[Proposed] Order Denying

Summary

A proposed order filed January 17, 2025 as Document 28-1 in Brandon Joe Williams v. United States Small Business Administration, No. 2:24-cv-09553-RGK-SK, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, with a hearing date of February 10, 2025 before Honorable R. Gary Klausner. The proposed order would deny the plaintiff's "Motion for Reconsideration" [Dkt. 27] on the ground that he has not made the showing required by C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-18. It would also deem the plaintiff's "Objections" pleading [Dkt. 24] a motion for reconsideration, treat it as duplicative, and deny it for the same reasons. It cites 389 Orange St. Partners v. Arnold, 179 F.3d 656, 665 (9th Cir. 1999). The two-page proposed order is unsigned and undated.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

     Case 2:24-cv-09553-RGK-SK   Document 28-1     Filed 01/17/25   Page 1 of 2 Page ID
                                        #:216



1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11                           UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12                  FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
      BRANDON JOE WILLIAMS,                      No. 2:24-cv-09553-RGK-SK
14
                Plaintiff,                       [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
15                                               PLAINTIFF’S “MOTION FOR
                      v.                         RECONSIDERATION” [DKT. 27] AND
16                                               “OBJECTIONS” PLEADING [DKT. 24]
      UNITED STATES SMALL
17    BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION,
                                                 Hearing Date:      February 10, 2025
18              Defendant.                       Hearing Time:      9:00 a.m.
                                                 Ctrm:              850
19
                                                 Honorable R. Gary Klausner
20                                               United States District Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
     Case 2:24-cv-09553-RGK-SK     Document 28-1     Filed 01/17/25   Page 2 of 2 Page ID
                                          #:217



1            The Court, having considered the motion titled as “NOTICE OF MOTION AND
2    MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO
3    DISMISS 11/8/24 (DCKT #8) AND TO VACATE VOID ORDER FROM 12/30/24
4    (DCKT #23)” [Dkt. 27] (“Motion for Reconsideration”) filed by plaintiff Brandon Joe
5    Williams (“Plaintiff”), as well as defendant the United States Small Business
6    Administration’s (“SBA”) Opposition, the SBA’s Response to the Plaintiff’s Objections
7    [Dkt. 24], the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, it is hereby ordered
8    that:
9            Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED on the grounds that Plaintiff
10   has not demonstrated that (a) a material difference in fact or law from that presented to
11   the Court that, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, could not have been known to the
12   party moving for reconsideration at the time the Order was entered; (b) the emergence of
13   new material facts or a change of law occurring after the Order was entered; or (c) a
14   manifest showing of a failure to consider material facts presented to the Court before the
15   Order was entered. C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-18. Plaintiff failed to carry his burden that
16   reconsideration of the Court’s Order [Dkt. 23] is proper. See 389 Orange St. Partners v.
17   Arnold, 179 F.3d 656, 665 (9th Cir. 1999).
18           The pleading titled as “OBJECTIONS REGARDING ORDER FROM 12/30/24
19   (DOCKET #23)” [Dkt. 24] also filed by Plaintiff, is deemed a motion for
20   reconsideration, is a duplicative filing, and is DENIED for the same reasons as the
21   Motion for Reconsideration. See Borsotti v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC, 2018 WL 6252457,
22   at *1 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2018).
23           IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25   Dated: _____________                  _________________________________
26                                         Honorable R. Gary Klausner
                                           United States District Court Judge
27
28
                                                 1


File and source

File

williams_sba_eidl__docket-69344443__doc-28_att-1__id-427537402__Proposed_Order.pdf

Size

129,646 bytes

SHA-256

aa73eea713b73e7c076daa4b690e6d61fad855cb793fb5c6fb433a6fe20e46a9

Our copy

williams_sba_eidl__docket-69344443__doc-28_att-1__id-427537402__Proposed_Order.pdf

Original

storage.courtlistener.com