and CARL BRADLEY JOHANSSON, aka “Brad Johnson,” aka “Carl Johnson,” aka “C. Brad Johanson,” aka “Jay Johnson,” aka “Keith Golatta,” Defendants. Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, the United States Attorney for the Central District of California, and Assistant United States Attorneys Matthew O’Brien and Joseph Johns, hereby submits this opposition to defendant CARL BRADLEY JOHANSSON’s (“JOHANSSON”) Motion to Continue Sentencing, based on the following grounds. On August 12, 2021, the government filed JOHANSSON’s plea agreement. (Dkt. No. 264.)1 After several unsuccessful change of plea hearings, JOHANSSON pled guilty on September 29, 2021. The Court scheduled his sentencing for May 9, 2022. (See Dkt. No. 282.) On April 4, 2022, the Probation Office disclosed its Presentence Report and letter for JOHANSSON, recommending an above-Guidelines sentence of 90 months in prison. (Dkt. Nos. 305, 306.) On April 12, 2022, JOHANSSON filed a stipulation in which the parties agreed – at JOHANSSON’s request – to continue his sentencing 1 All references to the docket herein refer to the docket in 5:18-CR-114(B)-VAP; references to the “PPP Dkt.” refer to the docket in 5:21-00170-VAP. Case 5:21-cr-00170-JGB Document 83 Filed 10/03/22 Page 2 of 5 Page ID #:600 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 from May 9, 2022 to August 22, 2022 because JOHANSSON “wishe[d] to retain new counsel to prepare for his sentencing” and he therefore “need[ed] time either to resolve this conflict or for new counsel to prepare for the sentencing.” (Dkt. No. 314, ¶¶ 3, 4.) Nonetheless, for the next three months, JOHANSSON did nothing. Finally, on July 28, 2022, JOHANSSON moved ex parte to retain new counsel and continue the sentencing once again. (Dkt. Nos. 346, 347.) The government opposed JOHANSSON’s request because it was untimely: JOHANSSON had had four months to address the issues raised in the application, and almost an entire year to prepare for his sentencing. (Dkt. No. 344.) On July 29, 2022, the government timely filed its sentencing papers for JOHANSSON, seeking a ten-year sentence of imprisonment. (Dkt. No. 345.) On August 8, 2022, over the government’s objection, the Court granted JOHANSSON’s ex parte application for new counsel and continued JOHANSSON’s sentencing to October 24, 2022. (Dkt. No. 357.) At the hearing on August 8, 2022, the Court made clear that there would be no further continuances of JOHANSSON’s sentencing absent extraordinary circumstances. JOHANSSON now requests yet another continuance. (PPP Dkt. No. 82.) The Court should deny JOHANSSON’s request because each purported justification for the continuance was foreseeable months ago: (1) the fact that newly retained counsel would need to review a large volume of discovery; (2) the fact that newly retained counsel would need to order and review transcripts; (3) the fact that JOHANSSON’s detention would complicate a psychological evaluation; and (4) the fact that JOHANSSON’s detention would complicate Case 5:21-cr-00170-JGB Document 83 Filed 10/03/22 Page 3 of 5 Page ID #:601 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 attorney-client communications. (See Declaration of Edward M. Robinson, ¶¶ 5-9.) Due to the lack of any exceptional, unforeseeable circumstances justifying a third continuance of JOHANSSON’s sentencing, the government respectfully requests that the Court deny JOHANSSON’s motion. This case needs to come to an end: the victims and the public deserve justice and closure, and four other defendants are waiting to be sentenced pending JOHANSSON’s sentencing. Finally, the continuity of counsel that JOHANSSON’s corporate shells have enjoyed throughout this prosecution mitigates against the Court providing more time for another criminal defense attorney retained by JOHANSSON to get up to speed. In addition to his previous counsel, JOHANSSON has had two other sets of retained counsel continuously representing his interests in United States v. National Distribution Services, Inc. et al. for more than four years. Under JOHANSSON’s direction, his co-defendants and corporate shells – National Distribution Services, Inc. (“National”) and Wholesale Distribution, Inc. (“Wholesale”) – each retained criminal-defense lawyers in this case. JOHANSSON controls National and Wholesale and has been the corporate representative of each entity throughout this prosecution. (See, e.g., PSR ¶ 100.) The identical interests shared by JOHANSSON and his corporate shells in this prosecution are evidenced by the fact that, for example: • Wholesale’s lawyers initially represented JOHANSSON in his individual capacity in this case (see Dkt. No. 9) and for years represented JOHANSSON in his individual capacity in a related state-court criminal case arising out of the 2014 explosion (see PSR ¶ 130); and Case 5:21-cr-00170-JGB Document 83 Filed 10/03/22 Page 4 of 5 Page ID #:602 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 • The factual bases to National’s and Wholesale’s plea agreements are nearly identical to the corresponding portions of the factual basis to JOHANSSON’s plea agreement, and each party has acted in unison throughout this prosecution. In sum, the four teams of highly experienced criminal-defense attorneys that JOHANSSON has retained to defend his interests in this prosecution undermine his latest request to have more time to prepare for sentencing. (JOHANSSON’s financial capacity to retain all of these lawyers and their various investigators and experts also undermines his repeated claims to the Court that he is broke.) Dated: October 3, 2022 Respectfully submitted, E. MARTIN ESTRADA United States Attorney SCOTT M. GARRINGER Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division /s/ MATTHEW W. O’BRIEN JOSEPH O. JOHNS Assistant United States Attorneys Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Case 5:21-cr-00170-JGB Document 83 Filed 10/03/22 Page 5 of 5 Page ID #:603
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cacd.826563.83.0.pdf
- Size
- 124,756 bytes
- SHA-256
- afc5406da4d3ad1b54450634304990ce9a76eff5bd7cd9c93ff9a9f2e6b4e4a6
- Original
- PACER (login required)