Order for Service — ID.me, Inc., and Cogency Global, Inc., Civil Action File No. 1:22-cv-02237

Summary

Order for service of a report and recommendation, signed August 5, 2022 by U.S. Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas in Raissa Djuissi Kengne v. ID.me, Inc. and Cogency Global, Inc., Civil Action File No. 1:22-cv-02237-SEG in the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division. It directs the Clerk to serve the report and recommendation and this order on counsel and on any unrepresented party. Each party may file written objections within fourteen days of service of the order, and the order warns that a party who does not object waives the right to challenge on appeal the unobjected-to factual and legal findings. If no objections are filed, the report may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

AO 72A
(Rev.8/82)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATLANTA DIVISION
RAISSA DJUISSI KENGNE,
Plaintiff,
v.
ID.me, INC., and COGENCY
GLOBAL, INC.,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION FILE
NO. 1:22-cv-02237-SEG
ORDER FOR SERVICE OF
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
The Report and Recommendation of the undersigned United States Magistrate
Judge made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b),
N.D. Ga. R. 72.1(B), (D), and Standing Order 18-01 (N.D. Ga. Feb. 12, 2018) has
been filed.  The Clerk is DIRECTED to serve upon counsel for the parties and
directly upon any unrepresented parties a copy of the Report and Recommendation
and a copy of this Order.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.  § 636(b)(1), each party may file written objections, if any,
to the Report and Recommendation within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS of service of this
Order.  Should objections be filed, they shall specify with particularity the alleged
Case 1:22-cv-02237-SEG     Document 8     Filed 08/05/22     Page 1 of 2

AO 72A
(Rev.8/82)
error(s) made (including reference by page number to any transcripts if applicable)
and shall be served upon the opposing party.  The party filing objections will be
responsible for obtaining and filing the transcript of any evidentiary hearing for review
by the District Court.  If no objections are filed, the Report and Recommendation
may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court, and on appeal, the
Court of Appeals will deem waived any challenge to factual and legal findings to
which there was no objection, subject to interests-of-justice plain error review.
Harrigan v. Metro Dade Police Dep’t Station #4, 977 F.3d 1185, 1191–92 (11th Cir.
2020); 11th Cir. R. 3-1 (“A party failing to object to a magistrate judge’s findings or
recommendations . . . waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court’s order
based on unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions if the party was informed of the
time period for objecting and the consequences on appeal for failing to object.”).
The Clerk is DIRECTED to submit the Report and Recommendation with
objections, if any, to the District Court after expiration of the above time period.
IT IS SO ORDERED and DIRECTED, this 5th day of August, 2022.
CATHERINE M. SALINAS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Case 1:22-cv-02237-SEG     Document 8     Filed 08/05/22     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.gand.304058.8.0.pdf

Size

150,535 bytes

SHA-256

1b7e4a4de6c5214a1c356193326677fd7ccc63a06b60feba688b321457f1efd5

Our copy

gov.uscourts.gand.304058.8.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)