Court filing
Exhibit A — USA v. RIVERA et al (Dkt. 50.2)
Summary
Exhibit A, Document 50-2, filed 12/02/24 under Case 1:24-cr-00267-KMW in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey: a letter dated December 2, 2024 from Shane Herrmann of Cornerstone Discovery to Troy Archie, regarding 24-823 USA v. RIVERA et al (Ponzo, Wessels). The letter describes the data received and the time it took to analyze and prepare it, stating that data from multiple devices was provided in different formats, including iOS device backups and iCloud information from Apple Inc. It states that a large zip file split into 95 parts totaling 2.08 TB had to be copied into one folder to open, that over 3.41 TB of encrypted archive files were examined and found to be duplicates, and that Cornerstone received just over 10 terabytes of data in total. It states that after over a month of processing the review platform holds under 3 TB.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed December 2, 2024 in USA v. RIVERA et al; one of 163 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2024-12-02 |
Cite this document
“Exhibit A — USA v. RIVERA et al (Dkt. 50.2).”
U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, No. 1:24-cr-00267-KMW, Doc. 50-2, filed 2024-12-02. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-adrienne-ponzo-njd-546707/2024-12-02-gov-uscourts-njd-546707-50-2-doc-50-2/
, SHA-256 82ad2a1626e5604339dc372e552b3659319831095723a18f02f6f7e145dab4ff.Full text
EXHIBIT A Case 1:24-cr-00267-KMW Document 50-2 Filed 12/02/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 314 4775 League Island Boulevard | Philadelphia, PA 19112 (P) 267.639.6900 | www.cornerstonediscovery.com P a g e 1 | 2 December 2, 2024 Troy Archie 21 Route 130 South Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Re: 24-823 USA v. RIVERA et al (Ponzo, Wessels) Mr. Archie, As discussed, this letter is to describe data received for the above-mentioned case, and the time it took to analyze and prepare the data. Upon initial review, we found that data from multiple devices was generated in different formats. We needed to spend time to examine this more to account for any duplication. On top of this we received standard files, along with a Relativity export in single page tiff format that also needed to be quality checked, processed and loaded to our review platform for easy review. Cornerstone Discovery received data from multiple devices in various formats. Some data was provided by Apple Inc. Apple provided iOS device backup(s) and iCloud information. This data is made up of images and records from several electronic devices linked to the Apple IDs, lt@iaminfluence and queenslogisticsde@gmail. Cornerstone located UFDRs, Axiom reports, and archive files of the above- mentioned accounts as well. As with the other data mentioned, Cornerstone Discovery processed this data, filtered, and removed duplicates to help reviewers save time by eliminating unnecessary or repetitive information. In addition to the duplication in different formats, we found that there was a large zip file split into 95 parts totaling 2.08 TB. The problem with how this was provided is that the splits of the zip were dispersed across several folders. This caused errors when trying to analyze the contents of the split zip. The 95 parts were saved in different locations on the provided drives. When provided this way the split Case 1:24-cr-00267-KMW Document 50-2 Filed 12/02/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 315 4775 League Island Boulevard | Philadelphia, PA 19112 (P) 267.639.6900 | www.cornerstonediscovery.com P a g e 2 | 2 zip did not open properly. The 2.08 TB of data had to be copied locally into one folder for the split zip to open properly. This added additional time to copy, and quality check the contents. Cornerstone Discovery also received over 3.41 TB of encrypted archive files, that our team examined and determined to be duplicates of provided data in zip format. Our team needed to take time to confirm that this was duplicative to avoid increasing the amount of time needed to review this data. In total Cornerstone received just over 10 terabytes of data. After spending over a month of processing, deduplication, quality checking data, and loading data for a timely review, we have a platform with under 3 TB. The data that was sent needed sufficient time to properly handle and get ready for review. If there are additional documents that can point to why specific devices were produced, and the data from those devices that are of key importance, that could help with the review as well. Sincerely, Shane Herrmann Cornerstone Discovery Case 1:24-cr-00267-KMW Document 50-2 Filed 12/02/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID: 316
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.njd.546707.50.2.pdf
- Size
- 728,806 bytes
- SHA-256
- 82ad2a1626e5604339dc372e552b3659319831095723a18f02f6f7e145dab4ff
- Our copy
- gov.uscourts.njd.546707.50.2.pdf
- Original
- PACER (login required)