Motion to Dismiss Complaint — Marshall v. Prestamos CDFI
Summary
Defendant Prestamos CDFI, LLC's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint, filed December 10, 2021 as Document 15 in Marshall v. Prestamos CDFI, LLC, Case No. 5:21-cv-04337-JMG, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Prestamos moves under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) to dismiss the complaint of Alicia Marshall, Daniel Pronsky, and Paris Townsend with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. It states that the Rule 12(b)(6) grounds, covering Counts I and II and the absence of a private right of action under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, are not curable by amendment. The two-page motion is signed by counsel at Ballard Spahr LLP.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
- Date
- 2021-12-10
Cite this document
“Motion to Dismiss Complaint — Marshall v. Prestamos CDFI.”
Original at ecf.paed.uscourts.gov, dated 2021-12-10. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2021-12-10-plaintiffs-v-prestamos-cdfi-llc-592a1bbc-1/
, SHA-256 592a1bbc52763bbee8681b517b67d6c69880177645b0417bfc56cecae07e73ce.Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ALICIA MARSHALL, DANIEL PRONSKY, and PARIS TOWNSEND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. PRESTAMOS CDFI, LLC, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 5:21-cv-04337-JMG DEFENDANT PRESTAMOS CDFI, LLC’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT Defendant Prestamos CDFI, LLC, hereby moves, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), to dismiss the Complaint with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. On December 10, 2021, counsel for Prestamos called counsel for Plaintiffs and provided notice of this motion to dismiss and outlined its substance. Counsel were unable to reach a resolution that would eliminate the need for the portion of this motion made under Rule 12(b)(6). Defendant’s position is that the grounds for dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6)—regarding the inability to state claims under Counts I and II of the Complaint, and the absence of a private right of action under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act—do not assert pleading deficiencies that are curable by amendment. See Policies and Procedures of Judge John M. Gallagher § II(B)(5). Case 5:21-cv-04337-JMG Document 15 Filed 12/10/21 Page 1 of 2 WHEREFORE, Prestamos respectfully requests that the Court enter an order granting its Motion to Dismiss and dismissing the Complaint with prejudice. Dated: December 10, 2021 BALLARD SPAHR LLP By: /s/ Marcel S. Pratt Marcel S. Pratt (Pa. ID 307483) Michael R. McDonald (Pa. ID 326873) 1735 Market Street, 51st Floor Philadelphia, PA 19103 T: 215-665-8500 F: 215-864-8999 PrattM@ballardspahr.com McDonaldM@ballardspahr.com Roy Herrera* Daniel A. Arellano* 1 East Washington Street Suite 2300 Phoenix, AZ 85004 T: 602-798-5400 F: 602-798-5595 HerreraR@ballardspahr.com ArellanoD@ballardspahr.com *pro hac vice admission to be sought Attorneys for Defendant Case 5:21-cv-04337-JMG Document 15 Filed 12/10/21 Page 2 of 2
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.paed.589575.15.0.pdf
- Size
- 25,965 bytes
- SHA-256
- 592a1bbc52763bbee8681b517b67d6c69880177645b0417bfc56cecae07e73ce
- Original
- PACER (login required)