Exhibit (2024-12-09) — In re Vyaire Medical, Inc., et al.

What This Document Is

A 2-page exhibit, filed 2024-12-09 as an attachment to the Fee Examiner's Final Report (Docket 827), consolidating the fees/expenses requested and the Fee Examiner-agreed reductions for all six professionals reviewed for the First Interim Fee Period (June 9 - August 31, 2024).

Factual Summary

The full table: Kirkland & Ellis, LLP (Docket 742) — $9,309,620.32 fees requested, $55,000.00 reduction agreed; $65,000.23 expenses requested, $5,142.16 reduction agreed. Cole Schotz, P.C. (Docket 715) — $1,552,014.00 fees, $9,150.00 reduction; $6,030.48 expenses, $0.00 reduction. BDO USA P.C. (Docket 698) — $1,181,374.60 fees, $35,116.56 reduction; $0.00 expenses. PJT Partners LP (Docket 734) — $1,228,333.33 fees, $0.00 reduction (no fee reduction agreed); $2,104.96 expenses, $0.00 reduction. McDermott Will & Emery LLP (Docket 619, counsel to the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors) — $1,275,870.40 fees, $22,500.00 reduction; $4,959.70 expenses, $0.00 reduction. Berkeley Research Group, LLC (Docket 633, Committee's financial advisor) — $935,753.00 fees, $7,000.00 reduction; $0.00 expenses. TOTAL across all six: $15,482,965.65 fees requested, $128,766.56 in agreed fee reductions; $78,095.37 expenses requested, $5,142.16 in agreed expense reductions.

Key Facts

• Filed as an attachment to Docket 827, 2024-12-09, 2 pages.
• Total First Interim Fee Period professional fees requested across all six retained professionals: $15,482,965.65; total agreed reduction: $128,766.56 (fees) + $5,142.16 (expenses) = $133,908.72, roughly 0.86% of the total requested.
• PJT Partners LP is the only professional with zero agreed fee reduction ($1,228,333.33 approved as requested).
• Kirkland & Ellis's $55,000.00 reduction is by far the largest in absolute dollars but represents under 0.6% of its $9,309,620.32 request.
• This table covers both Debtors' professionals (K&E, Cole Schotz, BDO, PJT) and Committee professionals (McDermott Will & Emery, Berkeley Research Group).

Source Caveats

• This table reflects the Fee Examiner's agreed reductions, not necessarily the court's final approved amounts; any separate approval order should be checked independently if final-approved figures are needed.