PO Granting Mtn to Seal re Reply to Class Cert

Summary

Order Granting Motion to File Documents Under Seal re: Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Motion for Class Certification, dated December 5, 2024 and filed as Document 390 in In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation, Case No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel. The court grants plaintiffs' motion, joined by the defendant, finding compelling reasons under Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu to seal the documents. It lists the materials kept under seal, including portions of the reply and its index of exhibits, portions of Exhibits 158 to 162, 174 and 178, and Exhibits 164 to 168, 177 and 179 to 183 to the Supplemental Declaration of Connie K. Chan. The order is two pages.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Order Granting Motion to File Documents Under Seal re: Plaintiffs’ Reply ISO Motion for Class
Certification; Case No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
IN RE BANK OF AMERICA
CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT
BENEFITS LITIGATION
Case No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
RE: PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY IN
SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR CLASS
CERTIFICATION

[Dkt. No. 376.]
Judge: Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel
Ctrm:  2D (2nd Floor)

This Document Relates to All Actions

Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 390     Filed 12/05/24     PageID.23337     Page
1 of 2

Order Granting Motion to File Documents Under Seal re: Plaintiffs’ Reply in Support of Class
Certification; Case No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB
1

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER
Upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion to File Documents Under Seal, and
Defendant’s Joinder, (Dkt. No. 383), the motion is GRANTED. Plaintiffs have shown
compelling reasons to file these documents under seal. See Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of
Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006).
The Court will maintain the following materials under seal, [Dkt. No. 377.]:
1. Portions of Plaintiffs’ Reply in support of Motion for Class Certification;
2. Portions of Plaintiffs’ Index of Exhibits in support of the Reply;
3. Portions of Exhibits 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 174, and 178 attached to the
Supplemental Declaration of Connie K. Chan (“Supplemental Declaration”); and
4. Exhibits 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 177, 179, 180, 181, 182, and 183 attached to
the Supplemental Declaration.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:  December 5, 2024

Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 390     Filed 12/05/24     PageID.23338     Page
2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.casd.709615.390.0.pdf

Size

178,370 bytes

SHA-256

f89c54658f7eabb61f7d01b378033453d32f1c895c146de0afae6555c9e3ad25

Our copy

gov.uscourts.casd.709615.390.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)