Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Exhibit (2024-07-26)

Exhibit (2024-07-26)

Date
2024-07-26

Summary

Exhibit D, filed July 26, 2024 as Document 133-4 in Case 5:22-cv-00009-TES, reproduces a Department of the Air Force opening statement before the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Military Personnel dated February 28, 2023, by Under Secretary of the Air Force Gina Ortiz Jones, on COVID-19 vaccination implementation, rescission and requirements. The statement describes the Department's pandemic measures and reports that approximately 98% of over 500,000 total force Airmen and Guardians complied with the vaccination order. It describes the Air Force Medical Service deploying 2,724 Total Force Airmen in COVID-19 response operations. It states that Secretary Austin rescinded the vaccination requirement on January 10, 2023 and Secretary Kendall rescinded his order on January 23, 2023, and it outlines steps on accommodation requests and adverse actions. The exhibit is seven pages.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Case 5:22-cv-00009-TES   Document 133-4   Filed 07/26/24   Page 1 of 7




         Exhibit D
  Case 5:22-cv-00009-TES   Document 133-4   Filed 07/26/24   Page 2 of 7




                                101690
         DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE OPENING STATEMENT


                              BEFORE THE
   HOUSE ARMED SERVICES SUBCOMMITTEE ON MILITARY PERSONNEL
                           FEBRUARY 28, 2023




   UPDATE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION IMPLEMENTATION, RESCISSION,
                           AND REQUIREMENTS


                            STATEMENT OF:
THE HONORABLE GINA ORTIZ JONES, UNDER SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE




                NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED
               BY THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES
             UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
      Case 5:22-cv-00009-TES            Document 133-4          Filed 07/26/24      Page 3 of 7




        Chairman Banks, Ranking Member Kim, distinguished members of the Armed Services

Committee and this subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today. It

is my pleasure to be able to discuss the Department of the Air Force’s (DAF’s) highly effective

efforts throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. The steps used to protect our total force—both

military and civilian—enabled the DAF to continue protecting the Nation and defend its interests

around the globe at a time of unprecedented challenge. I will also address the efforts underway

to implement the rescission of the mandate while continuing to take care of our personnel and

execute global missions on a daily basis.

        I am grateful to be sitting here today, speaking without a mask on, with relatively high

confidence that I will remain healthy, and that if I fall ill, the risk of death from the effects of

COVID-19 are far less likely than early in the pandemic. Additionally, I am grateful that we

have efficacious treatments should they be needed. This was not the case 26 months ago.

December 2020, when the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) first granted the Emergency

Use Authorization for the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, was the deadliest month for COVID-19-

related deaths in the United States. That month, our Nation experienced more than 65,000

confirmed and probable COVID-19-related deaths, raising our total count to over 334,000 deaths

since the start of the pandemic. It was also that month that the Centers for Disease Control and

Prevention initiated new travel restrictions to and from the United Kingdom, where we have a

significant force presence, to contain a new variant that was 70% more transmissible.

        When Secretary of Defense Austin mandated immunization for service members on

August 24, 2021, our national death toll had risen to over 634,000. Those circumstances drove

Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall’s decision to implement the earliest vaccination

deadline amongst the Military Departments. The decision to immunize was the right decision at



                                                   2
      Case 5:22-cv-00009-TES           Document 133-4         Filed 07/26/24      Page 4 of 7




the time, and in fact, the only choice given the criticality of our mission. I will never forget those

dire summer months when I would receive a notification, sometimes as many as two a day, about

a DAF teammate who died due to COVID-related complications—only to read they were

unvaccinated.

       Vaccination was essential in allowing us to deploy, rotate our forces to countries that

mandated vaccination, and most importantly, keep the men, women, and dependents of the DAF

healthy. As they have for decades, the vast majority of our Airmen and Guardians complied with

the lawful order to vaccinate. Of the over 500,000 total force Airmen and Guardians,

approximately 98% [99% of Regular Air Force and Space Force or 326,000 personnel; 94.3% of

Air National Guard or 105,000 personnel; and 95.9% of Air Force Reserve or 70,000 personnel]

followed the Secretary of Defense’s lawful order—as a result, our force was able to focus on the

mission.

       While vaccination has received the overwhelming majority of public attention, I want to

reinforce that the Department did not rely solely on immunization to protect the force. The DAF,

in concert with the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) and other Services, took a holistic

approach to combat COVID-19. Through a series of prophylactic measures such as masking,

physical distancing, telework, remote work, travel, and deployment restrictions and control, we

maintained readiness while much of industry and the commercial sector ground to a stand-still.

The DAF continued its flying mission, operating from austere locations conducting world-wide

operations, executing strike and mobility operations in support of the Joint Force, maintaining

our nuclear deterrent, and ensuring we continued to induct and train our force. Our collective

safety measures kept our depots running, facilities maintained, bases operating, and missions

executed.



                                                  3
      Case 5:22-cv-00009-TES           Document 133-4          Filed 07/26/24      Page 5 of 7




       The Space Force is tasked with highly classified, no-fail missions which largely preclude

telework or remote work. During the pandemic, our Space Force fully supported combatant

command missions 24 hours a day, seven days a week, using vaccination, preventive measures,

and solid operational planning, including standby crews ready to support exposure, quarantine,

and isolation requirements. Commanders leveraged the full suite of capabilities to take care of

their people and effectively execute the mission.

       The DAF simultaneously supported national efforts to augment civilian emergency

response, mass testing and immunization, and healthcare infrastructure, notably hospitals

operating beyond capacity. The Air Force Medical Service deployed 2,724 Total Force Airmen

(2,412 Active Duty and 312 Reserve Component) in support of COVID-19 response operations

during the pandemic. We deployed contingency Medical Strike Teams across the country to

provide immediate and acute support. We deployed 10 vaccination teams to 10 cities, in 9 states,

to deliver 1.6 million vaccinations. And, we deployed 612 medical personnel to support 33

locations in 18 states to provide in-patient, critical care at hospitals experiencing significant

personnel shortages. This lifesaving care provided to our communities was only possible

because of the vaccination rates within the Force and the safety measures we employed.

       Religious liberty is a foundation of our society and our Constitution—it is among those

rights that Airmen and Guardians have sworn their lives to defend. In accordance with long-held

policy, and based upon law, we considered all requests for medical, administrative, and religious

accommodations seriously and thoroughly. Our ability to accommodate our members’ religious

convictions had to be weighed against the impact of that accommodation on military readiness.

While each request was weighed on its merits, the collective impact of the accommodations was

also considered. Readiness and deployability are the hallmark of the force and must remain so.



                                                  4
      Case 5:22-cv-00009-TES          Document 133-4         Filed 07/26/24      Page 6 of 7




        On January 10, 2023, Secretary Austin rescinded the COVID-19 vaccination

requirement for military personnel, at the direction of Congress. Accordingly, on January 23,

2023, Secretary Kendall formally rescinded his order to vaccinate as well as the force

implementation guidance associated with the mandate. We are actively engaged with OSD and

the other Services to expeditiously implement Secretary Austin’s guidance. No individual

currently serving in the DAF will be separated solely on the basis of their refusal to receive the

COVID-19 vaccination if they sought an accommodation on religious, administrative, or medical

grounds. We are finalizing how to expeditiously remove adverse actions solely associated with

refusal to vaccinate following any denial of such requests. We have also ceased ongoing reviews

of current service members’ religious, administrative, or medical accommodation requests for

exemption from the COVID-19 vaccine, to include accommodation denial appeals.

Additionally, we have taken action to ensure that there are no bars to enlistment or

commissioning, to include those whose commissions were held in abeyance. In concert with

OSD, we are developing the policy, processes, and procedures for those who were discharged

after submitting an accommodation request and wish to re-enter the force.

       Notwithstanding these actions, there may be situations in the future when vaccination

status will be a consideration. For example, this may occur when a host-nation has a vaccination

requirement for entrance that may impact deployment or even permanent relocation of members.

Additionally, vaccination may need to be a consideration for members serving in unique

positions, such as at austere locations with limited medical care. Barring unanticipated

developments with COVID-19, we expect such cases to be rare and if considered, they will

receive appropriate review at the general officer level. The DAF will continue to promote

COVID-19 vaccination and available boosters to our service members, employees and family



                                                 5
      Case 5:22-cv-00009-TES           Document 133-4        Filed 07/26/24       Page 7 of 7




members in accordance with FDA and governmental recommendations, while being clear there

is not a COVID-19 vaccination mandate. We will take actions consistent with the law and adapt

our policies to continue to protect the force as we face evolving epidemiology in the future.

       Let me close by expressing my profound respect for the men and women of the DAF; for

their tenacity, resolve, hard work, resilience, and indomitable spirit in the face of this pandemic.

Thank you again for the opportunity to appear before this distinguished committee. I look

forward to addressing your questions.




                                                  6


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.gamd.123364.133.4.pdf
Size
106,368 bytes
SHA-256
47d0dba0c8d796171fcf1367630e8b5853ff0b9ac3e11207b2cc8c0556ef775a
Our copy
gov.uscourts.gamd.123364.133.4.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top