Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Bofa Ca Unemployment In re: Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation — S.D. Cal., No. 21-md-02992 Proposed Order — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 209-3, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)

Court filing

Proposed Order — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 209-3, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)

Summary

A proposed order submitted by Bank of America, N.A. in In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation, Case No. 21-MD-02992-LAB-MSB, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, filed 01/23/24 as Document 209-3 (2 pages). It would grant the bank's motion to preclude additional ESI discovery and bar the plaintiffs from further ESI discovery. It was lodged with a memorandum of points and authorities and declarations of James W. McGarry and Dustin Anderson, and leaves the date and the signature of Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg blank. It is the bank's proposal, not a ruling.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed January 23, 2024 in In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation; one of 1602 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Filed2024-01-23

Cite this document

“Proposed Order — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 209-3, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992).” U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB, Doc. 209-3, filed 2024-01-23. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-bofa-ca-unemployment-casd-709615/2024-01-23-gov-uscourts-casd-709615-209-3-gov-uscourts-casd-709615-209-3/, SHA-256 92625b696c2e0c4a9e75ac9096d8ae87b6866718fcae8824416e6d5eec4d6efa.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

ACTIVE/127262147.1
 
1 
 
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING  MOT. TO  
 
 
CASE NO. 21-MD-02992-LAB-MSB 
PRECLUDE ADD’L ESI DISCOVERY  
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
JAMES W. MCGARRY (admitted pro hac vice) 
JMcGarry@goodwinlaw.com 
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 
100 Northern Avenue 
Boston, MA  02210 
Tel.: +1 617 570 1000 
Fax: +1 617 523 1231 
YVONNE W. CHAN (admitted pro hac vice) 
YChan@jonesday.com 
JONES DAY 
100 High Street 
Boston, MA  02110 
Tel.: +1 617 960 3939 
Fax: +1 617 449 6999 
Attorneys for Defendant  
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA  
SAN DIEGO DIVISION 
IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA 
CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT 
BENEFITS LITIGATION 
Case No. 21-MD-02992-LAB-MSB 
[PROPOSED] ORDER 
GRANTING DEFENDANT BANK 
OF AMERICA N.A.’S MOTION 
TO PRECLUDE ADDITIONAL 
ESI DISCOVERY 
 
Filed/Lodged Concurrently with: 
1. Mem. of Points and Authorities 
in support of Motion to Preclude 
Additional ESI Discovery 
2. Declaration of James W. 
McGarry 
3. Declaration of Dustin Anderson 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 209-3     Filed 01/23/24     PageID.2048     Page
1 of 2

ACTIVE/127262147.1
 
2 
 
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING  MOT. TO  
 
 
CASE NO. 21-MD-02992-LAB-MSB 
PRECLUDE ADD’L ESI DISCOVERY  
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
[PROPOSED] ORDER 
Upon consideration of Defendant Bank Of America, N.A.’s Motion To 
Preclude Additional ESI Discovery, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 
1. 
This Court GRANTS Bank Of America, N.A.’s Motion To Preclude 
Additional ESI Discovery.  Plaintiffs are precluded from further ESI discovery. 
 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
 
 
Dated: ______________, 2024 
 
HON. MICHAEL S. BERG 
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 209-3     Filed 01/23/24     PageID.2049     Page
2 of 2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.209.3.pdf
Size
164,292 bytes
SHA-256
92625b696c2e0c4a9e75ac9096d8ae87b6866718fcae8824416e6d5eec4d6efa
Our copy
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.209.3.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top