Arizona House of Representatives Committee on Commerce — Report of Regular Meeting, January 28, 2020 (Fifty-fourth Legislature, Second Regular Session)

Summary

The report of the regular meeting of the Arizona House of Representatives Committee on Commerce, Fifty-fourth Legislature, Second Regular Session, held Tuesday, January 28, 2020, chaired by Mr. Weninger, with its attachments. The minutes record do pass actions on HB2363, HB2644, HB2144, HB2645 and HB2373, with one member absent. Attachments include the meeting agenda, the Request to Speak report listing organizations that registered support, opposition or neutrality, and the committee attendance record. Bill analyses describe HB 2363 on the definition of home solicitation sales, HB 2644 on the American Law Institute's Restatement of the Law, Liability Insurance, and HB 2373 on the definition of factory-built building, each followed by a roll call vote sheet. A written submission to the committee on HB 2363 is also attached.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-fourth Legislature - Second Regular Session

COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE

Report of Regular Meeting
Tuesday, January 28, 2020

House Hearing Room 3 -- 2:00 P.M.

Convened 2:00 P.M.
Recessed
Reconyened
Adjourned 4:00 P.M.

Members Present

Mr. Biasiucci

Ms. Butler

Mr. Chavez

Ms. Epstein

Mr. Kern

Mr. Roberts

Mr. Grantham, Vice-Chairman
Mr. Weninger, Chairman

Agenda
Original Agenda ~ Attachment |

Request to Speak
Report — Attachment 2

Committee Attendance
Report — Attachment 3

Committee Action

Bill Action
HB2363 DP
HB2644 DP
HB2144 DP
HB2645 DP
HB2373 DP

MINUTES RECEIVED
CHIEF CLERK'S OFFICE

[-3/-20

Members Absent

Mr. Meza
Vote Attachments
8-0-0-1 4,5,6
6-2-0-1 7,8
8-0-0-1 9, 10
8-0-0-1 11,12

8-0-0-1 13, 14

Iris McMahon, Committee Secretary
January 31, 2020

(Original attachments on file in the Office of the Chief Clerk; video archives available at http://Awww.azleg.gov)

COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE
January 28, 2020
Conpvencd } 4:00 Pin

REVISED - 1/24/20 REVISED - 1/24/20 REVISED - 1/24/20

ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-fourth Legislature - Second Regular Session

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA

COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE

DATE Tuesday, January 28, 2020 ROOM HHR3 TIME 2:00 P.M.
Members:
Mr, Biasiucci Ms. Epstein Mr. Roberts
Ms. Butler My. Kern Mr. Grantham, Vice-Chairman
Mr, Chavez Mr. Meza Mr. Weninger, Chairman

l. Introduction of Members and Staff

Bills Short Title Strike Everything Title
3 ' HB2144 state liquor board; membership
b<0-0-] (Kern)

> 4 COM, RULES

{ HB2363 ‘e D-o home solicitation sales; definition
- (Toma)

D/? COM, RULES

4 482373 factory-built building; definition
A o-9 -} :

D p COM, RULES

Page 1 of 2 Attachment. |
Bills Short Title Strike Everything Title
COM LAG-RULES

liability insurance restatement; prohibition

HB2644 L
a - dep.
iat hi (Weninger: Allen J, Livingston, et al)
Df COM, RULES

} HB2645 L insurers; insolvency; administration
kd (Weninger: Meza, Alston, et al)
D f° COM, RULES

ORDER OF BILLS TO BE SET BY THE CHAIRMAN

im
84/22/2620
01/24/2020

People with disabilities may request reasonable accommodations such as interpreters, alternative formats, or
assistance with physical accessibility. If you require accommodations, please contact the Chief Clerk's Office at
(602) 926-3032 or through Arizona Relay Service 7-1-1.

Page 2 of 2
Information Registered on the Request to Speak System

House Commerce (1/28/2020)

HB2144, state liquor board; membership

Testified in support:
Marcus Dell'Artino, City Of Glendale

support:

Marge Zylla, TEMPE, CITY OF; Brad Lundahl, SCOTTSDALE, CITY OF; Amber Wakeman, City Of El Mirage; Rob Bohr,
GILBERT, TOWN OF; Jessica Blazina, City Of Avondale; Ginna Carico, PEORIA, CITY OF; Dale Wiebusch, MARICOPA,
CITY OF; Yesenia Dhott, PHOENIX, CITY OF; fan Linssen, MESA, CITY OF; Ryan Lee, GLENDALE, CITY OF; Alexis
Apodaca, representing self; Roxanna Pitones, LEAGUE OF ARIZONA CITIES & TOWNS

Oppose:

Dr Garrison Ellam, representing self

All Comments:

Alexis Apodaca, Self: On behalf of the City of Chandler.; Roxanna Pitones, LEAGUE OF ARIZONA CITIES & TOWNS:
Support. Adds municipal member to State Liquor Board, without creating additional red tape.; Dr Garrison Ellam,
Self: Currently local governing bodies have a say in the licensing of liquor establishments and allowing a permanent
seat on the Liquor Board would afford an unfair advantage for local governing bodies to have a second attempt to

injure a business.

HB2363, home solicitation sales: definition

HB2373, factory-built building: definition

Testified in support:
Jessie Armendt, KATERRA INC

Testified as neutral:
Zackary Goetz, AZ DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING

Support:
Kelsey Lundy, KATERRA INC

Neutral:
Spencer Kamps, HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL AZ

Attachment &
All Comments:

Jessie Armendt, KATERRA INC: This bill fixes an issue for the Department of Housing and Katerra supports this
change.; Zackary Goetz, AZ DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING: This is a technical fix that restores proper oversight and
regulation of the panelized and modular construction industries.

HB2644, liability insurance restatement: prohibition

Testified in support:
Ellen Poole, Executive Director, SW Region Govt Relations, American Property & Casualty Insurers; Courtney
Coolidge, AZ CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

Testified as opposed:
Kevin DeMenna, American Law Institute; Barry Aarons, AZ TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION; Scott Bales, representing
self; Jeff Willis, representing self; Don Bivens, representing self

Support:

Michelle Ahimer, representing self; Daniel Romm, ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO, American Family Insurance, FARMERS
INSURANCE GROUP OF COMPANIES, GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY (GEICO), LIBERTY MUTUAL
INSURANCE GROUP, NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Chubb insurance ; Kerry L. Hayden, UNITED
SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSN (USAA}; Marc Osborn, Geico; Liberty Mutual Insurance; Nationwide insurance

Neutral:
Don Isaacson, STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANIES; Marie Isaacson, STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANIES

Oppose:
Ryan DeMenna, American Law Institute

All Comments:
Courtney Coolidge, AZ CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: Yes; Barry Aarons, AZ TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION: oppose.;
Don Isaacson, STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANIES: changed position to neutral.

HB2645, insurers; insolvency: administration

Testified in support:
Marc Osborn, Federal Home Loan Bank SF

Support:
Chuck Bassett, Blue Cross Blue Shield Of AZ; Daniel Romm, AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS {ACLI); karen
kruse, FHLB
ARIZONA STATE LEGISLATURE
Fifty-fourth Legislature - Second Regular Session

COMMITTEE ATTENDANCE RECORD

COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE
CHAIRMAN: Jeff Weninger VICE-CHAIRMAN: _ Travis W. Grantham
DATE 01/28/20 120 /20 /20 /20
CONVENED Yioo pm m m m m
RECESSED
~ RECONVENED
“ADJOURNED 4:90 fm
MEMBERS
Biasiucci SL
Butler “
Chavez /
Epstein WA
Kern WA
Meza Lf
Roberts /
Grantham, Vice-Chairman /
Weninger, Chairman WA

V Present --- Absent exc Excused

Attachment_3 _
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Fifty-fourth Legislature
Second Regular Session

HB 2363: home solicitation sales; definition
Sponsor: Representative Toma, LD 22
Committee on Commerce

Overview
Modifies the definition of home solicitation sale.

History
A home solicitation sale is defined as a sale of goods or services in which the seller personally

solicits the sale and the buyer's agreement at a home other than that of the person solicitating the
same and that agreement is there given to the seller and all or any part of the purchase price is
payable in installments, or a debt incurred for payment of the purchase price is payable in
installments. A sale which otherwise meets the definition of a home solicitation sale, except that
itis a cash sale, shall be deemed to be a home solicitation sale if the seller makes or provides a
loan to the buyer or obtains or assists in obtaining a loan for the buyer to pay the purchase price

(A.R.S. § 44-5001).

The buyer has until midnight of the third business day to cancel the home solicitation sale. The
buyer must provide a written notice of cancellation to the seller (A.R.S. § 44-5002).

Provisions
4. Removes the requirement that all or any part, or a debt incurred for payment, of the purchase

price be payable in installments as a qualifier for a home solicitation sale. (Sec. 1)

2. Stipulates a cash sale qualifies as a home solicitation sale provided the seller makes or
provides a Joan to the buyer or obtains a loan for the buyer to pay the purchase price. (Sec.

1)

3. Makes technical changes. (Sec. 1)

© Prop 105 (45 votes) 1 Prop 108 (40 votes) [ Emergency (40 votes) 1 Fiscal Note

Initials PRB Commerce

fa

Attachment of
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-fourth Legislature - Second Regular Session

ROLL CALL VOTE
COMMITTEE ON Commerce BILL NO. __ HB 2363
DATE January 28, 2020 MOTION: D (o
PASS AYE NAY PRESENT | ABSENT

Biasiucci S

Butler : VA

Chavez A

Epstein iY

Kern “

Meza J
Roberts “4

Grantham, Vice-Chairman S

Weninger, Chairman WA

g 0 O (

APPROVED: we COMMITTEE SECRETARY

JEFF WENINGER, Chairman
TRAVIS W. GRANTHAM, Vice-Chairman

on
ATTACHMENT__
Ben Toma

From: David Wickenhauser <djwick@cox.net>

Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2020 4:05 PM

To: Jeff Weninger

Ce: Ben Toma; Paul Benny

Subject: Wickenhauser testimony regarding AB2363. HB 23 C3

Apologies if the Background portion went on too long. Believe me, | barely scratched the surface
of all of the predatory and elder abuse practices that | have learned since first falling afoul of
Singh Roofing's door-to-door salesmen back in April of last year. .

You are welcome to use all or any part of my testimony. And thank you for giving me the
opportunity to be an advocate for the elderly in our communities. These are elderly retired folks
who often do not have the resources or the knowledge to defend against door-to-door predators,

and who have found their savings stripped by their dishonest practices.

The Honorable Rep. Jeff Weninger, Chair, Commerce Committee
The Honorable Rep. Ben Toma, Prime Sponsor #82363
Paul Benny, Research Analyst

Re: AB2363 Home Solicitation Sales; Definition

| asked Rep. Toma to amend A.R.S. §44-5001 Home Solicitation Sales Definitions in order to make
‘Arizona's cooling-off period right-to-cancel law consistent with the FTC's definition in C.F.R.
§429.0 Rule Concerning Cooling-Off Period for Sales Made at Homes Or At Other Locations.

The Federal Rule speaks to Federal preemption of weaker state cooling-off period statutes (my
emphasis in bold):

- §429.2(b) This part will not be construed to annul, or exempt any seller from
complying with, the laws of any State or the ordinances of a political subdivision
thereof that regulate door-to-door sales, except to the extent that such laws or
ordinances, if they permit door-to-door selling, are directly inconsistent with
the provisions of this part. Such laws or ordinances which do not accord the
buyer, with respect to the particular transaction, a right to cancel a door-to-door sale
that is substantially the same or greater than that provided in this part, which
permit the imposition of any fee or penalty on the buyer for the exercise of such
right, or which do not provide for giving the buyer a.notice of the right to
cancel the transaction in substantially the same form and manner provided for
in this part, are among those which will be considered directly inconsistent.

i Attachment 6
A.R.S. §44-5001 Definitions states in part (my emphasis in bold):

1."Home solicitation sale" means a sale of goods or services in which the seller or
his representative personally solicits the sale and the buyer's agreement or offer to
purchase is made at a home other than that of the person soliciting the same and
that agreement or offer to purchase is there given to the seller or his representative
and all or any part of the purchase price is payable in installments, or a debt
incurred for payment of the purchase price is payable in installments.

The last "and" phrase in this part of the Arizona State Statute is clearly inconsistent with the
Federal Rule in that it weakens Arizona's door-to-door seller definition to the extent that any door
knocker in Arizona who takes full payment in cash or by check can exploit this weaker,
inconsistent definition in order to escape the homeowner protections that are the heart and soul
of the Federal cooling-off right-to-cancel provisions for home solicitation sales.

BACKGROUND

My desire for the Arizona State Legislature to amend the statute to conform to the Federal Rule
arose from becoming a defendant in a lawsuit brought against me and my wife by a disreputable,
predatory door-to-door roofing company, Singh Roofing LLC, who tried to rely on the weaker,
inconsistent Arizona definition to prove their claim against us.

| had made a lawful cancellation of Singh's Work Authorization and Proposal pursuant to Federal
Rule and State Statute cooling-off period right-to-cancel, but the company's owner, Jasvinder
Singh, declined to honor our lawful cancellation and sued us for breach of contract, claiming

$2,300 in liquidated damages.

We immediately filed a Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim. Singh's
counsel, William Fischbach of Tiffany and Bosco, responded by claiming the cooling-off period
right-to-cancel provision did not apply to Singh Roofing because according to state law Singh does
not conduct home solicitation sales. Fischbach specifically cited A.R.S. §44-5001 Definitions;

stating that Singh does not accept payments in installments.

Fischbach's claim was ludicrous in light of the-fact that Singh's-salesmen-parked-in-front-of MYy-~----——- =
neighbor's house and knocked on her door. She wasn't home, so they walked down the sidewalk
and knocked on my door — the very definition and example of a door-to- door home-solicitation

practice.

Furthermore, in testimony during a trial against another one of their lawsuit victims, a 69-year-old
Sun City resident, Jasvinder Singh testified under oath that Singh's primary business strategy is

soliciting sales by going door to door,

Fortunately, Judge Miles Keegan of Hassayampa Justice Court recognized the dishonest and
exploitative nature of Fischbach's claim and ruled in our favor, granting our Motion to Dismiss.

2
However, Fischbach filed a Notice of Appeal; which was rejected pending resolution of a timing
issue, but it is highly likely to be re-filed again in the future if allowed.

There is no doubt that in Singh's appeal Fischbach will rely again on exploiting the “loophole”
currently existing in the Arizona cooling-off right-to-cancel statute definition.

Singh Roofing has brought suit against more than two dozen seniors in the Sun City and Sun City
West communities -- average age 78, highest age 103 -- in the past 2-3 years, in addition to
extorting settlements from countless others at the threat of a lawsuit, and Singh is likely to

continue to abuse the elderly.

| appreciate the Arizona State Legislature taking this action to close the definition loophole in
order to prevent this predatory roofing company, and others, from claiming further victims using

this exploit.

David Wickenhauser, 69
Sun City West

ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Fifty-fourth Legislature
Second Regular Session

HB 2644: liability insurance restatement; prohibition
Sponsor: Representative Weninger, LD 17
Committee on Commerce

Overview
Asserts a liability insurance restatement is not the law or public policy.

History . 7
Liability insurance is defined as a contract by which one party promises .on consideration to

compensate or reimburse another if he shall suffer loss from specified cause or to guaranty or
indemnify or secure him against loss from that cause. (Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition)

Provisions
4. Stipulates a statement of the law in the American Law Institute's Restatement of the Law,

Liability Insurance is not the law or public policy of the state if the statement is inconsistent, in
conflict with or not addressed by:
a) Either the Arizona or Federal Constitution;

b) A statute of Arizona;
c) Case law adopted by either the Supreme Court and Appellate courts of Arizona; or

d) Common law adopted by Arizona. (Sec. 1)

2. Asserts the American Law Institute's Restatement of the Law, Liability Insurance is not a
source of Arizona law andis not recognized as an authoritative reference of this state's liability

insurance law. (Sec. 1)

2 Prop 105 (45 votes) (0 Prop 108 (40 votes) O Emergency (40 votes) 0 Fiscal Note

Commerce

Attachment_’/

initials PRB
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-fourth Legislature - Second Regular Session

ROLL CALL VOTE

COMMITTEE ON Commerce BILL NO. —_HB 2644
DATE January 28, 2020 moTiON: PD?
PASS AYE NAY PRESENT ABSENT
Biasiucci Uv
Butler VA
Chavez WA
Epstein Va
Kern A
Meza S
Roberts SK
Grantham, Vice-Chairman Ve
Weninger, Chairman Y
A a 0 |
free Tne. Da hor
APPROVED: COMMITTEE SECRETARY

JEFF WENINGER, Chairman
TRAVIS W. GRANTHAM, Vice-Chairman

ATTACHMENT. g

ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Fifty-fourth Legislature
Second Regular Session

HB 2144: state liquor board; membership
Sponsor: Representative Kern, LD 20
Committee on Commerce

Overview
Requires a State Liquor Board (Board) appointment be made after nominees are submitted to the

Governor.

History
The Department of Liquor Licenses and Control (Department) consists of the Office of the Director

of the Department and the Board. The Board grants and denies applications for a liquor license,
adopts rules and hears appeals and holds hearings (A.R.S. § 4-112).

The Board consists of seven members appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate.
Five members may not be financially interested in business licensed to deal with spirituous
liquors. Two members must currently or previously be engaged in the liquor industry, and at least
one of the two must be a retail ficensee or employee of a retail licensee. One member must be a
member of a neighborhood association recognized by a local government. No more than four
members may be of the same political party, and no more than three members may be from the
same county. Members are appointed for three-year terms (A.R.S. § 4-111).

A person eligible for appointment must have a continuous recorded registration with the same
political party or as an independent for at least two years immediately preceding appointment. A
person appointed to serve on the Board must be a resident of the state for at least five years
before the date of appointment (A.R.S. § 4-111).

Provisions
1. Requires one member of the Board who is not financially interested in business licensed to

deal with spirituous liquor to be appointed after an association representing cities and towns
forwards three nominees who must be current or former elected municipal officials to the

Governor. (Sec. 1)
Allows current members of the Board to serve until the expiration of their terms. (Sec. 2)

Contains technical changes. (Sec. 1)

LD Prop 105 (45 votes) (0 Prop 108 (40 votes) (© Emergency (40 votes) {8 Fiscal Note

Commerce

Initials PRB ;
Attachme nt_F_
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-fourth Legislature - Second Regular Session

ROLL CALL VOTE
COMMITTEE ON Commerce BILL NO. HB 2144
DATE January 28, 2020 MOTION: D ~
PASS AYE NAY PRESENT ABSENT

Biasiucci Ae

Butler A

Chavez /

Epstein A

Kern “

Meza A
Roberts /

Grantham, Vice-Chairman “

Weninger, Chairman /

V4 0 0 /
hace Tre (Ndthar

APPROVED: COMMITTEE SECRETARY

WM _
JEFF WENINGER, Chairman
TRAVIS W. GRANTHAM, Vice-Chairman

ATTACHMENT_7 2
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Fifty-fourth Legislature
Second Regular Session

HB2645: insurers; insolvency; administration
Sponsor: Representative Weninger, LD 17
Committee on Commerce

Overview
Provides a federal home loan bank an exemption from certain injunctions.

History _
Established by the Federal Home Loan Bank Act, the Federal Home Loan Bank System provides

its members with a source of funding for: 1) mortgages and asset-liability management, 2) liquidity
for a member's short-term needs; and 3) additional funds for housing finance and community
development.

During a delinquency proceeding involving the liquidation, rehabilitation or reorganization of an
insolvent insurer, a court may issue an injunction against an insurer preventing: 1) interference
with the receiver or proceeding; 2) the waste of the assets of the insurer, 3) the commencement
or prosecution of any actions; 4) the obtaining of preferences, judgments, attachments or other
liens; and 5) the making of any levy against the insurer or against its assets (A.R.S. § 20-614).

Law requires all proceedings in which the insolvent insurer is a party to be stayed for six months
from the date of insolvency to permit proper defense by the Property and Casualty Guaranty Fund
of all pending causes of action as to any covered claim (A.R.S. § 20-676).

Provisions
4. Asserts a federal home loan bank cannot be stayed, enjoined or prohibited from exercising or

enforcing any right or cause of action against collateral pledged by an insurer member under
any pledge, security, collateral or guarantee agreement to which that federal home loan bank
is a party. (Sec. 2, 6, 7)

2. Prohibits a receiver, rehabilitator, liquidator or conservator from voiding any transfer of money
or other property arising in connection with any pledge, security, collateral or guarantee
agreement with an insurer member unless the transfer was made with actual intent to hinder,
delay or defraud either existing or future creditors. (Sec. 5, 8)

3. Defines federal home loan bank and insurer member. (Sec. 1)
4, Makes technical changes. (Sec. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5)

1 Prop 105 (45 votes) 1 Prop 108 (40 votes) 0 Emergency (40 votes) 1 Fiscal Note

Commerce

Initials PRB
Attachment__//
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-fourth Legislature - Second Regular Session

ROLL CALL VOTE

COMMITTEE ON Commerce BILL NO. HB 2645

DATE January 28, 2020 MOTION: Dr
PASS AYE NAY PRESENT | ABSENT

Biasiucci JS

Butler /

Chavez WA

Epstein WA

Kern V4 ,

Meza J

Roberts /

Grantham, Vice-Chairman /

Weninger, Chairman /

f O 0 (

APPROVED: COMMITTEE SECRETARY

JEFF WENINGER, Chairman
TRAVIS W. GRANTHAM, Vice-Chairman

ATTACHMENT LA

ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-fourth Legislature
Second Regular Session

HB 2373: factory-built building; definition
Sponsor: Representative Weninger, LD 17
Committee on Commerce

Overview
Modifies the definition of factory-built building in relation to the Office of Manufactured Housing

(OMH).

History

OMH maintains and enforces standards for the installation, safety and quality of manufactured
homes, factory-built buildings, mobile homes and accessory structures. The OMH must conduct
the office consistently with minimum standards of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) and is designated as the "state inspector" for manufactured homes and

related industries (A.R.S. § 41-4002).

Current law outlines the powers and duties of the Board of Manufactured Housing which include
adopting rules relating to: 1) the minimum construction requirements for factory-built buildings; 2)
inspections by the Arizona Department of Housing (ADH) relating to the installation of
manufactured homes, mobile homes, factory-built buildings and accessory structures; and 3)
compliance with HUD's procedural and enforcement regulations and contract creation necessary
to administer federal manufactured home regulations (A.R.S. § 44-4010).

Each licensee who intends to accomplish construction must submit detailed plans to ADH, prior
io the installation of a factory-built building, for each project for approval. Additionally, the OMH
must inspect the factory-built building (A.R.S. § 41-4005).

A factory-built building is a residential or commercial building that is: 1) either wholly or in
substantial part manufactured using closed construction at an off-site location and transported for
installation or completion on-site; 2) constructed in compliance with adopted codes, standards
and procedures; 3) installed temporarily or permanently (A.R.S. § 41-4001).

Provisions
1. Modifies the definition of factory-built building by deleting language referencing closed

construction. (Sec. 1)
2. Makes technical changes. (Sec. 1)

Commerce

Initials PRB
Attachment {3
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Fifty-fourth Legislature - Second Regular Session

ROLL CALL VOTE
COMMITTEE ON Commerce BILL NO. HB 2373
DATE January 28, 2020 MOTION: D iP
PASS AYE NAY PRESENT ABSENT

Biasiucci 4

Butler “~

Chavez S

Epstein vA

Kern Y

Meza A
Roberts 4

Grantham, Vice-Chairman YY

Weninger, Chairman vA

& 0 O |
APPROVED: COMMITTEE SECRETARY

JEFF WENINGER, Chairman
TRAVIS W. GRANTHAM, Vice-Chairman

ATTACHMENT. / /

File and source

File

2020-01-28_commerce-minutes.pdf

Size

848,034 bytes

SHA-256

71ceba8a17a6bebdcd4df93477d2489dfb069e9e7f8211170b1cc94020c4267f

Our copy

2020-01-28_commerce-minutes.pdf

Original

www.azleg.gov