Joint Motion For Leave To File Consolidated Briefing, And For
Summary
A joint motion for leave to file consolidated briefing, and for extension of page limits and filing deadlines, in United States of America ex rel. Paul Pietschner v. Kathryn Petralia, Robert Frohwein, and Spencer Robinson, Civil Action No. 4:21-cv-110-SDJ, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division, dated February 26, 2025 (Document 63). Defendants and the government jointly ask to file one joint motion-to-dismiss brief on common issues (not to exceed 30 pages) and individual briefs (not to exceed 25 pages each). The motion proposes opposition briefs due April 17, 2025, reply briefs due May 9, 2025, and sur-replies due May 30, 2025, with opening briefs staying due March 11, 2025.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
- Date
- 2021-02-05
Cite this document
“Joint Motion For Leave To File Consolidated Briefing, And For.”
Original at ecf.txed.uscourts.gov, dated 2021-02-05. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2021-02-05-plaintiff-v-kathryn-petralia/
, SHA-256 a850513042d52369477c8d19797b82ee163a542a72fcd50ac2b5f867f79de573.Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. PAUL PIETSCHNER, Plaintiff, v. KATHRYN PETRALIA; ROBERT FROHWEIN; and SPENCER ROBINSON, Defendants. Civil Action No.: 4:21-cv-110-SDJ JOINT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE CONSOLIDATED BRIEFING, AND FOR EXTENSION OF PAGE LIMITS AND FILING DEADLINES Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6(b) and 12(a) and the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Civil Local Rules, Defendants Kathryn Petralia, Robert Frohwein, and Spencer Robinson (“Defendants”)1 and Plaintiff, the United States of America (the “government”), (collectively, the “Parties”) jointly move for permission to file consolidated briefing on common issues related to Defendants’ motions to dismiss the Complaint in Intervention (“Complaint”) and for an extension of the page limits and filing deadlines. In support, the Parties state as follows: 1. Relator filed this action on February 5, 2021. ECF No. 1. 2. The action remained under seal pending a decision from the United States on whether to intervene in this matter. 1 By joining and filing this Motion, Defendants do not waive and expressly reserve their objections to these proceedings for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue. Case 4:21-cv-00110-SDJ Document 63 Filed 02/26/25 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 416 2 3. On August 26, 2024, the United States elected to intervene, ECF No. 34, filing the operative Complaint in Intervention on December 20, 2024, ECF No. 40. 4. Defendants’ motions to dismiss are due on March 11, 2025. 5. The Complaint includes many allegations premised on numerous common legal arguments amongst the Defendants and that present complex legal issues. 6. The Parties have conferred and agreed on the following proposal: • The Defendants may file a single joint motion to dismiss brief on behalf of all three individual Defendants (not to exceed 30 pages) that addresses the common legal arguments and individual motion to dismiss briefs addressing issues specific to each Defendant (not to exceed 25 pages each); • The government, in turn, may file a single opposition brief addressing the joint opening brief (not to exceed 30 pages), and opposition briefs addressing each individual defendant’s brief (not to exceed 25 pages each). • In addition, for both replies and potential sur-replies, each side would be entitled to file one brief addressing the common arguments (not to exceed 15 pages) and briefs addressing the individual arguments (not to exceed 10 pages each). 7. The Parties submit that this coordination would promote judicial economy, avoid the duplication of common arguments, and streamline the briefing process for the Court’s consideration. 8. In addition, the Parties would request the following briefing schedule that reflects extensions of deadlines that appropriately account for the complexity of the issues that will be briefed: Case 4:21-cv-00110-SDJ Document 63 Filed 02/26/25 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 417 3 Filing Original Due Date Under Local Civil Rule 7 Requested Due Date Opening Briefs March 11, 2025 March 11, 2025 (unchanged) Opposition Briefs March 25, 2025 April 17, 2025 Reply Briefs April 1, 2025 May 9, 2025 Sur-Reply Briefs (if necessary) April 8, 2025 May 30, 2025 WHEREFORE, Defendants respectfully request that this Court enter an order permitting: a. Defendants to file a brief in support of a joint motion to dismiss not to exceed 30 pages addressing issues common to all Defendants; b. Each Defendant to file a brief in support of individual motions to dismiss not to exceed 25 pages addressing issues specific to each Defendant; c. The government to file a response to Defendants’ joint motion to dismiss not to exceed 30 pages; d. The government to file a separate response to each individual Defendant’s motion to dismiss not to exceed 25 pages; e. Defendants to file a reply in support of their joint motion to dismiss not to exceed 15 pages; f. Each defendant to file a separate reply in support of their individual motion to dismiss not to exceed 10 pages; g. The government to file sur-replies, if any, in accordance with the Local Rules, in response to the joint motion not to exceed 15 pages, and in response to individual motions to dismiss not to exceed 10 pages each; h. The government’s opposition briefs to be due on April 17, 2025, the Defendants’ reply briefs to be due on May 9, 2025; and any sur-replies filed by the government to be due on May 30, 2025. Case 4:21-cv-00110-SDJ Document 63 Filed 02/26/25 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 418 4 For the Court’s convenience, a Proposed Order granting this Motion is filed with this Motion. Dated: February 26, 2025 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Michaela S. Wilkes Klein Christopher E. Babbitt (pro hac vice) Michaela S. Wilkes Klein (pro hac vice) Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP 2100 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20037 Telephone: (202) 663-6000 Fax: (202) 663-6363 christopher.babbitt@wilmerhale.com michaela.wilkesklein@wilmerhale.com Anjan Sahni (pro hac vice) Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP 7 World Trade Center, 250 Greenwich Street New York, NY 10007 Tel: (212) 230-8800 Fax: (212) 230-8888 anjan.sahni@wilmerhale.com George P. Varghese (pro hac vice) Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP 60 State Street Boston, MA 02109 Telephone: (617) 526-6000 Fax: (617) 526-5000 george.varghese@wilmerhale.com Melissa R. Smith Gillam & Smith LLP 303 South Washington Ave. Marshall, TX 75670 Telephone: (903) 934-8450 Fax: (903) 934-9257 melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com Counsel for Kathryn Petralia MICHAEL D. GRANSTON Deputy Assistant Attorney General ABE MCGLOTHIN, JR. Acting United States Attorney Eastern District of Texas /s Betty Young____________ James G. Gillingham, Texas Bar #24065295 Betty S. Young, Texas Bar #24102498 Assistant U.S. Attorneys Eastern District of Texas 110 N. College Street, Suite 700 Tyler, Texas 75702 E-mail: James.Gillingham@usdoj.gov E-mail: Betty.Young@usdoj.gov (903) 590-1400 (903) 590-1436 (facsimile) Jamie A. Yavelberg Colin M. Huntley Sarah E. Loucks Kelly E. Phipps Attorneys, Civil Division United States Department of Justice P.O. Box 261 Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044 E-mail: Sarah.E.Loucks@usdoj.gov E-mail: Kelly.E.Phipps@usdoj.gov (202) 616-4203 (202) 514-0280 (facsimile) Counsel for the United States of America Case 4:21-cv-00110-SDJ Document 63 Filed 02/26/25 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 419 5 Nicholas M. Mathews Alexander J. Chern McKool Smith, PC - Dallas 300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500 Dallas, TX 75201 Telephone: (214) 978-4258 Fax: (214) 978-4044 Nmathews@mckoolsmith.com Achern@mckoolsmith.com Miranda Hooker (pro hac vice) Kate E. MacLeman (pro hac vice) Kara N. Czekai (pro hac vice) Goodwin Procter LLP 100 Northern Avenue Boston, Massachusetts 02210 Telephone: (617) 570-1000 Fax: (617) 523-1231 MHooker@goodwinlaw.com KMacLeman@goodwinlaw.com KCzekai@goodwinlaw.com Counsel for Robert Frohwein Henry W. Asbill (pro hac vice) Christopher B. Mead (pro hac vice) Lisa H. Schertler (pro hac vice) Paola Pinto (pro hac vice) Schertler Onorato Mead & Sears 555 13th Street NW Suite 500W Washington DC 20004 Telephone: 202-628-4199 Facsimile: 202-628-4177 hasbill@schertlerlaw.com cmead@schertlerlaw.com lschertler@schertlerlaw.com ppinto@schertlerlaw.com Counsel for Spencer Robinson Case 4:21-cv-00110-SDJ Document 63 Filed 02/26/25 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 420 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on February 26, 2025, I caused the foregoing to be filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to counsel of record. Dated: February 26, 2025 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Michaela S. Wilkes Klein Michaela S. Wilkes Klein (pro hac vice) Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP 2100 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20037 Telephone: (202) 663-6000 Fax: (202) 663-6363 michaela.wilkesklein@wilmerhale.com Case 4:21-cv-00110-SDJ Document 63 Filed 02/26/25 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 421
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.txed.204031.63.0.pdf
- Size
- 236,088 bytes
- SHA-256
- a850513042d52369477c8d19797b82ee163a542a72fcd50ac2b5f867f79de573
- Original
- PACER (login required)