Court filing

Public version of Exhibit A-16 — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 151.16)

Summary

Public version of Exhibit A-16, Document 151-16, filed 01/26/23 in Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, Civil No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC (N.D. Cal.): selected pages of the August 22, 2022 videoconference deposition of Terry Lloyd, reported by Heidi Hunter. Appearances are listed for Amy Zeman, Andre M. Mura and Ezekiel S. Wald of Gibbs Law Group for the plaintiffs and Hayden M. Schottlaender, Susan D. Fahringer and Kayla Lindgren of Perkins Coie for the defendant. The one testimony page shows Lloyd answering that he was not asked to account for portions of CLEAR and is not a lawyer. The reporter's certificate follows, and the remaining pages carry only the court header.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed January 26, 2023 in Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation; one of 443 filings from this case.

Record facts

Court	U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed	2023-01-26

Cite this document

“Public version of Exhibit A-16 — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 151.16).” U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Doc. 151-16, filed 2023-01-26. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-brooks-thomsonreuters-cand-374304/2023-01-26-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-151-16-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-151-16/, SHA-256 efd46b8bcdc6d93d1417be9a319838944baaf501144040271b2944f4b235c5bd.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

EXHIBIT A-16 
 
 
 
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 151-16     Filed 01/26/23     Page 1 of 11

8/22/2022
Cat Brooks and Rasheed Shabazz, et al. v. Thomson Reuters Corp.
Terry Lloyd
www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
202-232-0646
Page 1
              UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
            NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
                 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
______________________________
CAT BROOKS and RASHEED        )
SHABAZZ, individually and on  )
behalf of all others          )
similarly situation,          )
                              )
     Plaintiffs,              ) Civil No.
                              ) 3:21-cv-01418-EMC
  v.                          )
                              )
THOMSON REUTERS               )
CORPORATION,                  )
                              ) Hon. Edward M. Chen
     Defendant.               )
______________________________)
               DEPOSITION OF TERRY LLOYD
               August 22, 2022  9:18 a.m.
        Location: DEPOSITION BY VIDEOCONFERENCE
Reported by:
HEIDI HUNTER, RPR, CSR
______________________________________________________
                  DIGITAL EVIDENCE GROUP
              1730 M Street, NW, Suite 812
                  Washington, D.C. 20036
                     (202) 232-0646   
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 151-16     Filed 01/26/23     Page 2 of 11

8/22/2022
Cat Brooks and Rasheed Shabazz, et al. v. Thomson Reuters Corp.
Terry Lloyd
www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
202-232-0646
Page 2
1
                 A P P E A R A N C E S
2
FOR THE PLAINTIFF:
3
          Amy Zeman
4
          Andre M. Mura
5
          Ezekiel S. Wald
6
          GIBBS LAW GROUP
7
          Attorneys at Law
8
          505 14th Street, Suite 1110
9
          Oakland, CA 94612
10
          Email: amz@classlawgroup.com
11
12
FOR THE DEFENDANT:
13
          Hayden M. Schottlaender
14
          Susan D. Fahringer
15
          Kayla Lindgren
16
          PERKINS COIE, LLP
17
          Attorneys at Law
          500 N Akard Street, Suite 3300
18
          Dallas, TX 75201
          Email: hschottlaender@perkinscoie.com
19
20
21
22
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 151-16     Filed 01/26/23     Page 3 of 11

8/22/2022
Cat Brooks and Rasheed Shabazz, et al. v. Thomson Reuters Corp.
Terry Lloyd
www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
202-232-0646
Page 101
1
for California natural persons.
2
     Q    If we go to page 18 of your report.  This
3
table contains the same calculations as in the
4
Exhibit 1 table we just looked at, but does not
5
contain the blanks for other information that might be
6
missing; is that right?
7
     A    I think that's a fair summary.
8
     Q    And in the calculations that you have
9
performed with the numbers that you do have both on
10
page 18 and in Exhibit 1, is there any accounting here
11
for just portions of CLEAR or unjust portions of
12
CLEAR?
13
     A    My answer is the same as when you asked me
14
that previously.  I was not asked to do that.  I am
15
not a lawyer.  It is not a question that I addressed.
16
          MS. ZEMAN:  We've been going for, I think,
17
quite a bit over an hour.  Can we take a 10-minute
18
break.
19
          MR. SCHOTTLAENDER:  We're about to go in
20
to -- we can do like a longer lunch break in about 20
21
minutes.
22
          Do you want to do that?
8
Q 
And in the calculations that you have
9
performed with the numbers that you do have both on
10
page 18 and in Exhibit 1, is there any accounting here
11
for just portions of CLEAR or unjust portions of
12
CLEAR?
13
A 
My answer is the same as when you asked me
14
that previously. I was not asked to do that. I am
15
not a lawyer. It is not a question that I addressed.
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 151-16     Filed 01/26/23     Page 4 of 11

8/22/2022
Cat Brooks and Rasheed Shabazz, et al. v. Thomson Reuters Corp.
Terry Lloyd
www.DigitalEvidenceGroup.comDigital Evidence Group C'rt 2022
202-232-0646
Page 287
1
2
REPORTER'S CERTIFICATE
3
STATE OF UTAH        )
4
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE  )
5
6
I, Heidi Hunter, RPR, CCR, for the state
7
of Utah.
8
That the foregoing proceedings were taken
before me at the time and place set forth in the
9
caption hereof; that the witness was placed under
oath to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing
10
but the truth.
That I thereafter transcribed my said
11
shorthand notes into typing and that the typewritten
transcript of said deposition is a complete, true
12
and accurate transcription of my said shorthand
notes taken at said time.
13
I further certify that I am not a relative
employee, attorney, or counsel of any of the parties
14
nor am I a relative or employee of any of the
parties' attorney or counsel connected with the
15
action, nor am I financially interested in the
action.
16
17
18
19
20
________________________________
21
Heidi Hunter, RPR, CCR
22
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 151-16     Filed 01/26/23     Page 5 of 11

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 151-16     Filed 01/26/23     Page 6 of 11

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 151-16     Filed 01/26/23     Page 7 of 11

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 151-16     Filed 01/26/23     Page 8 of 11

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 151-16     Filed 01/26/23     Page 9 of 11

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 151-16     Filed 01/26/23     Page 10 of 11

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 151-16     Filed 01/26/23     Page 11 of 11

File and source

File: gov.uscourts.cand.374304.151.16.pdf
Size: 1,687,444 bytes
SHA-256: efd46b8bcdc6d93d1417be9a319838944baaf501144040271b2944f4b235c5bd
Our copy: gov.uscourts.cand.374304.151.16.pdf
Original: PACER (login required)