Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order — Attorney Janet Jones-Duffey's Motion to Withdraw Appearance — Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA, Document 427

Order — Attorney Janet Jones-Duffey's Motion to Withdraw Appearance — Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA, Document 427

Summary

An Order (Document 427) in In re January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation, Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA (Case No. 21-2989-MDL-ALTONAGA/Torres), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, entered on the FLSD docket October 22, 2021 over the name of Chief United States District Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga. The one-page order grants Attorney Janet Jones-Duffey's Motion to Withdraw Appearance [ECF No. 426], in which Ms. Jones-Duffey seeks to withdraw her appearance as counsel for Defendants E*TRADE Securities LLC, E*TRADE Financial Corporation, E*TRADE Financial Holdings, LLC and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC, and advises that she no longer represents these Defendants in the MDL. The order recites that Attorney Brian S. Weinstein of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP and local counsel Peter W. Homer of HomerBonner will continue to represent those Defendants.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Date
2021-10-22

Cite this document

“Order — Attorney Janet Jones-Duffey's Motion to Withdraw Appearance — Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA, Document 427.” Original at archive.org, dated 2021-10-22. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2021-10-22-covid-era-misc-4970fc15-1/, SHA-256 4970fc151a171e6a4c5ccfc5a024c5a8da0d1421694dc93f73503114b5f579ad.

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.  21-2989-MDL-ALTONAGA/Torres

In re:

JANUARY 2021 SHORT SQUEEZE
TRADING LITIGATION
_________________________________/

This Document Relates to All Actions

ORDER

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Attorney Janet Jones-Duffey’s Motion to
Withdraw Appearance [ECF No. 426].  Ms. Jones-Duffey seeks to withdraw her appearance as
counsel for Defendants, E*TRADE Securities LLC, E*TRADE Financial Corporation, E*TRADE
Financial Holdings, LLC, and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC.  Ms. Jones-Duffey advises she
no longer represents these Defendants in the MDL, but that Attorney Brian S. Weinstein of Davis
Polk & Wardwell LLP and local counsel Peter W. Homer of HomerBonner will continue to
represent the cited Defendants in this matter.  Being fully advised, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is GRANTED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 22nd day of October, 2021.

    _______________________________________

   CECILIA M. ALTONAGA

   CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc:
counsel of record
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA   Document 427   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/22/2021   Page 1 of 1

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.flsd.590042.427.0.pdf
Size
46,296 bytes
SHA-256
4970fc151a171e6a4c5ccfc5a024c5a8da0d1421694dc93f73503114b5f579ad
Our copy
gov.uscourts.flsd.590042.427.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
  1. Order… (Dkt. 450, dated 2021-10-15)same docket · 2021-10-15
  2. Order… (Dkt. 420, dated 2021-10-15)same docket · 2021-10-15
  3. Antitrust Plaintiffs' Notice of Supplemental Authority (Tether and Bitfinex) (Dkt. 429)same docket · 2021-10-22
  4. Defendant Citadel Securities LLC's Notice of Supplemental Authority in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the… (Dkt. 430)same docket · 2021-10-26
  5. THIS CAUSE came before the Court on the An titrust Plaintiffs ’ Motion to Strikesame docket · 2021-11-04
  6. Defendants Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC and Robinhood Securities, LLC's Motion to Dismiss the… (Dkt. 421)same docket · 2021-10-15
  7. Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss of Defendant Apex Clearing Corp. in the Other… (Dkt. 435)same docket · 2021-11-05
  8. Arizona v. Maricopa Cty Med Soc — Doc. 419same docket · 2021-10-05
  9. Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, and Robinhood Securities, LLC's… (Dkt. 436)same docket · 2021-11-05
  10. Ordered and Adjudged as followssame docket · 2021-09-23
  11. A strong understanding of market structure, including trading, reporting, and clearingsame docket · 2021-11-05
  12. Defendant Apex Clearing Corporation's Reply in Support of Its Rule 12 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended… (Dkt. 440)same docket · 2021-11-19
  13. Court Filing — FLSD Case 590042, Doc. 407same docket · 2021-08-30
  14. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Antitrust Tranche Complaint (Dkt. 408)same docket · 2021-08-30
  15. Stipulated Rule 502(d) and Privileged Materials Order (2021-11-23)same docket · 2021-11-23
  16. Aas v. Super Ct 12 P 3d 1125 Cal — Doc. 406same docket · 2021-08-30
  17. THIS CAUSE came before the Court on the Antitrust Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion forsame docket · 2021-11-29
  18. ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant, SoFi Securities LLC , is dismissedsame docket · 2021-08-27
  19. Robinhood's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File an Answer to Plaintiffs' Federal Securities Tranche Complaint (Dkt. 504)same docket · 2021-11-30
  20. ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant, Ally Financial, Inc., is dismissed withoutsame docket · 2021-08-24

Part of: In re: January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation · Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) · Motions · Federal court dockets (PACER) · 2021 · Source documents

Back to top