Home/Source documents/Before the Court is the Motion for Reconsideration and Reply to Defendant’s Opposition
Before the Court is the Motion for Reconsideration and Reply to Defendant’s Opposition
Date
2022-06-02
Full text
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION
U.S. NAVY SEALs 1-26, et al.,
§
§
Plaintiffs,
§
§
v.
§
Civil Action No. 4:21-cv-01236-O
§
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, et al.,
§
§
§
Defendants.
§
ORDER
Before the Court is the Motion for Reconsideration and Reply to Defendant’s Opposition
to Request for Leave to Intervene (ECF No. 166), filed by pro se litigant Mike Webb on June 2,
2022.
Webb has once again failed to meet the criteria for intervention. He has presented no “claim
or defense that shares with the main action a common question of law or fact.” Fed. R. Civ. P.
24(b)(1). He admits that unlike Plaintiffs in this action, he does not seek a religious exemption to
the Navy’s COVID vaccine policy. Mot. 3, ECF No. 166. As noted previously, he is not a member
of the Navy. Nothing in the Motion for Reconsideration overcomes the deficiencies of Webb’s
first attempt at intervention.
Accordingly, the Court DENIES the Motion for Reconsideration.
SO ORDERED on this 2nd day of June, 2022.
Case 4:21-cv-01236-O Document 167 Filed 06/02/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 5131
Case 4:21-cv-01236-O Document 167 Filed 06/02/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 5131
_____________________________________
Reed O’Connor
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE