Court filing
Court Minutes/Order — USA v. Alexandra Acosta (Dkt. 28, S.D. Fla.)
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2024-03-21 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida · No. 0:23-cr-60170-RNS · Doc. 28 · 2024-03-21 · Docket on CourtListener
Summary
Court minutes and order for an arraignment on a superseding indictment held March 21, 2024 before United States Magistrate Judge Panayotta Augustin-Birch in United States v. Alexandra Acosta, No. 0:23-cr-60170-RNS, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, entered as Document 28. The form lists the violations as wire fraud, conspiracy to defraud the United States and false statement to the SBA, with Trevor Christopher Jones as AUSA and Brian Yaacov Silber as defense counsel. It records that the defendant was arraigned, reading of the indictment was waived, a not guilty plea was entered and a jury trial demanded. The court grants the defense ore tenus motion for a Standing Discovery Order, and the form shows a bond set at $50,000 PSB.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Full text
COURT MINUTES/ORDER United States Magistrate Judge Panayotta Augustin‐Birch Courtroom 203D Date: 3/21/2024 Time: 11:00 a.m. Defendant: Alexandra Acosta (B) J#: 81798‐510 Case #: 23‐cr‐60170‐RNS AUSA: Trevor Christopher Jones Attorney: Brian Yaacov Silber, Esq. (Permanent) Violation: WIRE FRAUD; CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES; FALSE STATEMENT TO THE SBA Proceeding: Arraignment on Superseding Indictment CJA Appt: Bond/PTD Held: Yes No Recommended Bond: Bond Set at: $50,000 PSB Co‐signed by: Language: English Surrender and/or do not obtain passports/travel docs Report to PTS as directed/or x’s a week/month by Disposition: phone: x’s a week/month in person Defendant present Defendant arraigned Reading of Indictment Waived Not guilty plea entered Jury trial demanded Standing Discovery Order requested Court grants Defense Ore Tenus Motion for Standing Discovery Order. Random urine testing by Pretrial Services Treatment as deemed necessary Refrain from excessive use of alcohol Participate in mental health assessment & treatment Maintain or seek full‐time employment/education No contact with victims/witnesses No firearms Not to encumber property May not visit transportation establishments Home Confinement/Electronic Monitoring and/or Curfew pm am, paid by Allowances: Medical needs, court appearances, attorney visits, religious, employment Travel extended to: Other: NEXT COURT APPEARANCE Date: Time: Judge: Place: Report RE Counsel: PTD/Bond Hearing: Prelim/Arraign or Removal: Status Conference RE: D.A.R. 10:59:39 Time in Court: 5 minutes CHECK IF APPLICABLE: ____For the reasons stated by counsel for the Defendant and finding that the ends of justice served by granting the ore tenus motion for continuance to hire counsel outweigh the best interests of the public & the Defendant in a Speedy Trial, the Court finds that the period of time from today, through and including _____, shall be deemed excludable in accordance with the provisions of the Speedy Trial Act, l8 USC 3161 et seq.. Case 0:23-cr-60170-RNS Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/21/2024 Page 1 of 1
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.flsd.654235.28.0.pdf
- Size
- 126,495 bytes
- SHA-256
- 131413cd6a0b4896ac9e63a8e31d686a4e98130f38c1867313c2325cd338b299
- Original
- PACER (login required)