Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. Qureshi — U.S. District Court, District of Maryland Text of Proposed Order Preliminary Order of Forfeiture — USA v. Qureshi (Dkt. 16.1)

Court filing

Text of Proposed Order Preliminary Order of Forfeiture — USA v. Qureshi (Dkt. 16.1)

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the District of Maryland
Filed2023-05-16

U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland · No. 1:22-cr-00330-JKB · Doc. 16-1 · 2023-05-16 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

A proposed Preliminary Order of Forfeiture in United States of America v. Ayaz Qureshi, No. 1:22-cr-00330-JKB, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, filed May 16, 2023 as Doc. 16-1. The proposed order recites that an Information filed September 19, 2022 charged the defendant with Wire Fraud Conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 1349, that he pled guilty on October 14, 2022, and that he agreed to a forfeiture money judgment. It would grant the government's motion and enter a forfeiture money judgment of $250,723.00 under 18 U.S.C. §§ 982(a)(2)(A) and (b), 21 U.S.C. § 853(p) and Rule 32.2. It also addresses credit for substitute assets, discovery to locate forfeited property, and the order becoming final at sentencing. The three-page proposed order has a signature line for Hon. Richard D. Bennett and is undated.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 
v. 
 
AYAZ QURESHI, 
 
Defendant 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
 
 
CRIMINAL NO. RDB-22-330 
 
 
 
******* 
 
 
PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE 
WHEREAS, on September 19, 2022, United States of America filed an Information, 
charging AYAZ QURESHI (the “Defendant”) with Wire Fraud Conspiracy, in violation of 18 
U.S.C. § 1349 (Count One); 
WHEREAS, the Information also included a forfeiture allegation, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 
§§ 924(d), 981(a)(1)(C), and 982(a)(2)(A), 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), which 
provided notice that the United States intended to seek forfeiture, upon conviction of the 
Defendant, of the offense alleged in Count One of the Information; 
WHEREAS, on October 14, 2022, the Defendant pled guilty to the offense alleged in 
Count One of the Information; 
WHEREAS, as part of his guilty plea, the Defendant agreed to entry of an order of 
forfeiture, as part of the Defendant’s sentence, to include a money judgment of at least 
$250,723.00 in U.S. currency equal to the value of the property derived from, or otherwise 
involved in, the Defendant’s offense; 
WHEREAS, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 982(a)(2)(A) and (b), 21 U.S.C. § 853(p) and Rule 
32.2(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States is now entitled to a 
Case 1:22-cr-00330-JKB     Document 16-1     Filed 05/16/23     Page 1 of 3

2 
Preliminary Order of Forfeiture imposing a money judgment in the amount of $250,723.00 in 
U.S. currency against the Defendant; 
ACCORDINGLY, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: 
1. 
The United States’ Motion for a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture is GRANTED. 
2. 
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 982(a)(2)(A) and (b), 21 U.S.C. § 853(p) and Rule 32.2 
of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, a forfeiture money judgment in the amount of 
$250,723.00 in U.S. currency is hereby entered against the Defendant. 
3. 
The Defendant shall remain personally liable until the judgment is satisfied.  The 
value of any substitute assets shall be credited toward the satisfaction of the money judgment.  
Likewise, the value of any directly forfeitable property that is forfeited as the proceeds of the 
offense shall also be credited toward the satisfaction of the money judgment, but property 
forfeited as property used to commit or to facilitate the commission of the offense shall not be so 
credited. 
4. 
The United States is authorized to conduct any discovery that might be necessary 
to identify, locate, or dispose of forfeited property, and to resolve any third-party petition, 
pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3), (c)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and 21 U.S.C. 
§ 853(m). 
5. 
Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(6) and (c)(1), no third-party notice or ancillary 
proceeding is required to the extent that this Order consists solely of a money judgment. 
6. 
Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this 
Preliminary Order of Forfeiture will become final as to the Defendant at the time of his 
sentencing, will be part of the Defendant’s criminal sentence, and will be included in the 
criminal judgment entered by this Court against him. 
Case 1:22-cr-00330-JKB     Document 16-1     Filed 05/16/23     Page 2 of 3

3 
7. 
The Court shall retain jurisdiction in this matter for the purpose of enforcing this 
Order, and pursuant to Rule 32.2(e)(1) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, shall amend 
this Order, or enter other orders as necessary, to forfeit additional specific property or substitute 
property when identified. 
                                   
Hon. Richard D. Bennett 
United States District Judge 
Dated:                
 
Case 1:22-cr-00330-JKB     Document 16-1     Filed 05/16/23     Page 3 of 3

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.mdd.519685.16.1.pdf
Size
153,738 bytes
SHA-256
a30e98f1a34d8168bb70bfc0bdae7856dd9002b1dd777e8b70daa7adfa545d10
Our copy
gov.uscourts.mdd.519685.16.1.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top