Order Granting Joint Motion to Modify Preliminary Injunction Order — Bank of America Unemployment Benefits

Summary

An Order Granting Joint Motion to Modify Preliminary Injunction Order by Hon. Larry A. Burns in In re: Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation, Case No. 21-MD-02992-LAB-MSB in the Southern District of California, dated and filed 06/20/22 as Document 103. It amends the Preliminary Injunction Order entered in Yick v. Bank of America, N.A., Case No. 3:21-cv-00376-VC (N.D. Cal.), by replacing the first sentence of Paragraph 7. As revised, the bank must give written notice to class members whose accounts are blocked solely based upon its Claims Fraud Filter, explaining that it will promptly unblock the account if the class member authenticates their identity. Notice is due by mail within four (4) business days and email within two (2) business days, with longer limits if technology issues or data delays intervene.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

1 
 
 
 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA  
IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA 
CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT 
BENEFITS LITIGATION 
Case No. 21-MD-02992-LAB-MSB 
 
ORDER GRANTING JOINT 
MOTION TO MODIFY 
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 
ORDER [Dkt. 102] 
 
 
 
The Court, having fully considered the Joint Motion to Modify the Preliminary 
Injunction Order and having reviewed the Preliminary Injunction Order entered in 
Yick v. Bank of America, N.A., Case No. 3:21-cv-00376-VC (N.D. Cal.), ECF No. 
103 (the “PI Order”), hereby GRANTS the Motion and ORDERS as follows: 
The first sentence of Paragraph 7 of the PI Order is hereby deleted in its 
entirety and replaced with the following: “Within 10 days of the entry of this Order 
(by mail and email, if available) or after the date of the blocking (by mail, within four 
(4) business days, and email, if available, within two (2) business days), whichever 
is later, Defendant shall give written notice to class members whose accounts are 
blocked solely based upon its Claims Fraud Filter that explains that the Bank will 
promptly unblock their account if the class member authenticates their identity,  
/ / / 
/ / / 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 103     Filed 06/20/22     PageID.826     Page 1
of 2

 
2 
 
 
 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
unless there are technology issues or delays in receiving data regarding blocked 
accounts that prevent Defendant from meeting those deadlines, in which case 
Defendant will give written notice by mail within five (5) business days and email, 
if available, within three (3) business days after the date of the blocking.” 
IT IS SO ORDERED.  
 
 
Dated:  June 20, 2022 
Hon. Larry A. Burns 
United States District judge 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 103     Filed 06/20/22     PageID.827     Page 2
of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.casd.709615.103.0.pdf

Size

242,040 bytes

SHA-256

cc70a5fe45f5b7bb76672ffa21f6804fc94d222d62aa5f49a54208aa6a2e6dd4

Our copy

gov.uscourts.casd.709615.103.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)