Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 21-2989-MDL-ALTONAGA/Torres
IN RE:
JANUARY 2021 SHORT SQUEEZE
TRADING LITIGATION
____________________________________/
This Document Relates to the Non-Federal Securities Actions
STIPULATED RULE 502(D) AND PRIVILEGED MATERIALS ORDER
Plaintiffs and Defendants (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective
counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to the terms of this Rule 502(d) and Privileged Materials Order.
All capitalized terms that are not defined herein have the same meaning as those terms set forth in
the Stipulated Protective Order.
I.
SCOPE
1.
This Order shall be applicable to any privileged or otherwise protected or exempted
information disclosed during the course of this litigation, including, but not limited to, deposition
transcripts or videotapes, responses to requests for production of documents, answers to
interrogatories, responses to requests for admissions, affidavits, declarations, electronically stored
information (“ESI”), testimony or evidence adduced at trial or during any hearing, and all other
information or material produced or made available for inspection or otherwise submitted by any
of the parties in this litigation pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or otherwise
(collectively, “Information”).
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 342 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2021 Page 1 of 18
CASE NO. 21-2989-MDL-ALTONAGA/Torres
2
II.
PRODUCTION OF DISCOVERY MATERIALS CONTAINING POTENTIALLY
PRIVILEGED INFORMATION
2.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d), the disclosure, whether inadvertent
or otherwise, of any privileged or otherwise protected or exempted Information in this case, shall
not be deemed a waiver or forfeiture of any claim of privilege or other protection — in this case
or in any other federal, state, regulatory, or congressional proceeding, or a proceeding before a
self-regulatory organization — that the producing Party would otherwise be entitled to assert with
respect to the Information and its subject matter.
3.
Nothing contained herein is intended to or shall serve to limit a Party’s duty to
conduct a review of documents, ESI (including metadata), or other Information for responsiveness
or segregation of privileged or protected information before production.
4.
The Party disclosing Information (the “Producing Party”) must promptly notify the
Party receiving the Information (the “Receiving Party”) in writing if it discovers that Information
has been produced for which the Producing Party asserts privilege or other protection. The notice
should be in the form of a “Clawback Notice,” and shall include:
a.
The Bates range of the produced materials; and
b.
A privilege log listing the item(s) produced in the form set forth in
Paragraphs 13–22 herein.
5.
The Producing Party shall make a good faith effort to produce a new copy of the
material (using the same Bates number as the original material) within seven (7) days after serving
the Clawback Notice with the privileged or protected Information redacted if the Producing Party
claims only a portion of the document contains privileged or otherwise protected Information, or,
if the Producing Party claims that the entire document is privileged or protected, a slip sheet noting
that the entire document is privileged.
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 342 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2021 Page 2 of 18
CASE NO. 21-2989-MDL-ALTONAGA/Torres
3
6.
Upon receipt of a Clawback Notice, the Receiving Party shall make good faith
efforts to immediately destroy or return all such Information, all copies thereof, and not use such
Information for any purpose. The Receiving Party shall certify to the Producing Party that all of
the inadvertently disclosed Information has been returned or destroyed in conformance with NIST
800-88 or with mutually agreed standards.
7.
Nothing herein shall prevent the Receiving Party from preparing a record for its
own use containing the date, author, addresses, and topic of the inadvertently produced Disclosure
or Discovery Material to identify the Disclosure or Discovery Material and describe its nature to
the Court in any motion to compel production of the Disclosure or Discovery Material, consistent
with the procedures as set forth in Paragraphs 8 and 9, until further order of the Court.
8.
If the Receiving Party decides to contest the Producing Party’s assertion of
privilege or other protection, it must do so within seven (7) business days from receipt of the
Clawback Notice by serving upon the Producing Party a written “Notice of Clawback Challenge”
providing the reason(s) for challenging the assertion of privilege or protection. The Producing
Party will have seven (7) business days to respond to the Notice of Clawback Challenge in writing
by either: agreeing to withdraw the claim of privilege or other protection or stating the reasons for
the claim. If the Producing Party’s response to the Notice of Clawback Challenge does not resolve
the issue, the Parties shall meet and confer within five (5) business days of the Producing Party’s
response to the Notice of Clawback Challenge. Should the dispute remain unresolved, the
Receiving Party may bring a motion for a determination of whether privilege applies and must do
so within seven (7) business days of its determination that no resolution will be achieved. The
Parties may stipulate to extend or otherwise modify the time periods set forth in this Paragraph.
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 342 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2021 Page 3 of 18
CASE NO. 21-2989-MDL-ALTONAGA/Torres
4
9.
The Producing Party shall provide the item(s) listed in a Clawback Notice to the
Court for review in camera with its response to a motion for determination of whether privilege
applies. Should the Receiving Party’s motion contain the content of any item(s) whose claim of
privilege or other protection is being challenged, the motion shall be filed under seal. The
Receiving Party may not assert the facts or circumstances of the disclosure as a ground for
compelling disclosure.
10.
If, during a deposition, a Producing Party claims that a document being used in the
deposition (e.g., marked as an exhibit or shown to the witness) contains material that is subject to
the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work product doctrine or any other privilege or
protection, the Producing Party may (a) allow the document to be used during the deposition
without waiver of any claim of privilege or other protection; or (b) instruct the witness not to
answer questions concerning the parts of the document containing privileged or protected material.
If the Producing Party allows the examination concerning the document to proceed consistent with
this paragraph, all Parties shall sequester all copies of the inadvertently produced document. As
to any testimony subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the Producing Party shall serve
a Clawback Notice within seven (7) business days of the deposition’s conclusion. In either case,
the Receiving Party may challenge the assertion of privilege or other protection consistent with
the procedures as set forth in Paragraphs 6 and 7 herein. If a Clawback Notice concerning any
such document or testimony upon which a privilege or protection is asserted is not timely served
as set forth in this Paragraph, i.e., more than seven (7) business days after the conclusion of the
deposition, the Receiving Party may challenge that the document or testimony is no longer
protected under Paragraph 2 herein, and that Federal Rule of Evidence 502(b) applies instead.
Paragraph 5 shall apply pending resolution of the privilege dispute as to the relevant document or
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 342 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2021 Page 4 of 18
CASE NO. 21-2989-MDL-ALTONAGA/Torres
5
testimony to all Parties with access to the deposition transcript. Should the Court decide the
dispute in the Receiving Party’s favor, i.e., that the document or testimony is not privileged or
protected, and the Receiving Party was denied the opportunity to depose the witness as to the
Information subject to the dispute, the Parties shall work in good faith to make the witness
available for deposition within fourteen (14) days of the Court’s resolution of the dispute, at the
expense of the Party who served the Clawback Notice, i.e., the Party who asserted the claim of
privilege or other protection.
11.
This Order does not override any attorney’s ethical responsibilities to refrain from
examining or disclosing materials that the attorney knows or reasonably should know to be
privileged and to inform the Producing Party that such materials have been produced.
12.
Nothing in this Order precludes a Party from voluntarily or intentionally waiving
any claim of privilege or protection. Should a Party use privileged or otherwise protected
information to support a claim or defense, Federal Rule of Evidence 502(a) shall apply.
III.
PRIVILEGE LOG
13.
Except as set forth otherwise in this Order, any document or ESI that is withheld
on the basis of a claim of attorney-client privilege, attorney work product doctrine, or any other
claim of privilege or immunity is to be identified by the Producing Party on a privilege log, which
shall be produced in an Excel format that permits electronic sorting and searching.
14.
After completing its production of documents or ESI, and with a good faith effort
within sixty (60) days, the Producing Party shall provide a privilege log or logs concerning any
Information that has been redacted or withheld in whole or in part from its production(s). To the
extent any previous designations are subsequently modified or withdrawn, they shall be so noted
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 342 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2021 Page 5 of 18
CASE NO. 21-2989-MDL-ALTONAGA/Torres
6
within fifteen (15) days of any decision to modify or withdraw any previous designations in an
amended log to ensure clarity.
15.
Privilege logs shall be detailed enough to enable other Parties to assess the
applicability of the privileges or protection asserted. The privilege log shall set forth the privilege
or protection relied upon and specify separately for each document:
a.
Bates-number range, or if no Bates-number range, a unique document
identifier;
b.
Family relationship, if applicable (e.g., identification of parent emails and
all attachments);
c.
The document title to the extent contained in metadata, including in the case
of emails, the subject line of the email, unless that information is itself
subject to a claim of privilege (in which case that withholding shall be
indicated on the log);
d.
Sufficient factual basis to support the claim of privilege or protection;
e.
The names of the author(s)/sender(s);
f.
The names of all addressees and recipients, including CC’s and BCC’s;
g.
The document date, which shall be defined as the date sent for
correspondence such as emails, memos and letters and the date last modified
for other documents;
h.
Whether the document has been produced in redacted form or withheld in
its entirety; and
i.
The designation of the privilege or protection relied upon (e.g., attorney-
client privilege or attorney work product).
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 342 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2021 Page 6 of 18
CASE NO. 21-2989-MDL-ALTONAGA/Torres
7
16.
Each member of a family of documents (i.e., each member of a set of documents in
parent-child relationship to each other) to the extent such members are also being withheld for the
same privilege, may be logged together as a single entry in the privilege log. In instances where
multiple documents in a family are logged together as a single entry in a privilege log, the privilege
log description shall clearly reflect that the entry relates to more than one document (e.g., “email
attaching memorandum”) and shall provide sufficient information to satisfy Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 26(b)(5)(A) as to all attachments.
17.
For the avoidance of doubt, each such document shall be logged on the basis of the
metadata (author(s) or sender(s) and recipient(s)) of the individual document, where available.
Email addresses may be included in the log, rather than full names of authors, senders, and
recipients, provided that the email addresses contain sufficient information to identify the
individual.
18.
Partially privileged documents need not be logged so long as the reason for the
redaction is provided on the document (e.g., “Redacted: Attorney-Client Privilege”). Upon
reasonable request, the Producing Party agrees to provide additional information supporting the
claim of privilege if it is not clear from the face of the redacted document.
19.
Materials relating to activities undertaken in compliance with the duty to preserve
information (including, but not limited to, litigation hold letters) which are protected from Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure 26(b)(3)(A) and (B) need not be logged.
20.
Attorneys or their staff must be identified on the log with an asterisk or similar
notation.
21.
When multiple email messages (“thread members”) are part of a single email chain
or thread, a Party is only required to include on a privilege log the most inclusive, i.e., last in time,
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 342 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2021 Page 7 of 18
CASE NO. 21-2989-MDL-ALTONAGA/Torres
8
email and need not log earlier, less inclusive email messages that are otherwise fully contained
within the thread, provided that log entry includes the names of the authors, addressees, recipients
(including CCs and BCCs) for all thread members, and that the description of the email chain or
thread include sufficient factual bases sufficient to support the claim of privilege for each email or
thread member a privilege or protection is claimed. The Party claiming a privilege or protection
over an email or thread member shall identify which specific email or thread member within the
email chain or thread the privilege or protection is being asserted. The asserting Party must also
indicate whether the email chain or thread has been produced in redacted form or withheld in its
entirety.
22.
After receipt of a privilege log, any Party may dispute a claim of privilege. Prior
to seeking Court intervention, the Party disputing or objecting to a claim of privilege shall provide
in writing the identification of the documents or category of documents for which the claim of
privilege or protection is being challenged and the reasons for disputing or objecting to the
privilege designation. Within twenty-one (21) days, the Party that designated the documents for
which the privilege or protection is being asserted will provide a written response setting forth the
basis for its claim of privilege or de-designating the challenged documents and producing those
documents in accordance with this Order. If the dispute is not resolved, the Parties shall meet and
confer in good faith as to the claims of privilege or protection. If no agreement has been reached
after 21 days after the meet and confer, the Parties shall submit the dispute by motion to the Court
consistent with the Court, Magistrate Judge, or Special Master’s procedures for raising discovery
disputes.
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 342 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2021 Page 8 of 18
CASE NO. 21-2989-MDL-ALTONAGA/Torres
9
DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, on this 13th day of July, 2021.
___________________________________
CECILIA M. ALTONAGA
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: July 9, 2021
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Joseph R. Saveri
JOSEPH SAVERI LAW FIRM, LLP
Joseph R. Saveri (CA SBN 130064)
Steven N. Williams (CA SBN 175489)
Anupama K. Reddy (CA SBN 324873)
Christopher K.L Young (CA SBN 318371)
601 California Street, Suite 1000
San Francisco, CA 94108
Tel: (415) 500-6800
jsaveri@saverilawfirm.com
swilliams@saverilawfirm.com
areddy@saverilawfirm.com
cyoung@saverilawfirm.com
/s/ Frank Schirripa
HACH ROSE SCHIRRIPA &
CHEVERIE LLP
Frank Schirripa (NY SBN 4103750)
Kathryn Hettler (NY SBN 5126065)
Seth Pavsner (NY SBN 4969689)
112 Madison Ave, 10th Floor
New York, New York 10016
Tel: (212) 213-8311
fschirripa@hrsclaw.com
khettler@hrsclaw.com
SPavsner@hrsclaw.com
/s/ Peter Safirstein
SAFIRSTEIN METCALF LLP
Peter Safirstein (NY SBN 2044550)
Elizabeth S. Metcalf (NY SBN 4644431)
1345 Avenue of the Americas, 2nd Floor
New York, NY 10105
Tel: (212) 201-5845
psafirstein@safirsteinmetcalf.com
emetcalf@safirsteinmetcalf.com
/s/ Natalia M. Salas
THE FERRARO LAW FIRM, P.A.
Natalia M. Salas (FBN 44895)
James L. Ferraro (FBN 381659)
James Ferraro, Jr. (FBN 107494)
Bruce S. Rogow (FBN 067999)
Sean A. Burstyn (FBN 1028778)
600 Brickell Avenue, Suite 3800
Miami, FL 33131
Tel: (305) 375-0111
nms@ferrarolaw.com
jlf@ferrarolaw.com
jjr@ferrarolaw.com
bsr@ferrarolaw.com
sab@ferrarolaw.com
Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 342 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2021 Page 9 of 18
CASE NO. 21-2989-MDL-ALTONAGA/Torres
10
/s/ Gabriel Amin Assaad
MCDONALD WORLEY, P.C.
Gabriel Amin Assaad (TX SBN 24076189)
Matthew Yezierski (TX SBN 24076989)
McDonald Worley
1770 St. James Place, Suite 100
Houston, TX 77056
Tel: (713) 523-5500
gassaad@mcdonaldworley.com
matt@mcdonaldworley.com
don@mcdonaldworley.com
/s/ Jeffrey A. Klafter
KLAFTER LESSER, LLP
Jeffrey A. Klafter (NY SBN 1662428)
Amir Alimehri (NY SBN 5631262)
Two International Drive Suite 350
Rye Brook, NY 10573
Tel: (914) 934-9200
jak@klafterlesser.com
amir.alimehri@klafterlesser.com
/s/ Maurice D. Pessah
Pessah Law Group, PC
Maurice D. Pessah (CA SBN 275955)
Michael Morris-Nussbaum (CA SBN 317146)
Summer E. Benson (CA SBN 326398)
Jason Sunshine (CA SBN 336062)
Stuart Neil Chelin (CA SBN 320357)
661 N Harper Avenue, Suite 208
West Hollywood, California 90048
Tel: (310) 772-2261
maurice@pessahgroup.com
mmnussbaum@pessahgroup.com
sbenson@pessahgroup.com
jsunshine@pessahgroup.com
stuart@chelinlaw.com
/s/ Roy T. Willey, IV
ANASTOPOULO LAW FIRM
Roy T. Willey, IV (SC SBN 101010)
Eric M. Poulin (SC SBN 100209)
Blake Abbott (SC SBN 104423)
32 Ann Street
Charleston, SC 29403
Tel: (843) 614-8888
roy@akimlawfirm.com
eric@akimlawfirm.com
blake@akimlawfirm.com
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 342 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2021 Page 10 of 18
CASE NO. 21-2989-MDL-ALTONAGA/Torres
11
/s/ Kevin J. Orsini
HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP
Samuel A. Danon (FBN 892671)
Gustavo Javier Membiela (FBN 513555)
María Castellanos Alvarado (FBN 116545)
333 S.E. 2 Avenue, Suite 2400
Miami, FL 33131
Telephone: (305) 810-2500
Facsimile: (305) 810-2460
sdanon@huntonak.com
gmembiela@huntonak.com
mcastellanos@hunton.com
/s/ Marc De Leeuw
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
Marc De Leeuw
125 Broad Street
New York, New York 10004
Telephone: (212) 558-4000
Facsimile: (212) 558-3588
deleeuwm@sullcrom.com
CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP
Antony L. Ryan
Kevin J. Orsini
Brittany L. Sukiennik
New York, NY 10019
Telephone: (212) 474-1000
Facsimile: (212) 474-3700
aryan@cravath.com
korsini@cravath.com
bsukiennik@cravath.com
Counsel for Defendants Robinhood
Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC,
Robinhood Markets, Inc. and Robinhood
Crypto, LLC
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
Adam S. Paris
1888 Century Park East
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: (310) 712-6600
Facsimile: (310) 712-8800
parisa@sullcrom.com
SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P.
Jennifer A. McLoone (Fla. Bar No. 0029234)
Citigroup Center Suite 3200
201 South Biscayne Boulevard
Miami, Florida 33131
Telephone: 305-358-5171
Counsel for Defendant Ally Financial, Inc.
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 342 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2021 Page 11 of 18
CASE NO. 21-2989-MDL-ALTONAGA/Torres
12
/s/ Justina K. Sessions
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Justina K. Sessions
One Market Plaza
Spear Tower, Suite 3300
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 947-2197
Facsimile: (415) 947-2099
jsessions@wsgr.com
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Kenneth R. O’Rourke
Brendan J. Coffman
1700 K Street NW, 5th Floor
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: (202) 973-8800
Facsimile: (202) 973-8899
korourke@wsgr.com
bcoffman@wsgr.com
Counsel for Defendant Open to the Public
Investing, Inc.
/s/ Christopher D. Kercher
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN,
LLP
Christopher D. Kercher
51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor,
New York, New York, 10010
Telephone: (212) 849-7000
Facsimile: (212) 849-7100
christopherkercher@quinnemanuel.com
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN,
LLP
Marina E. Lev
865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: (213) 443-3000
Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
marinalev@quinnemanuel.com
BARTLIT BECK LLP
Adam L. Hoeflich
Dawson Robinson
54 W. Hubbard St., Ste. 300
Chicago, IL 60654
Telephone: (312) 494-4400
Facsimile: (312) 494-4440
adam.hoeflich@bartlitbeck.com
dawson.robinson@bartlitbeck.com
Counsel for Defendants Citadel Enterprise
Americas, LLC and Citadel Securities LLC
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 342 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2021 Page 12 of 18
CASE NO. 21-2989-MDL-ALTONAGA/Torres
13
/s/ Daniel J. Kramer
PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON &
GARRISON LLP
Daniel J. Kramer
Richard Tarlowe
1285 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10019
Telephone: (212) 373-3000
dkramer@paulweiss.com
rtarlowe@paulweiss.com
Counsel for Defendant Point72 Asset
Management, L.P.
/s/ Harry A. Olivar, Jr.
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN,
LLP
Harry A. Olivar, Jr.
Korinna S. Anderson
865 S. Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: (213) 443-3000
Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
harryolivar@quinnemanuel.com
korinnaanderson@quinnemanuel.com
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN,
LLP
Linda J. Brewer
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4788
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
lindabrewer@quinnemanuel.com
Counsel for Defendant Sequoia Capital
Operations LLC
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 342 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2021 Page 13 of 18
CASE NO. 21-2989-MDL-ALTONAGA/Torres
14
/s/ Jason J. Mendro
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
Jason J. Mendro
Russell B. Balikian
1050 Connecticut Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20036
Telephone: (202) 887-3726
jmendro@gibsondunn.com
rbalikian@gibsondunn.com
Counsel for Defendants Charles Schwab &
Co., Inc.; TD Ameritrade, Inc.; TD
Ameritrade Clearing, Inc.; TD Ameritrade
Holding Corporation; and The Charles
Schwab Corporation
/s/ Shari Ross Lahlou
DECHERT LLP
Shari Ross Lahlou
1900 K Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20006
Telephone: (202) 261-3300
Facsimile: (202) 261-3333
shari.lahlou@dechert.com
Dechert LLP
Andrew J. Levander
Three Bryant Park
1095 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
Telephone: (212) 698 3500
Facsimile: (212) 698 3599
andrew.levander@dechert.com
DECHERT LLP
Steven Bizar
Cira Centre
2929 Arch Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
Telephone: (215) 994 4000
Facsimile: (215) 994 2222
steven.bizar@dechert.com
Counsel for Defendant Interactive Brokers
LLC
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 342 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2021 Page 14 of 18
CASE NO. 21-2989-MDL-ALTONAGA/Torres
15
/s/ Robin Nunn
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
Robin Nunn
101 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10178-0060
Telephone: (212) 309-6000
Facsimile: (212) 309-3001
robin.nunn@morganlewis.com
Counsel for Defendant Stash Financial, Inc.
/s/ Thomas E. Redburn, Jr.
LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP
Thomas E. Redburn, Jr.
Maya Ginsburg
1251 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10020
Telephone: (212) 262-6700
Facsimile: (973) 597-2457
tredburn@lowenstein.com
mginsburg@lowenstein.com
LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP
Zarema Arutyunova Jaramillo
2200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20037
Telephone: (202) 753-3800
Facsimile: (202) 753-3838
zjaramillo@lowenstein.com
Counsel for Defendants Melvin Capital
Management LP and Candlestick Capital
Management LP
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 342 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2021 Page 15 of 18
CASE NO. 21-2989-MDL-ALTONAGA/Torres
16
/s/ Peter W. Homer
HOMER BONNER JACOBS ORTIZ, P.A.
Peter W. Homer (Florida Bar No. 291250)
1200 Four Seasons Tower
1441 Brickell Avenue
Miami, Florida 33131
Telephone: (305) 350-5139
Facsimile: (305) 372-2738
phomer@homerbonner.com
DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP
Brian S. Weinstein
Gina Cora
Janet Jones-Duffey
450 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10017
Telephone: (212) 450-4000
Facsimile: (212) 701-5972
brian.weinstein@davispolk.com
gina.cora@davispolk.com
janet.jones-duffey@davispolk.com
Counsel for Defendants Morgan Stanley
Smith Barney LLC, E*TRADE Financial
Corporation, E*TRADE Securities LLC and
E*TRADE Financial Holdings, LLC
/s/ Patrick Gibbs
COOLEY LLP
Patrick Gibbs
Brett De Jarnette
Rebecca Ferrari
3175 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1130
Telephone: (650) 843-5000
Facsimile: (650) 849-7400
pgibbs@cooley.com
bdejarnette@cooley.com
rferrari@cooley.com
Counsel for Defendant M1 Finance, LLC
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 342 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2021 Page 16 of 18
CASE NO. 21-2989-MDL-ALTONAGA/Torres
17
/s/ Thomas G. Haskins, Jr.
BARNES & THORNBURG LLP
Thomas G. Haskins, Jr.
Allison Gerard
2121 N. Pearl Street, Suite 700
Dallas, TX 75201
Telephone: (214) 258-4200
Facsimile: (214) 258-4199
thaskins@btlaw.com
allison.gerard@btlaw.com
BARNES & THORNBURG LLP
Kevin Rising
2029 Century Park E, Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 90067-2904
Telephone: (310) 284-3888
Facsimile: (310) 284-3894
krising@btlaw.com
BARNES & THORNBURG LLP
Paul Olszowka
One North Wacker Drive, Suite 4400
Chicago, IL 60606-2833
Telephone: (312) 214-5612
Facsimile: (312) 759-5646
paul.olszowka@btlaw.com
Counsel for Defendants Dough, LLC and
tastyworks, Inc.
/s/ Jack E. Pace III
WHITE & CASE LLP
Jack E. Pace III
Bryan D. Gant
1221 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10020-1095
Telephone: (212) 819-8200
Facsimile: (212) 354-8113
jpace@whitecase.com
bgant@whitecase.com
WHITE & CASE LLP
J. Mark Gidley
701 Thirteenth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20005-3807
Telephone: (202) 626-3600
Facsimile: (202) 639-9355
mgidley@whitecase.com
WHITE & CASE LLP
Angela Daker
Southeast Financial Center
200 South Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 4900
Miami, FL 33131-2352
Telephone: (305) 995-5297
Facsimile: (305) 358-5744
adaker@whitecase.com
Counsel for Defendant Apex Clearing Corp.
/s/ Alfred C. Pfeiffer, Jr.
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Alfred C. Pfeiffer, Jr.
Belinda S Lee
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111-6538
Telephone: (415) 391-0600
Facsimile: (415) 395-8095
al.pfeiffer@lw.com
belinda.lee@lw.com
Counsel for Defendants Square, Inc. and
Cash App Investing LLC
/s/ Gregory M. Boyle
JENNER & BLOCK, LLP
Gregory M. Boyle
353 North Clark Street
Chicago, Illinois 60654-3456
Telephone: (312) 923-2651
gboyle@jenner.com
Counsel for Defendants The Depository Trust
& Clearing Corporation; The Depository
Trust Company
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 342 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2021 Page 17 of 18
CASE NO. 21-2989-MDL-ALTONAGA/Torres
18
/s/ Leiv H. Blad, Jr.
LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP
Leiv H. Blad, Jr.
Allison M. Vissichelli
2200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20037
Telephone: (202) 753-3800
Facsimile: (202) 753-3838
lblad@lowenstein.com
avissichelli@lowenstein.com
LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP
H. Gregory Baker
1251 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10020
Telephone: (212) 262-6700
Facsimile: (973) 597-2457
hbaker@lowenstein.com
Counsel for Defendants Alpaca Securities LLC,
eToro USA Securities Inc., WeBull Financial LLC
and Fumi Holdings, Inc.
/s/ Evangeline A.Z. Burbidge
Lewis & Llewellyn LLP
Evangeline A.Z. Burbidge
Paul T. Llewellyn
601 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111-6538
Telephone: (415) 800-0590
Facsimile: (415) 390-2127
eburbidge@lewisllewellyn.com
pllewellyn@lewisllewellyn.com
Counsel for Defendant FF Trade Republic Growth, LLC
Case 1:21-md-02989-CMA Document 342 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2021 Page 18 of 18