Arizona House of Representatives Committee on Regulatory Oversight Meeting Minutes

Summary

The report of a regular meeting of the Arizona House of Representatives Committee on Regulatory Oversight, Fifty-seventh Legislature, First Regular Session, held Tuesday, February 4, 2025, with Representative Chaplik as Chairman and Representative Kolodin as Vice-Chairman. The meeting convened at 2:00 P.M. and adjourned at 2:52 P.M. The committee action table records HCR2038 as do pass amended by a 3-2-0-0 vote, HB2049 as do pass by a 3-2-0-0 vote, action on HB2684, and HB2637 as held. Attachments include the agenda, the Request to Speak report listing public positions on each bill, a committee summary of HB 2637, which would repeal the state Board of Dispensing Opticians, and a roll call vote sheet.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-seventh Legislature — First Regular Session

COMMITTEE ON REGULATORY OVERSIGHT

Report of Regular Meeting
Tuesday, February 4, 2025

House Hearing Room 4 — 2:00 P.M. or upon recess or adjournment

Convened: 2:00 P.M.
Recessed
Reconvened
Adjourned 2:52 P.M.

Members Present Members Absent

Representative Contreras L
Representative Hernandez C
Representative Keshel

Representative Kolodin, Vice-Chairman
Representative Chaplik, Chairman

Agenda
Original Agenda — Attachment 1

Request to Speak
Report — Attachment 2

Committee Rules
Report — Attachment 3

Committee Attendance
Report — Attachment 4

Presentations

N/A

Committee Action
Bill Action Vote
HCR2038 DPA 3-2-0-0
HB2049 DP 3-2-0-0
HB2684 DP 5 O.H-0)

HB2637 HELD A |

MINUTES RECEIVED
CHIEF CLERK'S OFFICE

#1 51a2

Attachments

Del, F
$,9

10, 11
12, 13

Stephanie Smith, Committee Secretary

February 5, 2025

(Original attachments on file in the Office of the Chief Clerk; video archives available at http://www.azleg.gov)

Convene § 209071
fejoueed I: SAP

ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Fifty-seventh Legislature - First Regular Session *

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA

COMMITTEE ON REGULATORY OVERSIGHT

DATE Tuesday, February 4, 2025 ROOM HHR4 TIME 2:00 P.M. or upon recess or
adjournment of Floor

Members of the public may access a livestream of the meeting here:
https://www.azleg.gov/videoplayer/?clientID=636 1 162879&eventID=2025021011

Members:

Representative Contreras L — Representative Keshel Representative Chaplik, Chairman
Representative Hernandez C Representative Kolodin, Vice-Chairman
Bills Short Title Strike Everything Title
HB2049 ) administrative decisions; security proceedings;
2 ) hearings
Kolodin
3-0-0 hm)

——— RO, RULES

—HB2637— wore board of dispensing opticians; repeal
(Kolodin: Keshel)
RO, RULES

HB2684 =p) p pedestrians; congregating; medians; unsafe
locations

_aE Chaplik: Gillette, Heap, et al)
53-9005 RULES

*HCR2038 DA rulemaking; legislative ratification; regulatory
) costs

/ FD gg fhoodiny

7 If printed, first read and assigned

ORDER OF BILLS TO BE SET BY THE CHAIRMAN

VC
01/29/2025

People with disabilities may request reasonable accommodations such as interpreters, alternative formats, or
assistance with physical accessibility. If you require accommodations, please contact the Chief Clerk's Office at

(602) 926-3032 or through Arizona Relay Service 7-1-1.

Page 1 of 1 .
Attachment [
Information Registered on the Request to Speak System

House Regulatory Oversight (2/4/2025)

HB2049, administrative decisions; security proceedings; hearings

Oppose:
Jacob Emnett, COUNTY SUPERVISORS ASSN OF AZ; Robert Wisler , APACHE JUNCTION, CITY OF

All Comments:
Jacob Emnett, COUNTY SUPERVISORS ASSN OF AZ: Opposition related to lack of funding for the expanded court
services required in this and other bills.

HB2637, board of dispensing opticians; repeal

Support:
David Kahn, REPUBLICAN LIBERTY CAUCUS OF ARIZONA

Oppose:

Don Isaacson, Arizona Association Of Dispensing Opticians; Dale Nyblade, representing self; Marie Isaacson,
Arizona Association Of Dispensing Opticians; James McClafferty, representing self; Terry Brown, representing self;
David Lipkin, Other, Self; Darwin Mordhorst, representing self; Trish Hart, ARIZONA SOCIETY OF EYE PHYSICIANS &
SURGEONS; Julia Moghadam Abrishami, representing self; Megan Darian, representing self; Michael Searle, Other,
Self; Shana Tevlin, representing self; Michael Rens, representing self; Emit Torres, representing self; Greg Barr,
representing self; jesse saenz, representing self; Michelle Dyer, representing self; Margaret Whelan, Executive
Director, representing self; Suzanne Coleman, representing self; Lori Scott, representing self; Sheri Mayes,
representing self; Michael Ayars, representing self; Colin Trout, representing self; Angelia Dyer, representing self

All Comments:

James McClafferty, Self: The Arizona public needs this proper oversite to be protected against potential damage
caused by unqualified dispensing of eyewear.; Terry Brown, Self: | am a VP for one of the largest privately owned
optometry practices in the US. With over 15 years in the business and over 25 years in business operation.; Darwin
Mordhorst, Self: | respectfully ask you to vote against this bill,and keep licensure safe in Arizona for the protection
of all citizens who live here and to protect opticians livelihood here in this state. | have been licensed in the state
for over 22 years .; Julia Moghadam Abrishami, Self: Repealing Dispensing Optician licensure undermines public
safety and consumer protection, risking the quality of care. Licensed opticians ensure accurate eyewear, and
eliminating licensure would lead to unqualified individuals serving the public.; Michael Rens, Self: 1am a Licensed
Optician since 2012. Removing the License from Arizona would be a negative to keeping quality and ethics.
Creating a non licensed state will open the ability to dispense without oversight leading the Doctor to review
issues.; Emit Torres, Self: It's very important to keep LDO in the state of AZ.; Greg Barr, Self: This bill is frivolous and
partisan interference in government regulations; jesse saenz, Self: As a consumer | feel more comfortable
entrusting my vision to one | know who has has the "PROOF" of the education and training pertaining to one of
the most important and irreplaceable senses we posses. Sight is a gift; Michelle Dyer, Self: | feel this is necessary

Attachment aA
for patient care and to ensure those that need our services are getting the best that they can.; Margaret Whelan,
Executive Director, Self: Consider in discussions & decision-making, the regulation of professions. Maintaining
robust regulatory frameworks is not merely a bureaucratic necessity; it's a crucial component of protecting health,
safety & welfare of the constituents we serve.; Suzanne Coleman, Self: The Board of Dispensing Opticians is crucial
due to its role in regulating the profession and ensuring public safety. Its elimination could jeopardize consumer
protection and industry standards, highlighting the need for its continued existence.; Sheri Mayes, Self: We are a
self sufficient board since 1956. We help protect the citizens of Arizona with regards to their vision needs. We
also elevate the profession by ensuring certain standards are met!; Michael Ayars, Self: The board creates a skilled
system that benefits Arizona residents as well as its economy.; Colin Trout, Self: As a six year navy veteran and a
licensed optician of over 30 years | am confided that | must re-invent myself at the age of 59. This bill must be
denied. You need a license to cut hair, but not to dispense a medical product.; Angelia Dyer, Self: Licenses are
necessary to protect patient care and those needing glasses.

HB2684, pedestrians: congregating; medians; unsafe locations

Testified as opposed:
Gaelle Esposito, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF AZ; Natalya Brown, RURAL ARIZONA ACTION

Support:
Mary Evelyn Simpson, representing self; Peter Asencio, representing self; Chris Russo, representing self; Wendy
Radimer, representing self; Paul Johnson, representing self; Philip Carman, representing self

Oppose:

Francisco "Hugo" Polanco, Rural Arizona Action (RAZA); Mary Pradelt, representing self; Judith K. Moll,
representing self; Craig McDermott, representing self; Dianne Post, AZ NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN
(NOW), Self; Sharon Lee, representing self; Bobbie Howard, representing self; Martha O'Connor, representing self;
Kathleen Dubbs, representing self; Marilyn Rodriguez, AZ ATTORNEYS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE (AACJ); Nancy
Lecrone Nonini, representing self; Beth Ballmann, representing self; Michael Levine, representing self; Marisa
MATA, representing self

All Comments:

Mary Evelyn Simpson, Self: YavGOP PC Support Common sense. People should not be hanging out in unsafe
places. Unsafe for them and the drivers. Another type of distracted driving.; Peter Asencio, Self: | am a PC Captain,
AZ State Committeeman. | support this bill.; Chris Russo, Self: Chris Russo, Area 5 PC here. | would like to also see
language saying no liability if a driver hits someone blocking the road to do harm to the driver.; Wendy Radimer,
Self: | Support this bill. Wendy Radimer Yavapai County PC strong strong strong support; Paul Johnson, Self: | fully
strongly support this bill. Arnold Paul Johnson, Precinct Committeeman, Yavapai County; Beth Ballmann, Self: This
punishes homeless rather than seeking an actual solution.; Michael Levine, Self: would put panhandling in the
same category as petty theft and swatting; Marisa MATA, Self: This bill further criminalizes our houseless
community.
HCR2038, rulemaking; legislative ratification; requlatory costs

Testified in support:
Matt Fioriti, OPPORTUNITY SOLUTIONS PROJECT

Support:

Spencer Kamps, HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL AZ; Shirley Dye, representing self; Lynne Weaver,
representing self; Rose Sperry, representing self; Darlene Younker, representing self; Kevin Brown, representing
self; Nancy Cottle, representing self; Christine Maceri Genge, representing self; Mark Logan, representing self;
Theresa Logan, representing self; Stephen Harris, representing self; Buffalo Rick Galeener, representing self; Jan
Baron, representing self; Nikki Colletti, representing self; Dianna Gates, representing self; Melanie Hutchings,
representing self; Phyllis Lester, representing self; Mary Ann Johnston, representing self; Helen Hebert,
representing self; Starr Costa, representing self; Peter Asencio, representing self; Michael Mote, representing self;
Bev Miller, representing self; Gary Zimmerman, representing self; Wendy Radimer, representing self; Paul Johnson,
representing self; Ryan Larson, representing self; Yvonne Lowther, representing self

Neutral:
Marilyn Childs, representing self

Oppose:

Carolyn Watson, representing self; Marina Cabanillas Quintana, representing self; Sandy Bahr, Sierra Club - Grand
Canyon Chapter; Dave Long, representing self; Janie Hydrick, representing self; Theresa Ulmer, AZ MUNICIPAL
WATER USERS ASSN; Steve Ramos, representing self; Judith Simons, representing self; Thomas Krepitch,
representing self; Mary Pradelt, representing self; Judith K. Moll, representing self; Steven Linder, representing
self; Rebecca Smith Gross, representing self; Judith Robbins, representing self; Maria Salvucci, representing self;
Theodora Schiro, representing self; Eve Shapiro, representing self; Jeanne Casteen, representing self; Kelley
Murphy, representing self; Mariana Spier, representing self; Mary Ann Graffagnino, representing self; Beatriz Urrea,
representing self; Alisa McMahon, representing self; Michael Fiflis, representing self; DOUG ARNOLD, representing
self; Claudia Bloom, representing self; Dianne Post, AZ NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN (NOW), Self;
Cynthia Couture, representing self; Carol Maas, representing self; Sherrilynn James, representing self; Donita
Ramos, representing self; Bryna Koch, representing self; Mildred Rae Tucker, representing self; Catherine Sigmon,
representing self; Darrell Boomgaarden, representing self; Eileen Garces, representing self; SUSAN ARNOLD,
representing self; Katherine Doman Sheydayi, representing self; Elizabeth Schauer, representing self; Heather
Cates, representing self; Gail Kamaras, representing self; Charlie Silver, representing self; Farhana Sarder,
representing self; Joy Carter, representing self; Theresa Paszkiewicz, representing self; Patricia Gerrodette,
representing self; Leslie Stallcop, representing self; Dale Cohen-Bruno, representing self; Janice Counts,
representing self; Shelley Stephenson, representing self; Valerie Policastro Edie, representing self; Jacqueline deSa,
representing self; Laura Norton, representing self; Christopher Cerrato, representing self; ALICE BUCK,
representing self; Eileen Goldman, representing self; Martha O'Connor, representing self; Peggy Yeargain-Williams,
representing self; Barbara Hollway, representing self; Robin LaVoie, representing self; Shelly Gordon-Gray,
representing self; Chris Allen, representing self; Mary Nelson, representing self; Jennifer Dawson, representing self;
Kurt Reuter, representing self; Sherry Massie, representing self; Michelle Winker, representing self; Linda Ekstrum,
representing self; Deirdre MacDonald, representing self; David Myers, representing self; Lisa Maczura,
representing self; Ruth Shea, representing self; Joseph Alexander, representing self; Nelson Morgan, representing
self; Kathleen Woessner, representing self; Maria Hidalgo, representing self; Jan Perozeni Corbus, representing
self; Marilyn Coyle, representing self; Stephen Coyle, representing self; Paula Redinger, representing self; Frederick
James, representing self; Linda Edwards, representing self; Kathryn Anderson, representing self; Marilyn Murov,
representing self; Nancy Santori, representing self; Penny Boone, representing self; Amy Etzkorn, representing self;
Matthew Nelson, representing self; Carol Garnett, representing self; Becky Sayler, representing self; Carol
Campbell, representing self; William Yohey, representing self; Kathleen Dubbs, representing self; Kathy Boelte,
representing self; Kathryn Pensinger, representing self; Patricia Edelen, representing self; Liana Moran,
representing self; Wendy Anderson, representing self; Kathy Pyner, representing self; Claudia Oreck-Teplitsky,
representing self; Gary Townsend, representing self; Bobbie Howard, representing self; Brent Gibbs, representing
self; Annarose Lilly, representing self; William S. James, representing self; Linda Paul, representing self; Denise
Skalon, representing self; Jim Moran, representing self; Sherri Johnson, representing self; Kathleen Schanus-Gohl,
representing self; Jerrold Borchardt, representing self; Julie Branyan, representing self; Karen Dubin, representing
self; Marcia Tingley, representing self; Esteban Hidalgo, representing self; Anne Leota Hart, representing self; Jeri
Dow, representing self; Eric Harris, representing self; Marilyn Schwind, representing self; Mary Boomgaarden,
representing self; Maggie Huntington, representing self; Margaret Tinsley, representing self; Sharon Lee,
representing self; Loretta O'Connor, representing self; Kathleen Sauer, representing self; Mary-Jeanne Fincher,
representing self; Kendra Flory, representing self; Jocelyn Dustan, representing self; Angela Shopmeyer,
representing self; Nancy Musgrave, representing self; Daniel Stormont, representing self; Cynthia Wagner,
representing self; Susan Morris, representing self; Alice Patricia Price, representing self; Deborah Howard,
representing self; joan hall, representing self; Roy Verdery, representing self; LINDA GANTVERG, representing self;
Rebecca Haynes, representing self; Theresa Ryan, representing self; Angela J. Miller, representing self; Sharon
Trujillo, representing self; Nancy Lecrone Nonini, representing self; Aaron Essif, representing self; Monica Bills,
representing self; Gail Bliss, representing self; Michael Weingarten, representing self; Diane McQueen,
representing self; Christine Keitges, representing self; Charlotte Lis, representing self; Peter Coston, representing
self; Jo Ann Caruthers, representing self; RITA DEPUYDT, representing self; Vicky Campo, representing self; Debbie
Odle, representing self; Donna Corbin, representing self; Valerie Harris, representing self; Janet Hamlin,
representing self; Kelly Lake-Warnberg, representing self; Melissa Galarza, representing self; Sandra Adler,
representing self; Angela Buer, representing self; Mariette Francis, representing self; Barbara Larson, representing
self; Dee Maitland, representing self; Louise Good, representing self; Jessica Kitterman, representing self;
Katherine Warren, representing self; Chris Ahearn, representing self; Karolyn Switzer, representing self; Margaret
Adams , representing self; Peggy Kile, representing self; janice sandoz, representing self; Peggy Marlatt,
representing self; Carol Fiore, representing self; Linda Guarino, representing self; Jana Segal, representing self;
Heather Patenaude, representing self; Karen Peterson, representing self; marcia stewart, representing self;
Margaret Cordovano, representing self; Janet Senf, representing self; Sharon Ehrlich, representing self; George
Ehrlich, representing self; Teri Raml, representing self; Karen VanAllen, representing self; Linda Reichert,
representing self; Julie Bufkin, representing self; Maegan Johnson , PHOENIX, CITY OF; Amy Pedotto, representing
self; Laurie Liles, AZ IMPACT FOR GOOD; Pat Jayson, representing self; Barbara Rodman, representing self; Kelsey
McDougall, representing self; Terri Farneti, representing self; Jillian Ryan, representing self; Michael Levine,
representing self; Aaron Torrance, representing self; Patricia Prickett, representing self; Devon Sloan, representing
self; Shana Tevlin, representing self; Dawn Norton LD29, representing self; Cathy Noga, representing self; Eric
Kadel, representing self; Bart Briefstein, representing self; Greg Olszta, representing self; Tiana Channer,
representing self; William Parker, representing self; Nancee K Wood, representing self; Pamela Chittenden,
representing self; Lyandra Rodriguez, representing self; Susie Daniels, representing self; Karen Brown, representing
self; Karen Kaplan, representing self; Barrie Stachel, representing self; Joseph Murray, representing self; Mike
Kunnecke, representing self; Allen Brown, representing self; Philip Carman, representing self; Elissa Karn,
representing self; Garyh Rulapaugh, representing self; Janie Smieszek, representing self; Ethan Rigel, representing
self; Ashka Atodaria, representing self; Don Howard, representing self; Beth Ballmann, representing self; Leigh
Emrick, representing self; Valarie Bryant, representing self; Jane Johnson, representing self; Lisa Koenig,
representing self; Nicole Linn, representing self; Carol Rohe, representing self; Richard Brock, representing self;
Nick Arnold, CLIMATE CABINET ACTION; Jessica Bueno, representing self; Susan Heck, representing self; Virginia
Marth, representing self; Rita Marth, representing self; Amy Satre, representing self; Suzanne Zimmerman,
representing self; Peggy Church, representing self; Kathryn Dorn, representing self; James Lewison, representing
self; Melinda Bell, representing self

All Comments:

Shirley Dye, Self: Regulations should be removed from many businesses, etc. This should not be going to a ballot,
most citizens do not know about these things. But, yes, if there is a new reg prices should have oversight.; Darlene
Younker, Self: Increased regulatory costs and unfunded mandates cause tax increases, in my opinion. We must get
a handle on legislators and rule-makers penchant for tax and spend.; Stephen Harris, Self: This is a simple checks-
and-balance provision; Nikki Colletti, Self: This a a good checks and balances provision; Helen Hebert, Self: needed
for checks and balances; Starr Costa, Self: Checks and balance provisions make sense.; Peter Asencio, Self: | ama
PC Captain, AZ State Committeeman. We all should be accountably for a budget to controll spending EVEN
goverment agencyes.; Michael Mote, Self: | support this bill as a simple check-and-balance provision.; Gary
Zimmerman, Self: Common sense financial efficiency and responsiblity.; Wendy Radimer, Self: | Support this bill.
Wendy Radimer Yavapai County PC; Paul Johnson, Self: | fully support this bill. Arnold Paul Johnson, Precinct
Committeeman, Yavapai County; Carolyn Watson, Self: The voters decided this issue just last November. It would
criminalized unhoused people and make the cities liable. Rather than pay for the inevitable lawsuits this bill would
create, can't we move on?; Marina Cabanillas Quintana, Self: This would not only kneecap our state government's
ability to regulate spending, but is a direct slap in the face of voters who literally just rejected this idea.; Sandy
Bahr, Sierra Club - Grand Canyon Chapter: This is quite similar to Prop 315, rejected by voters last November. It
creates huge bureaucracy around rulemaking too.; Judith Simons, Self: Legislative overreach. Rejected by voters
who opposed Prop 315 just 3 months ago.; Judith Robbins, Self: This has already been voted down by the majority
of voters. Take these restrictions off of voters access to dropping off their ballots. Listen to AZ voters! Vote No.;
Kelley Murphy, Self: This will only cause gridlock and leave every day administration and operation of government
at the whims of political parties.; Mary Ann Graffagnino, Self: No, we need our state government to be able to
regulate spending.; Beatriz Urrea, Self: This idea has already been rejected by voters. It is a bad idea and we don't
want it.; Alisa McMahon, Self: 1. Voters rejected Prop 315 in 2024. 2. We have 3 branches of government for good
reason. 3. We have regulations for good reasons. 4. Exhibit better judgment than the 2024 legislature and do NOT
be responsible for a four-page ballot.; Michael Fiflis, Self: Quit bucking the will of the people. We already rejected
Prop 315 last year. This resolution, if approved, would create enormous red tape and prevent the government
from doing its jobs. It also violates the separation of powers clause.; Claudia Bloom, Self: We already voted against
this.; Dianne Post, AZ NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN (NOW), Self: The people have said no. No means
no.; Cynthia Couture, Self: Voters rejected prop 315 already.; Donita Ramos, Self: No need to vote on this again.;
Catherine Sigmon, Self: Voters already voted this down. It's arrogant to override the will of the people.; Gail
Kamaras, Self: Voters just said a big NO to this idea; Charlie Silver, Self: This was literally just rejected by voters ion
the last election.; Patricia Gerrodette, Self: We already said no to this. Quit wasting our time and your time too.;
Peggy Yeargain-Williams, Self: A slap in the face to voters who just rejected this idea.; Chris Allen, Self: You tried
this one already. The voters said no. If you keep saying no to the voters, they will vote you out.; Kurt Reuter, Self:
Similar to Prop. 315, which was rejected by voters last November. Please listen to your constituents!; Deirdre
MacDonald, Self: This was just rejected by voters in 2024! What are you trying to pull!; Lisa Maczura, Self:
Regulation makes things harder for people with less than stellar motives. Bad bill.; Joseph Alexander, Self: An
inappropriate and unwieldy infringement of the legislature on proper roles of State agencies.; Nelson Morgan, Self:
We voters already rejected this idea - it would be a regulation to reduce bureaucracy that would increase
bureaucracy, just of a different kind.; Maria Hidalgo, Self: Copy of Prop 315, already shot down by voters on the
2024 ballot. This would not only kneecap our AZ's government's ability to regulate spending, but is a direct slap in
the face of voters who literally just rejected this idea. AZ already said NO!; Jan Perozeni Corbus, Self: Another
attempt at pushing through a Bill that was already rejected by the Voters.; Paula Redinger, Self: Does Kolodin not
realize voters already rejected this idea? Committee, take note, we already said NO.; Marilyn Murov, Self: This
resurrects Prop 315 which voters already rejected in Nov. 2024. This resurrection is a waste of time and is an end
run around the will of the voters.; Penny Boone, Self: NO. Voters rejected this on the 2024 ballot.; Matthew
Nelson, Self: This bill already voted this bill down.; Carol Garnett, Self: The voters already said this is a bad idea. No
need to increase regulatory costs or add more clutter to our ballots.; Carol Campbell, Self: The voters already
decided and said NO!; Kathleen Dubbs, Self: The voters have spoken: they said no!; Kathy Boelte, Self: Voters just
rejected this in 2024. It disrespects the decision of the voters.; Wendy Anderson, Self: Voters rejected already- get
rid of it!; Gary Townsend, Self: This would not only kneecap our state government's ability to regulate spending,
but is a direct slap in the face of voters who literally just rejected this idea.; Annarose Lilly, Self: The voters already
said NO to this.; William S. James, Self: This seems to be essentially prop 315 which was defeated by voters in the
last election. Since this did not go your way, do you feel that there should be a revote? If so, should there also be
a revote on your election to office?; Denise Skalon, Self: this is a close copy of Prop 315 which was not passed by
the voters on the 2024 ballot; Sherri Johnson, Self: This was already rejected by Arizona voters in Prop 315.; Marcia
Tingley, Self: Another power grab by the Legislature of executive office authority. Also a slap in the face of voters
who just rejected this idea.; Jeri Dow, Self: voters already rejected a similar bill in 2024.; Margaret Tinsley, Self:
This bill would make it very difficult for agencies to operate efficiently and would lengthen the legislative session
by requiring the legislature to do agency work. An all-around bad idea. Please vote no.; Loretta O'Connor, Self:
Voters *just* said No to this. Don't waste our time, money, and paper; Mary-Jeanne Fincher, Self: Voters already
rejected this idea. Stop already.; Jocelyn Dustan, Self: This harms our state government's ability to regulate
spending, and is also an insult to voters who literally just rejected this idea.; Angela Shopmeyer, Self: This would
not only kneecap our state government's ability to regulate spending, but is a direct slap in the face of voters who
literally just rejected this idea.; Daniel Stormont, Self: First of all, if you can't get legislation passed through normal
order, stop sending it to the ballot. We're tired of doing your job. Secondly, economic costs should not be the only
measure for regulation, protecting citizens should be.; Cynthia Wagner, Self: This would not only kneecap our state
government's ability to regulate spending, but is a direct slap in the face of voters who literally just rejected this
idea.; Susan Morris, Self: Did you not hear us in 2024?!; Alice Patricia Price, Self: This has been rejected by voters;
Deborah Howard, Self: Voters rejected this measure just three months ago. Respect voters and oppose this bill
right here, this week.; Roy Verdery, Self: Unnecessary interference by the legislature into the day to day work of
governing. Costly in time and money.; LINDA GANTVERG, Self: This idea has been rejected by the voters already.;
Rebecca Haynes, Self: We already said NO to Prop 315. Why would we want to pay more to hamstring the state
gov't's ability to regulate spending?; Theresa Ryan, Self: This idea was just rejected by the voters; Angela J. Miller,
Self: We voters just rejected this in November in the form of Pop 315! Stop disrespecting the voters wishes.; Nancy
Lecrone Nonini, Self: Voters already defeated; Aaron Essif, Self: This is similar to Prop. 315 which was shot down in
November.; Jo Ann Caruthers, Self: Voters just said NO to a similar proposition! NO! NO! NO!; Donna Corbin, Self:
The voters turned this down in 2024. Republicans, stop trying to take away the people’s voice. That is not what you
do in a democracy.; Janet Hamlin, Self: voters just rejected prop 315, this looks like a version of that. don't waste
voters time with repeat issues on the ballot.; Kelly Lake-Warnberg, Self: We've already said "NO" to this before.
Let's focus on real needs!; Sandra Adler, Self: Already voted down by AZ voters; Angela Buer, Self: This has been
previously rejected by voters and will restrict AZ gov't ability to regulate spending.; Dee Maitland, Self: We already
told you NO!; Louise Good, Self: This is very similar to Prop 315 that was voted down in last November's election.
Take the hint and vote NO.; Jessica Kitterman, Self: This bill is a direct slap in the face of voters who literally just
rejected this idea. Oppose and respect the voters' voices.; Chris Ahearn, Self: The Arizona state government needs
to be able to regulate spending - a duty to all Arizona citizens. The voters recently rejected this idea. It is not a
productive or proper bill. Thank you; janice sandoz, Self: Prop 315 was voted down in the last election. Respect
the will of the people.; Linda Guarino, Self: We already said NO!; marcia stewart, Self: voters rejected similiar in
2024. knee caps state government to regulate spending; Margaret Cordovano, Self: Requiring a state agency to
submit for review a regulation which would incur regulatory costs of over $500,000 over 5 years would needlessly
give additional hurdles to agencies in carrying out their missions. This was rejected by voters in 2024.; Karen
VanAllen, Self: Didn't voters just vote this down in November? Reintroducing this is insulting.; Linda Reichert, Self:
Voters have recently rejected this proposal. Why are legislators wasting time on this instead of addressing real
problems?; Barbara Rodman, Self: | urge you to drop this proposal, which would not only hinder our state
government's ability to regulate spending, but has already been rejected by voters (Prop 315) in the 2024 election.
This is a waste of taxpayer time and money.; Terri Farneti, Self: This would not only kneecap our state
government's ability to regulate spending, but is a direct slap in the face of voters who literally just rejected this
idea.; Jillian Ryan, Self: This would not only kneecap our state government's ability to regulate spending, but is a
direct slap in the face of voters who literally just rejected this idea.; Michael Levine, Self: This bill is a close copy of
Prop 315, shot down by voters on the 2024 ballot.This would not only kneecap our state government's ability to
regulate spending, but is a direct slap in the face of voters who literally just rejected this idea.; Aaron Torrance,
Self: This would not only kneecap our state government's ability to regulate spending, but it's a direct slap in the
face of voters who literally just rejected this idea.; Dawn Norton LD29, Self: Banning agencies from creating rules
that increase costs undermines government regulations. | oppose this bill as it limits effective governance and
disregards voter rejection of similar proposals.; Bart Briefstein, Self: The people have spoken on this. DO NOT PASS
THIS.; Tiana Channer, Self: Very close copy of Prop 315 that we the voters already rejected in 2024. Stop trying to
overturn voter mandates.; Pamela Chittenden, Self: Listen to the voters! We already said “no”!; Karen Brown, Self:
This is essentially the same as Prop 315, which was rejected by voters in November 2024.; Barrie Stachel, Self:
HCR2038 is the same as Prop 315 that was rejected resoundingly by voters two months ago. This bill is a blatant
disregard of AZ voters' wishes, waste of resources. Vote NO on HCR2038.; Joseph Murray, Self: This would not only
kneecap our state government's ability to regulate spending, but is a direct slap in the face of voters who literally
just rejected this idea.; Mike Kunnecke, Self: How about "if at ist U don't succeed" just go home!; Allen Brown,
Self: A bad idea. Just another version of Prop 315 that was overwhelming rejected by the voters last November.
Please republicans, let's get to work on bills that would help the citizens of Arizona instead of wasting time with
Prop13 2.0.; Philip Carman, Self: Our state legislators are not experts in all fields. The experts in the relevant
agencies are the persons best qualified to make decisions regarding necessary expenses for their agencies to
conduct their missions.; Elissa Karn, Self: Voters rejected this in the recent election; it is insulting to see it
introduced again.; Janie Smieszek, Self: Voters rejected this bill already.; Beth Ballmann, Self: Puts non-experts in
charge of decision-making that requires expertise.; Jane Johnson, Self: | voted against this before on the 2024
ballot and oppose this bill. It would prevent state government's ability to regulate spending.; Lisa Koenig, Self:
Voters have already spoken on this, and they do not want it. Vote NO.; Nicole Linn, Self: This is an issue that has
already been vetoed and rejected by voters. You are not listening to your constituents and trying to enact policies
that are clearly NOT what the public wants.; Richard Brock, Self: | am an Independent voter and | rejected this very
same idea (Proposition 315) in last November's election. Please (Please, Please) listen to the voters. Which is your
job.; Nick Arnold, CLIMATE CABINET ACTION: Voters rejected this in 2024 by a good margin, let's respect the will of
the voters who demonstrated a clear understanding of the issues with how differently they voted on each
legislative referral.; Susan Heck, Self: The voters already said NO to this issue, so why is more time and effort spent
on it?; Kathryn Dorn, Self: Please don't spam our ballots with a rehashed version of Prop. 315. We defeated your
last attempt at this; we can defeat this, too, but | hope you all see sense and don't waste taxpayer time and money
on this gaslighting attempt.; James Lewison, Self: This bill would degrade our state government's ability to regulate
spending and goes AGAINST the will of the voters who rejected this in the 2024 election cycle
Rules of the House Committee on Regulatory Oversight

RULE 1. A majority of the members of the committee shall constitute a quorum. No official
action may be taken unless a quorum is present in person at the time of taking such
action.

RULE 2. The chairman sets the agenda and determines the order of measures. The chairman

also controls all public testimony.

RULE 3. The following motions are customary and in order relating to actions on measures:
1, Do pass
Zn Do pass amended
3s Return for consideration of the House
4, Hold for further study
5, Do not pass
6. Be assigned to subcommittee for...
RULE 4. The affirmative vote of a majority of those voting is required to take any action.
RULE 5. On a roll call vote the names of committee members shall be called alphabetically

by surname, except that the vice chairman and the chairman shall be called upon
last. Each member present shall be allowed to pass on one call of the roll, and shall
vote "aye" or "nay" (yes/no) or respond "present." Members may change their votes
before the announcement of the results and any member may explain his or her vote
on any measure.

RULE 6. Whenever a measure is reported from the committee on a divided vote, any member
may request a minority report.

RULE 7. All amendments (except strike-everything amendments, see House Rule 8 (T))
shall be distributed to each committee member's office by 12:00 P.M. the day before
the committee at which it will be offered. Verbal amendments may be offered
during the committee meeting at the discretion of the chairman.

In accordance with Rule 9 of the House Rules, the following House Rules are also incorporated
into the Committee Rules:

RULE 9(C) Each Standing Committee shall adopt and file with the Chief Clerk's Office rules
of procedure consistent with the Rules of the House and shall include the following:

f. With the exception of executive sessions ordered by a majority of the
committee constituting a quorum, all committee meetings shall be open to
the other members of the Legislature, the press and public so long as proper
decorum is maintained.

Zz. All committees shall meet at regularly scheduled times and places unless
cancelled with the permission of the Speaker. In the absence of the

en ae
RULE 9(E)

chairman, the vice chairman shall preside. In the absence of both the
chairman and vice chairman, some other committee member designated by
the Speaker shall preside.

2, The committee chairman (presiding officer) other than the chairman of the
Committee on Rules shall prepare an agenda and distribute copies to
committee members, the Information Desk and the Chief Clerk's Office by
5:00 p.m. at least five days before the committee meeting. Absence of a bill,
memorial or resolution from the committee agenda will prohibit its
consideration unless unanimous consent of all committee members is
obtained. Unless a reconsideration motion has been offered and failed, a
chairman may place a measure that failed in committee on any subsequent
agenda.

4, A bill not on the committee agenda shall be scheduled for discussion at the
next subsequent committee meeting by presentation of a petition containing
the signatures of two-thirds or more of the committee members.

5. A roll call vote shall be taken in each standing committee when final action
on any bill is voted.

6. Written committee reports shall be filed with the Chief Clerk's Office within
a reasonable time but no later than two weeks from time of completion of
meetings. A recording of the meeting shall be made available for public
inspection three working days after the meeting. Attendance records of all
committee meetings shall be filed with the Chief Clerk's Office within 24
hours from time of completion of meetings.

a Special meetings may be called by the chairman but require permission of
the Speaker and notice to members and the general public at the Information
Desk by 5:00 p.m. on the previous day, except that the notice of a special
meeting of the Committee on Rules may be given in open session prior to
the meeting and does not require the Speaker’s permission.

No committee other than the Committee on Rules shall meet while the House is
meeting in session without special permission of the Speaker.
ARIZONA STATE LEGISLATURE
Fifty-seventh Legislature - First Regular Session

COMMITTEE ATTENDANCE RECORD

COMMITTEE ON REGULATORY OVERSIGHT
CHAIRMAN: Joseph Chaplik VICE-CHAIRMAN: | Alexander Kolodin
DATE 02/04/25 125 125 125 125
CONVENED 2, OOpm m m m m
RECESSED
RECONVENED
ADJOURNED oO: Sam)
MEMBERS .
Contreras L ,
Hernandez C a
Keshel ew
Kolodin, Vice-Chairman a
Chaplik, Chairman Y~

V Present --- Absent exc Excused

Attachment 4
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Fifty-seventh Legislature
First Regular Session

HCR2038; rulemaking; legislative ratification; regulatory costs
Sponsor: Representative Kolodin, LD 3
Committee on Regulatory Oversight

Overview
Submits a proposition regarding legislative ratification of proposed rules to the voters.

History
The mission of the Office of Economic Opportunity (OKO) is to expand economic opportunities

for people in Arizona by leading the analysis and evaluation of Arizona's population and
economy and investing in communities to power the state's economic growth (OKO).

The Administrative Rules Oversight Committee (AROC) has the authority to review any
proposed or final rule for conformity with statute and legislative intent. AROC additionally
receives complaints concerning statutes, rules, agency practices and substantive policy
statements that are alleged to be duplicative or onerous and may hold hearings regarding
the allegations (A.R.S. §§ 41-1047, 41-1048).

Provisions

1. Directs an agency to submit a proposed rule to OEO for review if the rule is estimated to
increase state regulatory costs by more than $100,000 within five years after
implementation.

2. Specifies that if OKO confirms a proposed rule is estimated to increase state regulatory
costs by more than $500,000 within five years after the rule's implementation, the rule
becomes effective only when the Legislature enacts legislation ratifying the rule.

3. Stipulates that OKO submit the proposed rule to AROC not later than 30 days before the
next regular legislative session and that

4. Instructs AROC to submit the proposed rule to the legislature as soon as practicable.

5. Authorizes any member of the Legislature to introduce legislation to ratify the proposed
rule and exempts the proposed rule from statute relating to the time and manner of
rulemaking.

6. Prohibits an agency from filing a final rule with the Secretary of State before obtaining
legislative approval through legislation ratifying the proposed rule.

7. Requires an agency to publish a notice of termination in the register and terminate the
proposed rulemaking if the Legislature does not enact legislation to ratify the proposed
rule during the current legislative session.

8. Allows a person who is regulated by an agency proposing a rule or a legislator to request
OEO to review the rule.

0D Prop 105 (45 votes) O Prop 108 (40 votes) 0 Emergency (40 votes) DO Fiscal Note

HCR 2038
Initials MT/GG Page 1 Regulatory Oversight

Attachment 5
9. Exempts emergency rules adopted pursuant to statute from the legislative ratification
requirements on rulemaking.

10. States that, beginning on the general effective date, a rule is void and unenforceable
unless the rule is ratified as prescribed.

11. Excludes the Arizona Corporation Commission from the requirements of legislative
ratification of proposed rules.

12. Allows the Legislature to eliminate by concurrent resolution any agency rule that costs
taxpayers more than $1,000,000 per year.

13. Stipulates that citizens or businesses affected by an agency rule may request OKO
conduct an assessment of a rule's impact on taxpayers.

14, Requires OKO to complete the assessment and notify AROC, the public and the
Legislature of the findings within six months.

15. Contains a severability clause. (Sec. 2)

16. Directs the Secretary of State to submit this proposition to the voters at the next general
election.

HCR 2038
Initials MT/GG Page 2 Regulatory Oversight
Fifty-seventh Legislature Regulatory Oversight
First Regular Session H.C.R. 2038

PROPOSED
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AMENDMENTS TO H.C.R. 2038
(Reference to printed bill)

Amendment instruction key:

E DERLINING B J] indicates text added to statute or

previously enacted session law.

[Green underlining in brackets] indicates text added to new session law

or text restoring existing law.

[LGREEN-STRTRECUT-TN-BRACKEFS] indicates new text removed from statute

or previously enacted session law.

[Green—strtkevut—iirtbrackets] indicates text removed from existing statute,
previously enacted session law or new session law.

<<Green carets>> indicate a section added to the bill.
<<Green—strikevut—nrcarets>> indicates a section removed from the bill.

1 The resolution as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows:
2 1. Under the power of the referendum, as vested in the Legislature,
3 the following measure, relating to rulemaking, is enacted to become valid
4 as a law if approved by the voters and on proclamation of the Governor:

5 AN ACT

6 AMENDING TITLE 41, CHAPTER 6, ARTICLE 4.1, ARIZONA REVISED

7 STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 41-1049.01; RELATING TO

8 RULEMAKING.

9 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:

10 Section 1. Title 41, chapter 6, article 4.1, Arizona

11 Revised Statutes, is amended by adding [sectroms—#t-t049—ard]

12 [section] 41-1049.01, to read:

13 (4t-t64S.— Proposed —Tutemekigs — regutatory——costsy

14 at<ter eerrertton: abt

jalysts Initials

Attachment zZ
House Amendments to H.C.R. 2038

ANOAOHP WN FE

to FES SECFE ON BBES HOF BP PEF FE EB RP ERAT TON
COMMESSTON[ ]

41-1049.01. Legislative rule removal; rule assessment;
definition

A. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER LAW, THE LEGISLATURE MAY
ELIMINATE ANY AGENCY RULE THAT COSTS TAXPAYERS MORE THAN
$1,000,000 PER YEAR BY CONCURRENT RESOLUTION.

B. CITIZENS OR BUSINESSES IN THIS STATE THAT ARE
AFFECTED BY A RULE MAY REQUEST THE OFFICE OF ECONOMIC
OPPORTUNITY TO CONDUCT AN ASSESSMENT OF A RULE'S IMPACT ON
TAXPAYERS. THE OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY SHALL COMPLETE
THE ASSESSMENT AND NOTIFY THE ADMINISTRATIVE RULES OVERSIGHT
COMMITTEE, THE PUBLIC AND THE LEGISLATURE OF THE OFFICE'S
FINDINGS WITHIN SIX MONTHS.

C. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "RULE" HAS THE
SAME MEANING PRESCRIBED IN SECTION 41-1001.

Sec. 2. Severability

If a provision of this act or its application to any
person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity does
not affect other provisions or applications of the act that
can be given effect without the invalid provision or
application and to this end the provisions of this act are
severable.

House Amendments to H.C.R. 2038

1 2. The Secretary of State shall submit this proposition to the
2 voters at the next general election as provided by article IV, part 1,
3 section 1, Constitution of Arizona.

4 Enroll and engross to conform
5 Amend title to conform

ALEXANDER KOLODIN

HCR2038KOLODIN. docx
02/03/2025

08:56 AM

H: DC/1s
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-seventh Legislature - First Regular Session

ROLL CALL VOTE
COMMITTEE ON Regulatory Oversight BILL NO. _ HCR 2038
DATE February 04, 2025 MoTION: D?A
PASS AYE NAY PRESENT | ABSENT

Contreras L a

Hernandez C ~~

Keshel ad

Kolodin, Vice-Chairman uw

Chaplik, Chairman ~~

4 oO
APPROVED: & Wl “COMMITTEE SECRETARY
LIA

JOSEPH CHAPLIK, Chairman-
A NDER KOLODIN, Vice-Chairman

ATTACHMENT. 7
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Fifty-seventh Legislature
First Regular Session

HB 2049: administrative decisions; security proceedings; hearings
Sponsor: Representative Kolodin, LD 3
Committee on Regulatory Oversight

Overview

Requires the right to trial by jury to be available and exercisable to the defendant in an
appeal of a final administrative decision in which the judgment or order sought seeks
payment from the other party.

History
A person is permitted to appeal a final administrative decision of a contested case or an

appealable agency action in accordance with statute relating to judicial review of
administrative decisions. In an action for judicial review of a final administrative decision,
jurisdiction is vested with the superior court, unless another venue is expressly prescribed in
statute (A.R.S. §§ 41-1092.08 and 12-905).

An affected party in a final administrative decision must file a notice of appeal within 35
days of receiving the decision in order to commence an action to review a final administrative
decision. The notice of appeal must contain a statement of the findings and decisions sought
to be reviewed (A.R.S. §§ 12-904 and 12-909).

After reviewing the administrative record and supplementing evidence, the court may affirm,
reverse, modify or vacate and remand the agency action. The court is required to affirm the
agency action unless the court concludes that the agency action is: 1) contrary to law; 2) not
supported by substantial evidence; 3) arbitrary and capricious; or 4) an abuse of discretion.

Statutes relating to the appeal of a final administrative decision do not apply to the issuance
of evidence of indebtedness, such as stocks and bonds, by public service corporations under
the jurisdiction of the Corporation Commission (A.R.S. §§ 40-301 and 12-910).

Provisions

1. Requires the right to trial by jury to be available and exercisable to the defendant in an
appeal of a final administrative decision in which the judgement or order sought seeks
payment from the other party. (Sec. 1)

2. Removes, pertaining to appeals of final administrative decisions before judicial review,
language that exempts public service corporations that issue stocks and bonds. (Sec. 1)

3. Makes conforming changes. (Sec. 1)

O Prop 105 (45 votes) Oo Prop 108 (40 votes) 0 Emergency (40 votes) UO Fiscal Note

HB 2049
Initials MT/GG Page 1 Regulatory Oversight

‘Attachment ao
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-seventh Legislature - First Regular Session

ROLL CALL VOTE
COMMITTEE ON Regulatory Oversight BILLNO. __ HB 2049
DATE February 04, 2025 MOTION: NM

PASS AYE NAY PRESENT | ABSENT

Contreras L HW
L~

Hernandez C

Keshel

Kolodin, Vice-Chairman

Chaplik, Chairman

US IK IATA

Ale le

PI, 7 SOMMITTEE SECRETARY

/ JOSEPH CHAPLIK, Chairman
ALEXANDER KOLODIN, Vice-Chairman

ATTACHMENT. a
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Fifty-seventh Legislature
First Regular Session

HB 2684: pedestrians; congregating; medians; unsafe locations
Sponsor: Representative Chaplik, LD 3
Committee on Regulatory Oversight

Overview

Prohibits a pedestrian from congregating or engaging in solicitation if they are on a painted
or raised traffic median or island, on an exit or entrance ramp or roadway of a controlled
access highway or in an unsafe location where there is no sidewalk or safe corridor for

pedestrians.

History
A person commits obstructing a highway or other public thoroughfare if the person, alone or

with others:

1) having no legal privilege to do so, recklessly interferes with the passage of any
highway or public thoroughfare by creating an unreasonable inconvenience or hazard.
A person guilty of this is responsible for a class 2 misdemeanor and for a second or
subsequent violation within 24 months a class 1 misdemeanor;

2) intentionally activates a pedestrian signal on a highway or public thoroughfare if their
reason for activating the signal is not the cross the highway or thoroughfare but to
stop the passage of traffic and solicit a driver for a donation or business. A person
guilty of this is responsible for a class 8 misdemeanor; or

3) after receiving a verbal warning to desist, intentionally interferes with passage on a
highway or other public thoroughfare or entrance into a public forum that results in
preventing other persons from gaining access to a governmental meeting, hearing or
a political campaign event. A person guilty of this is responsible for a class 1
misdemeanor (A.R.S. § 13-2906).

A similar bill was introduced tn the 56th Legislature, 2nd Regular Session and was vetoed
by the Governor (HB 2658 pedestrians; congregating; medians; intersections).

Provisions

1. Prohibits a pedestrian from congregating or engaging in solicitation if the pedestrian is:
a) ona painted or raised traffic island or median;
b) on an exit or entrance ramp or roadway of a controlled access highway; or
c) in an unsafe location where there is not a sidewalk or a safe corridor for pedestrians.

(Sec. 1)

2. States that ifa person violates these requirements:
a) for the first violation, a peace office may only issue a warning;
b) for a second violation, the person is responsible for a civil traffic violation; and

Attachment_/ O

0 Prop 105 (45 votes) OO Prop 108 (40 votes) 0 Emergency (40 votes) O Fiscal Note

HB 2684
Initials DC/MT Page 1 Regulatory Oversight
c) for a third or subsequent violation, the person is guilty of a class 1 misdemeanor.
(Sec. 1)

Page 2
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-seventh Legislature - First Regular Session

ROLL CALL VOTE

COMMITTEE ON Regulatory Oversight BILL NO. __ HB 2684

DATE February 04, 2025 MOTION: __, Z, /

PASS AYE NAY PRESENT | ABSENT
Contreras L oe
Hernandez C gu
Keshel eZ
Kolodin, Vice-Chairman ue 2
Chaplik, Chairman Xv
3 | Alo O

hes ea / COMMITTEE SECRETARY
A

(Seri SH PLIK, Chairman
Poel OLODIN, Vice-Chairman

ATTACHMENT _|[
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Fifty-seventh Legislature
First Regular Session

HB 2637: board of dispensing opticians; repeal
Sponsor: Representative Kolodin, LD 8
Committee on Regulatory Oversight

Overview
Repeals the state Board of Dispensing Opticians (Board).

History
The Board regulates the profession of opticianry, consists of 2 public members and 5

professional members that are licensed as dispensing opticians each of whom is appointed by
the Governor and serves five-year terms. Responsibilities of the Board include: 1) issuing
licenses to qualified optician and optical establishments; 2) administering examinations; and
3) investigating and adjudicating complaints against licensees (A.R.S. §§ 32-1672, 32-1673).

The 2020 Auditor General Performance Review concluded that the Board generally met its
statutory objective and purpose, but noted that the Board needs to ensure the submission of
proper documentation for license applications, provide written notice to applicants of
application deficiencies and review the necessity of its fees (QAG Audit).

Laws 2022, Chapter 36 continued the board for eight years and the Board is set to terminate
on July 1, 2030 (A.R.S. § 41-3030.06).

Provisions
1. Repeals the Board and its powers and duties. (Sec. 1)

2. Makes a conforming change. (Sec. 2)

3. Directs Legislative Council staff to prepare proposed legislation conforming the Arizona
Revised Statutes. (Sec. 3)

Oo Prop 105 (45 votes) O Prop 108 (40 votes) 0 Emergency (40 votes) UO Fiscal Note

HB 2637
Initials DC/GG Page 1 Regulatory Oversight

Attachment ws
ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Fifty-seventh Legislature - First Regular Session

ROLL CALL VOTE

COMMITTEE ON Regulatory Oversight BILL NO. __HB 2637

DATE February 04, 2025 MOTION: ee

PASS AYE NAY PRESENT | ABSENT

Contreras L

Hernandez C

Keshel

Kolodin, Vice-Chairman

Chaplik, Chairman

YIREZ
OP WW 7 COMMITTEE SECRETARY

Zibele HAPLIK, Chairman
PETE KOLODIN, Vice-Chairman

ATTACHMENT. 5

File and source

File

2025-02-04_regulatory-oversight-minutes.pdf

Size

9,711,128 bytes

SHA-256

2faa58cad4fc60d080c2d7345e401c7476e3940660f573cf2ebfabcc67d87826

Our copy

2025-02-04_regulatory-oversight-minutes.pdf

Original

www.azleg.gov