Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Fountainhead SBF, LLC v. OTO Analytics, Inc. d/b/a Womply Order Granting Motion to Determine Confidentiality of Court Records — Fountainhead v. W…

Court filing

Order Granting Motion to Determine Confidentiality of Court Records — Fountainhead v. Womply

Filed October 14, 2021 in Fountainhead v. Oto Analytics Womply; one of 8 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtCircuit Court of the 18th Judicial Circuit, Seminole County, Florida — Civil Division
Filed2021-10-14

Full text

Filing # 136543406 E-Filed 10/14/2021 11:10:50 AM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA

FOUNTAINHEAD SBF,
Plaintiff, CIVIL DIVISION

V.

OTO ANALYTICS, INC. d/b/a WOMPLY, CASE NO.: 2021-CA-002143

Defendant.

Nem Nee Nee Ne Ne ee ee ee ee ee ee”

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DETERMINE
CONFIDENTIALITY OF COURT RECORDS

THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Determine
Confidentiality of Court Records (the “Motion”), and the Court having reviewed the Motion,
recognizing that neither party objects to the entry of this Order, and being otherwise fully
advised, hereby ORDERS AND ADJUDGES:

1. The Motion is GRANTED.

2. This is a civil dispute arising out of an alleged breach of a PPP Loan Referral
Agreement (the “Agreement”) entered into between Plaintiff, FOUNTAINHEAD SBF
(“Plaintiff” or “Fountainhead”), and Defendant, OTO ANALYTICS, INC. d/b/a WOMPLY
(“Defendant” or “Womply”).

3. As set forth in the Motion, the Agreement incorporates the terms of the Womply
Master Development Agreement, which provides for the confidentiality of certain of Womply’s
business information, including its pricing information.

4. The Agreement is identified as Exhibit 1 to Plaintiff’s Complaint. Further, a

Notice of Termination is identified as Exhibit 2 to Plaintiff’s Complaint. Both the Agreement

*#%* E-FILED: GRANT MALOY, CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT SEMINOLE COUNTY, FL 10/14/2021 11:10:49 AM.***#*

and the Notice of Termination are attached to Plaintiff’s Notice of Confidential Information
Within Court Filing, which was filed on August 27, 2021.

5. The Agreement and Notice of Termination both contain Womply’s confidential
and proprietary pricing information. As such, the Agreement and Notice of Termination are
confidential pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420(c)(9)(A)(ii), which
provides that documents containing confidential business information and trade secrets shall be
considered confidential and exempt from public disclosure when filed in the Court records.

6. Womply maintains the Agreement, the Notice of Termination, and the pricing
information detailed therein, as proprietary and non-public, and confidentiality is required in
order to maintain trade secrets and to avoid unfair disadvantage to Womply in revealing to the

public, competitors or other third parties, Womply’s proprietary information.

7. Neither party’s name shall be deemed confidential.

8. The progress docket or similar records generated in this case need not be deemed
confidential.

9. The entire Agreement and the entire Notice of Termination (Exhibits 1 and 2 to

Plaintiff’s Complaint), which are attached to Plaintiff’s Notice of Confidential Information
Within Court Filing, shall be deemed confidential and maintained as confidential on the docket.
10. ‘The parties to this action shall be permitted to view the confidential information.
11. The Court finds that: (i) the degree, duration, and manner of confidentiality
ordered are no broader than necessary to protect the interests set forth in subdivision (c) of
Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420; and (ii) no less restrictive measures are available

to protect the interests set forth herein.

12. ‘The clerk of the court is directed to publish this Order in accordance with

subdivision (e)(4) of Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Sanford, Seminole County, Florida this
Thursday, October 14, 2021

59-2021-CA-002143 10/14/2021 11:01:20 AM

=a

/
Susan Stacy, Circuit Judge U
59-2021 -CA-002143 10/14/2021 11:01:20 AM

CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by US
MAIL/Email or eportal to the following on Thursday, October 14, 2021

ERIC C REED DANIEL T STABILE
ereed@shutts.com dstabile@shutts.com
TMartin@shutts.com etorres@shutts.com
Emily Joy Lang

elang@foley.com

dburgos@foley.com

kwarren@foley.com

59-2021-CA-002143 10/14/2021 11:09:43 AM

Coot. Tes?

Anne Brezina, Judicial assistant C7
59-2021-CA-002143 10/14/2021 11:09:43 AM



File and source

File
CASE_FLSEM18_2021CA002143_Fountainhead-v-Oto-Womply_doc21_ORDER-CONFIDENTIALITY_2021-10-14.pdf
Size
147,685 bytes
SHA-256
426d2faafb3d69f4b13d9d4cc1bbaeaed0d4ae99cfd2dce999cecf0dbb30cd37
Our copy
CASE_FLSEM18_2021CA002143_Fountainhead-v-Oto-Womply_doc21_ORDER-CONFIDENTIALITY_2021-10-14.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top