Court filing
Brady Order as to ARLEN G. Encarnacion — USA v. Encarnacion (Dkt. 9, D.N.J.)
Summary
An order dated December 16, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, filed 12/16/21 as Document 9 in Case 3:23-cr-00794-GC, in United States of America v. Encarnacion, which cites the defendant's initial appearance and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5(f), confirms that the United States must produce all exculpatory evidence to the defendant under Brady v. Maryland and its progeny, and orders production at the appropriate time. It warns that untimely production may bring exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, or sanctions, is signed s/ Leda Dunn Wettre, United States Magistrate Judge, and carries Mag. No. 21-13425.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed December 16, 2021 in USA v. Encarnacion; one of 39 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2021-12-16 |
Cite this document
“Brady Order as to ARLEN G. Encarnacion — USA v. Encarnacion (Dkt. 9, D.N.J.).”
U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, No. 3:23-cr-00794-GC, Doc. 9, filed 2021-12-16. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-arlen-g-encarnacion-njd-534279/2021-12-16-gov-uscourts-njd-534279-9-0-doc-9/
, SHA-256 aa5ba232d3e5cc495458e1fa2a930e731b0341717748f2f7e3f1b407e997c2c6.Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. ARLEN G. ENCARNCION, Defendant. Mag. No. 21-13425 ORDER On this 16th day of December 2021, as set forth on the record during the initial appearance of the defendant in this matter, the Court confirms pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5(f) that the United States is required to produce all exculpatory evidence to the defendant pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny, and it hereby orders it to do so at the appropriate time. Failing to do so in a timely manner may result in consequences, including, but not limited to, exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, or sanctions by the Court. s/ Leda Dunn Wettre Hon. Leda Dunn Wettre United States Magistrate Judge Case 3:23-cr-00794-GC Document 9 Filed 12/16/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 37
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.njd.534279.9.0.pdf
- Size
- 166,039 bytes
- SHA-256
- aa5ba232d3e5cc495458e1fa2a930e731b0341717748f2f7e3f1b407e997c2c6
- Our copy
- gov.uscourts.njd.534279.9.0.pdf
- Original
- PACER (login required)