Order re Hearing on Motion for Preliminary Injunction — Yick v. Bank of America

Summary

"It appears that the plaintiffs' evidence, taken on its own, supports their claim that Bank of America is systematically violating the EFTA, due process, and its contracts with cardholders," United States District Judge Vince Chhabria writes in this May 13, 2021 order setting the hearing on the motion for a preliminary injunction (Re: Dkt. No. 64) in Jennifer Yick, et al. v. Bank of America, N.A., Case No. 21-cv-00376-VC (N.D. Cal.), Document 84. The hearing will focus on whether Bank of America's evidence rebuts the plaintiffs' evidence, and if injunctive relief is warranted the parties should be prepared to discuss meeting with a Magistrate Judge about an injunction more modest and practical than the one the plaintiffs proposed.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JENNIFER YICK, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
Defendant.
Case No.  21-cv-00376-VC

ORDER RE HEARING ON THE
MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION
Re: Dkt. No. 64

It appears that the plaintiffs’ evidence, taken on its own, supports their claim that Bank of
America is systematically violating the EFTA, due process, and its contracts with cardholders.
Therefore, the hearing will focus on whether Bank of America’s evidence adequately rebuts the
plaintiffs’ evidence. In addition, if the Court concludes that injunctive relief is warranted, the
parties should be prepared to discuss whether it would be helpful to meet with a Magistrate
Judge to hammer out an injunction that is more modest and practical than the one proposed by
the plaintiffs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 13, 2021
______________________________________
VINCE CHHABRIA
United States District Judge

Case 3:21-cv-00376-VC   Document 84   Filed 05/13/21   Page 1 of 1

File and source

File

CASE_CAND_3-21-cv-00376_Yick-v-BofA_doc84_ORDER-PI-HEARING_2021-05-13.pdf

Size

78,443 bytes

SHA-256

afc663ac683c5e7939b34e8872ba804e1051f4b59f9e7884222ff6fe19af0113

Our copy

CASE_CAND_3-21-cv-00376_Yick-v-BofA_doc84_ORDER-PI-HEARING_2021-05-13.pdf

Original

storage.courtlistener.com