Arizona House of Representatives Committee on Commerce — Report of Regular Meeting, March 23, 2021 (Fifty-fifth Legislature, First Regular Session)

Summary

Minutes and attachments for the regular meeting of the Arizona House of Representatives Committee on Commerce held Tuesday, March 23, 2021, in the Fifty-fifth Legislature, First Regular Session, chaired by Jeff Weninger. The minutes record SB1268 passed as amended 6-4-0-0, SB1353 passed as amended with a strike-everything amendment 9-0-0-1, SB1215 and SB1063 given do-pass recommendations 6-4-0-0, SB1230 approved 10-0-0-0, and SB1064 and SB1293 held. The agenda states the meeting was held via teleconference software. A Request to Speak report lists organizations and members of the public registering support or opposition on each bill. The document closes with the analysis of SB 1230 on limited liability companies and roll call votes for SB 1230, SB 1064 and SB 1293.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-fifth Legislature - First Regular Session

COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE

Report of Regular Meeting
Tuesday, March 23, 2021
House Hearing Room 3 -- 2:00 P.M.

Cc 3:04 PM. MINUTES RECEIVED
Convened CHIEF CLERK'S OFFICE

Recessed

Reconyened 3 ~ Qt [- 2 |

Adjourned 4:30 P.M.

Members Present Members Absent
Mr, Chaplik

Mr. Cook

Mr. Espinoza

Mrs. Fernandez

Mr. Meza

Ms. Nutt

Ms. Powers Hannley

Mr. Wilmeth

Mr. Kaiser, Vice-Chairman
Mr. Weninger, Chairman

Agenda
Original Agenda — Attachment |

Request to Speak
Report — Attachment 2

Committee Attendance
Report — Attachment 3

Committee Action
Bill Action Vote Attachments

SB1268 DPA 6-4-0-0 4, 5,6
SB1353. DPA/SE 9-0-0-1 7, 8,9, 10
SB1215 DP 6-4-0-0 li, 12
SBi1S6 = DP 8-2-0-0 13, 14
SB1063. DP 6-4-0-0 15, 16
SB1230 DP 10-0-0-0 17, 18
SB1064 HELD 19
SB1293. HELD 20

Iris McMahon, Committee Secretary
March 24, 2021

(Original attachments on file in the Office of the Chief Clerk; video archives available at
http:/Avww.azleg.gov)

COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE
March 23, 2021

REVISED - 3/19/21 REVISED - 3/19/21 REVISED - 3/19/21

ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES _, ;
Fifiy-fifth Legislature - First Regular Session Lonvtened a AO fom

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA hogutirred  hid0 PM

COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE

DATE Tuesday, March 23, 202! ROOM HHR3 TIME 2:00 P.M.

This meeting will be held via teleconference software. Members of the public may access a livestream of the meeting here:
https://Avww.azlee.gov/videoplayer/2clientID=636 1 162879&event]ID=202 1031108

Members:

Mr. Chaplik Mr. Meza Mr, Wilmeth
Mr. Cook Ms. Nutt Mr. Kaiser, Vice-Chairman
Mr. Espinoza Ms. Powers Hannley Mr. Weninger, Chairman
Mrs. Fernandez
Bills Short Title Strike Everything Title
-
5 SBi063 dD administrative review of agency decisions

(Mesnard)
G-4H-0- & COM, RULES

*SB1064 za E LD contractor license numbers; advertising; exception
(Mesnard)
COM, RULES

H SB1156 dD forfeiture of office; technical correction(now: solid
waste; advanced recycling facilities)

‘2 Q-o- o (Mesnard)
————— COM, RULES

3 SB1215 D f liquor; sales; delivery; identification information
(Borrelli)

b- 4-0 ~0Q COM, RULES

6  $B1230 D {7 __ limited liability companies
(Pace)
/0 - 0-0-0 COM, RULES

Page 1 of 2
Attachment | :

Bills Short Tifle Strike Everything Tifle

] SB1268 DFA labor organizations; fiduciary guidelines;
_ tL disclosure

Petersen
b-Ho-9 Cen
———— COM, RULES

SB1293 H in LD refrigerated product display; retailers

(Shope)
COM, RULES
SB1353 D id A S\anti-rabies vaccination; rabies titer S/E: terminally ill patients; compounding;
A (Barto) pharmacy

G. Ove- | LARA w/d, COM, RULES

* On previous agenda

ORDER OF BILLS TO BE SET BY THE CHAIRMAN

Pursuant to Committee Rule (2). Any person desiring to be heard concerning legislation remotely shall email that request to
(HouseCOM@azleg. gov) at least 24 hours, excluding weekends and holidays, in advance of committee, if practicable. The request must
state the bill the person desires fo present arguments upon, and whom the person represents. Timely requests will receive a response that
includes meeting access information to participate in the committee remotely. Sharing meeting access information with unauthorized
users may result in being prohibited to participate remotely in future legislative hearings. The request to participate remotely via
teleconference shall be in addition to requesting to speak via the Request to Speak system
(https://apps.azleg.gov/requesttospeak/topicsearch). Persons desiring to testify remotely shall indicate that the participation is remote

within the comments of the Request to Speak system.

DF
03/19/2021

People with disabilities may request reasonable accommodations such as interpreters, alternative formats, or
assistance with physical accessibility, If you require accommodations, please contact the Chief Clerk's Office at

(602) 926-3032 or through Arizona Relay Service 7-1-1.

Page 2 of 2

Information Registered on the Request to Speak System

House Commerce (3/23/2021)

$B1268, labor organizations; fiduciary quidelines; disclosure

Testified in support:
Jack Biltis, representing self

Testified as opposed:
Michael Colletto, COMMUNITY HORIZONS; Fred Yamashita, Arizona AFL-CIO; Dawn Schumann, TEAMSTERS LOCAL

UNION 104; Christian Bearden, AZ STATE BLDG & CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL; Joshua Wells, representing

self

Support:

Jonathan Paton, Jack Biltis

Oppose:
Don Isaacson, FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE (AZ STATE LODGE}; Rivko Knox, representing self; Judith Robbins,

representing self; Sheila Ogea, representing self; Kenneth Bierman, representing self; Dianne Post, representing
self; Kathleen Pettycrew, representing self; Marvin Mccollum, representing self; Becky Sayler, representing self;
Sharon Lee, representing self; Mary Fortney, representing self; Greer Warren, representing self; Shannon Schell, AZ
EDUCATION ASSN; Kathleen Dubbs, representing self; Katie Rice, representing self; Jean Meconi, representing self;
Jeff Hawkins, ARIZONA STATE TROOPERS ASSOCIATION; Christine McLachlan-Comer, representing self; Hannah
Williams, representing self; Mike Bieleckl, MARICOPA COMMUNITY COLLEGES FACULTY ASSOCIATION; Aaron Essif,

representing self; Javier Soto, representing self

All Comments:

Jack Biltis, Self: SB1268 protects employees by giving union members the same transparency that non-union
employers have been providing for decades.; Michael Colletto, COMMUNITY HORIZONS: | would like to testify
remotely; Dawn Schumann, TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION 104: On behalf of 8,600 plus members in Arizona, this bill is
redundant and will try and break up the collective bargaining unit as a whole. This anti labor bill is being pushed by
an out of state business person.; Rivko Knox, Self: Details aside, this is in its essence an anti union bill & strong
unions helped create our most economically positive & just period in the US.; Kathleen Dubbs, Self: this is an anti-
union ploy; Jeff Hawkins, ARIZONA STATE TROOPERS ASSOCIATION: In opposition to 1268 until an agreed-upon
amendment is introduced.; Mike Bielecki, MARICOPA COMMUNITY COLLEGES FACULTY ASSOCIATION: This bill is
unnecessary and punitive towards organizations whose membership has the right to leave if they are not satisfied
with the manner of the employee organization's management.; Aaron Essif, Self: This is just Anti-Union.; Javier
Soto, Self: There is no need for more government to get involved with private business. Any republican Senator or
Legislator that is in favor of this bill ,would be going against any conservative ideology they represent.

Attachment wl a

$B1353, anti-rabies vaccination; rabies titer

Testified in support:
Kurt Altman, (AHIMA) Arizona Homeopathic And Integrated Medicine Association, Envita/Vertisis Custom

Pharmacy; Sandra Yozipovic, representing self; John Oertle, representing self; Angela Derosa, representing self

Support:
Dianne McCallister, Az Independent Pharmacists Coalition, AZ PHARMACY ASSOCIATION; Lisa Platt, representing

self

Neutral:
Jon Amores, AZ MEDICAL ASSN

All Comments:
Sandra Yozipovic, Self: Over the past 20 years the lives of my father, sister, sister in law and myself have all been

saved due to personalized compounded medicine.; Lisa Platt, Self: | am in favor of pharmacy compounding - the
striker amendment to enable the intent of SB 1418.; John Oertle, Self: i am the medical director of a clinic with 14
physicians all using these life saving and improving 503a compounded medications. | am also the Chief Medical
Officer of a large Healthcare Sharing Ministry who approves access to these medications.,; Jon Amores, AZ
MEDICAL ASSN: ArMA is neutral on the bill / striker with the committee amendment

SB1215, liquor: sales: delivery; identification information

Testified in support:
Michelle Ahimer, AZ RETAILERS ASSN; Cheyenne Walsh, SHIPT, iNC.

Testified as neutral:
Tom Farley, Wine Spirits Wholesalers Association Of Arizona

Testified as opposed:
Tony Bradley, President and CEO, Arizona Trucking Association; Steve Barclay, BEER & WINE DISTRIBUTORS OF

ARIZONA

Support:
Courtney Coolidge, AZ CHAMBER OF COMMERCE; Kent Wilson, TARGET CORPORATION

Neutral:
Dr Garrison Ellam, representing self

All Comments:
Michelle Ahlmer, AZ RETAILERS ASSN: I have a bill in Senate Approps at the same time but | will try to be in

Commerce as well.

$B1156, forfeiture of office; technical correction (NOW: solid waste:

Support:
Becky Hill, AMERICAN CHEMISTRY COUNCIL; Courtney Coolidge, AZ CHAMBER OF COMMERCE; Prapti Muhuri,

representing self

Oppose:

Nancy Pfafflin, representing self; Harry Lumley, representing self; howard johnson, representing self; Betty
Bengtson, representing self; Rebecca Smith Gross, representing self; Peggie Jo Vincent, representing self; Kevin
Brown, representing self; Beverly Janowitz-Price, representing self; Kenneth Bierman, representing self; Mary Ann
Graffagnino, representing self; Alisa McMahon, representing self; Michael Fiflis, representing self; Doug Arnold,
representing self; Dianne Post, representing seif; elizabeth Michele Edson, representing self; Diane E. Brown, AZ
PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP (AZ PIRG); Karen Cusano, representing self; Meg Weesner, representing self;
Bettina Bickel, representing self; Susan Arnold, representing self; Elizabeth Kelchner, representing self; Barbara
Hutchinson, representing self; Becky Sayler, representing self; Jackie Rich, representing self; Dean Roskosz,
representing self; Kathy Fraser, representing self; Linda Bentley, representing self; Kathryn Pensinger, representing
self; Don Bentley, representing self; Patricia Mentz, representing self; Cathy Della Penta, representing self; Virginia
Dotson, representing self; Jim Moran, representing self; Martha O'Connor, representing self; Kathleen Dubbs,
representing self; Nancy Santori, representing self; Vivian Harte, representing self; Steve Gorman-Hackstadt,
representing self; Dorothy Reed-inman, representing self; Carolyn Shafer, representing self; Margaret Owen,
representing self; Diane Hermann, representing self; Tom Hermann, representing self; Martha Pearce,
representing self; Cynthia Wagner, representing self; Barbara Hollway, representing self; Linda Paul, representing
self; Marjorie Shavlik, representing self; Paula Schiusberg, representing self; Karen Fasimpaur, representing self;
Peter Bengston, representing self; Sandy Bahr, Sierra Club - Grand Canyon Chapter

All Comments:
Prapti Muhuti, Self: | am available to answer any technical questions re the bill if necessary.; Alisa McMahon, Self:

There is no reason to exempt this “advanced recycling” from environmental regulations. It does not make sense to
create more pollution in furtherance of an environmental goal.; Michael Fiflis, Self: There is no reason to exempt
this “advanced recycling.” It will create a large amount of pollution to further an environmental goal.; Jackie Rich,
Self: this would exempt dangerous wastes from regulation and give them grants.; Virginia Dotson, Self: This would
greenlight pollution,; Kathteen Dubbs, Self: We need more regulations, not less; Marjorie Shavlik, Self: This is not
"advanced recycling". Jt continues to burn fossil fuels as well as pyrolysis. It also exempts these plastics processes
from the definition of solid waste so that they are more lightly regulated.; Paula Schlusberg, Self: If anything, these
new processes should have more oversight, not less, until fully tested and evaluated.; Karen Fasimpaur, Self: This is
not really “advanced recycling” and part of a “circular economy,” but instead promotes the production and

burning of fossil fuels.

$B1063, administrative review of agency decisions

Support:
Paul Avelar, INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE AZ CHAPTER
Oppose:

Nancy Pfafflin, representing self; Rivko Knox, representing self; Judith Simons, representing self; Harry Lumley,
representing self; howard johnson, representing self; Betty Bengtson, representing self; Rebecca Smith Gross,
representing self; Peggie Jo Vincent, representing self; Kevin Brown, representing self; Sheila Ogea, representing
self; Beverly Janowitz-Price, representing self; Eve Shapiro, representing self; Kenneth Bierman, representing self;
Mary Ann Graffagnino, representing self; Alisa McMahon, representing self; Michael Fiflis, representing self; Doug
Arnold , representing self; Dianne Post, representing self; elizabeth Michele Edson, representing self; Kathleen
Pattycrew, representing self; Karen Cusano, representing self; Meg Weesner, representing self; Bettina Bickel,
representing self; Susan Arnold, representing self; Elizabeth Kelchner, representing self; Barbara Hutchinson,
representing self; Becky Sayler, representing self; Jackie Rich, representing self; Sharon Lee, representing self;

Dean Roskosz, representing self; Kathy Fraser, representing self; Linda Bentley, representing self; Peggy Klemp,
representing self; Don Bentley, representing self; Patricia Mentz, representing self; Cathy Della Penta, representing
self; Virginia Dotson, representing self; Jim Moran, representing self; Martha O'Connor, representing self; Kathleen
Dubbs, representing self; Nancy Santori, representing self; Vivian Harte, representing self; Steve Gorman-Hackstadt,
representing self; Dorothy Reed-Inman, representing self; Carolyn Shafer, representing self; Margaret Owen,
representing self; Diane Hermann, representing self; Tom Hermann, representing self; Martha Pearce,

representing self; Jean Meconi, representing self; Cynthia Wagner, representing self; Barbara Hollway,

representing self; Christine McLachlan-Comer, representing self; Paula Schlusberg, representing self; Sharon Regen,

representing self

All Comments:

Paul Avelar, INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE AZ CHAPTER: Regulatory boards can impose fines and order people to stop
working. Due process and separation of powers at least requires a fair day in court before you can be fined and put
out of work.; Rivko Knox, Self: By eliminating precedent & prior decisions, the administrative review process will
become very chaotic & be in violation of the ‘rule of law.’ Who ts backing this and why??; Alisa McMahon, Self:
This bill would enmesh the court dockets in administrative issues. Agencies are far more famifiar with the matters
in front of them than the courts will be.; Michael Fiflis, Self: This bill would upset decades of administrative law
precedent, tie up the courts in administrative issues, require expanding the courts to handle the infiux of cases,
and eat up taxpayer dollars for issues the agencies know far better than the courts; Kathleen Dubbs, Self: This is a

violation of the rule of law

§B1230, limited liability companies

Support:
Janna Day, STATE BAR OF AZ; Jen Springman, GREATER PHOENIX CHAMBER OF COMMERCE; Scott DeWald,

representing self

All Comments:
Scott DeWald, Self: | am happy to answer questions on the bill. | participated in the State Bar committee that

drafted this clean-up of the LLC Act. No need to testify if there are no questions.

$B1293, refrigerated product display; retailers

Support:
Cheyenne Walsh, SAZERAC COMPANY, INC.; Michelle AhImer, AZ RETAILERS ASSN

Oppose:
Camila Alarcon, ARIZONA CRAFT BREWERS GUILD; Barbara Meaney, Arizona Wine Growers Association; Ryan

Whitten, representing self; Brian Vance, representing self; Adam Schmeichel, representing self; Chris Wheeler,
representing self; erika button, representing self; Andrew Bauman, representing self; Alejandro Fontes,
representing self; Adam Wojcik, representing self; Nicholas Kelley, representing self; Matt Brown, representing
self; Josh Johnson, representing self; Natalie Fredrickson, representing self; Emily McMenemy, representing self;
Taylor Carter, representing self; Marshall Norris, representing self; Jeff Herbert, representing self; Rob Fullmer,
ARIZONA CRAFT BREWERS GUILD; Dr Garrison Ellam, representing self; Steve Barclay, BEER & WINE DISTRIBUTORS

OF ARIZONA; Scott Hendrix, representing self

All Comments:
Ryan Whitten, Self: This will give an unfair advantage to large, out of state beer producers and push small, locally

owned breweries out of establishments.; Brian Vance, Self: Hello, | own a microbrewery in district 9, and { strongly
oppose 1293. It will completely disable smaller breweries to compete with the ultra-large companies in the
distribution arena.; Adam Schmeichel, Self: This would all for an unfair advantage to large producers, that my
company coutd not afford to compete with.; Chris Wheeler, Self: This bill effectively eliminates the ability for a
small brewery to complete on a level playing field with large manufacturers which is bad for employers and
employees alike. Prison Hill Brewing Co, my small brewery, would never be able to expand.; Andrew Bauman, Self:
This measure would put small local businesses at an incredible disadvantage to large multi-national companies. My
brewery could never afford to provide inducements to retailers such as refrigerated displays, while “the big guys”
could do so easily.; Alejandro Fontes, Self: This bill enables a new form of “pay-to-play" that benefits the biggest
suppliers, like Sazerac. This will harm Arizona producers and creates a loophole that Title 4 tries to prevent,
allowing this slotting fee disguised as a "sold" fridge; Adam Wojcik, Self: Right now, customers choose my beers
because of flavor and quality, and customer preference. | cannot compete by spending as much as $300 per
retailer and { am afraid that my beers won't be selected by bars/stores because | am unable to provide them;
Nicholas Kelley, Self: As the owner of Lake Pleasant Brewing in District 15, §B1293 will work against us as we start
to build our brand and grow our business. We cannot compete by spending as much as $300 per retailer especially
coming off the heels of a pandemic.; Matt Brown, Seif: Tombstone Brewing Company; Josh Johnson, Self: Rep
David Cook | own a brewery in district 8. | strongly oppose 1293. | can not afford to furnish restaurants and bars
like the large commercialized distributors and breweries can. This bill would be crushing for my small independent
business.; Natalie Fredrickson, Self: | represent myself, Natalie Fredrickson. | own Electric Brewing in Bisbee,
Arizona in Becky Nutt's District 14 and | am strongly against SB1293. We opened in August in the midst of the
pandemic and have already been struggling to make ends meet.; Emily McMenemy, Self: My family owns and
operates Front Pourch Brewing. We are barely 1.5 years old. This Bill would add additional strain to our small
business by providing an advantage to bigger companies with more expendable resources. Thank you for your
consideration.; Taylor Carter, Self: My name is Taylor Carter and | am one of the owners of FireTruck Brewing
Company in Tucson Arizona, owned and operated by firefighters. This bill gives an unfair advantage of pay-for-play.
it only benefits the giant beer / distribution companies.; Marshall Norris, Self: This bill does not consider small
business, and definitely does not consider Arizona small business. Now is not the time to implement legislation
that favors large companies. This damages small craft brewerles.; Jeff Herbert, Self: | run a small business and this
bill would make it more challenging to compete with large businesses who are comfortable with the not so grey
area of “Pay to Play.” 1 the owner of Superstition Meadery and amin LD 1 and LD 27

$B1064, contractor license numbers; advertising; exception

Suppoit:
Jen Springman, GREATER PHOENIX CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

Neutral:
Spencer Kamps, HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL AZ

ARIZONA STATE LEGISLATURE
Fifty-fifth Legislature - First Regular Session

COMMITTEE ATTENDANCE RECORD

COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE
CHAIRMAN: Jeff Weninger VICE-CHAIRMAN: _ Steve Kaiser
DATE . 03/09/21] 3/) €121| 3/2121 21 21
CONVENED A 9B pM; 05M! 4, 9 pm om m
RECESSED
RECONVENED .
ADJOURNED Biel onl 4s olen 4:20
MEMBERS
Chaplik VA V J
Cook Y J VA
Espinoza Yo / ; Sf
Fernandez Y J v
Meza vv / J
Nutt J / | v
Powers Hannley “4 J /
Wilmeth 4 / /
Kaiser, Vice-Chairman 4 ; / /-
Weninger, Chairman Vv 4 /
V¥ Present --- Absent exc Excused

Attachment_. 3

ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-fifth Legislature

First Regular Session

Senate: COM DP 5-4-0-0 [3 Read 16-14-0-0

ga a
SB 1268: labor organizations; fiduciary guidelines; disclosure
Sponsor: Senator Petersen, LD 12
Committee on Commerce

Overview
Subjects labor organizations that collect benefit monies or union dues to certain fiduciary

guidelines,

History

Pursuant to the Arizona State Constitution, Article 25 and A.R.S. § 23-1302, no person shall be
denied the opportunity to obtain or retain employment because of non-membership in a labor
organization, nor shall they be excluded, by way of agreement, from employment or the
continuation of employment by any entity because of non-membership.

The federal Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act requires labor organizations file a
financial report annually that is signed by its president and treasurer. The annual report must be

filed with the U.S. Secretary of Labor and must include:

4) Assets and liabilities and the beginning and end of the fiscal year;

2) Any receipts and sources thereof;
3) Salary, allowances and other direct or indirect disbursement to each officer and employee

receiving more than $10,000 from the labor organization and any affiliated organization;
4) Loans greater than $250 made to an officer, employee or member;
5) Loans made to a business enterprise; and
6) Other disbursements.

A labor organization must make the required information available to ail members (29 _ U.S.C.
§ 431).

Provisions

Labor Organizations; Fiduciary Guidelines (Sec. 1)

4. Subjects a labor organization that collects benefit monies or union dues to fiduciary guidelines
similar to those required by employers or third-party administrators providing benefits to
employees, including the following:

a) Requires the labor organization to annually disclose specified information to its members
and its members’ employers;
i. Provides further requirements for the annual disclosure.

b) Requires the labor organization benefit plan to use generally accepted accounting
principles to account for benefit funds;

c) Permit a member of a labor organization to obtain health and welfare, pension, vacation,
sick or holiday benefits of the member's choosing instead of the benefits offered by the

labor organization;
i. Asserts the member has ultimate discretion in choosing benefits.

1 Prop 105 (45 votes) (1 Prop 108 (40 votes) (] Emergency (40 votes) OU Fiscal Note

SB 1268

initials _ Page 1 Commerce

Attachment uf

Initials _

i. Provides requirements for withhold payments based on the members choice.

d) Directs any fringe benefit contributions that a union receives that are in excess of the costs
the union incurs with respect to that fringe benefit to, within 75 days after the end of the
year: 1) be refunded to the employee, or 2) be deposited into a defined contribution pian;

e) Prohibits a labor organization from accepting dues or benefits contributions for employees
that have not voluntarily joined the labor organization;

f) Grants any resident of this state standing in court against the labor organization for
moneys that are paid to a labor organization on behalf of the resident without consent;

g) Prevents, without affirmative written consent, an individual from being considered as a
member of a labor organization or have any union dues or benefits withheld; and

h) Specifies an employee or an employer may not pay any penalty or fee related to abstention
or resignation from labor organization membership.

. Specifies the fiduciary guidelines apply to any labor organization that is collecting benefit
monies or union dues on behalf of a resident or an employer that is domiciled within Arizona.

. Specifies the fiduciary guidelines do not apply to employees working for the state, a political
subdivision of the state or federal governments.

_ Asserts a member or employer is not obligated to contribute union dues or monies for training
or other benefits during any time the labor organization is in violation of fiduciary guidelines.

. Deems a labor organization in violation of fiduciary guidelines for more than 30 days to have
forfeited their claim on the benefit monies that the member or the employer is otherwise

obligated to contribute.

. Specifies that the non-obligation to contribute benefit monies or union dues does not allow a
member or employer to halt contribution for outlined benefit categories and that a labor
organization does not forfeit its claim on benefit monies or dues unless in accordance with an

election made by the member.

. Defines benefit category to include any combination of one or more of the following:
a) Health and welfare;

b) Pension;

c) Vacation, sick or holiday;

d) Training; and

e) Other.

8. Specifies that benefit categories may vary for each labor organization.
9. Contains a severability clause. (Sec. 2)

SB 1268
Page 2 Commerce
Verbal Amendment
SB 1268
Senate Engrossed

Mr. Chairman, I move the following verbal amendment to Senate
Bill 1268 be adopted:

On page 2, line 40, after "GOVERNMENTS" insert "OR TO
LABOR ORGANIZATIOS OR ASSOCIATIONS WHOSE
MEMBERSHIP INCLUDES PRIMARILY PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES"

—t
Attachment ie

Adopted /

Failed

Not Offered Analysts Initials
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-fifth Legislature - First Regular Session

COMMITTEE ON

ROLL CALL VOTE

Commerce

BILLNO. $B 1268_

DATE

March 23, 2021

MOTION: D PA

PASS

NAY PRESENT | ABSENT

Chaplik

Cook

AYE
VA
v

Espinoza

Fernandez

Meza

Nutt

Powers Hannley

NOUNS

Wilmeth

Kaiser, Vice-Chairman

Weninger, Chairman

APPROVED:
VW Ge —

JEFF WENINGER, Chairman
STEVE KAISER, Vice-Chairman

TIN ON

UY 0 0

COMMITTEE SECRETARY

ATTACHMENT__@

ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-fifth Legislature

First Regular Session

Senate: GOV DP 5-3-0-0 | 3° Read 16-14-0-0

sn
SB 1383: anti-rabies vaccination; rabies titer
S/E: terminally ill patients; compounding; pharmacy
Sponsor: Senator Barto, LD 15
Committee on Commerce

Summary of the Strike-Everything Amendment to SB 1353

Overview
Asserts chronically and terminally ill patients have the right to determine treatment by medications

obtained from a compounding pharmacy.

History
According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) compounding is generally a practice in

which a licensed pharmacist, a licensed physician or a person under the supervision of a licensed
pharmacist combines, mixes or alters ingredients of a drug to create a medication tailored to the
needs of an individual patient (FDA). A drug may be compounded for a patient who cannot be
treated with an FDA-approved medication, and practitioners in hospitals, clinics and other health
care facilities can provide compounded drugs to patients when an FDA-approved drug is not
medically appropriate to treat the patient. Compounded drugs are not FDA approved and the FDA
does not review or evaluate compounded drugs for safety, effectiveness or quality before being

offered to patients.

In 2012, the U.S. Congress passed the Drug Quality and Security Act (DQSA) which made various
updates to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) regarding human drug
compounding, including eliminating provisions concerning advertising of compounded drugs that
had been found to be unconstitutional. Additionally, the FD&C Act describes the conditions under
which compounded human drug products are exempt from requirements regarding pre-marketing
approval, manufacturing practices and directions for use labeling. Further, the DQSA and FD&C
Act outline requirements for compounding in state-licensed pharmacies and by doctors, as well
as compounding in outsourcing facilities (P.L. 113-54, 113th Congress, 2013; FD&C Act § 503A).

Statute defines compounding as the preparation, mixing, assembling, packaging or labeling of a
drug by a pharmacist or an intern or pharmacy technician under the pharmacist's supervision, for
the purpose of dispensing to a patient based on a valid prescription order (A.R.S. § 32-1901).

Provisions
1. Asserts chronically and terminally ill patients have the right to determine, with assistance from

their health care provider, individual courses of treatment through the use of medications and
treatments obtained from a compounding pharmacy. (Sec. 1)

2. Grants licensed compounding pharmacies access to active pharmaceutical ingredients for
use in compounding that meet U.S. pharmacopeia monographs if the active pharmaceutical

ingredient:
a) Is prepared for use by a U.S. FDA-registered manufacturer or packager;

(2 Prop 105 (45 votes) Ci Prop 108 (40 votes) © Emergency (40 votes) O Fiscal Note

SB 1353

Initials _ Page 1 Commerce

Attachment /
b) Is lawfully shipped into Arizona and arrives with a certificate of analysis detailing quality

specifications; and
c) Is deemed safe for compounding by the FDA and placed on the federal 503A Category II

Bulk Drug Substance List. (Sec. 1)
3. Stipulates the compounding pharmacy requirements do not allow any treatment or use of the
medication that is intended to cause the death of the patient. (Sec. 1)
4. Defines chronically ill patient; compounding pharmacy, monographs; and terminally ill patient.
(Sec. 1)

SB 1353

Initials _ Page 2 Commerce
mo ON A MH BW DH &

NR MRM MY DR RB BH wR ee oe
On OO Fao WDA Aka Pe

Fifty-fifth Legislature
First Regular Session

Commerce
S.B. 1353

PROPOSED
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AMENDMENTS TO S.B. 1353

(Reference to Senate engrossed bill)

Strike everything after the enacting clause and insert:

Section 1. Title 32, chapter 18, article 3, Arizona Revised

Statutes, is amended by adding section 32-1971, to read:

32-1971. Compounding pharmacies; certain medications:

requirements; definitions

A, CHRONICALLY ILL PATIENTS AND TERMINALLY ILL PATIENTS HAVE THE
RIGHT TO DETERMINE, WITH THE ASSISTANCE AND GUIDANCE OF THEIR HEALTH CARE
PROVIDERS, INDIVIDUAL COURSES OF TREATMENT THROUGH THE USE OF MEDICATIONS
AND TREATMENTS OBTAINED FROM A COMPOUNDING PHARMACY.

B, COMPOUNDING PHARMACIES THAT ARE LICENSED IN THIS STATE SHALL HAVE
ACCESS TO ACTIVE PHARMACEUTICAL INGREDIENTS FOR USE IN COMPOUNDING THAT
MEET UNITED STATES PHARMACOPEIA MONOGRAPHS, IF THE ACTIVE PHARMACEUTICAL
INGREDIENT IS PREPARED FOR USE BY A UNITED STATES FOOD AND ORUG
ADMINISTRATION-REGISTERED ACTIVE PHARMACEUTICAL INGREDIENT MANUFACTURER OR
PACKAGER, IS SHIPPED INTO THIS STATE IN COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW AND
ARRIVES WITH A CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS DETAILING QUALITY SPECIFICATIONS,
INCLUDING ANY MEDICATIONS, DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS AND AMINO ACIDS THAT ARE
ALREADY IN USE BY COMPOUNDING PHARMACIES IN THIS STATE, IN ORDER TO PROVIDE
CHRONICALLY ILL PATIENTS AND TERMINALLY ILL PATIENTS WITH THE PRESCRIBED
INDIVIDUAL COURSE OF TREATMENT. PROVIDED HOWEVER SUCH ACTIVE
PHARMACEUTICAL INGREDIENT IS NOT DEEMED UNSAFE FOR COMPOUNDING BY THE
FEDERAL FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION AND PLACED ON THE 503A CATEGORY II

BULK DRUG SUBSTANCE LIST.

Attachment I

Adopted JL # of Verbals _

Failed Withdrawn

Not Offered Analysts Initials

Oo BoB SS DD oO F&F CD MR r&

| ee cee noo eee
Oo On DO & WO HY F OD

House Amendments to $.B. 1353

C. THIS SECTION DOES NOT ALLOW ANY TREATMENT OR USE OF MEDICATION

THAT IS INTENDED TO CAUSE THE DEATH OF THE PATIENT.

D. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION:
1, "CHRONICALLY ILL PATIENT" MEANS A PATIENT WHOSE PHYSICIAN HAS

DIAGNOSED THE PATIENT AS HAVING A LONG-TERM DISEASE OR CONDITION THAT IF
LEFT UNTREATED MAY CAUSE MAJOR IRREVERSIBLE MORBIDITY AND WHO MIGHT BENEFIT
FROM INDIVIDUALIZED OR SPECIALIZED MEDICATION THAT IS NOT COMMERCIALLY
AVAILABLE.

2, “COMPOUNDING PHARMACY" MEANS A PHARMACY THAT IS CLASSIFIED AS A
503A PHARMACY BY THE UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION.

3. "MONOGRAPHS" MEANS QUALITY STANDARDS FOR PRESCRIPTION MEDICINES
AND DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS THAT ARTICULATE THE QUALITY EXPECTATIONS FOR A
MEDICINE OR DIETARY SUPPLEMENT, INCLUDING ITS IDENTITY, STRENGTH, PURITY

AND PERFORMANCE.
4. “TERMINALLY ILL PATIENT’ MEANS A PATIENT WHOSE PHYSICIAN HAS

DIAGNOSED THE PATIENT WITH A DISEASE THAT, TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE
PATIENT'S MEDICAL CIRCUMSTANCES, WILL CAUSE THE PATIENT'S DEATH IN A
REASONABLY FORESEEABLE TIME,

Amend title to conform

JEFF WENINGER

1353WENINGER
03/18/2021
10:26 AM

H: PRB/1s

na oO Fe WD MR &

Fifty-fifth Legistature
First Regular Session

PROPOSED

Commerce
S.B. 1353

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AMENDMENTS TO S.B. 1353
(Reference to WENINGER s/e amendment dated: 3/18/21; 10:26 AM)

Page 1, line 22, strike the second “AND” insert

"INTERIN"

“OR IS”; after “THE” insert

Line 23, after the period insert “COMPOUNDERS MAY ONLY USE SUBSTANCES PLACED
ON THE INTERIM 503A CATEGORY III BULK DRUG SUBSTANCE LIST IF THE SUBSTANCE

MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION.”

Amend title to conform

1353WENINGER2
03/22/2021
09:37 AM

H: PRB/1s

JEFF WENINGER

Attachment_ 7

Adopted a # of Verb

Failed = Withdrawn.

Not Offered Analysts Initials
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-fifth Legislature - First Regular Session

ROLL CALL VOTE

COMMITTEE ON Commerce BILLNO. __ $B 1353
DATE March 23, 2021 votion: DPA/DE

NAY PRESENT | ABSENT

>
x
mM

PASS

Chaplik
Cook

Espinoza

VA

Fernandez

Meza
Nutt

Powers Hannley
Wilmeth

Kaiser, Vice-Chairman

Weninger, Chairman

IN\AAASWN OS

D 0 (

APPROVED: COMMITTEE SECRETARY
|

JEFF WENINGER, Chairman
STEVE KAISER, Vice-Chairman

ATTACHMENT__/2

ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-fifth Legislature

First Regular Session

Senate: COM DP 8-1-0-0 | 3°? Read 27-2-1-0

serps

SB 1215: liquor; sales; delivery; identification information
Sponsor: Senator Borrelli, LD 5
Committee on Commerce

Overview
Exempts, under specified conditions, containers of spirituous liquor for delivery from prescribed

labeling requirements.

History
A retail licensee with off-sale privileges may take orders through the internet or by telephone,

mail, fax, catalog or other means for the sale and delivery of spirituous liquor off the licensed
premises to a person in Arizona. The licensee may maintain a delivery service and may contract
with an independent contractor or a common carrier for delivery of spirituous liquor. An employee
of a licensee or other authorized person must verify the age of the person accepting the delivery
through the display of an identification document and receive the person's signature. A licensee
must label containers of spirituous liquor for delivery with the words, “contains alcohol, signature
of person who is twenty-one years of age or older is required for delivery." The licensee is
responsible for any violations of the requirements for the sale and delivery of spirituous liquor

(A.R.S. § 4-203).

Provisions
1. Exempts containers of spirituous liquor for delivery from the prescribed labeling requirement

provided:
a) The person delivering the order has personally retrieved and bagged or otherwise

packaged the container; and
b) The retail licensee records, or requires to be recorded electronically, the identification

information for each delivery. (Sec. 1)
2. Makes technical changes. (Sec. 1)

C) Prop 105 (45 votes) — Prop 108 (40 votes) O Emergency (40 votes) 0 Fiscal Note

$B 1215

Initials _ Page 1 Commerce

Attachment / /

COMMITTEE ON

DATE

ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-fifth Legislature - First Regular Session

ROLL CALL VOTE

Commerce

BILL NO.

March 23, 2021

MOTION:

SB 1215

DP

PASS

AYE

NAY

PRESENT

ABSENT

Chaplik

Cook

WISN

Espinoza

V

Fernandez

Meza

Nutt

Ny

Powers Hannley

NINN

Wilmeth

Kaiser, Vice-Chairman

Weninger, Chairman

APPROVED:

YW,

”

cee

“JEFF WENINGER, Chairman
STEVE KAISER, Vice-Chairman

© IIA

tf

0

9

COMMITTEE SECRETARY

ATTACHMENT“ &

ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-fifth Legislature

First Regular Session

Senate: COM DPA/SE 6-3-0-0 | 3% Read 16-14-0-0

ase

SB 1156: solid waste; advanced recycling facilities
Sponsor: Senator Mesnard, LD 17
Committee on Commerce

Overview
Excludes an advanced recycling facility that converts recovered feedstocks to manufacture raw

materials and intermediate and final products from being considered as a solid waste facility.

History
The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) is required to prepare and keep current

a statewide solid waste management plan which establishes standards for solid waste facilities in
cooperation with facility owners or operators, local governments and management agencies

(A.R.S. § 49-721).

ADEQ's Solid Waste Program is responsible for permitting, inspecting, and providing compliance
assistance to solid waste facilities. The main functions of the Solid Waste Program include:
1. Issuing permits, certifications and licenses to solid waste facilities.
2. Conducting solid waste facility inspections to ensure compliance in accordance with state
and federal regulations.
3, Responding to and investigating any complaints related to solid waste.
4, Providing information to the public regarding proper residential and commercial disposal

of solid waste.

Statute directs ADEQ to implement an Arizona Recycling Program as well as initiate, conduct and
support research, demonstration projects and investigations pertaining to recycling and source
reduction (A.R.S. § 49-832). The Recycling Fund, administered by the Director of ADEQ and
overseen by the Director-appointed Recycling Fund Advisory Committee, consists of monies
appropriated by the Legislature, gifts, grants, donations and, subject to legislative appropriation,
monies derived from Landfill Disposal Fees. Monies from the Recycling Fund may be used for
the following purposes: 1) to provide grants to or contracts with political subdivisions, nonprofit
organizations or private enterprise for research, demonstration projects, market development and
source reduction studies and the implementation of Arizona Recycling Program
recommendations and reports; 2) public programs on litter control, recycling and source reduction;
3) the collection of Landfill Disposal Fees and administration of the Recycling Fund; 4) the Arizona
Recycling Program; 5) the Arizona Commerce Authority's Recycled Market Development
Program; and 6) ADEQ's Solid Waste Control Program (A.R.S. § 49-837).

A solid waste facility is a transfer facility and any site owned, operated or utilized by any person
for the storage, processing, treatment or disposal of solid waste, conditionally exempt small
quantity generator waste or household hazardous waste. Solid waste is any garbage, trash,
rubbish, waste tire, refuse, sludge from a waste treatment plant, water supply treatment plant or
pollution control facility and other discarded material, including solid, liquid, semisolid or contained
gaseous material. (A.R.S. §§ 49-701 and 49-701.01).

SB 1156

Initials _ Page 1 Commerce

|

Attachment S32
Provisions

1.

4.

5.

Excludes an advanced recycling facility that converts recovered feedstocks to manufacture
raw materials and intermediate and final products from the definition of solid waste facility.

(Sec. 1)

Exempts, from the definition of solid waste, recovered feedstocks if those materials are
processed through advanced recycling and if the advanced recycling facilities are operated in

a manner that:
a) Controls wind and other surface dispersion of recovered feedstock from the advanced

recycling facility so that the recovered feedstock does not create a public nuisance or pose

an imminent endangerment to public health or the environment;

i. Including the requirement to recover on a regular basis any visible recovered feedstock
that is dispersed beyond the boundaries of the advanced recycling facility.

b) Does not discharge hazardous substances to surface water, groundwater or subsurface
soil in a manner that creates a public nuisance or poses an imminent endangerment to
public health or the environment;

c) Does not cause a nuisance, vector breeding or fire hazard by storing recoverable
feedstocks or post-use polymers; and

d) Requires recoverable feedstocks or post-use polymer to be converted using an advanced
recycling process after storage or less than 90 days or, for advanced recycling operations

on government property, 120 days. (Sec. 2)

Permits Recycling Fund monies to be used for grants to or contracts with political subdivisions,
nonprofit organizations or private enterprises for new technologies. (Sec. 4)

Defines advanced recycling, advanced recycling facility, depolymerization, gasification, post-
use polymer, pyrolysis, recovered feedstocks, and solvolysis. (Sec. 1)

Makes technical and conforming changes. (Sec. 1-4)

C] Prop 105 (45 votes) ( Prop 108 (40 votes) Emergency (40 votes) O Fiscal Note

Initials _

SB 1156
Page 2 Commerce

ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-fifth Legislature - First Regular Session

ROLL CALL VOTE

COMMITTEE ON Commerce

BILL NO.

DATE March 23, 2021

__$B1156_

MOTION: D (

PASS

NAY

PRESENT

ABSENT

Chaplik

Cook

Espinoza

Fernandez

Meza

Nutt

Powers Hannley

Wilmeth

Kaiser, Vice-Chairman

Weninger, Chairman

VA tae -

JEFF WENINGER, Chairman
STEVE KAISER, Vice-Chairman

elISIQY INS KINA

COMMITTEE SECRETARY

ATTACHMENT_/ Yy

ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-fifth Legislature

First Regular Session

Senate: GOV DP 5-3-0-0 | 3% Read 16-14-0-0

pg a Sc So

SB 1063: administrative review of agency decisions
Sponsor: Senator Mesnard, LD 17
Committee on Commerce

Overview
Requires, if demanded by certain parties, that a trial for review of final administrative decisions of

certain state agencies be a trial de novo.

History
A person is permitted to appeal a final administrative decision of a contested case or an

appealable agency action in accordance with statute relating to judicial review of administrative
decisions. In an action for judicial review of a final administrative decision, jurisdiction is vested
with the superior court, unless another venue is expressly prescribed in statute (A.R.S. §§ 44:
{092.08 and 12-905).

An affected party in a final administrative decision must file a notice of appeal within 35 days of
receiving the decision in order to commence an action to review a final administrative decision.
The notice of appeal must contain a statement of the findings and decisions sought to be reviewed
(A.R.S. §§ 12-904 and 12-909).

After reviewing the administrative record and supplementing evidence, the court may affirm,
reverse, modify or vacate and remand the agency action. The court must affirm the agency action
unless the court concludes that the agency action is contrary to law, not supported by substantial
evidence, arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretion. In proceedings brought by or against
a regulated party, the court must decide all questions of law without deference to any previous
determination by the agency. For review of final administrative decisions of specified agencies
that are exempt from administrative hearing procedures, the trial must be a trial de novo, if: 1)
demanded in the notice of appeal or motion of an appellee other than the agency; and 2) a hearing
was either not held by the agency or not reported or recorded to maintain a transcript (A.R.S. §

42-910).
A trial de novo is a trial in a higher court in which all the issues of fact or law tried in a lower court
are reconsidered as if no previous trial had taken place.

Provisions
1. Requires a trial, in an action to review a final administrative decision of certain state agencies

that regulate a profession or occupation, to be de novo if demanded in the notice of appeal or
motion of an appellee other than the agency. (Sec. 1)

2. instructs the court, in a proceeding brought by or against the regulated party, to decide all
questions of fact without deference to any previous determination that may have been made

by the agency. (Sec. 1)
3. Makes technical changes. (Sec. 1-2)

(0 Prop 105 (45 votes) C1 Prop 108 (40 votes) Emergency (40 votes) 1 Fiscal Note

SB 1063

Initials _ Page 1 Commerce

Attachment is
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-fifth Legislature - First Regular Session

COMMITTEE ON

ROLL CALL VOTE

Commerce

BILL NO.

DATE March 23,

2021

MOTION: D p

SB 1063

PASS

NAY PRESENT | ABSENT

Chaplik

Cook

wz

Espinoza

Fernandez

Meza

Nutt

Powers Hannley

NAINA

Wilmeth

Kaiser, Vice-Chairman

Weninger, Chairman

Wie

mISIQN IN

Uf 0 | 2

JEFF WENINGER, Chairman
STEVE KAISER, Vice-Chairman

COMMITTEE SECRETARY

ATTACHMENT. [¢
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-fifth Legislature

First Regular Session

Senate: COM DP 9-0-0-0 | 3 Read 29-0-1-0

pes
SB 1230: limited liability companies
Sponsor: Senator Pace, LD 25
Committee on Commerce

Overview
Updates and makes revisions to statute relating to Limited Liability Company (LLC) Act.

History
In 2018, the Legislature adopted the Arizona Limited Liability Company Act (2019 Act), revising

LLC requirements relating to organization, standards of conduct, operating agreements, service
of process, transferable interest, liability, notice, dissolution and winding up processes, derivative
actions and mergers, as well as requirements specific to member-managed LLCs, professional

LLCs and foreign LLCs.

Until September 1, 2020, the 2019 Act applied only to: 1) an LLC formed, converted or
domesticated beginning September 1, 2019; 2) a foreign LLC registered in Arizona beginning
September 1, 2019; and 3) an LLC formed, converted or domesticated before September 1, 2019,
that elected to be subject to the 2019 Act. Previous statutory requirements for LLCs were repealed
on September 1, 2020, applying the 2019 Act to all LLCs and foreign LLCs. The 2019 Act directed
Legislative Council Staff to prepare proposed legislation to conform the Arizona Revised Statutes
to the 2019 Act's provisions for consideration in the 54th Legislature, Second Regular Session

(Laws 2018, Chapter 168).

Provisions

1, Clarifies an LLC operating agreement is prohibited from reducing or eliminating the statutory
distribution restrictions or the statutory liabilities for prohibited distributions in a manner that
adversely affects the rights of a person other than a member or manager. (Sec. 9)

2. Prohibits an LLC operating agreement from varying statutory prohibitions on an LLC relating
to:
a) Engaging in the business of banking; or
b) Being an insurer, except for a title insurance agent or a pure captive insurer. (Sec. 9)

3. Deems, as the statutory agent's mailing address, the street address of the statutory agent of
an LLC formed, or a foreign LLC registered, before September 1, 2019. (Sec. 10)

4, Includes, to the events causing a person to be dissociated from an LLC, if and when the

person's entire transferable interest is transferred and either:

a) At the effective time of the transfer, at least one transferee is or becomes a member; or

b) At any time after the effective time of the transfer, at least one transferee becomes a
member and the transferring person has not otherwise acquired a transferable interest.

(Sec. 12)

5. Removes the Arizona Corporation Commission's authority to administratively dissolve an LLC
that does not have a principal address in Arizona for at least 60 consecutive days. (Sec. 13)

SB 1230

Initials _ Page 1 Commerce

‘Attachment / /
6. Makes technical and conforming changes. (Sec. 1-8, 11, 12, 14-17)

(J Prop 105 (45 votes) Cl Prop 108 (40 votes) O Emergency (40 votes) 0 Fiscal Note

SB 1230
Page 2 Commerce

Initials _
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-fifth Legislature - First Regular Session

ROLL CALL VOTE
COMMITTEE ON Commerce BILLNO. $B 1230
DATE March 23, 2021 MOTION:
PASS AYE NAY PRESENT | ABSENT

Chaplik /

Cook / ,

Espinoza V

Fernandez VA

Meza V4

Nutt /

Powers Hannley /

Wilmeth J,

Kaiser, Vice-Chairman / y

Weninger, Chairman /

/ 2 ) O 0
COMMITTEE SECRETARY

Vk Wine

JEFF WENINGER, Chairman
STEVE KAISER, Vice-Chairman

ATTACHMENT_/S
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-fifth Legislature - First Regular Session

COMMITTEE ON

Commerce

ROLL CALL VOTE

BILLNO. __ $B 1064_

DATE March 23, 2021

motion: HE 4D

PASS

AYE NAY PRESENT | ABSENT

Chaplik

Cook

Espinoza

Fernandez

Meza

Nutt

Powers Hannley

Wilmeth

Kaiser, Vice-Chairman

Weninger, Chairman

APPROVED:

JEFF WENINGER, Chairman
STEVE KAISER, Vice-Chairman

COMMITTEE SECRETARY

ATTACHMENT_/9

ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-fifth Legislature - First Regular Session

ROLL CALL VOTE

COMMITTEE ON Commerce BILL NO.

DATE March 23, 2021 MOTION: E LD

SB 1293

PASS AYE NAY PRESENT | ABSENT

Chaplik

Cook

Espinoza

Fernandez

Meza

Nutt

Powers Hannley

Wilmeth

Kaiser, Vice-Chairman

Weninger, Chairman

APPROVED: COMMITTEE SECRETARY

JEFF WENINGER, Chairman
STEVE KAISER, Vice-Chairman

ATTACHMENT_c¢ 2

File and source

File

2021-03-23_commerce-minutes.pdf

Size

1,535,992 bytes

SHA-256

c7b35edce399d3257fc2fccab9c78d217792b596a5f75735821a5bfbbc39c826

Our copy

2021-03-23_commerce-minutes.pdf

Original

www.azleg.gov