Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents GAO-21-583, COVID-19: Selected Agencies Overcame Technology Challenges to Support Telew…

GAO-21-583, COVID-19: Selected Agencies Overcame Technology Challenges to Support Telework but Need to Fully Assess Security Controls

Issuer
Government Accountability Office
Document type
Report
Date
2021-09-30

Summary

GAO-21-583, a report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office to congressional addressees dated September 30, 2021, on how selected federal agencies provided information technology for maximum telework during the COVID-19 pandemic. It cites a CARES Act provision for GAO monitoring, Pub. L. No. 116-136, § 19010. The report finds that each of the 12 agencies selected had IT in place for remote access and generally overcame initial challenges, such as seven agencies increasing bandwidth. It also finds that two agencies had not fully documented relevant IT security controls, assessments at five agencies did not address all relevant controls, and four had not fully documented remedial actions. GAO makes nine recommendations to six agencies; appendices include the questions sent to agencies and comments from agencies such as the Internal Revenue Service.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

United States Government Accountability Office

Report to Congressional Addressees

September 2021

COVID-19
Selected Agencies
Overcame Technology
Challenges to Support
Telework but Need to
Fully Assess Security
Controls

GAO-21-583


September 2021

COVID-19

Highlights of GAO-21-583, a report to
congressional addressees

Selected Agencies Overcame Technology Challenges
to Support Telework but Need to Fully Assess
Security Controls

Why GAO Did This Study

What GAO Found

In response to the onset of the COVID19 pandemic, in March 2020 the Office
of Management and Budget directed
federal agencies to maximize their use
of telework to enable the workforce to
remain safe while ensuring that
government operations continue.
Telework is essential to continuity of
operations but also brings added
cybersecurity risks.

Each of the 12 agencies GAO selected for review had information technology (IT)
in place to support remote access for telework during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Although the agencies initially experienced IT challenges in supporting remote
access for maximum telework, they generally overcame them. For example,
seven agencies were challenged in providing sufficient bandwidth to provide
remote access for teleworkers, but they increased bandwidth as needed to
ensure networks could handle additional remote connections. In addition, while
the increased number of remote connections brings additional cybersecurity
risks, all of the selected agencies reported that they continued activities intended
to help ensure the security of their information and systems.

The CARES Act contains a provision
for GAO to monitor the federal
response to the pandemic. GAO was
also asked to examine federal
agencies’ preparedness to support
expanded telework. GAO’s objectives
were to determine (1) selected
agencies’ initial experiences in
providing the IT needed to support
remote access for maximum telework
and (2) the extent to which selected
agencies followed federal information
security guidance for their IT systems
that provide remote access.

While the selected agencies had documented elements of a telework security
policy, such as permitted telework devices and forms of remote access, not all
agencies had fully addressed other relevant federal guidance for securing their
systems that support remote access for telework (see figure). Specifically, two
agencies had not fully documented relevant IT security controls to protect those
systems. In addition, assessments for systems that five agencies relied upon for
remote access did not address all relevant controls to ensure the controls were
operating effectively. Further, four selected agencies had not fully documented
remedial actions to mitigate weaknesses they had previously identified.
Extent to Which 12 Selected Agencies Followed Federal Information Security Guidance in
Implementing Their IT Systems That Support Remote Access for Telework

GAO selected 12 agencies for review
that varied in their percentages of
reported employee telework use and
sent a questionnaire to solicit these
agencies’ perspectives on the use of IT
in transitioning to maximum telework.
GAO also reviewed the selected
agencies’ information security
documentation and interviewed
relevant officials.

What GAO Recommends
GAO is making a total of nine
recommendations to six agencies to
document and assess relevant
controls, and to fully document
remedial actions for systems
supporting remote access. The
agencies agreed with the
recommendations.
View GAO-21-583. For more information,
contact Jennifer R. Franks at (404) 679-1831
or franksj@gao.gov.

Although one of the selected agencies subsequently resolved its shortcomings,
others had not. For the agencies that did not fully follow federal information
security guidance, agency IT security officials stated that these conditions existed
for various reasons, such as out-of-date documentation, among others. If
agencies do not sufficiently document relevant security controls, assess the
controls, and fully document remedial actions for weaknesses identified in
security controls, they are at increased risk that vulnerabilities in their systems
that provide remote access could be exploited.

United States Government Accountability Office


Contents

Letter

1
Background
Selected Agencies Supported Remote Access and Overcame IT
Challenges during Maximum Telework
Selected Agencies Generally Followed Federal Information
Security Guidance, but Gaps Remained
Conclusions
Recommendations
Agency Comments and Our Evaluation

5
11
18
26
26
27

Appendix I

IT Telework Questions Sent to Selected Agencies

33

Appendix II

Objectives, Scope, and Methodology

38

Appendix III

Comments from the Department of Homeland Security

47

Appendix IV

Comments from the Securities and Exchange Commission

48

Appendix V

Comments from the Social Security Administration

50

Appendix VI

Comments from the Office of Personnel Management

51

Appendix VII

Comments from the Internal Revenue Service

52

Appendix VIII

GAO Contact and Staff Acknowledgments

54

Page i

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Table
Table 1: Remote Access Methods Agencies Can Leverage to
Provide Teleworkers with Access to Computing
Resources

7

Figures
Figure 1: Remote Access Technologies Used by 12 Selected
Agencies during the Pandemic to Support Telework
Figure 2: Extent of IT Challenges Identified by Selected Agencies
in Implementing Maximum Telework
Figure 3: Extent to Which Selected Agencies Followed Federal
Information Security Guidance for Their IT that Supports
Remote Access for Telework

Page ii

12
13
19

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Abbreviations
the Act
BYOD
COVID-19
CISA
DHS
DOJ
DOT
FBI
FISMA
GFE
Interior
IT
NIST
NSA
OCIO
OMB
OPM
PIV
POA&M
SEC
SP
SSA
VPN

Telework Enhancement Act of 2010
bring your own device
Coronavirus Disease 2019
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency
Department of Homeland Security
Department of Justice
Department of Transportation
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014
government-furnished equipment
Department of the Interior
information technology
National Institute of Standards and Technology
National Security Agency
Office of the Chief Information Officer
Office of Management and Budget
Office of Personnel Management
personal identity verification
plan of action and milestones
Securities and Exchange Commission
Special Publication
Social Security Administration
virtual private network

This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright protection in the
United States. The published product may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety
without further permission from GAO. However, because this work may contain
copyrighted images or other material, permission from the copyright holder may be
necessary if you wish to reproduce this material separately.

Page iii

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Letter

441 G St. N.W.
Washington, DC 20548

September 30, 2021
Congressional Addressees
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in a
catastrophic loss of life and generated unprecedented challenges for
federal agencies that must continue to carry out their missions while also
ensuring that their employees are able to perform their work safely and
effectively. Telework—an arrangement that allows employees to perform
their work at an approved alternative worksite—can be used by agencies
to accomplish their missions during periods of disruption, such as during
this pandemic. In March 2020, federal agencies moved rapidly to
maximize their use of telework.
To support telework, agencies rely on various technologies that provide
remote access to agency networks over the internet. While these
technologies have allowed agencies to continue their operations during
the pandemic, remote access also brings additional cybersecurity risk to
agencies’ information and systems. Concerned with the risk to
cybersecurity across federal government systems, we initially designated
information security as a government-wide high-risk area in 1997—a
designation it retains today. 1
The CARES Act 2 includes a provision for GAO to report on its ongoing
monitoring and oversight efforts related to the COVID-19 pandemic.3 In
addition, the chair of the Senate Subcommittee on Emerging Threats
and Spending Oversight of the Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs, and the chairman of the House Committee on
Homeland Security requested that we examine the federal government’s
1See GAO, High-Risk Series: An Overview, GAO-HR-97-1 (Washington, D.C.: February

1997); High-Risk Series: Information Management and Technology, GAO-HR-97-9
(Washington, D.C.: February 1997) and High-Risk Series: Dedicated Leadership Needed
to Address Limited Progress in Most High-Risk Areas, GAO-21-119SP (Washington, D.C.:
March 2, 2021). In 2003, we expanded this area to include computerized systems
supporting the nation’s critical infrastructure and, in 2015, we further expanded this area to
include protecting the privacy of personally identifiable information.
2CARES Act, Pub. L. No. 116-136, § 19010, 134 Stat. 281, 579-581 (2020).
3We regularly issue government-wide reports on the federal response to COVID-19. For

the latest report, see GAO, COVID-19: Continued Attention Needed to Enhance Federal
Preparedness, Response, Service Delivery, and Program Integrity, GAO-21-551
(Washington, D.C.: July 19, 2021). Our next government-wide report will be issued in
October 2021 and will be available on GAO’s website at https://www.gao.gov/coronavirus.

Page 1

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


preparedness to support maximum telework in response to the pandemic
and whether federal agencies had maintained cybersecurity during the
expansion of telework. Our specific objectives for this report were to
determine (1) selected agencies’ initial experiences in providing the
information technology (IT) needed to support remote access for
maximum telework in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and (2) the
extent to which the selected agencies followed federal information
security guidance for their IT systems that provide remote access to
support telework.
In conducting this work, we first selected a non-probability sample of
federal agencies to review. To do so, we initially identified the 28
agencies that perform national essential functions or primary missionessential functions, as defined by Presidential Policy Directive 40, Annex
A. 4 For each of the 28 agencies, we reviewed telework data from fiscal
year 2018, as published by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM)
in its annual Status of Telework in the Federal Government report to
Congress for fiscal year 2018. 5
Based on the data available in the OPM telework report, we reviewed
telework data for a total of 66 agencies, which included subcomponents
of the initial 28 agencies. We removed from our analysis those agencies
with fewer than 1,000 employees and those with less than 20 percent of
employees eligible to telework. 6 We then split the remaining agencies into
4The White House, National Continuity Policy, Presidential Policy Directive 40
(Washington, D.C.: July 2016). Annex A of this policy directive assigns executive
departments and agencies to one of four categories commensurate with their continuity of
operations responsibilities during a catastrophic emergency. These categories are
intended to be used for continuity planning, communications and information services
requirements, emergency operations capabilities, and other related requirements.
Agencies identified as Category I perform “national essential functions,” which are those
functions necessary to lead and sustain the nation during a catastrophic emergency.
Agencies identified as Category II are agencies that are not Category I, but perform
“primary mission-essential functions” that support national essential functions. We
removed the Central Intelligence Agency and the Office of the Director of National
Intelligence from this list due to concerns about the classified nature of data at those
entities.
5Office of Personnel Management, Status of Telework in the Federal Government, Report

to Congress Fiscal Year 2018 (Washington, D.C.: March 2020). At the time of our agency
selection, the data from fiscal year 2018 were the most recent available.

6We removed agencies with fewer than 1,000 employees and with less than 20 percent of

employees eligible to telework because agencies with such a small number of employees
eligible to telework are likely to have missions that do not facilitate the use of telework.

Page 2

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


three tiers, to include (1) those with a small number of employees, (2)
those with a medium number of employees, and (3) those with a large
number of employees. 7
Within each tier, we arranged the agencies based on the percentage of
eligible employees that teleworked in fiscal year 2018 at each agency.
Our final selection included the two agencies from each tier with the
smallest percentage of eligible employees who teleworked and the two
agencies from each tier with the largest percentage of eligible employees
who teleworked. 8 We selected agencies in this manner because we
wanted to perform our review at agencies with both small and large
telework operations before the pandemic.
Applying these criteria, we selected the following 12 agencies for our
review:
•

Food and Nutrition Service at the U.S. Department of Agriculture

•

Bureau of Indian Affairs and National Park Service at the Department
of the Interior (Interior)

•

Federal Highway Administration at the Department of Transportation
(DOT)

•

Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers and U.S. Secret Service
at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)

•

Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

•

Social Security Administration (SSA)

•

Internal Revenue Service at the Department of the Treasury

•

OPM

•

Executive Office for Immigration Review and Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI) at the Department of Justice (DOJ)

7The small tier contained agencies with 1,000–4,000 employees; the medium tier
contained agencies with 4,001–14,000 employees; and the large tier contained agencies
with more than 14,000 employees. We chose these ranges because they appeared to be
a natural breakdown in the size of the agencies in our selection.
8In three cases, we removed agencies from our list based on conversations that we

conducted with agency inspectors general. These conversations provided insight into the
nature of agency telework environments that we determined made them unsuitable for our
review.

Page 3

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


To address the first objective, we conducted a survey of IT subject matter
experts, including operations and security officials, at each of the 12
agencies selected for our review (see appendix I for a list of the survey
questions). 9 We developed and administered a questionnaire, and
received responses from all 12 agencies. The questionnaire asked about
a number of topics, including the agency’s telework environment, IT
support available for teleworkers, and changes in agency remote access
infrastructure due to the expansion of telework in response to the
pandemic. It also included a list of several potential IT challenges that
agencies may have faced during the transition to maximum telework, and
asked them to indicate the extent to which they experienced these
challenges.
In addition, we interviewed IT officials from each of the 12 agencies to ask
additional questions and clarify questionnaire responses. 10 The
experiences reflected the views of only those agencies that participated in
our survey and interviews and, therefore, are not generalizable to federal
agencies as a whole. We also held interviews with agency union
representatives to ask questions about employees’ experiences with IT
during maximum telework. 11
To address our second objective, we requested and reviewed IT security
documentation associated with the systems that provide remote access to

9Six of the agencies in our review relied on department-level resources to provide remote

access to their employees during the transition to maximum telework. In the following
instances, we solicited responses from both agency and department IT officials: the
Bureau of Indian Affairs and National Park Service relied on the Department of Interior for
remote access for their employees; the Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers relied
on the Department of Homeland Security; the Executive Office for Immigration Review
relied on the Department of Justice; Food and Nutrition Service relied on the Department
of Agriculture; and the Federal Highway Administration relied on the Department of
Transportation.

10As mentioned previously, we solicited responses from both agency and department IT
officials as necessary.
11We conducted interviews with union representatives from seven of the 12 selected
agencies. During these interviews, we asked questions regarding employees’ experiences
during maximum telework from an IT perspective to gain insight into experiences beyond
those of agency officials. Officials from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Federal
Highway Administration, and U.S. Secret Service told us that their employees were not
members of a union. In addition, a union representative from the Bureau of Indian Affairs
declined to comment, and a union representative from the Federal Law Enforcement
Training Centers did not respond to our interview request.

Page 4

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


support telework for the 12 selected agencies. 12 Documentation included
telework security policies, system security plans, results of relevant
security control assessments for the systems, and remedial action plans,
as appropriate. We reviewed the documentation to determine whether
agencies had addressed guidance published by the National Institute of
Standards and Technology (NIST). 13 In addition, we interviewed agency
IT operations and IT security officials.
During our review of the documentation, we focused on relevant security
controls and enhancements cited by NIST as being of particular
importance to protecting IT systems that provide remote access to
support telework. The controls covered topics such as account
management, remote access, identification and authentication of users,
and backup of agency information. Appendix II provides more details on
our objectives, scope, and methodology.
We conducted this performance audit from April 2020 to September 2021
in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our
findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. We believe that
the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and
conclusions based on our audit objectives.

Background

In response to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, on March 17, 2020,
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) directed agencies to
maximize their telework options for employees to enable the workforce to
remain safe while ensuring that government operations continue during
the pandemic. 14 In addition, OMB stated that agencies were to extend
12Because six of the agencies in our review relied on department-level resources to
provide remote access to their employees, we reviewed documentation associated with
both agencies and departments, as necessary.
13Guidance included, for example: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Guide
to Enterprise Telework, Remote Access, and Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) Security,
Special Publication 800-46 revision 2 (Gaithersburg, MD: July 2016), and National
Institute of Standards and Technology, Security and Privacy Controls for Information
Systems and Organizations, Special Publication 800-53 revision 4 (Gaithersburg, MD:
January 2015). NIST released revision 5 of Special Publication 800-53 in September
2020; however, revision 4 was in effect at the time of our review.
14Office of Management and Budget, Federal Agency Operational Alignment to Slow the

Spread of Coronavirus COVID-19, M-20-16 (Washington, D.C.: March 17, 2020).

Page 5

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


telework flexibilities to contractors whenever feasible and noted that the
government was to immediately adjust operations and services to
minimize face-to-face interactions.

Federal Law Requires
Agencies to Develop
Telework Policies

Since 1990, telework has received significant attention in Congress and in
the executive branch. In October 2000, Congress and the President
enacted the Department of Transportation and Related Agencies
Appropriations, 2001, which contained a mandate requiring each
executive agency 15 to establish a policy to permit eligible employees to
telework to the maximum extent possible without affecting performance. 16
Additionally, the Telework Enhancement Act of 2010 (the Act) further
requires each executive agency to notify employees of their eligibility to
telework and establish telework participation goals to help measure and
report results, among other things. 17 We have previously reported on
federal telework programs, including key practices for ensuring the
success of agencies’ telework programs, the reliability of agency-reported
data, the extent to which agencies have implemented telework as a tool
for continuity and emergency planning, and the information available on
costs and benefits of telework programs. 18

Agencies Use Various
Remote Access
Technologies to Support
Telework

On March 22, 2020, OMB issued a memo that directed federal agencies
to use technology to the greatest extent practicable to support mission

15Executive agencies are defined in 5 U.S.C. § 105 as an executive department, a
government corporation, and an independent establishment.
16Pub. L. No. 106-346, § 359, 114 Stat. 1356, 1356A-36 (2000).
17Pub. L. No. 111-292, 124 Stat. 3165 (Dec. 9, 2010), codified primarily at chapter 65 of
title 5 of the United States Code.
18See GAO, Federal Telework: Key Practices That Can Help Ensure the Success of
Telework Programs, GAO-21-238T (Washington, D.C.: November 18, 2020); Federal
Telework: Additional Controls Could Strengthen Telework Program Compliance and Data
Reporting, GAO-17-247 (Washington, D.C.: February 17, 2017); Federal Telework: Better
Guidance Could Help Agencies Calculate Benefits and Costs, GAO-16-551 (Washington,
D.C.: July 15, 2016); Federal Telework: Program Measurement Continues to Confront
Data Reliability Issues, GAO-12-519 (Washington, D.C.: Apr. 19, 2012); Emergency
Preparedness: Agencies Need Coordinated Guidance on Incorporating Telework into
Emergency and Continuity Planning, GAO-11-628 (Washington, D.C.: July 22, 2011); and
Human Capital: Telework Programs Need Clear Goals and Reliable Data, GAO-08-261T
(Washington, D.C.: Nov. 6, 2007).

Page 6

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


continuity during the nation’s COVID-19 emergency response efforts. 19
According to NIST, agencies can do so by, among other things,
leveraging one or more methods to provide teleworkers with remote
access to an agency’s computing resources. These methods include
tunneling, application portals, remote desktop access, and direct
application access. Table 1 describes each of these methods.
Table 1: Remote Access Methods Agencies Can Leverage to Provide Teleworkers with Access to Computing Resources
Tunneling

Tunneling offers an encrypted communications tunnel through which information can be securely
transmitted between networks, including public networks such as the internet. A virtual private network
(VPN) is a common tunneling technology that establishes an encrypted connection between a teleworker’s
device and the agency’s network, providing the teleworker with secure access to many of the agency’s
computing resources.

Application portal

An application portal is a server that offers access to one or more applications through a single centralized
interface. For example, a web-based portal provides a user with access to multiple applications from a
single website. Another type of portal solution, called a virtual desktop infrastructure, involves the user
connecting to a system that contains virtual images of standardized, non-simulated operating systems and
desktops.

Remote desktop access

Remote desktop access gives a teleworker the ability to remotely control a particular workstation at the
agency (most often the user’s own computer at the agency’s office) from a teleworker’s client device, such
as a laptop computer. The teleworker interacts with the remote computer and is able to access all of the
applications, data, and other resources that are normally available from their agency’s workstation.

Direct application access

Remote access can be accomplished without using remote access software. A teleworker can access an
individual application directly, with the application providing its own security. One of the most common
examples of direct application access is webmail.

Source: National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-46. I GAO-21-583

Remote Access Comes
with Increased
Cybersecurity Risks

The IT systems supporting federal agencies are highly complex and
dynamic, technologically diverse, and geographically dispersed. Without
proper safeguards, computer systems are vulnerable to individuals and
groups with malicious intentions who can intrude into those systems and
use their access to obtain sensitive information, commit fraud and identity
theft, disrupt operations, or launch attacks against other computer
systems and networks. While telework is an important option during the
COVID-19 pandemic, the large number of additional remote connections
needed to allow agencies to maintain maximum telework capabilities
brings more risks to agency networks and systems.
Remote access technologies, including employee telework devices (e.g.,
laptop computers and other devices), often need additional protection due
19Office of Management and Budget, Harnessing Technology to Support Mission
Continuity, M-20-19 (Washington, D.C.: March 2020).

Page 7

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


to higher exposure to external threats compared to technologies located
inside an agency’s network boundary. In its memo directing agencies to
use technology to support mission continuity during the pandemic, OMB
also provided a list of areas of increased focus concerning cybersecurity
and privacy. 20
In April 2020, the Congressional Research Service reported that the
increase in telework in response to the COVID-19 pandemic had
increased cybersecurity risks for agencies. 21 Specifically, it reported that
adversaries were, for example, using phishing attempts to try and take
advantage of the pandemic to entice and trick users into downloading
malicious software onto their devices. 22 Further, the increase in remote
users brings additional risks, as remote users are no longer accessing
agency computing resources from inside agency facilities.

Federal Agencies Provided
Guidance to Address Cyber
Risks

To help address the cybersecurity risks associated with remote access to
agency systems, the Act requires OMB to coordinate with DHS and NIST
to issue guidelines to ensure the adequacy of information and security
protections for information and information systems used by employees
while teleworking. In response to the Act, OMB issued security guidelines,
which stated that agencies must continue to follow OMB policies and
NIST standards and guidelines. 23 The OMB guidelines also referred to
NIST publications and resources to assist in the protection of remote
devices. In addition to OMB’s reference to NIST guidance, several
agencies provided additional guidance.
In addition to the security guidelines OMB provided as a result of the Act,
in its March 22, 2020 memo, the agency provided additional guidance to
agencies. The memo stated that agencies should, among other things,
•

ensure that virtual private network (VPN) components, network
infrastructure devices, and other devices used to enable remote work

20OMB, M-20-19.
21Congressional Research Service, Federal Telework During the COVID-19 Pandemic:

Cybersecurity Issues in Brief, R46310 (Washington, D.C.: April 10, 2020).

22Phishing is a digital form of social engineering that uses authentic-looking, but fake,

emails to request information from users or direct them to a fake website that requests
information.
23Office of Management and Budget, Implementing the Telework Enhancement Act of
2010: Security Guidelines, M-11-27 (Washington, D.C.: July 15, 2011).

Page 8

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


are updated with the latest software patches and security
configurations;
•

provide guidance to employees on applying appropriate information
security and privacy controls when working from alternate locations or
from home;

•

continue to prohibit employees from forwarding federal government
materials or information to personal devices; and

•

continue to prohibit the unauthorized use of social media or any
unauthorized devices for government business.

NIST Special Publication (SP) 800-53 revision 4 provides guidance to
federal agencies on identifying the security and privacy controls needed
to manage risk to their information and information systems. 24 To help
agencies and information system users address cybersecurity challenges
presented by teleworking and remote access, NIST issued two
complementary publications on telework security. One publication 25
makes recommendations to federal agencies for securing a variety of
remote access and bring your own device (BYOD) technologies. 26 The
publication also recommends that agencies develop a telework security
policy and identifies the security controls from NIST SP 800-53 that are
most pertinent for securing enterprise telework, remote access, and
BYOD technologies. The second publication provides recommendations
to users for securing BYOD technologies used for remote access, as well
as those directly attached to the enterprise’s own networks. 27
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the NIST Information
Technology Laboratory issued new bulletins providing guidance to
24National Institute of Standards and Technology, Security and Privacy Controls for
Federal Information Systems and Organizations, Special Publication 800-53 revision 4
(Gaithersburg, MD: January 2015). NIST released revision 5 of this publication in
September 2020; however, revision 4 was in effect at the time of our review.
25National Institute of Standards and Technology, Guide to Enterprise Telework, Remote
Access, and Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) Security, Special Publication 800-46 revision
2 (Gaithersburg, MD: July 2016).
26“Bring Your Own Device” refers to a situation in which an agency allows an employee to
use his or her own personal device (e.g., a personal laptop computer) to perform workrelated tasks.
27National Institute of Standards and Technology, User’s Guide to Telework and Bring
Your Own Device (BYOD) Security, Special Publication 800-114 revision 1 (Gaithersburg,
MD: July 2016).

Page 9

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


agencies on remote access. One bulletin highlighted specific
recommendations from its publication on securing agencies’ remote
access technologies. A second bulletin provided recommendations for
securing files exchanged over the internet. 28
DHS’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) provides
a variety of telework security guidance for both federal agencies and nonfederal organizations and for employees working remotely. For example,
it has provided guidance for implementing strong authentication, securing
web applications against cybersecurity threats, and avoiding social
engineering 29 and phishing attacks. Other guidance has also highlighted
cybersecurity principles and practices that individuals and agencies can
follow to employ video conferencing tools (i.e., collaboration tools) more
securely. 30
In response to the pandemic, CISA issued additional guidance to
agencies using telework. For example, one alert issued in March 2020
provided recommendations that agencies can implement to secure their
VPN against cyber threats. The alert also recommended that agencies
take steps to ensure that VPN connections are able to accommodate
increased remote connections occurring as a result of increased
telework. 31
The National Security Agency (NSA) has also published several guides
on telework and network security topics, including, among others,
securing mobile devices, home networks, and web browsers against
cyber threats; safely using social media; configuring VPNs securely; and

28National Institute of Standards and Technology Information Technology Laboratory,
Security for Enterprise Telework, Remote Access, and Bring Your Own Device (BYOD)
Solutions (Gaithersburg, MD: March 2020) and Security Considerations for Exchanging
Files Over the Internet (Gaithersburg, MD: August 2020).
29An attack using personal information to build trust with a user in order to gain
unauthorized access to sensitive information, systems, and networks or to engage in
identity fraud, among other things.
30Resources on telework security from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security
Agency can be found at https://www.cisa.gov/telework.
31Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, Enterprise VPN Security, Alert AA20-

073A, accessed March 13, 2020, https://www.us-cert.gov/ncas/alerts/aa20-073a.

Page 10

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


evaluating security features for collaboration tools. 32 For example, in
November 2020, NSA issued guidance outlining security features to
consider when selecting a collaboration tool, such as a video meeting
application, and steps to take to use the services securely. The guidance
also included a list for comparing the security features of 17 commercial
collaboration tools. 33
Further, in response to the pandemic, NSA and CISA jointly developed a
best practices guide for telework. This guide is intended to help federal
teleworkers protect federal information and information systems from
cybersecurity threats while working remotely. 34

Selected Agencies
Supported Remote
Access and
Overcame IT
Challenges during
Maximum Telework

The 12 agencies selected for review reported that they had IT in place to
allow employees to remotely access agency resources during the
pandemic. As they transitioned to maximum telework, the agencies
reported that they experienced IT challenges, which they generally
overcame. Further, the selected agencies were able to continue activities
intended to help ensure the cybersecurity of their information systems
during maximum telework.

Selected Agencies Had
Technology in Place to
Support Remote Access
during the Pandemic

Each of the selected agencies reported that they had technology in place
to support employees’ remote access to agency resources during the
pandemic. For example, all of the agencies used a VPN, and some also
used other technologies, such as application portals, remote desktop
access, and direct application access to enable employees to connect
remotely to agency resources. The extent of the selected agencies’ uses
of these various technologies to achieve remote access for telework is
shown in figure 1.

32National Security Agency, Telework and Mobile Security Guidance, accessed March 29,
2021,
https://www.nsa.gov/What-We-Do/Cybersecurity/Telework-and-Mobile-Security-Guidance/
.
33National Security Agency, Selecting and Safely Using Collaboration Services for
Telework–UPDATE (Fort Meade, MD: November 2020).
34National Security Agency and Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency,
Telework Best Practices, April 29, 2020; available at
https://www.nsa.gov/What-We-Do/Cybersecurity/Telework-and-Mobile-Security-Guidance/
and https://www.cisa.gov/publication/telework-best-practices.

Page 11

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Figure 1: Remote Access Technologies Used by 12 Selected Agencies during the
Pandemic to Support Telework

Further, six of the 12 selected agencies reported that they allowed their
employees to use personally owned devices (e.g., employees’ personal
laptops) during telework, and all 12 agencies had established methods to
enable their employees to log in to agency systems and services
remotely. To do so, they enabled employees to use personal identity
verification (PIV) or other methods, such as a secure token. 35

35Department of Homeland Security, Policy for a Common Identification Standard for
Federal Employees and Contractors, Homeland Security Presidential Directive 12 (HSPD12) (Washington, D.C.: August 2004). This directive mandates a federal standard for
secure and reliable forms of identification, including for rapid electronic authentication,
which includes a personal identity verification card. A secure token is a physical object a
user possesses and controls that is used to authenticate a user’s identity, such as a
hardware device that can generate information that the verifier knows can only come from
that device.

Page 12

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Selected Agencies Faced,
but Generally Overcame,
IT Challenges Associated
with the Transition to
Maximum Telework

All of the agencies in our review reported that they had experienced
challenges in ensuring that their IT would support the transition to
maximum telework. At least half of the agencies reported experiencing
some degree of (i.e., major, moderate, or minor) challenge in eight areas
while implementing maximum telework. These challenges ranged from
managing expired multifactor authentication to acquiring equipment.
Further details on the challenges are provided in figure 2 and in the
discussion that follows the figure.
Figure 2: Extent of IT Challenges Identified by Selected Agencies in Implementing
Maximum Telework

Managing expired multifactor authentication
Multifactor authentication credentials, such as PIV cards, are required for
employees to log in to agency systems and services, including for remote
access. In the event that an employees’ PIV card expires, the agency has

Page 13

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


to either come up with an alternative solution for employee log in, or
provide an updated PIV card to the employee.
Officials from 11 agencies told us that they experienced challenges
regarding the expiration of multifactor authentication credentials, such as
PIV cards, in a maximum telework environment. Officials from the 11
agencies told us that they had alleviated the problems with card
expiration. For example, five of those agencies created temporary
credentials, such as a combination of username and password, for
employees to use in the event that they could not physically obtain a new
card. In addition, three of those agencies allowed employees to perform a
temporary online renewal of the PIV credential to enable the employee to
continue to use the card without going into the office for renewal.
Managing printing at telework sites
Employees may be accustomed to having access to printers or, in some
cases, may need to print documents in order to perform their jobs.
Officials from 10 of the selected agencies identified the need for
employees to print documents at their telework sites as a challenge in a
maximum telework environment.
However, officials from eight of those 10 agencies told us that their
agencies had overcome the challenge. 36 One of the agencies decided to
disallow wireless printing, but to allow employees to print using a wired
connection, because allowing remote users to print over a home wireless
network can expose an agency’s systems to security threats. In addition,
five of the 10 agencies chose to not allow employees to print from home
in most cases. For example, one of those five agencies was concerned
that additional IT help desk support would be required to assist
employees in managing the process of connecting their printers at home.
Providing IT support to employees
IT support services, including help desks, are critical for helping
employees access computer systems and software, providing technical
support for software applications and computer equipment, and
troubleshooting and identifying software, hardware, network, or
telecommunications problems experienced by end users, among other
36The two additional agencies did not provide descriptions of the challenge associated

with managing printing at telework sites, and therefore did not tell us whether or not they
had overcome the challenge.

Page 14

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


things. Officials from nine of the selected agencies told us that they
experienced challenges in providing IT support to all of their employees
during the transition to maximum telework. For example, officials from
one of the nine agencies told us that their agency was challenged by an
initial spike in support requests as employees who were not familiar with
teleworking attempted to connect using the agency’s VPN for the first
time.
Officials from six of the nine agencies stated that they had overcome the
challenges associated with providing IT support for teleworkers. 37 For
example, officials from three of those six agencies told us that they had
expanded IT support by either adding more support staff or extending IT
help desk hours available to employees. However, union representatives
from two of those six agencies told us that timely resolution of IT support
issues was still a problem for employees at least 7 months after the
expansion to maximum telework.
Ensuring adequate patch management on remote equipment
Patch management is an important element in mitigating the risks
associated with known vulnerabilities. When vulnerabilities are
discovered, the software vendor may release an update, called a patch,
to mitigate the risk. Unless the patch is applied in a timely manner, an
attacker may exploit a vulnerability that is not yet mitigated, enabling
unauthorized access to information systems or enabling users to have
access to greater privileges than authorized.
Officials from eight of the selected agencies told us that certain aspects of
ensuring that government-furnished equipment (GFE) were sufficiently
patched became more difficult in an expanded telework environment with
a large number of employees working from home offices instead of
agency offices. For example, officials told us that it was difficult to
maintain adequate patches on GFE because patches are easiest to apply
overnight when employees are not using their laptops. However, during
maximum telework, employees at home did not always maintain remote
connections on their laptops to the agency’s network at the end of the
work day. In these instances, the agency would have a smaller window of
opportunity for agency IT staff to patch the laptops remotely.

37Officials from the other three agencies did not comment on whether the challenge
associated with IT support services had decreased or not.

Page 15

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Officials from the eight agencies stated that IT security staff generally
were able to work around the patching challenge. For example, to ensure
that GFE could be kept up to date with needed patches, officials from four
agencies told us that IT staff communicated in advance with employees to
ensure that laptops remained remotely connected to agency networks at
the end of the work day. An official from another agency told us that, upon
first connecting to the VPN in the morning, users would be prompted to
install any necessary updates either at lunchtime or the end of the work
day.
Overcoming infrastructure limitations with VPN access, bandwidth,
and software licenses
Due to the increase in employees accessing agency services remotely
when they transitioned to maximum telework, officials from 11 of the
selected agencies told us that they experienced challenges concerning
the infrastructure comprising their systems that provide remote access to
employees, including VPN access, bandwidth, and software licenses. For
example:
•

VPNs are important components of remote access because they
provide for secure connections between remote devices and an
agency’s information systems. Eight agencies’ officials stated that
they experienced challenges in ensuring adequate VPN service to
support maximum telework. They added that they upgraded or
expanded this service in order to enable employees to securely
connect to agency resources. Specifically, agencies had to add
additional infrastructure or obtain additional VPN licenses for use by
employees.

•

Agencies need sufficient bandwidth to ensure quality performance as
their employees access agency networks remotely. Officials from
seven agencies told us that they experienced challenges in ensuring
adequate bandwidth to support increased traffic on their networks.
The agencies reported that they monitored the bandwidth and
increased it as necessary in order to ensure that their networks could
handle the additional teleworkers.

•

Agencies require software licenses to enable employees to use
externally acquired software on laptop computers or elsewhere in the
telework environment. Officials from six agencies told us that they had
been challenged to ensure that they had an adequate number of
software licenses to support the increased number of teleworkers. For
example, the agencies had to add or expand the number of software

Page 16

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


licenses, such as licenses for software that enables IT help desk staff
to interact remotely with employees’ laptop computers.
Acquiring telework equipment for employees
Not all agencies allow employees to use personally owned devices (e.g.,
personal laptops) when teleworking and, instead, provide them with GFE,
including laptops and peripherals, such as headsets. As a result of
increased telework, nine selected agencies said they had to acquire
additional GFE for employees.
Officials from seven of the selected agencies reported that they
experienced challenges in procuring additional telework equipment for
employees. For example, officials from five of the seven agencies told us
that they experienced delays in acquiring GFE to be used by employees
during maximum telework. Specifically, officials at three of those agencies
told us that they experienced delays of between 2 weeks and 1 month in
procuring additional GFE; officials from two other agencies reported that
they experienced delays of more than 1 month in procuring the additional
equipment. Officials from three of the five agencies told us that problems
with acquiring GFE had subsided over time.
Agency officials told us that the delay in GFE acquisitions were due to
high demand across government and the private sector for equipment to
be used by teleworkers. A union representative from one of the selected
agencies told us that employees could not access email without GFE, and
that employees without it had to use weather and safety leave 38 until they
obtained needed equipment.

Five of the Selected
Agencies Reported an
Increase in Cyberattacks
and All Continued
Cybersecurity Activities

Officials from five of the selected agencies told us that they experienced
an increase in certain types of cyberattacks during maximum telework.
For example, officials from four of the five agencies stated that they saw
an increase in phishing attacks.
Notwithstanding these reported increases in cyberattacks, all of the
agencies in our review stated that they had continued activities intended
to help ensure the security of their information and systems, as they had
done prior to maximum telework. For example, officials from 10 of the
selected agencies told us that their security operations centers were
38Agencies may grant weather and safety leave due to a condition that prevents the

employee or group of employees from safely traveling to, or performing work at, an
approved location.

Page 17

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


operating remotely and could do the majority of their tasks remotely. As
such, the security operations centers’ activities and operational capacity
had not changed due to the transition to maximum telework. In addition,
several agencies reduced cybersecurity risk by increasing employee
awareness. For example, officials from seven of the selected agencies
told us that they had provided additional security guidance to employees
as the number of teleworkers increased.

Selected Agencies
Generally Followed
Federal Information
Security Guidance,
but Gaps Remained

NIST has issued federal information security guidance that recommends
that agencies develop a telework security policy. NIST also recommends
that agencies document IT security controls and enhancements relevant
to securing their systems that support telework; assess the controls and
enhancements; and document risk associated with, and remedial actions
for, controls and enhancements assessed to be other than satisfactory.
The selected agencies generally followed federal information security
guidance for their IT that supports remote access for telework. 39 For
example, these agencies documented elements of a telework security
policy. The agencies also had, except in limited cases:
•

documented IT security controls and enhancements relevant to
securing their systems that support telework,

•

assessed the controls and enhancements, and

•

documented any risks associated with, and remedial actions for,
controls and enhancements assessed to be other than satisfactory.

Figure 3 provides a summary of the extent to which the agencies had
followed information security guidance for their IT that provides remote
access for telework.

39Our evaluation consisted of an assessment of documentation provided to us by the
selected agencies to determine the extent to which they had documented the required
elements of a telework security policy, documented IT controls and enhancements
relevant to securing their systems that support telework, assessed the controls and
enhancements, and documented any risks associated with, and remedial actions for,
controls and enhancements assessed to be other than satisfactory. We did not perform
any on-site or technical testing of security controls to determine whether agencies had or
had not implemented controls effectively.

Page 18

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Figure 3: Extent to Which Selected Agencies Followed Federal Information Security
Guidance for Their IT that Supports Remote Access for Telework

All Selected Agencies
Documented Elements of
a Telework Security Policy

NIST SP 800-46, Guide to Enterprise Telework, Remote Access, and
Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) Security recommends that agencies
create telework security policies. According to NIST, an agency’s telework
security policy should define, among other things:
•

the forms of remote access the agency permits,

•

the types of telework devices that are permitted to use each form of
remote access, and

•

how user account provisioning should be handled.

Only one agency in our review had created a specific telework security
policy document. However, each of the 12 selected agencies had
documented these elements of a telework security policy in various
sources, including telework policies, remote access policies, and system
security plans.

Page 19

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Most Selected Agencies
Had Documented and
Assessed Controls and
Documented Remedial
Actions, but Gaps
Remained

NIST SP 800-53, Security and Privacy Controls for Federal Information
Systems and Organizations, identifies security controls and
enhancements that are to be used by agencies to protect their systems
and recommends that agencies describe them in system security
documentation. 40 Specifically, it outlines the basic controls that agencies
should implement based on the documented impact a system has on
agency operations, as determined in NIST Federal Information
Processing Standards Publication 199, Standards for Security
Categorization of Federal Information and Information Systems. 41 Further,
NIST SP 800-46 identifies relevant controls from NIST SP 800-53 that are
especially important for securing systems that support remote access for
telework. 42
Ten of the selected agencies had documented in system security plans,
all relevant security controls and enhancements for protecting their
systems that provide remote access to support telework. Among others,
these agencies had documented controls related to account
management, remote access, access control for mobile devices, use of
external information systems, internal system connections, information

40NIST SP 800-53. According to NIST, control enhancements either add functionality or

specificity to a base control or increase the strength of a base control. Control
enhancements are used in systems and environments of operation that require greater
protection than the protection provided by the base control.

41National Institute of Standards and Technology, Standards for Security Categorization of

Federal Information and Information Systems, Federal Information Processing Standards
Publication 199 (Gaithersburg, MD: February 2004). This publication establishes security
categories for both information and information systems based on the potential impact on
an agency if certain events occur that jeopardize the information and information systems
needed by the agency to accomplish its assigned mission. The potential impacts are
defined as low, moderate, and high. The information systems we reviewed at the 12
selected agencies were all at the moderate- or high-impact level, as determined by
agency officials.

42NIST SP 800-46 includes 12 controls that it deems to be of particular importance for
remote access security. Further, NIST SP 800-53 includes a set of IT security controls and
enhancements that are important for securing moderate- and high-impact systems. We
determined the IT security control and enhancements relevant to our review through a
combination of the two NIST documents and agency impact determination as described.
In total, there are 34 relevant controls and enhancements for systems determined to be at
the moderate-impact level, and 46 relevant controls and enhancements for systems
determined to be at the high-impact level. The controls cover topic areas such as account
management, remote access, access control for mobile devices, use of external
information systems, internal system connections, information system backup,
identification and authentication (agency users), device identification and authentication,
risk assessment, boundary protection, and transmission confidentiality and integrity.

Page 20

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


system backup, identification and authentication, risk assessment,
boundary protection, and transmission confidentiality and integrity.
However, two other agencies’ system security plans did not include all
relevant controls or enhancements. Specifically:
•

Although SEC documented most of the relevant security controls and
enhancements in the security plan documents for its system that
provided remote access, in four instances, the agency did not
document all relevant controls. Specifically, as of May 2021, the
agency had not documented one security control and two security
control enhancements; in addition, it had incorrectly described another
security control enhancement. SEC IT security officials told us that
they were in the middle of a regular assessment cycle for the
components associated with this system and, therefore, had not made
adjustments to documentation, as applicable, based on the results of
the assessment.

•

SSA did not document all relevant security controls and
enhancements in the system security plan for its system that provided
remote access. For example, as of May 2021, the agency had not
documented about half of the relevant controls and enhancements in
the plan. SSA IT security officials told us that the agency was
reorganizing the components that make up the system that provided
remote access to the agency’s employees, and that, due to the
reorganization, they had not updated the system security plan since
2016. SSA asserted, however, that the controls and enhancements
were in place. Nevertheless, the agency had not documented the
controls in an updated system security plan.

Until SEC and SSA consistently document the controls and
enhancements relevant to protecting their systems that provide remote
access to support telework, these agencies are at increased risk that
cybersecurity officials will not have the necessary information to make
credible, risk-based decisions regarding their information systems.

Five Selected Agencies Relied
on Systems for Remote
Access That Had Not Been
Fully Assessed

The Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014 (FISMA)
requires that agencies periodically test the effectiveness of information
security controls. 43 Similarly, NIST SP 800-53 recommends that an
agency assess the controls in a system and its environment of operation
to determine the extent to which the controls have been implemented
43Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014, Pub. L. No. 113-283, 128 Stat.

3073 (Dec. 18, 2014).

Page 21

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


correctly, are operating as intended, and are producing the desired
outcome with respect to meeting established security and privacy
requirements.
Although seven of the selected agencies had documented that they
assessed all of the relevant security controls and enhancements for
protecting their systems that provided remote access to support telework,
four of the systems that provided remote access for five selected
agencies had not been fully assessed. Specifically:
•

The Federal Highway Administration relies on DOT to provide a
remote access solution to employees. However, DOT had not
assessed one of the relevant security control enhancements as of
January 2021. Department officials told us that the team responsible
for their controls assessment had overlooked the enhancement during
their review. As of February 2021, the department had created a
remedial action plan to track the enhancement and ensure that it
includes the enhancement in its next assessment. However, until DOT
assesses the remaining control enhancement, it will be at increased
risk that the enhancement is not working as intended.

•

In 2020, SEC assessed the relevant controls and enhancements for a
subset of components associated with its system that supports
telework. For the remaining components, although SEC had
documented assessments in prior years, the documentation was not
detailed enough to demonstrate whether all relevant controls had
been assessed. For example, the agency did not link assessment
results to specific controls in its assessment documentation. The
agency has plans to assess the controls and enhancements for the
components again in calendar years 2021 and 2022. Until the agency
completes these assessments and associates the results to specific
relevant controls, it lacks assurance that relevant controls for remote
access are operating as intended.

•

SSA assessed controls and enhancements as part of its annual
FISMA assessment, including conducting both internal and external
penetration testing, 44 as of March 2021. 45 Officials in SSA’s Office of
the Deputy Commissioner of Systems asserted that this level of

44Penetration testing is a test methodology in which assessors, typically working under
specific constraints, attempt to circumvent or defeat the security features of an information
system.
45FISMA requires agencies to report the status of their information security program to

OMB and requires inspectors general to conduct annual independent assessments of
those programs.

Page 22

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


testing covered all of the relevant controls and enhancements, and
emphasized that, from an operations perspective, they believe regular
reviews and testing of information security controls are effective.
However, the agency’s documentation was not detailed enough to
demonstrate that it had assessed about half of the relevant controls
and enhancements for its system that provided remote access to
support telework. For example, SSA did not always link assessment
results to specific controls in its assessment documentation. As a
result, the agency lacks assurance that relevant controls for remote
access are operating as intended.
•

The Bureau of Indian Affairs and National Park Service both rely on
the Department of the Interior to provide a remote access solution to
employees. However, Interior had not assessed eight of the relevant
security controls and enhancements as of May 2021. Interior’s Office
of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO) officials told us that the
controls were not included in the prior assessment schedule.
Further, assessments for another 10 of the security controls and
enhancements had been in progress since 2018. Department officials
stated that the controls were not assessed in 2018 due to staffing and
resource issues. The officials asserted that they have addressed
staffing and resource issues and will assess the controls in the
department’s current assessment period. In May 2021, after we
informed Interior of these shortcomings, the department reassessed
the 18 controls and enhancements. We verified that the department
addressed all 18 controls and enhancements in its updated
assessment.

Selected Agencies Had Not
Always Assigned Risk Levels
or Documented Remedial
Actions Appropriately

FISMA requires that agencies periodically assess the risk that could result
from the unauthorized access, use, disclosure, disruption, modification, or
destruction of information and information systems that support agency
operations. FISMA also requires agencies to document remedial actions
to address any deficiencies. Similarly, NIST SP 800-53 recommends that
agencies periodically assess the risks to their systems in the event that
they discover new threats or vulnerabilities. In addition, NIST SP 800-37
recommends that agencies create plans of action and milestones
(POA&M) to identify the actions planned to correct weaknesses
discovered in their information security controls. 46 NIST also recommends
that POA&Ms include scheduled completion dates for milestones and
46National Institute of Standards and Technology, Risk Management Framework for

Information Systems and Organizations, Special Publication 800-37 revision 2
(Gaithersburg, MD: December 2018).

Page 23

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


tasks associated with addressing the weaknesses. The guidance further
states that POA&Ms are to be used to monitor progress toward
completing the tasks.
Based on their assessments of relevant controls and enhancements, all
of the agencies in our review had identified weaknesses in their systems
that support remote access. However, four agencies could not
demonstrate that they had consistently monitored progress toward
completing the remedial actions. In addition, one of these four agencies
could not demonstrate that it had documented the risks associated with
the identified weaknesses. Specifically: 47
•

The Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers rely on DHS to
provide a remote access solution to employees who are teleworking.
However, DHS did not always consistently monitor its progress toward
completing the remedial actions for weaknesses identified in its
control assessments. For example, DHS had documented planned
remedial actions to reduce the risks from weaknesses identified in
nine relevant security controls and enhancements. Nevertheless, as
of May 2021, the remedial actions associated with these weaknesses
had passed their scheduled completion dates by just over 2 years.
DHS OCIO officials told us that the remediation work for the two
POA&Ms took longer than expected and, as a result, they had put
waivers in place to allow more time to fully address the concerns.

•

As of May 2021, DOT could not demonstrate that it had consistently
monitored its progress toward completing remedial actions because
the POA&Ms it created did not include estimated completion dates.
Agency officials told us that the department’s OCIO had been
assuming operational and management responsibilities for technology
and services transferred to it from other component agencies within
the department. The officials explained that, during the transfer, OCIO
inherited POA&Ms from the component agencies and did not initially

47Subsequent to our initial request for documentation (as of July 31, 2020), but before
providing documentation to us, three agencies developed plans of action and milestones
(POA&Ms) for relevant controls assessed as not fully implemented. Specifically, the
Department of Justice (providing remote access service for the Executive Office of
Immigration Review) developed a POA&M in October 2020 and the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (providing remote access to the Food and Nutrition Service) developed
POA&Ms in August 2020. In addition, the Securities and Exchange Commission, which
had completed assessments through August 2020, developed POA&Ms through May
2021.

Page 24

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


assess the planned actions due to COVID-19 response efforts,
evolving priorities, and resource challenges. 48
•

Although the FBI had documented remedial actions and risks for
weaknesses found with three relevant security control enhancements,
the agency could not demonstrate that it had consistently monitored
its progress in completing two of the three remedial actions.
Specifically, the two remedial actions were still in progress at least 12
months beyond their estimated completion dates. FBI OCIO officials
told us that staff responsible for remediation activities had made an
administrative error and had not updated estimated completion dates
associated with the two remedial actions; the officials added that FBI
IT security personnel were properly tracking the remedial actions as
well as the overall security posture of the system.

•

Although OPM had documented remedial actions for weaknesses
discovered by control assessments, it did not demonstrate that it
always consistently monitored its progress toward completing the
actions. For example, the agency had identified 16 remedial actions to
correct weaknesses found in the relevant security controls and
enhancements in calendar year 2019. However, 14 of the 16 remedial
actions were in “draft” or “initial” status, and one did not have a status
listed. Additionally, the agency had not estimated a date for
completing any of the remedial actions. Further, OPM had not
documented the risks for any of these weaknesses. OPM OCIO
officials did not offer an explanation as to why these shortcomings in
the documentation of risks and remedial actions existed. 49

If these agencies do not consistently document risks and remedial actions
and adequately monitor the progress toward completing those actions,
they are at an increased risk that vulnerabilities in their systems that
provide remote access connections could be exploited.

48In May 2021, subsequent to our analysis of agency documentation, Department of

Transportation officials told us that the Office of the Chief Information Officer had taken
corrective actions to review plans of action and milestones on a monthly basis, including
an assessment of estimated completion dates and adherence to planned milestones. We
plan to review the department’s corrective actions as we follow up with agencies regarding
the status of our recommendations to them.

49According to OPM OCIO officials, the agency had assessed the risk for each of the

weaknesses, but did not communicate this information to us. We will verify OPM’s actions
as part of our recommendation follow-up process.

Page 25

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Conclusions

Officials from the 12 selected agencies reported that they had IT in place
to allow employees to remotely access agency resources during the
COVID-19 pandemic. While the selected agencies reported that they
faced challenges in providing the IT needed to support remote access for
maximum telework in response to the pandemic, they also reported that
they had overcome most of the challenges quickly and were successfully
supporting maximum telework.
In order to protect their systems in a time of increased cybersecurity risks
associated with teleworking, the selected agencies generally followed
federal information security guidance in implementing the systems that
support remote access for telework. However, not all of the selected
agencies assessed all relevant security controls to determine if they were
operating as intended. In addition, not all of the selected agencies fully
documented the risks and planned remedial actions intended to mitigate
the gaps discovered during an assessment of the controls. Until the
selected agencies fully assess all security controls and complete remedial
actions for those controls assessed to not be operating as intended, their
systems could be vulnerable to exploits.

Recommendations

We are making a total of nine recommendations to six agencies, including
two to SEC, two to SSA, one to DHS, two to DOT, one to FBI, and one to
OPM. Specifically:
The Chair of SEC should ensure that the agency documents relevant IT
security controls and enhancements in the security plan for the system
that provides remote access for telework. (Recommendation 1)
The Commissioner of SSA should ensure that the agency documents
relevant IT security controls and enhancements in the security plan for
the system that provides remote access for telework. (Recommendation
2)
The Secretary of Transportation should ensure that the agency assesses
all relevant IT security controls and enhancements for the system that
provides remote access for telework. (Recommendation 3)
The Chair of SEC should ensure that the agency assesses and
sufficiently documents the assessment of relevant IT security controls and
enhancements for the system that provides remote access for telework.
(Recommendation 4)

Page 26

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


The Commissioner of SSA should ensure that the agency assesses and
sufficiently documents the assessment of relevant IT security controls and
enhancements for the system that provides remote access for telework.
(Recommendation 5)
The Secretary of Homeland Security should ensure that the agency
consistently monitors progress toward the completion of remedial actions
for the system that provides remote access for telework.
(Recommendation 6)
The Secretary of Transportation should ensure that the agency
consistently monitors progress toward the completion of remedial actions
by including estimated completion dates in its plan of action and
milestones for the system that provides remote access for telework.
(Recommendation 7)
The Director of the FBI should ensure that the bureau consistently
monitors progress toward the completion of remedial actions for relevant
IT security controls and enhancements for the system that provides
remote access for telework. (Recommendation 8)
The Director of OPM should ensure that the agency documents risks and
monitors progress toward the completion of remedial actions by including
estimated completion dates in plans of action and milestones and keeping
them up to date with current information for the system that provides
remote access for telework. (Recommendation 9)

Agency Comments
and Our Evaluation

We requested comments on a draft of this report from the 12 agencies
selected for our review. In response, the six agencies to which we made
recommendations provided comments agreeing with the
recommendations. In addition, one agency to which we did not make a
recommendation provided comments on the draft report. The remaining
agencies did not provide any comments on the draft report.
Via email, an audit liaison at DOT, which provides remote access service
to the Federal Highway Administration, stated that the department
concurred with our recommendation.
Via email, an audit liaison at DOJ stated that the department concurred
with our recommendation to FBI.
DHS provided written comments on behalf of the Federal Law
Enforcement Training Centers and the U.S. Secret Service. In its

Page 27

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


comments, DHS stated that it agreed with our recommendation to the
department related to providing remote access service to the Federal Law
Enforcement Training Centers. DHS also believed that it has
implemented the recommendation. We plan to follow-up to validate the
department’s actions regarding the recommendation. DHS’s comments
are reprinted in appendix III. 50 The department also provided a technical
comment, which we have incorporated into this report as appropriate.
SEC provided written comments in which it agreed with our two
recommendations. Regarding our recommendation that SEC ensure that
it documents relevant IT security controls and enhancements in the
security plan for the system that provides remote access for telework, the
agency stated that it was tracking the issue and expects to complete
actions to address it by December 2021.
Regarding our recommendation that the agency ensure that it assesses
and sufficiently documents the assessment of relevant IT security controls
and enhancements for the system that provides remote access for
telework, SEC stated that it was currently performing a new assessment
of the components that support the agency’s remote access solutions.
SEC added that it expects to complete the assessment by the second
quarter of fiscal year 2022 and that the assessors are expected to fully
document their findings. The agency further noted that it plans to continue
to frequently assess the security posture of its remote access capabilities.
SEC’s comments are reprinted in appendix IV.
In written comments, SSA stated that it agreed with our
recommendations. The agency added that it was finalizing the security
plan for its system that provides remote access for telework. SSA’s
comments are reprinted in appendix V.
In written comments, OPM agreed with our recommendation. The agency
stated that it intended to document risks and monitor the progress of
remedial actions. In addition, the agency said it will include estimated
completion dates and current information to keep the plans of action and
milestones up to date for its systems that provide remote access for
telework. OPM’s comments are reprinted in appendix VI.

50We did not include a second page of the department’s letter reprinted in appendix III

because it contained sensitive information. The second page included details specific to
actions taken by DHS to address our recommendation.

Page 28

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


While we did not make recommendations to IRS, in written comments,
the agency described actions it had taken to ensure that IRS could
continue its mission-critical activities while responding to the COVID-19
pandemic. For example, the agency said it quickly scaled up its
infrastructure and equipped customer service representatives with laptops
and peripheral equipment to support telework. The agency added that in
expanding telework, IRS followed cybersecurity recommendations for
federal agencies, as well as applicable guidance from NIST bulletins and
OMB. IRS’s comments are reprinted in appendix VII.
In addition to the aforementioned responses, officials from the remaining
agencies sent emails stating that they did not have any comments on the
draft report. Specifically, we received emails from liaisons at the
Department of Justice, which provides remote access service to the
Executive Office of Immigration Review; the Department of Agriculture,
which provides remote access service to Food and Nutrition Services;
and the Department of the Interior, which provides remote access service
to the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the National Park Service.
We are sending copies of this report to the appropriate congressional
committees; the Secretaries of Agriculture, Homeland Security, Interior,
and Transportation; the Attorney General of the United States; the
Directors of the Executive Office of Immigration Review, the FBI, the
Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers, the National Park Service,
OMB, OPM, and the U.S. Secret Service; the chair of SEC; the
Commissioners of the Internal Revenue Service and SSA; the Principal
Deputy Secretary for Indian Affairs; the Administrator of the Federal
Highway Administration; offices of the chief information officer of agencies
selected for our review; inspectors general of agencies selected for our
review; and other interested congressional parties. In addition, the report
is available at no charge on the GAO website at http://www.gao.gov.

Page 29

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


If you or your staff have any questions about this report, please contact
me at (404) 679-1831 or franksj@gao.gov. Contact points for our Offices
of Congressional Relations and Public Affairs may be found on the last
page of this report. GAO staff who made key contributions to this report
are listed in appendix VIII.

Jennifer R. Franks
Director
Information Technology and Cybersecurity

Page 30

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


List of Addressees
The Honorable Patrick Leahy
Chairman
The Honorable Richard Shelby
Vice Chairman
Committee on Appropriations
United States Senate
The Honorable Ron Wyden
Chairman
The Honorable Mike Crapo
Ranking Member
Committee on Finance
United States Senate
The Honorable Patty Murray
Chair
The Honorable Richard Burr
Ranking Member
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
United States Senate
The Honorable Gary C. Peters
Chairman
The Honorable Rob Portman
Ranking Member
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
United States Senate
The Honorable Margaret Wood Hassan
Chair
Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Spending Oversight
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
United States Senate
The Honorable Rosa L. DeLauro
Chairwoman
The Honorable Kay Granger
Ranking Member
Committee on Appropriations
House of Representatives

Page 31

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


The Honorable Frank Pallone, Jr.
Chair
The Honorable Cathy McMorris Rodgers
Republican Leader
Committee on Energy and Commerce
House of Representatives
The Honorable Bennie G. Thompson
Chairman
The Honorable John Katko
Ranking Member
Committee on Homeland Security
House of Representatives
The Honorable Carolyn B. Maloney
Chairwoman
The Honorable James Comer
Ranking Member
Committee on Oversight and Reform
House of Representatives
The Honorable Richard Neal
Chair
The Honorable Kevin Brady
Republican Leader
Committee on Ways and Means
House of Representatives

Page 32

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Appendix I: IT Telework Questions Sent to
Selected Agencies
Appendix I: IT Telework Questions Sent to
Selected Agencies

This appendix contains the introduction and survey questions sent to the
12 selected agencies to obtain their perspectives regarding their initial
experiences in providing the IT needed to support remote access for
maximum telework in response to the pandemic. We sent the survey to
agency liaisons in order to provide it to agency IT subject matter experts.
See appendix II for our full scope and methodology. We received
responses from all 12 agencies.

Survey Introduction

GAO is gathering information about the experience of implementing or
expanding telework (working remotely) from an IT perspective as a result
of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. We are doing this work at the
request of the Congress and under the authority of the CARES Act.
If another agency or entity is responsible for the question content, please
coordinate with the appropriate officials. For example, it may be
appropriate to consult with CIO officials at the Departmental level. Please
invite the relevant officials to assist in providing responses to these
questions on behalf of <Name of agency/entity>.
Throughout this questionnaire, we use the term telework to mean when
employees or contractors work remotely to access agency systems and
applications to perform their work tasks.

Survey Questions

Do teleworkers (employees or contractors) using government-furnished
equipment connect to the necessary agency systems and applications in
the following ways? [yes/no/not sure]
•

Virtual Private Network – VPN? (e.g., IPSec or SSL Tunnel)

•

Application portals? (e.g., Virtual Desktop Infrastructure – VDI)

•

Remote desktop access? (e.g., direct access to a device, such as an
internal workstation through means other than VPN or VDI)

•

Direct application access? (e.g., direct access to an application such
as webmail via HTTPS)

•

Other? (please describe)

How do teleworkers (employees or contractors) authenticate when
accessing the network remotely using government-furnished equipment?
[yes/no/not sure]
•

PIV authentication?

•

Other multi-factor authentication?

Page 33

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Appendix I: IT Telework Questions Sent to
Selected Agencies

•

Password alone?

•

Other method? (please describe)

Are teleworkers (employees or contractors) allowed to use personallyowned devices to connect (directly or virtually) to agency systems and
applications necessary to perform their work tasks? [yes/no]
[If personally-owned devices are allowed]
Are any of the following personally-owned devices allowed or not?
[allowed/not allowed]
•

Laptop/notebook computers?

•

Smartphones?

•

Tablets?

•

Other? (please describe)

[If personally-owned devices are allowed]
Do teleworkers (employees or contractors) using personal devices
connect to agency systems and applications in the following ways?
[yes/no/not sure]
•

Virtual Private Network – VPN? (e.g., IPSec or SSL Tunnel)

•

Application portals? (e.g., Virtual Desktop Infrastructure – VDI)

•

Remote desktop access? (e.g., direct access to a device, such as an
internal workstation through means other than VPN or VDI)

•

Direct application access? (e.g., direct access to an application such
as webmail via HTTPS)

•

Other? (please describe)

[If personally-owned devices are allowed]
How do teleworkers (employees or contractors) authenticate when
accessing the network remotely using personal devices? [yes/no/not sure]
•

PIV authentication?

•

Other multi-factor authentication?

•

Password alone?

•

Other method? (please describe)

Page 34

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Appendix I: IT Telework Questions Sent to
Selected Agencies

Did your agency procure additional government-furnished equipment for
teleworkers in response to the telework expansion? [yes/no]
[If government-furnished equipment was procured]
Was any of the following additional equipment procured in response to
the telework expansion? [not procured/procured] If so, how many?
[indicate whether an estimate or exact amount]
•

Laptop/notebook computers?

•

Smartphones?

•

Tablets?

•

Peripherals (monitors, cameras, keyboards, headsets, mice, docking
stations, etc.)?

•

Other? (please describe)

Does your agency have any ongoing procurement of additional
government-furnished equipment in response to the telework expansion?
[yes/no/not sure]
Did your agency expand existing IT infrastructure capacity (e.g.,
hardware, software licenses, or services) to support the telework
expansion? [yes/no/not sure]
[If existing IT infrastructure capacity was expanded]
Did you expand the following existing IT infrastructure capacity or not?
[yes/no/not sure]
•

Bandwidth?

•

VPN access?

•

Cloud services?

•

Software licenses?

•

Other infrastructure? (e.g., servers, firewalls, network devices, etc.)

•

Other? (please describe)

Did your agency add new IT infrastructure capacity (e.g., hardware,
software, licensing, or services) to support the telework expansion?
[yes/no/not sure]

Page 35

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Appendix I: IT Telework Questions Sent to
Selected Agencies

[If new IT infrastructure capacity was added]
Did your agency add the following new IT infrastructure capacity or not?
[yes/no/not sure]
•

Bandwidth?

•

VPN access?

•

Cloud services?

•

Software licenses?

•

Other infrastructure? (e.g., servers, firewalls, network devices, etc.)

•

Other? (please describe)

How much of a challenge, if at all, were each of the following IT
operational matters in transitioning to increased telework? [major
challenge/moderate challenge/minor challenge/not a challenge/not sure
or no basis to judge]
•

VPN?

•

Bandwidth?

•

Software or application licenses?

•

Connecting remotely to legacy IT?

•

PIV expirations requiring alternative authentication?

•

Printing remotely?

•

Providing government-furnished equipment?

•

Service or Help Desk support?

•

Other? (please describe)

What vendor delays, if any, did your agency experience in acquiring the
following in transitioning to increased telework? [major delay (more than 1
month)/moderate delay (2 weeks to a month)/minor delay (less than 2
weeks)/no delay/not sure or no basis to judge]
•

VPN access?

•

Bandwidth?

•

Cloud services?

•

Software licensing?

Page 36

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Appendix I: IT Telework Questions Sent to
Selected Agencies

•

Government-furnished equipment?

•

Other? (please describe)

Has your agency provided additional security training or guidance to
teleworkers since mid-March 2020? [yes/no/not sure]
•

Additional security training?

•

Additional security guidance?

•

Other? (please describe)

Has your agency experienced an increase, no change, or a decrease in
the following activities related to cyberattacks or exploits since the
telework expansion? [increase/no change/decrease/not sure]
•

Denial of service?

•

Phishing/spear-phishing

•

Other? (please describe)

How much of a challenge, if at all, were the following IT security activities
as a result of the expansion in telework? [major challenge/moderate
challenge/minor challenge/not a challenge/not sure or no basis to judge]
•

Deployment of patches and/or patch management?

•

Oversight and enforcement of relevant security policies and
procedures?

•

Ensuring teleworker awareness of cyber threats?

•

Incident response?

•

Other? (please describe)

Considering your agency’s telework in response to the pandemic, is there
anything else you would like to offer from an IT perspective?

Page 37

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Appendix II: Objectives, Scope, and
Methodology
Appendix II: Objectives, Scope, and
Methodology

The objectives for this review were to determine (1) selected agencies’
initial experiences in providing the IT needed to support remote access
for maximum telework in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and (2) the
extent to which the selected agencies followed federal information
security guidance for their IT systems that provide remote access to
support telework.
In conducting the review, we first selected a non-probability sample of
agencies to review. To do so, we initially identified the agencies listed in
categories I and II in National Continuity Policy, Presidential Policy
Directive 40, Annex A. 1 The agencies listed in Annex A perform mission
essential functions that support national essential functions, and
therefore, must be able to continue their operations in the event of an
emergency or other continuity of operations event. In this first step, we
chose 28 agencies from the list of agencies in Annex A. 2
Next, we reviewed telework data about each of the 28 agencies from
fiscal year 2018, as published by the Office of Personnel Management
(OPM) in its annual Status of Telework in the Federal Government report
to Congress. 3 This report includes, among other things, data regarding
the number of employees at each agency, the number of employees
eligible for telework, and the percentage of eligible employees who
teleworked during the fiscal year.

1The White House, National Continuity Policy, Presidential Policy Directive 40
(Washington, D.C.: July 2016). Annex A of this policy directive assigns executive
departments and agencies to one of four categories commensurate with their continuity of
operations responsibilities during a catastrophic emergency. These categories are
intended to be used for continuity planning, communications and information services
requirements, emergency operations capabilities, and other related requirements.
Agencies identified as Category I perform “national essential functions,” which are those
functions necessary to lead and sustain the nation during a catastrophic emergency.
Agencies identified as Category II are agencies that perform “primary mission essential
functions” that support national essential functions.
2We removed the Central Intelligence Agency and the Office of the Director of National

Intelligence from this list due to concerns about the classified nature of data at those
entities. Excluding the Central Intelligence Agency and the Director of National
Intelligence, this list contains 28 agencies.

3Office of Personnel Management, Status of Telework in the Federal Government, Report

to Congress Fiscal Year 2018 (Washington, D.C.: March 2020). The data from fiscal year
2018 were the most recent available for us to use at the time we selected agencies for our
survey.

Page 38

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Appendix II: Objectives, Scope, and
Methodology

To perform this analysis, we subdivided the 28 agencies selected from
Annex A into subcomponent agencies, as applicable. 4 We did so
because, in some cases, employee telework infrastructure and policies
would be managed at the subcomponent agency level, rather than at the
department level. Based on the data available in the OPM telework
report, we reviewed telework data from 66 agencies, which included
subcomponent agencies from the initial 28 agencies.
We assessed the reliability of the data in the OPM report by reviewing the
documentation of the methodology the agency used in preparing the
report. We determined these data were sufficiently reliable for
categorizing agencies by telework usage as part of the selection process
for the agencies we reviewed.
We removed from our analysis, those agencies that had fewer than 1,000
employees and those where less than 20 percent of their employees were
eligible to telework. We did so because agencies with so few employees
eligible to telework are likely to have a mission that does not facilitate the
use of telework. We then split the remaining agencies into three tiers, to
include (1) those with a small number of employees, (2) those with a
medium number of employees, and (3) those with a large number of
employees. 5
Within each tier, we arranged the agencies based on the percentage of
eligible employees that teleworked in fiscal year 2018 at each agency.
Our final selection included the two agencies from each tier with the
smallest percentage of eligible employees who teleworked and the two
agencies from each tier with the largest percentage of eligible employees
who teleworked. 6 We selected agencies in this manner because we

4Some federal agencies are “federated,” which means that they consist of multiple

components. In this report, we use “agency” to refer to both an agency and its
components.

5The small tier contained agencies with 1,000–4,000 employees; the medium tier
contained agencies with 4,001–14,000 employees; and the large tier contained agencies
with more than 14,000 employees. We chose these ranges because they appeared to be
a natural breakdown in the size of the agencies in our selection.
6In three cases, we removed agencies from our list based on conversations that we

conducted with agency inspectors general. These conversations provided insight into the
nature of agency telework environments that we determined made them unsuitable for our
review.

Page 39

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Appendix II: Objectives, Scope, and
Methodology

wanted to perform our review at agencies with both small and large
telework operations before the pandemic.
Applying these criteria, we selected the following 12 agencies for our
review:
•

Food and Nutrition Service at the U.S. Department of Agriculture

•

Bureau of Indian Affairs and National Park Service at the Department
of the Interior

•

Federal Highway Administration at the Department of Transportation

•

Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers and U.S. Secret Service
at the Department of Homeland Security

•

Securities and Exchange Commission

•

Social Security Administration

•

Internal Revenue Service at the Department of Treasury

•

OPM

•

Executive Office for Immigration Review, and Federal Bureau of
Investigation at the Department of Justice

To address the first objective, we conducted a survey of agency IT
subject matter experts, including operations and IT security officials, at
each of the 12 agencies selected for our review. 7 We developed and
administered a questionnaire to, and received responses from, all 12
agencies. The questionnaire included questions about topics including the
agency’s telework environment, the process by which agencies expanded
their systems that support telework in response to the COVID-19
pandemic, and changes in agency telework infrastructure due to the
expansion of telework. It also included a list of several potential IT
challenges that agencies may have faced during their transition to

7We collected questionnaire results from knowledgeable officials at each of the 12

agencies in our review. However, in some cases, agency components relied on telework
infrastructure at the department level, such as a department-wide virtual private network.
Accordingly, we requested that agency officials forward the questionnaire to
knowledgeable parties at the department level, as applicable. We collected the contact
information for those individuals who filled out the questionnaire to understand which
responses reflected the perspectives of the components in our scope, and which reflected
the agency’s perspectives.

Page 40

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Appendix II: Objectives, Scope, and
Methodology

maximum telework, and asked them to indicate the extent to which they
experienced these challenges. 8
The practical difficulties of developing and administering a survey may
introduce errors, including how a particular question is interpreted, for
example. Therefore, we included steps in developing and administering
the questionnaire to minimize such errors. We conducted two pretests of
the questionnaire with IT subject matter experts from two agencies by
telephone to check that (1) the questions were clear and unambiguous,
(2) terminology was used correctly, (3) the questionnaire did not place an
undue burden on agency officials, (4) the information could be obtained,
and (5) the survey was comprehensive and unbiased.
We reviewed the results of the completed questionnaires and used the
responses to tailor follow-up interviews at each of the 12 agencies to ask
additional questions of the IT subject matter experts and clarify
questionnaire responses. In addition to clarifying questions, our interviews
included questions about
•

the agency’s telework environment,

•

the process by which the agency expanded its telework environment
in response to the COVID-19 pandemic,

•

IT support available for teleworkers, security policies, and
communication of cyber threats to teleworkers,

•

cybersecurity and threat management, and

•

lessons learned by the agency throughout its transition to maximum
telework.

We also held interviews with employee union representatives from seven
of the 12 agencies. 9 We conducted these interviews to ask questions
8Guidance included documentation from both the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure

Security Agency and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) regarding
securing federal telework solutions and the transition to maximum telework from an IT
perspective. We met with officials from NIST to ensure that we had included the most
pertinent guidance in our questionnaire.

9Officials from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Federal Highway Administration, and

U.S. Secret Service told us that their employees were not members of a union. In addition,
a union representative from the Bureau of Indian Affairs declined to comment, and a union
representative from the Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers did not respond to our
interview request. At the seven agencies in which we interviewed union representatives,
some of the agencies had a single union representative, while others had multiple union
representatives.

Page 41

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Appendix II: Objectives, Scope, and
Methodology

regarding employees’ experiences during maximum telework in response
to the pandemic from an IT perspective to gain insight into their
experiences beyond that of agency officials. We asked questions
regarding any challenges conveyed by employees to their union
representatives during maximum telework from an IT perspective, as well
as questions about what went well in the same time frame.
In conjunction with the survey results, we reviewed the results of the
interviews of agency IT subject matter experts and union representatives
to understand what agencies’ initial experiences were in providing the IT
needed to provide remote access to support maximum telework in
response to the pandemic. The experiences reflected the views of only
those agencies that participated in our survey and interviews, and,
therefore, are not generalizable to federal agencies as a whole.
Regardless of this limitation, the solicited perspectives provided insight
into the experiences and views of the selected agencies.
To address the second objective, in addition to interviews of the agency
officials, we requested and reviewed IT security documentation
associated with the systems that support remote access for telework for
the 12 selected agencies. 10 Specifically, the documentation we requested
was based on NIST guidance for securing federal information systems,
including those systems that provide remote access to support telework
at agencies, and included the following: 11

10We requested documentation from the agencies as of July 31, 2020. However, in some

cases, agencies did not provide us with documentation until much later (e.g. February
2021). Further, some of the documentation provided to us by the agencies included
information that had been updated after July 31, 2020.

11National Institute of Standards and Technology, Guide to Enterprise Telework, Remote

Access, and Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) Security, Special Publication 800-46 revision
2 (Gaithersburg, MD: July 2016) and Security and Privacy Controls for Federal Information
Systems and Organizations, Special Publication 800-53 revision 4 (Gaithersburg, MD:
January 2015), provide guidance for the security of agency IT systems, including those
systems that support telework. NIST released revision 5 of Special Publication 800-53 in
September 2020; however, revision 4 was in effect at the time of our review.

Page 42

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Appendix II: Objectives, Scope, and
Methodology

•

agency telework security policies,

•

system security plans for the systems that provide remote access to
support telework at agencies, 12

•

security and risk assessment documentation for the systems that
provide remote access at agencies, and

•

any remedial actions created as a result of the assessment of security
controls for the systems that support remote access at agencies.

We reviewed the agency documentation to evaluate whether the
agencies had included the following elements of a telework security
policy, per NIST Special Publication (SP) 800-46, Guide to Enterprise
Telework, Remote Access, and Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) Security:
•

which forms of remote access would be permitted by the agency for
employees, 13

•

types of telework devices permitted for each form of remote access,
and

•

how user account provisioning should be handled.

We also reviewed how agencies had documented and assessed relevant
IT security controls intended to protect agency systems that support
telework. 14 Specifically, we reviewed security controls most relevant to
protecting agency telework environments based on guidance in NIST SP
800-46 and NIST SP 800-53 revision 4, Security and Privacy Controls for
Federal Information Systems and Organizations. Further, we reviewed
how agencies had documented remedial actions as warranted, in

12We defined a system that provides remote access to support telework at the selected

agencies as the system that contains the method by which employees connect to agency
resources, such as a virtual private network. Because of this, in some cases, we reviewed
department-level documentation because the connection method was implemented and
managed at the department level and not at the component level.

13In most cases, remotely accessing agency systems and services is required to enable
an employee to telework.
14Our evaluation consisted of an assessment of documentation provided to us by the

selected agencies. We did not perform any on-site or technical testing of IT security
controls to determine whether agencies had designed or implemented these controls
effectively or not.

Page 43

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Appendix II: Objectives, Scope, and
Methodology

accordance with NIST SP 800-37, Risk Management Framework for
Information Systems and Organizations. 15
NIST SP 800-46 includes a list of security controls that it deems most
relevant to securing systems that support remote access for telework. In
addition, NIST SP 800-53 revision 4 suggests that agencies implement a
set of control baselines based on the Federal Information Processing
Standard Publication 199, Standards for Security Categorization of
Federal Information and Information Systems impact assessment of their
system. 16 The baselines include additional enhancements to the controls
that are intended to provide increased security. 17 Based on the NIST SP
800-46 list of controls and the NIST SP 800-53 revision 4 control
baselines, we reviewed agency documentation associated with the
following controls and control enhancements: 18
•

AC-2, account management: Involves managing single-factor or
multifactor authentication for remote access users, such as
passwords, digital certificates, and/or hardware authentication tokens.
This control has four enhancements at the moderate-impact baseline
and eight enhancements at the high-impact baseline.

•

AC-17, remote access: Dedicated to documenting remote access
requirements, authorizing remote access prior to allowing

15National Institute of Standards and Technology, Risk Management Framework for
Information Systems and Organizations, Special Publication 800-37 revision 2
(Gaithersburg, MD: December 2018).
16National Institute of Standards and Technology, Standards for Security Categorization of

Federal Information and Information Systems, Federal Information Processing Standard
Publication 199 (FIPS-199) (Gaithersburg, MD: February 2004). FIPS-199 defines three
levels of potential impact on agencies or individuals should there be a breach of security
(i.e., a loss of confidentiality, integrity, or reliability) for its information systems. The levels
are low impact, moderate impact, and high impact. NIST SP 800-53 security control
baselines represent a starting point in determining the security controls for information
systems based on their impact level, as determined by FIPS-199.
17Enhancements to baseline security controls are used to supplement security controls.

For example, control AC-2 focuses on how agencies manage user accounts for their
information systems, and the first enhancement suggests that agencies additionally
employ automated mechanisms to support management of information system accounts.
Agencies have flexibility in applying baseline security controls from NIST SP 800-53 and
can tailor their relevant security control baseline so that it more closely aligns with their
mission and business requirements and environments of operation.
18NIST SP 800-46 also includes control IA-11 in its appendix of relevant security controls.
However, IA-11 does not appear in the NIST SP 800-53 baseline of controls for either
moderate-impact or high-impact systems, so we did not review agencies’ implementation
of it.

Page 44

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Appendix II: Objectives, Scope, and
Methodology

connections, monitoring and controlling remote access, encrypting
remote access, etc. This control has four enhancements at both the
moderate and high-impact baselines.
•

AC-19, access control for mobile devices: Includes requirements
for agency-controlled mobile devices and authorization to connect
mobile devices to agency systems, such as through remote access.
This control has one enhancement at moderate- and high-impact
baselines.

•

AC-20, use of external information systems: Involves the use of
external information systems, such as personally owned client devices
and third-party-controlled client devices that may process, store, or
transmit agency-controlled data. This control has two enhancements
at moderate- and high-impact baselines.

•

CA-9, internal system connections: Involves connections between
a system and its components, including mobile devices and laptops.
This control has no enhancements at either baseline.

•

CP-9, information system backup: Telework devices need to have
their data backed up either locally or remotely. This control has one
enhancement at the moderate-impact baseline and four
enhancements at the high-impact baseline.

•

IA-2, identification and authorization (agency users): Involves
using single factor or multifactor authentication for remote access
users, such as passwords, digital certificates, and/or hardware
authentication tokens. This control has six enhancements at the
moderate-impact baseline and eight enhancements at the high-impact
baseline.

•

IA-3, device identification and authentication: Mutual
authentication is recommended whenever feasible to verify the
legitimacy of a remote access server before providing authentication
credentials to it. This control has no enhancements at either baseline.

•

RA-3, risk assessment: A risk assessment should be performed as
part of selecting a remote access method. This control has no
enhancements at either baseline.

•

SC-7, boundary protection: Involves segmenting a network to keep
publicly accessible components off internal networks and monitoring
and controlling communications at key boundary points. This control
has four enhancements at the moderate-impact baseline, and seven
enhancements at the high-impact baseline.

•

SC-8, transmission confidentiality and integrity: The various
remote access methods discussed in NIST SP 800-46 protect the

Page 45

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Appendix II: Objectives, Scope, and
Methodology

confidentiality and integrity of transmissions through the use of
cryptography. This control has one enhancement at both the
moderate- and high-impact baselines.
For each of the relevant security controls and associated enhancements,
we evaluated whether a selected agency had:
•

documented the implementation of controls intended to protect their
systems that support telework in their system security plans,

•

assessed the implementation for these controls,

•

identified risks to their systems based on the assessments, and
planned remedial action activities to be taken based on the results of
control assessment activities (a plan of action and milestones), and

•

monitored progress toward completion of remedial actions (i.e.,
documented and met internal completion dates).

We also determined that the control activities component of internal
control was significant to this objective, along with the underlying
principles that management should implement control activities through
policy and design information system and related control activities to
achieve objectives and respond to risks. As previously noted, we
assessed whether selected agencies’ telework security policies aligned
with elements recommended by NIST. In addition, we reviewed agency
documentation to determine whether they had documented relevant
security controls in a security plan, assessed the controls, and assigned a
risk level to controls that they determined to not be fully implemented.
Further, we determined that the monitoring component of internal control
was significant to the objective, along with the underlying principle that
management should remediate identified control deficiencies on a timely
basis. As previously noted, we assessed whether selected agencies
documented remedial action plans for security controls that they
assessed to not be fully implemented and whether the agencies met time
frames specified in the plans for addressing the deficiencies.
We conducted this performance audit from April 2020 through September
2021 in accordance with generally accepted government auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain sufficient appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for
our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. We believe
that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings
and conclusions based on our audit objectives.

Page 46

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Appendix III: Comments from the
Department of Homeland Security
Appendix III: Comments from the Department
of Homeland Security

Page 47

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Appendix IV: Comments from the Securities
and Exchange Commission
Appendix IV: Comments from the Securities
and Exchange Commission

Page 48

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Appendix IV: Comments from the Securities
and Exchange Commission

Page 49

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Appendix V: Comments from the Social
Security Administration
Appendix V: Comments from the Social
Security Administration

Page 50

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Appendix VI: Comments from the Office of
Personnel Management
Appendix VI: Comments from the Office of
Personnel Management

Page 51

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Appendix VII: Comments from the Internal
Revenue Service
Appendix VII: Comments from the Internal
Revenue Service

Page 52

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Appendix VII: Comments from the Internal
Revenue Service

Page 53

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


Appendix VIII: GAO Contact and Staff
Acknowledgments
Appendix VIII: GAO Contact and Staff
Acknowledgments

GAO Contact

Jennifer R. Franks at (404) 679-1831 or franksj@gao.gov

Staff
Acknowledgments

In addition to the individual named above, Jeffrey Knott (Assistant
Director), William Cook (Analyst-in-Charge), Christopher Businsky, Nancy
Glover, Ronald La Due Lake, Richard Sayoc, Kevin Smith, Priscilla Smith,
and Haley Weller made key contributions to this report. West Coile,
Sailaja Ledalla, Monica Perez Nelson, and Adam Vodraska also provided
valuable assistance.

(104260)

Page 54

GAO-21-583 Federal Telework During COVID-19


GAO’s Mission

The Government Accountability Office, the audit, evaluation, and investigative
arm of Congress, exists to support Congress in meeting its constitutional
responsibilities and to help improve the performance and accountability of the
federal government for the American people. GAO examines the use of public
funds; evaluates federal programs and policies; and provides analyses,
recommendations, and other assistance to help Congress make informed
oversight, policy, and funding decisions. GAO’s commitment to good government
is reflected in its core values of accountability, integrity, and reliability.

Obtaining Copies of
GAO Reports and
Testimony

The fastest and easiest way to obtain copies of GAO documents at no cost is
through our website. Each weekday afternoon, GAO posts on its website newly
released reports, testimony, and correspondence. You can also subscribe to
GAO’s email updates to receive notification of newly posted products.

Order by Phone

The price of each GAO publication reflects GAO’s actual cost of production and
distribution and depends on the number of pages in the publication and whether
the publication is printed in color or black and white. Pricing and ordering
information is posted on GAO’s website, https://www.gao.gov/ordering.htm.
Place orders by calling (202) 512-6000, toll free (866) 801-7077, or
TDD (202) 512-2537.
Orders may be paid for using American Express, Discover Card, MasterCard,
Visa, check, or money order. Call for additional information.

Connect with GAO

Connect with GAO on Facebook, Flickr, Twitter, and YouTube.
Subscribe to our RSS Feeds or Email Updates. Listen to our Podcasts.
Visit GAO on the web at https://www.gao.gov.

To Report Fraud,
Waste, and Abuse in
Federal Programs

Contact FraudNet:
Website: https://www.gao.gov/about/what-gao-does/fraudnet
Automated answering system: (800) 424-5454 or (202) 512-7700

Congressional
Relations

A. Nicole Clowers, Managing Director, ClowersA@gao.gov, (202) 512-4400, U.S.
Government Accountability Office, 441 G Street NW, Room 7125, Washington,
DC 20548

Public Affairs

Chuck Young, Managing Director, youngc1@gao.gov, (202) 512-4800
U.S. Government Accountability Office, 441 G Street NW, Room 7149
Washington, DC 20548

Strategic Planning and
External Liaison

Stephen J. Sanford, Managing Director, spel@gao.gov, (202) 512-4707
U.S. Government Accountability Office, 441 G Street NW, Room 7814,
Washington, DC 20548

Please Print on Recycled Paper.

File and source

File
21-583-covid-19-selected-agencies-overcame-technology-challenges.pdf
Size
2,497,218 bytes
SHA-256
ffa268dec2596fc1f3531ae8a851263d65d76e37a8bc01b25c4199eaa49b6122
Our copy
21-583-covid-19-selected-agencies-overcame-technology-challenges.pdf
Original
www.gao.gov
Back to top