Court filing
Order as to Bridgitte Keim: Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act — USA v. Keim (Dkt. 4, M.D. Fla.)
Summary
A standing order regarding the Due Process Protections Act, In re: Due Process Protections Act, Case No. 3:20-mc-20-J-32, in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, filed November 30, 2021 as Doc. 4 in the docket of No. 8:21-cr-00370, dated December 1, 2020, in Jacksonville, Florida, confirming the United States' obligation to produce all exculpatory evidence to the defendant under Brady v. Maryland and its progeny and ordering the United States to do so. It states that failing to do so in a timely manner may result in exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, and sanctions, and directs the Clerk to enter the order in all criminal cases pending on October 21, 2020, or filed thereafter.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed November 30, 2021 in USA v. Keim; one of 37 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2021-11-30 |
Cite this document
“Order as to Bridgitte Keim: Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act — USA v. Keim (Dkt. 4, M.D. Fla.).”
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, No. 8:21-cr-00370, Doc. 4, filed 2021-11-30. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-bridgitte-keim-flmd-396399/2021-11-30-gov-uscourts-flmd-396399-4-0-doc-4/
, SHA-256 5e10f930a9c618152a61360c75a2eb20b752719934f39f45aa19d14cecee3d03.Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
IN RE: Due Process Protections Act
CASE NO. 3:20-mc-20-J-32
STANDING ORDER REGARDING
DUE PROCESS PROTECTIONS ACT
Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act, the Court confirms the
United States’ obligation to produce all exculpatory evidence to the defendant
pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny and orders
the United States to do so. Failing to do so in a timely manner may result in
consequences, including exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions,
dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, and sanctions.
The Clerk is directed to enter this order in all criminal cases pending on
October 21, 2020, or filed thereafter.
DONE AND ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida on December 1, 2020.
Case 8:21-cr-00370-CEH-T_W Document 4 Filed 11/30/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID 11File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.flmd.396399.4.0.pdf
- Size
- 104,681 bytes
- SHA-256
- 5e10f930a9c618152a61360c75a2eb20b752719934f39f45aa19d14cecee3d03
- Our copy
- gov.uscourts.flmd.396399.4.0.pdf
- Original
- PACER (login required)