Order of Forfeiture — United States v. Bridgitte Keim

Record facts

U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · No. 8:21-cr-00370 · Doc. 21 · 2022-03-28 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

An order of forfeiture entered March 28, 2022 in United States v. Bridgitte Keim, Case No. 8:21-cr-370-CEH-JSS, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, docketed as Doc. 21. The order grants the United States' Motion for Order of Forfeiture (Doc. 20), filed March 10, 2022, and states the Court's finding that at least $7,500 was obtained by the defendant in the bank fraud offense to which she pleaded guilty. It holds the defendant liable for an order of forfeiture of $7,500 under 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(2)(A) and Rule 32.2(b)(2). Because the order states the proceeds were dissipated, it allows the United States to seek substitute assets up to that value under 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), and it becomes a final order of forfeiture upon entry.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
TAMPA DIVISION 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 
v. 
 
 
Case No. 8:21-cr-370-CEH-JSS 
 
 
BRIDGITTE KEIM 
 
ORDER OF FORFEITURE 
 
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the United States’ Motion for 
Order of Forfeiture (Doc. 20), filed on March 10, 2022, against the Defendant in the 
amount of $7,500. 
Being fully advised of the relevant facts, the Court hereby finds that at least 
$7,500 was obtained by the Defendant as a result of her bank fraud scheme, for 
which she has pleaded guilty. 
 
Accordingly, it is hereby: 
ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that for good cause shown, the 
United States’ Motion for Order of Forfeiture (Doc. 20) is GRANTED. 
It is FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(2)(A) and 
Rule 32.2(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Defendant shall be 
held liable for an order of forfeiture in the amount of $7,500. 
 
It is FURTHER ORDERED that, because the $7,500 in proceeds was 
dissipated by the Defendant, the United States may seek, as a substitute asset, 
pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), as incorporated by 18 U.S.C. § 982(b)(1), forfeiture 
Case 8:21-cr-00370-CEH-T_W     Document 21     Filed 03/28/22     Page 1 of 2 PageID 87

2 
of any of the Defendant’s property up to the value of $7,500. 
 
It is FURTHER ORDERED that, upon entry, this order shall become a final 
order of forfeiture as to the Defendant. 
The Court retains jurisdiction to address any third party claim that may be 
asserted in these proceedings, to enter any further order necessary for the forfeiture 
and disposition of such property, and for any substitute assets that the United States 
may be entitled to seek up to the amount of the order of forfeiture. 
DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, this 28th day of March, 2022.    
 
 
 
Copies to: 
Suzanne C. Nebesky, AUSA 
Counsel of Record 
 
Case 8:21-cr-00370-CEH-T_W     Document 21     Filed 03/28/22     Page 2 of 2 PageID 88

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.flmd.396399.21.0.pdf

Size

64,904 bytes

SHA-256

9eb1b0e4ca7fe3db7ea40a492603b95e095827497cc0d23afacd90bffe5aed00

Our copy

gov.uscourts.flmd.396399.21.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)