Court filing
Ponzo's Consent Motion for Second Extension of Pre-Trial Motion Schedule — USA v. Rivera et al. (PONZO) (D.N.J. No. 1:23-mj-02053)
Filed September 6, 2024 in USA v. Rivera et al. (PONZO); one of 67 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2024-09-06 |
U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey · No. 1:24-cr-00267-KMW · Doc. 42 · 2024-09-06 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
:
:
Crim. No. 24-267 (KMW)
Plaintiff,
:
:
vs.
:
:
ADRIENNE PONZO, et al.
:
CONSENT MOTION FOR
:
MODIFICATION OF
:
PRE TRIAL MOTION SCHEDULE
Defendant. :
Application is hereby made for an Order extending time within which Defendant
Adrienne Ponzo may file Pretrial Motions and extending dates requiring subsequent responses,
replies, oral argument, and final pretrial conference by two months and it is represented that:
1. One previous extension has been obtained;
2. The current time to file pretrial motions expires on September 13, 2024;
3. Undersigned counsel for Adrienne Ponzo and Mark Catanzaro, Esq. for James
Wessels are currently waiting budget approval from the Third Circuit for ancillary services
from Cornerstone Legal Consultants to host the large volume of discovery turned over by the
Government and to put it in an organized and searchable formant or their legal trial cloud
based service Junto. This program has been used by CJA counsel before in other complex and
large volume discovery cases and will decrease counsel’s time in searching, organizing and
digitizing discovery for motion practice and for trial. To date we do not have the program as
Counsel and Cornerstone is awaiting budget approval. Counsel needs the program to
effectively review discovery for pre-trial motion practice.
Case 1:24-cr-00267-KMW Document 42 Filed 09/06/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 251
4. Defense Counsel for co-defendants James Wessels – Mark Catanzaro, Esq. and Eric
Rivera – Philip L. Reizenstein, Esq. – have indicated they wish to join this Application for
Extension of Time for Deadlines in Scheduling Order (DE 41) by two months; and
5. Counsel for the United States, AUSA Daniel Friedman, has indicated he has no
objection to this application
6. Wherefore it is respectfully requested that the Court grant the within request for
addition time to file motions, responses and a hearing for oral argument on said motions if
necessary.
Dated: September 6, 2024
/s/ Troy A. Archie
TROY A. ARCHIE, ESQUIRE
Case 1:24-cr-00267-KMW Document 42 Filed 09/06/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 252File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.njd.546707.42.0.pdf
- Size
- 149,610 bytes
- SHA-256
- 19babff1db969b76c726df4768cec1ef28883f16140a52abfd9d541d487992e1
- Our copy
- gov.uscourts.njd.546707.42.0.pdf
- Original
- PACER (login required)