Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Bofa Ca Unemployment In re: Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation — S.D. Cal., No. 21-md-02992 Exhibit 19 to Chan Decl — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 212-21, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)

Court filing

Exhibit 19 to Chan Decl — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 212-21, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)

Filed January 23, 2024 in In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation; one of 1415 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Filed2024-01-23

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California · No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB · Doc. 212-21 · 2024-01-23 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

EXHIBIT 19
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 212-21     Filed 01/23/24     PageID.2224 
Page 1 of 3

 
Matthew L. Riffee 
+1 202 346 4177 
MRiffee@goodwinlaw.com 
Goodwin Procter LLP 
1900 N St., NW 
Washington, DC 20036 
goodwinlaw.com 
+1 617 570 1000 
October 20, 2023 
VIA EMAIL 
Brian Danitz 
Karin B. Swope 
Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy LLP 
San Francisco Airport Office Center 
840 Malcolm Road #200 
Burlingame, CA 94010 
bdanitz@cpmlegal.com 
kswope@cpmlegal.com 
 
Michael Rubin 
Connie Chan 
Altshuler Berzon, LLP 
177 Post Street, Suite 300 
San Francisco, CA 94108 
mrubin@altshulerberzon.com  
cchan@altshulerberzon.com 
 
Re:   
In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation, 3:21-md-02992-LAB- 
MSB, Prepaid Organizational Structure 
Counsel: 
I write on behalf of Defendant Bank of America, N.A. (“Defendant” or “BANA”) in response to 
Plaintiffs’ October 4, 2023 Notice of Deposition and pursuant to the Parties’ agreement during the October 
6, 2023 status conference that BANA would provide an expedited written response in lieu of a deposition 
setting forth the organizational structure of BANA’s prepaid program from 2020 to 2022.  The Parties 
agreed that this approach enabled BANA to provide Plaintiffs with the relevant Prepaid organizational 
structure and reporting lines in the most comprehensive and efficient manner possible.  Accordingly, as 
agreed at the October 6 conference, BANA’s enclosed response identifies: 
 
• 
the groups that had a relevant role with respect to BANA’s EDD prepaid debit card accounts as 
of January 2020, January 2021, and under the new Prepaid structure starting in January 2022;  
• 
the role and responsibilities of each relevant group during the 2020 to 2022 time period; 
• 
the managers and executives and the reporting lines within each relevant group as of January 
2020, January 2021, and under the new Prepaid structure starting in January 2022; 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 212-21     Filed 01/23/24     PageID.2225 
Page 2 of 3

 
 
October 20, 2023 
Page 2 
  
• 
the relevant contractor(s) that each relevant group oversaw, if any, and who the contractor agents 
reported to; and 
• 
the reporting lines up to the highest level executives responsible for overseeing each relevant 
group as of January 2020, January 2021, and under the new Prepaid structure starting in January 
2022. 
The enclosed response has been designated Confidential pursuant to the Stipulated Protective 
Order (the “Protective Order”) entered by the Court on September 24, 2021 (ECF No. 82).  Consistent 
with our representations on our meet and confers, we will make ourselves available for further meet-and-
confer discussions regarding BANA’s prepaid organizational structure to address any follow-up 
questions.  
 
 
Sincerely, 
 
/s/ Matthew L. Riffee 
 
Matthew L. Riffee 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 212-21     Filed 01/23/24     PageID.2226 
Page 3 of 3

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.212.21.pdf
Size
199,432 bytes
SHA-256
9a7980e551c578618a2e2f14bd87fd4098fcc452a3f50813650fa2da4dfb92ca
Our copy
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.212.21.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top