Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Camonte Henderson Scheduling, Trial, and Continuance Order granting motion — USA v. Golden-Larimore et al. (Dkt. 66, W.D. Mo.)

Court filing

Scheduling, Trial, and Continuance Order granting motion — USA v. Golden-Larimore et al. (Dkt. 66, W.D. Mo.)

Filed January 3, 2024 in Camonte Henderson; one of 14 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Filed2024-01-03

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri · No. 4:23-cr-00233-BCW · Doc. 66 · 2024-01-03 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI 
WESTERN DIVISION 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
) 
 
)  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Plaintiff, 
) 
 
) 
vs. 
) Case No. 23-00233-01/06-CR-W-BCW 
 
)  
 
QUINNIECE SMITH, et al.,  
 
) 
)  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Defendants. 
)  
 
 
 
SCHEDULING, TRIAL, AND CONTINUANCE ORDER 
 
On October 18, 2023, the grand jury returned an indictment charging Defendants Renetta 
Golden-Larimore (1), Camonte Henderson (2), Tajona Manning (3), Tashawn Mayfield (4), 
Quinniece Smith (5), and Dannisha Taylor (6) with conspiracy to commit wire fraud in violation 
of 18 U.S.C. § 1349 and wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343.  Doc. 1.  The indictment also 
contains a forfeiture allegation naming each defendant.  Id. at 13-14. 
I. 
TRIAL SETTING 
During the arraignment of Defendant Camonte Henderson, this matter was initially set on 
the December 4, 2023 trial docket.  Doc. 14.  Defense counsel orally requested a continuance to 
the March 18, 2024 Joint Criminal Jury Trial Docket based on needing additional time “to obtain 
and review the discovery, and to meet and confer with Defendant.”  Docs. 14, 17, 18.  The Court 
granted the motion.  Id.  Additionally, during the arraignments of Defendants Renetta Golden-
Larimore, Tajona Manning, Tashawn Mayfield, Quinniece Smith, and Dannisha Taylor the Court 
notified Defendants that they are joined with co-defendants in this matter and are set for trial on 
the March 18, 2024 Joint Criminal Jury Trial Docket.  Docs.  40, 41, 46, 49, 56, 57.  This matter 
currently remains set on the March 18, 2024 Joint Criminal Jury Trial Docket.  Id. 
Case 4:23-cr-00233-BCW     Document 66     Filed 01/03/24     Page 1 of 8

 
2
On January 1, 2024, defense counsel for Quinniece Smith filed the pending motion to 
continue.  Doc. 61.  Therein, defense counsel requests a continuance to the June 3, 2024 Joint 
Criminal Jury Trial Docket.  Id. at 1.  Defense counsel explains the continuance is necessary 
because she needs “additional time to review discovery, to conduct an independent legal and factual 
investigation for pretrial motion preparation, to negotiate a resolution, and to prepare for trial.”  Id. 
at 2.  Further, defense counsel notified Government counsel and counsel for co-defendants of the 
requested continuance.  Id. at 1-2.  Counsel for Defendants Golden-Larimore and Henderson have 
no objection to the requested continuance.1  Id. at 1-2.  However, Government counsel objects and 
“disputes that a continuance is necessary” and he “is unavailable [during] the June 2024 docket” 
as he is scheduled for trial in a different matter.  Id. at 1.  
 
On January 3, 2024, the Court held scheduling conferences in this matter.  Doc. 64, 65.  
Present for a scheduling conference via video teleconference were Defendant Quinniece Smith, her 
counsel Jane Francis, and Government Counsel Paul Becker.  Doc. 64.  Present for an in-person 
scheduling conference were Defendant Taylor, her counsel Craig Divine, Defendant Henderson, 
his counsel Arimeta DuPree, counsel for Defendant Renetta Golden-Larimore, and counsel for the 
Government Paul Becker.  Doc. 65.  Defendant Renetta Golden-Larimore was not present due to a 
medical emergency.  Id. 
 
During the scheduling conferences, the parties discussed, inter alia, the volume of discovery 
and the status of the case.  Docs. 64, 65.  The Court also took up the pending motion to continue 
and took note of the Government’s objection.  Id.  After discussing the requested continuance with 
the parties and confirming there is no objection from Defendants Golden-Larimore or Henderson, 
 
1 Defendants Tajona Manning, Quinniece Smith, and Tashawn Mayfield all have change of plea hearings currently 
scheduled to take place in January 2024.  Docs. 60, 62, 63.    
Case 4:23-cr-00233-BCW     Document 66     Filed 01/03/24     Page 2 of 8

 
3
the Court orally granted a continuance to the April 29, 2024 Joint Criminal Jury Trial Docket.  Doc. 
65.  
In any case in which a plea of not guilty is entered, the defendant’s trial shall commence 
within seventy days from the filing of the information or indictment or the date of the defendant’s 
first appearance, whichever comes last.  18 U.S.C. § 3161(c)(1) (Speedy Trial Act).  In computing 
the seventy-day time period, the periods of delay set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h) are to be excluded.  
Any period of delay resulting from a continuance granted at the request of a defendant is excludable 
if the Court finds the ends of justice served by the taking of such action outweigh the best interests 
of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, provided the Court sets forth the reasons for such 
finding.  See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).   
In light of defense counsel’s need of additional time to review discovery, conduct 
independent investigation, negotiate potential resolutions, and prepare for trial, the Court finds it 
would be unreasonable to expect counsel to prepare this case for trial prior to March 18, 2024, and 
thus, would deny Defendant a right to effective assistance of counsel.  Upon consideration of the 
factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B), the Court finds the ends of justice served by granting 
a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.  The 
Court, in ordering this case removed from the March 18, 2024 Joint Criminal Jury Trial Docket, is 
not doing so because of congestion of the Court’s calendar, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 
3161(h)(7)(C). 
Based on the foregoing, Defendant’s Motion to Continue (Doc. 61) is GRANTED.  This 
case is removed from the Joint Criminal Jury Trial Docket which commences March 18, 2024, and 
is set for the Joint Criminal Jury Trial Docket which commences April 29, 2024.  Pursuant to 18 
U.S.C. § 3161(h), the time between the date of this Order and May 10, 2024, the last day of the 
Case 4:23-cr-00233-BCW     Document 66     Filed 01/03/24     Page 3 of 8

 
4
April 29, 2024 Joint Criminal Jury Trial Docket, shall be excluded in computing the time within 
which this trial must commence.   
II. 
PRETRIAL FILINGS2 
A. 
PRETRIAL MOTIONS 
 
 
 
On or before January 16, 2024, the parties shall file any relevant pretrial motions.  
Any suggestions in opposition shall be filed within fourteen days from the date the 
motion is filed unless otherwise ordered by the Court.   
For defendants who are represented by counsel, the Court will only accept pretrial 
filings made by counsel.  Pro se filings will not be accepted for defendants who are 
represented by counsel. 
 
B. 
WITNESS LISTS 
 
The government and the defendant are directed to file in writing witness lists which 
shall include the name and address of each witness whom counsel intends to call in its 
case-in-chief, together with any record of prior felony convictions for such witness, no 
later than fourteen days prior to trial.  If a new witness is discovered after counsel 
files its witness list, either prior to trial or during trial, counsel shall promptly notify 
opposing defense and provide the discovery identified above. 
 
C. 
EXHIBIT LISTS 
 
The government and the defendant are directed to file in writing exhibit lists which 
shall include a description of each exhibit, pre-marked for identification, that counsel 
intends to offer in its case-in-chief no later than fourteen days prior to trial.  
 
D. 
MOTIONS IN LIMINE 
 
No later than fourteen days prior to trial, the parties should file any motions in 
limine seeking to exclude evidence from trial.  Any suggestions in opposition to the 
motions in limine should be filed within seven days after the motion is filed.   
 
 
 
2 For purposes of this Order, the reference to “trial” means the first day of the Joint Criminal Jury Trial Docket on 
which the case is set. 
Case 4:23-cr-00233-BCW     Document 66     Filed 01/03/24     Page 4 of 8

 
5
 
E. 
STIPULATIONS 
 
Any proposed stipulations should be provided in writing to opposing counsel and the 
Court no later than fourteen days before trial.   
 
III.  
ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES BY THE GOVERNMENT 
 
A. 
RELEVANT OFFENSE CONDUCT 
 
No later than fourteen days prior to trial or a change-of-plea hearing, the 
government is directed to disclose all information in its possession on which it will 
rely to establish “relevant offense conduct” or to establish an upward departure 
under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. 
 
 
B. 
PRIOR CONVICTIONS 
 
No later than fourteen days prior to trial, the government is directed to provide 
a written list of the defendant’s prior felony convictions which the government 
intends to use for impeachment.  
 
C. 
RULE 404(b) EVIDENCE 
 
The government is directed to file written notice of all prior and subsequent acts 
and convictions intended to prove knowledge, intent or other elements identified in 
Rule 404(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence no later than twenty-eight days 
before trial. 
 
D. 
WITNESS INDUCEMENTS 
 
No later than fourteen days prior to trial, the government is directed to provide 
written disclosure of: (a) the name(s) and address(es) of the witness(es) to whom 
the government has made a promise; (b) all promises, or inducements made to any 
witness(es); (c) all agreements entered into with any witness(es); and (d) the 
amount of money or other remuneration given to any witness(es). 
E. 
INFORMANTS 
 
Unless the government has made a claim of privilege as to an informant, no later 
than twenty-eight days prior to trial, the government is directed to provide: (a) 
the name(s) and address(es) of the informant(s); (b) all promises or inducements to 
the informant(s); (c) all agreements entered into with the informant(s); (d) the 
amount of money or other remuneration given to the informant(s); (e) identification 
of the informant’s prior testimony; (f) evidence of psychiatric treatment; (g) 
evidence of the informant’s narcotic habit; and (h) the name, address and phone 
number for the lawyer(s) for the informant(s) if represented by counsel.  If an 
informant objects to the disclosure of his or her address, the government shall 
Case 4:23-cr-00233-BCW     Document 66     Filed 01/03/24     Page 5 of 8

6 
produce the informant to defense counsel for a determination of whether or not the 
informant will consent to an interview. 
 
F. 
GIGLIO IMPEACHMENT EVIDENCE 
 
No later than fourteen days prior to trial, the government is directed to disclose 
all evidence which may tend to adversely affect the credibility of any person called 
as a witness by the government pursuant to Giglio v. United States and United 
States v. Agurs, including the arrest and/or conviction record of each government 
witness, any offers of immunity or lenience, whether made directly or indirectly, to 
any government witness in exchange for testimony and the amount of money or 
other remuneration given to any witness. 
 
PLEASE NOTE:  The parties are to be prepared to disclose to the Court at the 
final pretrial conference in this case the method used to determine whether any 
favorable evidence exists in the government’s investigative file.  The government 
is advised that if any portion of the government’s investigative file or that of any 
investigating agency is not made available to the defense for inspection, the Court 
will expect that trial counsel for the government or an attorney under trial 
counsel’s immediate supervision who is familiar with the Brady and Giglio 
doctrines will have reviewed the applicable files for purposes of ascertaining 
whether evidence favorable to the defense is contained in the file.  The Court 
considers such evidence to include evidence favorable to the accused which may 
have a bearing on guilt or punishment, and evidence which adversely affects the 
credibility of any important government witness. 
 
G. 
STATEMENTS PRESENTING BRUTON ISSUES 
 
Any statements of a co-defendant which the government intends to offer at trial and 
which present Bruton issues along with proposed redactions should be filed no 
later than twenty-eight days prior to trial. 
 
IV. EXPERT TESTIMONY DISCLOSURES BY BOTH PARTIES 
 
A. 
RULE 16 EXPERTS 
 
1. 
No later than twenty-eight days prior to trial, the government must 
disclose to the defendant, in writing, the information required by Rule 
16(a)(1)(G)(iii) for any testimony that the government intends to use at trial 
under Rules 702, 703, or 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence during its 
case-in-chief, or during its rebuttal to counter testimony that the defendant 
has timely disclosed under Rule 16(b)(1)(C).   
 
2. 
No later than fourteen days prior to trial, the defendant shall disclose to 
the government, in writing, the information required by Rule 
16(b)(1)(C)(iii) for any testimony that the government intends to use at trial 
Case 4:23-cr-00233-BCW     Document 66     Filed 01/03/24     Page 6 of 8

7 
under Rules 702, 703, or 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence during the 
defendant’s case-in-chief at trial.   
 
B. 
MENTAL HEALTH EXPERTS/EVIDENCE 
 
1. 
On or before the date for filing pretrial motions, the parties must file any 
motion seeking to determine the defendant’s mental competency pursuant 
to 18 U.S.C. § 4241. 
 
2. 
On or before the date set for filing pretrial motions, the defendant shall 
file a notice in writing which complies with the requirements of Rule 12.2 
of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure stating: 
 
a. 
Whether the defendant intends to rely upon the defense of insanity 
at the time of the alleged offense; and 
 
b. 
Whether the defendant intends to introduce expert testimony 
relating to a mental disease or defect or any other mental condition 
of the defendant bearing upon the issue of guilt. 
 
3. 
If the defendant gives notice under Rule 12.2(b) of an intent to present 
expert testimony on the defendant’s mental condition, within two weeks of 
giving notice under Rule 12.2, the defendant shall disclose to the 
government, in writing, the information required by Rule 16(b)(1)(C)(iii) 
for said expert(s). At the same time the defendant discloses said expert(s), 
the defendant shall notify the Magistrate Judge to whom the case is referred 
that the disclosure has been made and request that the Court set a conference 
to establish additional deadlines. 
 
V. 
WITNESS ADDRESSES 
 
In lieu of providing the address of any witness required by this Order, counsel for the 
government or defendant may produce the witness for interview by opposing counsel. 
VI. 
JENCKS ACT MATERIAL 
 
The standard practice in this district is for all parties to voluntarily agree to provide Jencks 
Act material at least fourteen days prior to trial.  If any party does not agree with this deadline, 
the party must file a notice with the Court within seven (7) days of this Order noting their objection. 
 
 
Case 4:23-cr-00233-BCW     Document 66     Filed 01/03/24     Page 7 of 8

8 
VII. 
 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE 
 
A pretrial conference is set for April 4, 2024.  At the pretrial conference, the parties should 
be prepared to discuss the following issues: 
A. 
Anticipated questions of admissibility of evidence; 
 
B. 
Any other questions of law on which the parties desire pretrial rulings; 
 
C. 
Facts or circumstances requiring a larger than normal jury panel (more than 45); 
 
D. 
Pending motions; 
 
E. 
Estimated trial time; 
 
F. 
Discovery problems; 
 
G. 
Possible stipulations (counsel should have proposed stipulations available for 
review and signature by the parties at the conference); 
 
H. 
Number of exhibits to be offered at trial; 
 
 
 I. 
Number of witnesses to be called at trial;  
 
 
 J. 
Any objections to the anticipated witnesses or exhibits; and 
 
 K. 
Changes of plea or potential dismissal of any of the charges. 
 
VIII. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE 
 
During the pretrial conference, counsel for the government and for each defendant will 
be required to certify on the record that counsel has produced all discovery in accordance with the 
deadlines established in the Arraignment and Discovery Order and has timely complied with all 
pretrial filing deadlines established by the Scheduling and Trial Order up to the date of the pretrial 
conference. 
 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
 
 
DATE:        January 3, 2024  
 
 
      /s/ W. Brian Gaddy 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
W. BRIAN GADDY 
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE  
Case 4:23-cr-00233-BCW     Document 66     Filed 01/03/24     Page 8 of 8

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.mowd.172526.66.0.pdf
Size
226,572 bytes
SHA-256
1b81faf9f5f24438ab175864e277009d18d781618f645dbf78840f25e48099fb
Our copy
gov.uscourts.mowd.172526.66.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top