ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge W.… — USA v. Golden-Larimore et al (Dkt. 2)

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri · No. 4:23-cr-00233-BCW · Doc. 2 · 2023-10-19 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
) 
Plaintiff 
) 
 
) 
 
vs. 
) 
Criminal No.  
 
 
) 
 
)
Defendant(s) 
)
ORDER OF REFERENCE TO UNITED 
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The                     filed in the above-styled case was filed in the Western District of 
Missouri on the         day of
 ,           and assigned to the undersigned United States 
District Judge. 
Pursuant to Section 636(b), Title 28, United States Code, and Rule 72.1 of the Local 
Rules for the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri, it is 
ORDERED that United States Magistrate Judge                                 is designated to hear 
and determine all pretrial motions or matters now pending or later filed, except (1) a motion to 
dismiss or quash the indictment, and (2) a motion to suppress evidence, in accordance with the 
provisions of Section 636(b)(1)(A), Title 28, United States Code; and such pretrial motions or 
matters now pending or later filed in this criminal action are referred to the Magistrate Judge to 
hear and determine. 
Any party may appeal from the Magistrate Judge’s order determining a motion within 
fourteen (14) days after issuance of the order unless a different time is prescribed by the 
Magistrate Judge or the undersigned District Judge.  Such party shall file with the Clerk
WESTERN  DIVISION
 4:23-cr-00233-01/06-DGK
Renetta Golden-Larimore, et al
Indictment
18th
October
2023
W. Brian Gaddy
Case 4:23-cr-00233-BCW     Document 2     Filed 10/19/23     Page 1 of 3

of Court, and serve the Magistrate Judge and all parties, a written statement of the appeal which 
shall specifically designate the order, or part thereof, appealed from and the basis for the appeal. 
The undersigned District Judge will consider the appeal and set aside any portion of the 
Magistrate Judge’s order found to be clearly erroneous or contrary to law.  The undersigned 
District Judge may reconsider sua sponte any motion determined by the Magistrate Judge.  It is 
further 
ORDERED that United States Magistrate Judge                                 is designated to hear 
and process all pretrial motions to (1) dismiss or quash the indictment, and (2) suppress evidence, 
now pending or later filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 636(b)(1)(B) and 
(b)(1)(C), Title 28, United States Code; and all such pretrial motions now pending or later filed 
are referred to the Magistrate Judge to hear and process.  Any party may object to the Magistrate 
Judge’s proposed finding and recommendations in respect to (1) a motion to dismiss or quash the 
indictment, or (2) a motion to suppress evidence, within fourteen (14) days after being served 
with a copy of the proposed findings and recommendations.  Such party shall file with the Clerk 
of Court, and serve the Magistrate Judge and all parties, written objections which shall 
specifically identify the portion or portions of the proposed findings and recommendations to 
which an objection is made and the basis for each objection. 
The undersigned District Judge will make a de novo determination of those portions of 
the proposed findings and recommendations to which specific objections is made and may 
accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the proposed findings or recommendations made by 
the Magistrate Judge.  The undersigned District Judge need not conduct a new hearing and may 
consider only the record developed before the Magistrate Judge in making his de novo
W. Brian Gaddy
Case 4:23-cr-00233-BCW     Document 2     Filed 10/19/23     Page 2 of 3

determination.  The undersigned District Judge may receive further evidence, recall witnesses, or 
recommit the motion to the Magistrate Judge with instructions.  It is further 
ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge may, in his/her discretion, reassign any motions 
referred to him/her pursuant to this order, to another Magistrate Judge for processing and 
handling.  In the event of such a reassignment, the Magistrate Judge to whom the motion is 
reassigned is designated to hear and determine or hear and process the motion in accordance 
with the provisions of this order. 
It is further 
ORDERED with the consent of the parties, if directed by the undersigned District Judge, 
the Magistrate Judge may conduct guilty plea proceedings and make a recommendation to the 
District Judge.
                                                                                                        _____________________________________ 
 
        
 
 
 
 
 
  United States District Judge 
              , Missouri 
Dated:
s/ Greg Kays
Kansas City, Missouri
October 19, 2023
Case 4:23-cr-00233-BCW     Document 2     Filed 10/19/23     Page 3 of 3

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.mowd.172526.2.0.pdf

Size

152,859 bytes

SHA-256

e3e89fdfc58b52a3954a321bd3bf49b127ef9cc94c438be8f90b8fb0ae63a555

Our copy

gov.uscourts.mowd.172526.2.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)