Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order (Document 445): Antitrust Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time — In re January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation

Order (Document 445): Antitrust Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time — In re January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation

Summary

An Order (Document 445) in In re January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation, Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA (Case No. 21-2989-MDL-ALTONAGA/Torres), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, relating to the Antitrust Actions, entered on the FLSD docket November 30, 2021 over the name of Chief United States District Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga. The one-page order grants the Antitrust Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time [ECF No. 444], filed November 29, 2021, which sought a 30-day extension because co-lead counsel, the Joseph Saveri Law Firm, is engaged in a four-week trial that began on November 29, 2021. It recites that on November 17, 2021 the Court granted Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Antitrust Tranche Complaint [ECF No. 408] with a December 20, 2021 deadline for a final amended complaint, and sets January 20, 2022 as the new deadline.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Date
2021-11-29

Cite this document

“Order (Document 445): Antitrust Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time — In re January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation.” Original at archive.org, dated 2021-11-29. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2021-11-29-covid-era-misc-f1b51604-1/, SHA-256 f1b51604ffbd2c575bbad4031a6283acd113eabffa3bfd333a3a0cae1fe0b46c.

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 21-2989-MDL-ALTONAGA/Torres

IN RE:

JANUARY 2021 SHORT SQUEEZE
TRADING LITIGATION
____________________________________/

This Document Relates to the Antitrust Actions

ORDER

THIS CAUSE came before the Court on the Antitrust Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for
Extension of Time [ECF No. 444], filed on November 29, 2021.  On November 17, 2021, the
Court granted Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Antitrust Tranche Complaint [ECF No. 408] and
set a December 20, 2021 deadline for Plaintiffs to file their final amended complaint.  (See Order
[ECF No. 438] 50).  The Antitrust Plaintiffs now seek a 30-day extension of time to file their
amended complaint because co-lead counsel, the Joseph Saveri Law Firm, is engaged in a four-
week trial that began on November 29, 2021.  (See Mot. 1).  Being fully advised, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion [ECF No. 444] is GRANTED.  Plaintiffs
shall file their amended complaint in the Antitrust Tranche by January 20, 2022.
DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 30th day of November, 2021.

________________________________________

CECILIA M. ALTONAGA

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc:  counsel of record
       pro se Plaintiffs
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA   Document 445   Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2021   Page 1 of 1

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.flsd.590042.445.0.pdf
Size
141,587 bytes
SHA-256
f1b51604ffbd2c575bbad4031a6283acd113eabffa3bfd333a3a0cae1fe0b46c
Our copy
gov.uscourts.flsd.590042.445.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
  1. Stipulated Rule 502(d) and Privileged Materials Order (2021-11-23)same docket · 2021-11-23
  2. Robinhood's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File an Answer to Plaintiffs' Federal Securities Tranche Complaint (Dkt. 504)same docket · 2021-11-30
  3. Defendant Apex Clearing Corporation's Reply in Support of Its Rule 12 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended… (Dkt. 440)same docket · 2021-11-19
  4. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Attorney Rachel Morowitz’s Motion tosame docket · 2021-12-21
  5. Defendants Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC and Robinhood Securities LLC's Motion to Dismiss the… (Dkt. 449)same docket · 2022-01-07
  6. A strong understanding of market structure, including trading, reporting, and clearingsame docket · 2021-11-05
  7. Order (Motion to Dismiss the Federal Securities Tranche Complaint) (Dkt. 503)same docket · 2022-01-07
  8. Order (Briefing Schedule) (Dkt. 452)same docket · 2022-01-20
  9. Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, and Robinhood Securities, LLC's… (Dkt. 436)same docket · 2021-11-05
  10. Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss of Defendant Apex Clearing Corp. in the Other… (Dkt. 435)same docket · 2021-11-05
  11. Notice of Appeal — In re January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation (Dkt. 457)same docket · 2022-01-27
  12. Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC and Robinhood Securities, LLC's… (Dkt. 454)same docket · 2022-01-28
  13. THIS CAUSE came before the Court on the An titrust Plaintiffs ’ Motion to Strikesame docket · 2021-11-04
  14. Defendant Citadel Securities LLC's Notice of Supplemental Authority in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the… (Dkt. 430)same docket · 2021-10-26
  15. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Amended Antitrust Tranche Complaint (Dkt. 456)same docket · 2022-02-18
  16. Antitrust Plaintiffs' Notice of Supplemental Authority (Tether and Bitfinex) (Dkt. 429)same docket · 2021-10-22
  17. Antitrust Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Dkt. 459)same docket · 2022-03-11
  18. [Proposed] Order Granting Withdrawal As Counsel For Plaintiffssame docket · 2022-03-24
  19. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Attorney Janet Jones -Duffey’s Motion tosame docket · 2021-10-22
  20. Defendants' Reply in Support of Their Motion to Dismiss the Amended Antitrust Tranche Complaint (Dkt. 463)same docket · 2022-03-25

Part of: In re: January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation · Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) · Motions · Federal court dockets (PACER) · 2021 · Source documents

Back to top