Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order on Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 26)

Order on Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 26)

Summary

In U.S. Navy SEALs 1-26, et al. v. Biden, et al. (Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division, Civil Action No. 4:21-cv-01236-O), the Court addresses Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 26), filed December 1, 2021. Plaintiffs argue that disclosing the identities of the individual SEALs and Special Warfare personnel would jeopardize their missions and personal security, and Plaintiffs' Certificate of Conference indicated that Defendants are opposed. The Court finds that expedited briefing is necessary to resolve whether a protective order is required. Defendants' response is due on or before December 6, 2021, and Plaintiffs may reply on or before December 8, 2021. The order is dated December 2, 2021, and the signature block names Reed O'Connor, United States District Judge.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Date
2021-12-01

Cite this document

“Order on Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 26).” Original at archive.org, dated 2021-12-01. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2021-12-01-covid-era-misc/, SHA-256 fb7479869d2da1a2c1a8dfa41d0f79895db803792875edc2e77672a5c81a53ea.

Full text

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION
U.S. NAVY SEALs 1-26, et al.,
§
§
     Plaintiffs,
§
§
v.
§
Civil Action No. 4:21-cv-01236-O
§
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., et al.,
§
§
§
     Defendants.
§
ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 26), filed December
1, 2021. Plaintiffs argue that disclosing the identities of the individual SEALs and Special Warfare
personnel would jeopardize their missions and personal security. See Mot. 3, ECF No. 26.
Plaintiffs’ Certificate of Conference indicated that Defendants are opposed to this motion. Id. at 7.
The Court finds that expedited briefing is necessary to resolve the issue of whether a
protective order is required. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendants’ response is due on
or before December 6, 2021. Plaintiffs may then reply on or before December 8, 2021.
SO ORDERED on this 2nd day of December, 2021.
Case 4:21-cv-01236-O   Document 28   Filed 12/02/21    Page 1 of 1   PageID 1440
Case 4:21-cv-01236-O   Document 28   Filed 12/02/21    Page 1 of 1   PageID 1440
_____________________________________
Reed O’Connor
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.txnd.355696.28.0.pdf
Size
147,076 bytes
SHA-256
fb7479869d2da1a2c1a8dfa41d0f79895db803792875edc2e77672a5c81a53ea
Our copy
gov.uscourts.txnd.355696.28.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top